European Office Suites

Looking for a privacy-respecting alternative to Microsoft 365 or Google Docs? European office suites offer full-featured document editing, real-time collaboration, and GDPR compliance. Many are open source and can be self-hosted, giving you complete control over your documents.

6 European Office Suites

OnlyOffice

Open source office suite with MS Office compatibility

Latvia Free / Paid plans
MS Office compatible Real-time collaboration Self-hosted option

Collabora Online

LibreOffice-based cloud office suite

United Kingdom Open source
Open source Nextcloud integration ODF support

CryptPad

End-to-end encrypted collaborative documents

France Free tier available
End-to-end encrypted Zero knowledge Real-time collaboration

LanguageTool

Open source grammar and style checker

Germany Free / Premium
30+ languages Open source Browser extensions

Zoho (EU)

Comprehensive office suite with EU data centers

EU Data Centers Free / Paid plans
EU data residency Full office suite GDPR compliant

SoftMaker Office

German office suite with MS Office compatibility

Germany One-time / Subscription
MS Office compatible Desktop applications Cross-platform

How We Choose European Office Suites

  • European Headquarters - Company must be headquartered in Europe with primary operations in the EU/EEA or UK
  • Document Compatibility - Must support common formats like DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, and open document formats
  • GDPR Compliance - Full compliance with European data protection regulations
  • Collaboration Features - Real-time editing, commenting, and sharing capabilities
  • Self-Hosting Option - Preference for solutions that can be self-hosted for maximum control

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, most European office suites like OnlyOffice and Collabora Online have excellent compatibility with Microsoft Office formats (DOCX, XLSX, PPTX). OnlyOffice is particularly known for its high-fidelity rendering of Microsoft documents, often matching the original formatting better than other alternatives.

End-to-end encrypted document editing, offered by CryptPad, means your documents are encrypted in your browser before being sent to the server. The service provider cannot read your documents, even if they wanted to. Only you and the people you share with can decrypt and view the content.

Yes, all the European office suites we recommend support real-time collaboration. Multiple users can edit the same document simultaneously, see each other's cursors and changes, and communicate through comments. The experience is comparable to Google Docs or Microsoft 365.

Cloud-hosted options like OnlyOffice Cloud are easier to set up and maintain, making them ideal for small teams. Self-hosted solutions like Collabora Online or OnlyOffice Docs Server give you complete control over your data and are better for organizations with strict security requirements or IT resources to manage the infrastructure.

The Complete Guide to European Office Suites: Privacy-Focused Alternatives to Google Docs and Microsoft 365

The modern workplace depends on document collaboration tools, with teams worldwide creating, editing, and sharing documents in real-time. While Google Docs and Microsoft 365 have dominated this space, a growing number of European office suites offer compelling alternatives that prioritize privacy, data sovereignty, and user control. For organizations concerned about data protection, regulatory compliance, or simply preferring to support European software development, these alternatives provide full-featured document editing without compromising on functionality.

European office suite providers like OnlyOffice from Latvia, Collabora Online from the UK, and CryptPad from France have invested years in developing sophisticated document editing capabilities that rival their American counterparts. These solutions support real-time collaboration, comprehensive file format compatibility, and advanced features that modern teams require. Crucially, they operate under European data protection frameworks and often offer self-hosting options that give organizations complete control over their sensitive documents.

The shift toward European office alternatives accelerated following revelations about data access practices by US technology companies and the implementation of GDPR. Organizations increasingly recognize that document content represents some of their most sensitive information - contracts, financial records, strategic plans, and personnel files. Entrusting this data to providers subject to US surveillance laws like the CLOUD Act creates compliance risks and potential competitive vulnerabilities that European alternatives eliminate.

Why Organizations Are Moving Away from Google Docs

Google Docs revolutionized document collaboration with its free, browser-based approach to real-time editing. However, the convenience comes with significant trade-offs that many organizations find unacceptable upon closer examination. Google's business model fundamentally depends on data collection and analysis, creating inherent tensions with privacy requirements that no terms of service adjustment can fully resolve.

Document content processed through Google Docs contributes to Google's machine learning training data and advertising profiles. While Google's enterprise agreements include data protection provisions, the underlying architecture means document content passes through and is processed by Google's systems. For organizations handling confidential information - legal firms, healthcare providers, financial institutions, or any business with trade secrets - this exposure represents unacceptable risk.

Vendor lock-in presents another concern as organizations build workflows around Google's ecosystem. Documents stored in Google Drive, edited in Google Docs, and shared through Google's systems become difficult to migrate. While export options exist, the transition costs accumulate over time, and some collaborative features don't translate to other platforms. European alternatives typically embrace open standards that facilitate data portability and avoid dependency on any single vendor.

