European Time Tracking Software

Looking for a European alternative to Harvest, Clockify or QuickBooks Time? These European time trackers handle statutory working time rules and local accounting exports, and most of them refuse to ship the employee surveillance features that would be unlawful here anyway. Led by Toggl Track from Estonia.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

European Purpose may be paid for placements on this page and may earn a commission through links on it. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed or what our review says. Editorial policy

8 European Time Tracking Tools

Toggl Track

Estonian time tracking that refuses to spy on people

#1 of 8 in this category
Estonia Free tier + per user, per month
One-click timerNo surveillance featuresReporting & billable rates

Timeular

Austrian time tracking with a physical dice

#2 of 8 in this category
Austria Per user, per month
Physical tracking diceAutomatic activity capturePrivacy-first design

clockodo

German time recording built for the legal obligation

#3 of 8 in this category
Germany Per user, per month
German labour law complianceWorking time recordingDATEV export

MOCO

Agency operations with time tracking at the centre

#4 of 8 in this category
Germany Per user, per month
Time plus projects & invoicingAgency planningGerman accounting export

Kimai

Open-source time tracking you can run yourself

#5 of 8 in this category
Austria Free self-hosted + paid cloud
Open source, self-hostablePlugin ecosystemNo per-seat cloud lock-in

awork

Project management from Hamburg with tracking built in

#6 of 8 in this category
Germany Per user, per month
Time tracking inside project managementCapacity planningISO 27001, German hosting

TimeCamp

Polish time tracking with automatic capture and attendance

#7 of 8 in this category
Poland Free tier + per user, per month
Automatic time captureAttendance & billingWide integrations

Papershift

Shift planning and working time for shift-based teams

#8 of 8 in this category
Germany Per employee, per month
Shift planningWorking time recordingAbsence management

Key takeaways

  • Toggl Track ranks #1 among the European time trackers in this directory, because Toggl Track pairs a one-click timer with billable reporting and an explicit refusal to add screenshots, keystroke logging or activity scoring.
  • Recording time and monitoring employees are different products, and the second is subject to co-determination in Germany, Austria and elsewhere — which makes a tool without those features easier to roll out, not less capable.
  • Since the Court of Justice of the EU ruled on working time, member states must require employers to operate an objective and accessible system for measuring it; clockodo and Papershift are built around that obligation rather than around productivity.
  • The category splits by purpose: Toggl Track and Timeular for billable time, clockodo and Papershift for the statutory record, MOCO for agencies wanting projects and invoicing on the same hours, TimeCamp for breadth.
  • If your books are kept in DATEV, that integration usually decides the shortlist before any feature comparison does — clockodo, MOCO and Papershift all export into it.

European time tracking software records billable and statutory working time, built by companies established in Europe, where working time law, works council obligations and local accounting exports are core behaviour — and where employee surveillance features are largely absent because they would be unlawful to switch on.

European time tracking software compared

European time tracking software tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Toggl Track Estonia Free tier + per user, per month Agencies and teams billing time who do not want employee monitoring
#2 Timeular Austria Per user, per month People who forget to start the timer
#3 clockodo Germany Per user, per month German employers who must record working time by law
#4 MOCO Germany Per user, per month Agencies that want time, projects, planning and invoices in one place
#5 Kimai Austria Free self-hosted + paid cloud Teams that want their timesheet data on their own server
#6 awork Germany Per user, per month Agencies whose tracked hours end up on an invoice
#7 TimeCamp Poland Free tier + per user, per month Teams that want automatic tracking plus attendance in one tool
#8 Papershift Germany Per employee per month, published plans Retail, hospitality and care teams working in shifts

Every European time tracking software tool reviewed

#1 Toggl Track

Tallinn, Estonia Free tier + per user, per month Demo on request

Best for: Agencies and teams billing time who do not want employee monitoring

Toggl Track is an Estonian time tracker built around a single timer button and a reporting layer behind it, with one-click timers on web, desktop, mobile and browser extensions, projects and clients with billable rates, budgets and estimates.

It is deliberately not an employee monitoring product, and the company has been explicit that this is a design decision rather than a missing feature. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity scoring — which in most European jurisdictions removes a works council conversation before it starts.