Regulatory compliance requirements, particularly under GDPR, create additional complexity for Google Docs users. While Google offers data processing agreements and claims GDPR compliance, the reality involves data transfers to US jurisdiction where European protections don't apply. Organizations must evaluate whether their use cases fall within acceptable parameters and accept residual compliance risk. European office suites operating entirely within European jurisdiction eliminate this complexity.

Microsoft 365 vs European Alternatives: A Balanced Assessment

Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365) maintains strong enterprise market share through comprehensive functionality, deep integration with Windows environments, and familiar interfaces that minimize user training requirements. However, the same data sovereignty concerns affecting Google apply to Microsoft's cloud services, and the complexity of Microsoft's product licensing creates its own challenges.

Microsoft's enterprise agreements span dozens of pages covering data processing, security certifications, and compliance frameworks. Organizations must carefully evaluate which specific services and data residency options meet their requirements, as capabilities vary significantly across subscription tiers and geographic regions. European alternatives offer simpler, more transparent terms that don't require legal review for every deployment decision.

The cost comparison between Microsoft 365 and European alternatives often favors European options, particularly for organizations that don't need the full Microsoft suite. Microsoft bundles numerous applications and services, charging accordingly even when organizations only use document editing features. European office suites price their offerings more modularly, allowing organizations to pay only for required functionality.

OnlyOffice specifically positions itself as a Microsoft Office alternative with superior format compatibility. Their document editor renders Microsoft formats with high fidelity, preserving complex formatting, macros, and embedded objects that other alternatives sometimes struggle with. For organizations transitioning from Microsoft environments or frequently exchanging documents with Microsoft users, this compatibility reduces friction significantly.

How does real-time collaboration work in European office suites?

Real-time collaboration enables multiple users to edit the same document simultaneously, seeing each other's changes appear instantly as they type. European office suites implement this capability using various technical approaches, each with distinct characteristics affecting user experience and privacy.

Operational Transformation (OT) algorithms, used by OnlyOffice and Collabora Online, reconcile concurrent edits by transforming each operation against others that have occurred. When two users modify the same paragraph, OT determines how to merge their changes coherently. This approach has been refined over decades and provides reliable, intuitive collaboration behavior that users of Google Docs will find familiar.

Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs), used by CryptPad, take a different mathematical approach that guarantees eventual consistency without central coordination. CRDTs work particularly well for end-to-end encrypted collaboration where a central server cannot see or reconcile content. The algorithm ensures that all participants converge on identical document states regardless of network delays or ordering.

Cursor presence and user awareness features show where other collaborators are working within the document. Colored cursors, name labels, and selection highlights help prevent conflicting edits and facilitate coordination. European office suites implement these awareness features comparably to mainstream alternatives, creating familiar collaborative experiences.

Comments and suggestions enable asynchronous collaboration alongside real-time editing. Team members can propose changes, ask questions, and discuss document content without modifying the main text. Review workflows allow document owners to accept or reject suggestions, maintaining control over final content. These features support formal review processes required by many organizations.

Version history and revision tracking record document changes over time, enabling rollback to previous states and understanding how documents evolved. European office suites maintain comprehensive version histories that support audit requirements and protect against accidental or malicious modifications. Some solutions offer granular version comparison highlighting specific changes between versions.

What offline support options exist for European office suites?

Offline capability matters for users who travel, work from locations with unreliable connectivity, or simply prefer local applications to browser-based tools. European office suite providers offer various approaches to offline work, from full desktop applications to progressive web app capabilities.

OnlyOffice provides dedicated desktop applications for Windows, macOS, and Linux that function completely offline. These applications include full document editing capability without internet dependency, saving files locally in standard formats. When connectivity returns, documents can be manually uploaded or synced to cloud storage. This approach offers the most robust offline experience but requires local installation and storage.

Collabora Online, being browser-based by design, has more limited offline capability. However, when integrated with Nextcloud or similar platforms, users can leverage those platforms' sync clients to maintain local copies of documents. Files synced locally can be edited with compatible desktop applications and synchronized when online. The collaboration features naturally require connectivity, but document access remains possible offline.

CryptPad implements progressive web app (PWA) functionality that caches application code for offline use. While you cannot access server-stored documents without connectivity, the application interface remains available and some features function offline. CryptPad's architecture, designed around end-to-end encryption, presents unique challenges for offline sync that limit offline capability compared to alternatives.