Toggl OÜ is based in Tallinn and has been fully remote since long before that was ordinary. The free tier is genuinely usable for small teams, with per-user plans adding billable rates, project budgets and admin controls above it.

What Toggl Track does well

  • One-click timer with negligible friction
  • No surveillance features, by design
  • Billable rates, budgets and estimates
  • Genuinely usable free tier
  • Integrations with project tools and invoicing
  • Estonian company, EU jurisdiction

Where Toggl Track falls short

  • No statutory working time features
  • No DATEV export
  • Reporting is capable rather than deep
  • Not a project management tool

Standout feature. The only tracker here that refuses to add monitoring features as a matter of principle.

#2 Timeular

Graz, Austria Per user, per month Demo on request

Best for: People who forget to start the timer

Timeular is an Austrian time tracker best known for its hardware: an eight-sided dice on the desk, each face assigned to an activity. Flip it, and the timer switches. It addresses the actual failure mode of time tracking, which is not reporting but remembering.

The dice sounds like a gimmick and is not. Starting a timer requires a context switch at exactly the moment you are already switching context; a physical object removes that. The software also captures app, document and calendar activity locally, so a day you forgot to track can be reconstructed.

Timeular is based in Graz. The automatic tracking is explicitly local — the record of which applications you had open stays on your machine until you choose to turn part of it into an entry, which is a meaningful distinction from cloud-side activity monitoring.

What Timeular does well

  • Physical tracker removes the friction
  • Automatic capture stays local to the machine
  • Billable rates and team reporting
  • Exports for invoicing and payroll
  • Austrian company, EU jurisdiction

Where Timeular falls short

  • Hardware is a separate purchase
  • Software alone loses most of the point
  • Smaller feature set than the agency tools
  • No statutory working time module

Standout feature. A physical dice on the desk — the only answer here to the real reason time tracking fails.

#3 clockodo

Osnabrück, Germany Per user, per month Demo on request

Best for: German employers who must record working time by law

clockodo is a German time tracking service that treats working time recording as the legal duty it now is, rather than as a productivity feature. It covers both sides: billable project time, and the statutory working time record.

Since the courts made systematic recording of working time mandatory, employers need records that satisfy an auditor rather than an invoice. clockodo handles break rules, overtime accounts, absences and the documentation obligations — precisely the part international tools leave to the customer.

clockodo is based in Osnabrück and built specifically around German labour law, with DATEV export for the payroll and accounting handover. That is a category of product a US vendor cannot really localise into, because the rules are the product rather than a setting.

What clockodo does well

  • Built for the statutory working time obligation
  • Break, overtime and absence handling
  • DATEV export
  • Project time and billing alongside it
  • German company and hosting
  • Free trial without a card

Where clockodo falls short

  • German and Austrian focus
  • Interface functional rather than polished
  • Less suited to non-German employers
  • Working time features sit in the higher tier

Standout feature. Working time records built to survive an audit, not to produce an invoice.

#4 MOCO

Hamburg, Germany Per user, per month Demo on request

Best for: Agencies that want time, projects, planning and invoices in one place

MOCO is a Hamburg product for agencies and consultancies where time tracking is the entry point to something larger: the same hours drive project budgets, capacity planning, invoices and the handover to accounting.

It answers the agency stack problem — a timer in one tool, projects in another, invoices in a third, and nobody sure which is right. Because the hours, the budget and the invoice are the same record, project profitability is a report rather than a monthly spreadsheet exercise.

MOCO is based in Hamburg with German hosting, and its accounting exports are built for German practice rather than translated into it. Planning and invoicing are included rather than tiered separately, which usually compares favourably against a stack of single-purpose subscriptions.

What MOCO does well

  • Time, projects, planning and invoicing in one system
  • Project profitability without a spreadsheet
  • DATEV and German accounting exports
  • Resource planning included
  • API and integrations for the rest

Where MOCO falls short

  • More system than a solo freelancer needs
  • Agency-shaped — less general purpose
  • German market focus
  • Per-user pricing across the whole team

Standout feature. From timer to invoice on one record, so project margin is a report rather than a reconstruction.

#5 Kimai

Vienna, Austria Free self-hosted + paid cloud Demo on request

Best for: Teams that want their timesheet data on their own server

Kimai is an open-source time tracker developed in Vienna, run either on your own server for free or through the maintainer's hosted Kimai Cloud — the same AGPL application either way, which is unusual in a category built entirely on SaaS.

Self-hosting timesheets removes a question rather than answering it. Hours worked, per person, per day is employment data; keeping it on infrastructure you control means there is no processor agreement to negotiate and no export to arrange if you later change vendor. Tracking runs against customers, projects and activities with budgets and rates, and invoicing, exports and a REST API are in the box.

The project is developed and maintained from Vienna without VC funding, on paid plugins and the hosted service. Kimai Cloud is hosted in Germany for teams who would rather not run a PHP application themselves.

What Kimai does well

  • Open source and free to self-host, with no seat limit
  • Timesheet data stays on your own infrastructure
  • Invoicing, budgets and rates included
  • REST API and a plugin ecosystem
  • Hosted option in Germany if you do not want to run it

Where Kimai falls short

  • Self-hosting means you run and update a PHP application
  • Some functionality sits in paid plugins
  • Interface is plainer than the commercial trackers
  • Small team behind it rather than a large vendor

Standout feature. The only tracker here where the timesheet database can simply be yours.

#6 awork

Hamburg, Germany Per user, per month Demo on request

Best for: Agencies whose tracked hours end up on an invoice

awork is project management software from Hamburg that merges three things most teams pay for separately: task and project planning, time tracking, and capacity planning across the people doing the work.

Tracking hours where the work is planned is what makes the numbers trustworthy. When a timer starts from the task rather than from a separate app, the timesheet reflects the project plan instead of a reconstruction at the end of the week — the difference between billable hours you can defend and hours you estimate. Lists, boards and timelines sit alongside workload planning, budgets and billable rates.

awork GmbH is based in Hamburg, ISO 27001 certified and hosted on servers in Germany. Its audience is service businesses — agencies, consultancies, studios — where tracked hours end up on client invoices, which is also where the capacity planning earns its place.

What awork does well

  • Time tracking inside the project plan, not beside it
  • Capacity and workload planning per person
  • Budgets and billable rates on projects
  • ISO 27001 certified, hosted in Germany
  • Cheaper than a project tool plus a separate tracker

Where awork falls short

  • More tool than a team that only needs tracking
  • Per-user pricing across a whole agency adds up
  • Reporting is good rather than deep
  • Strongest fit is agencies specifically

Standout feature. Planning, tracking and capacity on one dataset, so the hours match the plan.

#7 TimeCamp

Wrocław, Poland Free tier + per user, per month Demo on request

Best for: Teams that want automatic tracking plus attendance in one tool

TimeCamp is a Polish time tracking platform combining manual timers with automatic capture of applications and sites used, plus attendance tracking, billing rates and a long list of integrations.

It covers more ground per subscription than most: project time, automatic activity capture, attendance with clock-in and leave, and billing all in one product with a free tier underneath. For a small company that would otherwise buy three tools, that breadth is the argument.

TimeCamp is based in Wrocław. The automatic activity capture is precisely the feature that needs a clear legal basis under the GDPR and, in many countries, a works council agreement — worth configuring deliberately rather than leaving on by default.

What TimeCamp does well

  • Time, attendance and billing in one tool
  • Automatic activity capture available
  • Free tier for unlimited users on basics
  • Wide integration list
  • Polish company, EU jurisdiction

Where TimeCamp falls short

  • Automatic capture needs a legal basis and works council agreement
  • Attendance features less deep than a dedicated tool
  • Interface busier than Toggl Track
  • Billing features behind paid tiers

Standout feature. Time, attendance and billing from one vendor instead of three subscriptions.

#8 Papershift

Karlsruhe, Germany Founded 2014 Per employee per month, published plans Demo on request

Best for: Retail, hospitality and care teams working in shifts

Papershift is a German platform for shift-based work: rota planning, working time recording and absence management for teams where the question is who is on tomorrow rather than which project this hour belongs to.

That is a genuinely different problem. Shift planning has to respect rest periods, availability, qualifications and labour law constraints, and the resulting hours feed payroll rather than a client invoice — which is why general time trackers fit these teams badly.

Papershift is based in Karlsruhe, covering the statutory working time record alongside the rota, with the payroll handover built for German practice. It appears here cross-listed from Payroll Software, where its page lives.

What Papershift does well

  • Shift and rota planning with labour rules
  • Statutory working time recording
  • Absence and holiday management
  • Payroll handover built for German practice
  • Mobile access for shift staff

Where Papershift falls short

  • Not aimed at project or billable time
  • German market focus
  • Per-employee pricing across the whole roster
  • Overkill for a team without shifts

Standout feature. Rota planning and the statutory time record in one place, for teams that work in shifts.

Time tracking or employee monitoring — which are you buying?

The search results for this category mix two products that have almost nothing in common, and buying the wrong one creates a problem that is expensive to unwind.

Time tracking records how long something took, against a project or a client, so it can be billed, budgeted or reported. Employee monitoring records what a person did: screenshots at intervals, keystroke counts, application activity scored into a productivity percentage.

In much of Europe the second is not simply distasteful, it is legally constrained. Systems capable of monitoring employee behaviour or performance are subject to co-determination in Germany and Austria, meaning a works council agreement before rollout, and the GDPR requires a lawful basis and purpose limitation on top.

This is why Toggl Track's refusal to ship those features is a selling point rather than a gap, and why a tool that offers automatic activity capture — TimeCamp does — needs that capability configured deliberately rather than left on by default.

What does European law require an employer to record?

The Court of Justice of the EU held that member states must require employers to set up an objective, reliable and accessible system for measuring daily working time, and Germany's Federal Labour Court has since confirmed the obligation there.

In practice that means records covering start and end times, breaks and overtime, kept in a form an auditor or a labour inspector would accept — not a spreadsheet reconstructed at month end, and not a project timer that only counts billable work.

That is a different product requirement from billing a client, and it is what clockodo and Papershift are built for: break rules, overtime accounts, absence handling and the documentation duties. A general international time tracker leaves that work to you.

The rules differ by member state and change, so this is a summary rather than legal advice — check the current position for your country and, if you have one, with your works council.

How do you get people to actually track their time?

This is the real failure mode, and no feature list addresses it. Time tracking dies because starting a timer requires a context switch at exactly the moment someone is already switching context.

Timeular's answer is physical: an eight-sided dice on the desk, each face an activity, flipped rather than clicked. It sounds like a gimmick and is not — removing the software interaction removes the moment of friction.

The other answers are reconstruction and automation. Timeular captures app and calendar activity locally so a forgotten day can be rebuilt; TimeCamp captures automatically in the cloud, which is more powerful and brings the works council question with it.

The unglamorous option is a timer simple enough that the friction is negligible, which is what Toggl Track optimises for. Whichever route you take, pick for adoption rather than for reporting depth — an unused tracker reports nothing.

How we selected and ranked these 8 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

Toggl Track, from Estonia, for most teams that bill by time: a one-click timer, billable rates, project budgets and reporting, with an explicit design decision against employee monitoring. clockodo is the better fit for German employers who need statutory working time records, and MOCO for agencies that want projects and invoicing built on the same hours.

Toggl Track is the clearest: no screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity scores, stated as a design decision rather than a roadmap gap. Timeular's automatic capture stays local on the employee's own machine until they turn it into an entry. Both stand in contrast to the US monitoring-first tools that dominate search results here.

Following the Court of Justice of the EU ruling, member states must require employers to operate an objective, reliable and accessible system for measuring daily working time, and Germany's Federal Labour Court has confirmed the obligation there. In practice that means records covering breaks and overtime that an auditor accepts — which is what clockodo and Papershift are built around. This is a summary, not legal advice.

In Germany, Austria and several other countries, systems capable of monitoring employee behaviour or performance are subject to co-determination, so a works council agreement is generally required before rollout. Plain time recording is usually easier to agree than automatic activity capture — which is a practical argument for choosing a tool that does not offer the latter at all.

clockodo and MOCO both export into DATEV, and Papershift covers the payroll handover for shift-based teams. If your books are kept in DATEV by a Steuerberater, that integration usually settles the shortlist before any feature comparison begins.

MOCO, which treats time tracking as the entry point to something larger: the same hours drive project budgets, capacity planning, invoices and the accounting handover. Because the hours, the budget and the invoice are one record, project profitability becomes a report rather than a spreadsheet exercise every month.