Hybrid workflows combining cloud and local storage provide flexible approaches for teams with varied connectivity situations. Documents can live primarily in cloud storage for collaboration while being synced to local drives for offline access. European office suites support standard file formats that work with this hybrid approach, unlike proprietary formats that lock documents to specific applications.

Mobile applications extend offline capability to tablets and smartphones, though editing complex documents on small screens has inherent limitations. OnlyOffice and Collabora both offer mobile apps with offline modes that sync changes when connectivity returns. These apps provide document viewing and basic editing suitable for review and quick modifications while traveling.

File format compatibility: DOCX, ODT, and beyond

Document exchange between organizations requires reliable file format support. European office suites handle multiple formats with varying levels of fidelity, and understanding these capabilities helps set appropriate expectations and choose the right tool for specific scenarios.

Microsoft Office formats (DOCX, XLSX, PPTX) remain the de facto standard for document exchange in many industries. OnlyOffice has invested heavily in Microsoft format compatibility, achieving rendering fidelity that often exceeds other alternatives. Complex documents with embedded objects, custom styles, and advanced formatting typically render correctly, making OnlyOffice suitable for organizations regularly exchanging documents with Microsoft users.

Open Document Format (ODT, ODS, ODP) provides a vendor-neutral alternative standardized by ISO. Collabora Online, built on LibreOffice technology, excels with ODF documents and advocates for open standards adoption. European government and public sector organizations increasingly mandate ODF support, making strong ODF capability valuable for organizations working in these contexts.

PDF export functionality appears universally across European office suites, enabling document sharing in a format viewable on any device without specialized software. PDF/A variants for archival purposes, PDF forms, and PDF annotations receive varying levels of support depending on the specific solution. Organizations with PDF-centric workflows should verify that required PDF features work correctly.

Format conversion during collaboration sessions requires careful handling to preserve document integrity. When collaborators open the same document in different applications, format differences can cause synchronization issues or formatting loss. European office suites handle conversion better when all collaborators use the same platform, motivating team-wide standardization on a single solution.

Legacy format support (DOC, XLS, PPT) varies between providers. While basic reading and conversion typically works, complex legacy documents may not render perfectly. Organizations with substantial legacy document archives should test representative samples before committing to a new platform. Most providers continue improving legacy format handling based on user feedback.

Markdown, HTML, and plain text formats serve specific use cases around technical documentation, web content, and maximum portability. CryptPad particularly embraces Markdown for its simplicity and encryption-friendly characteristics. These lightweight formats sacrifice rich formatting for broad compatibility and ease of processing.

Understanding document encryption and zero-knowledge architecture

Document security extends beyond access controls to include how and where document content is encrypted. European office suites offer various encryption approaches, with CryptPad's zero-knowledge architecture representing the strongest privacy guarantee available in collaborative document editing.

Traditional cloud office suites encrypt documents at rest (stored on servers) and in transit (traveling over networks), but the service provider holds encryption keys and can access document content. This model, used by Google Docs and Microsoft 365, allows providers to index documents for search, scan for malware, and comply with legal demands for content access. It also means provider employees or systems could theoretically access your documents.

End-to-end encryption, implemented by CryptPad, encrypts documents in your browser before transmission to servers. The server stores only encrypted data and never receives the keys needed to decrypt it. This zero-knowledge architecture means CryptPad cannot read your documents even if compelled by authorities - they genuinely don't have the capability. The encryption keys derive from document URLs that you share with collaborators.

The trade-offs of zero-knowledge encryption include limited server-side functionality. Search, machine learning features, and certain administrative capabilities become impossible when the server cannot read content. Password recovery also becomes challenging - if you lose access to encryption keys, documents may become permanently unrecoverable. CryptPad documents these trade-offs clearly, helping users understand whether zero-knowledge encryption fits their requirements.

Client-side encryption adds processing overhead that can affect performance, particularly on mobile devices or older computers. CryptPad has optimized their encryption implementation, but real-time collaboration on large documents may feel slower than unencrypted alternatives. For organizations prioritizing privacy over performance, this trade-off is acceptable; others may prefer solutions that encrypt only at rest.

Encryption key management in enterprise deployments requires careful consideration. How are keys distributed to authorized users? What happens when employees leave the organization? European office suite providers offer various approaches to these challenges, from simple shared passwords to integration with enterprise key management systems. Evaluating key management capabilities matters for organizations with formal security requirements.

Team features: permissions, administration, and user management

Organizations deploying office suites for teams require administrative capabilities beyond individual document editing. European office suites provide team-oriented features that help manage access, maintain security, and support organizational workflows.

User authentication integrates with existing identity systems through standards like SAML, OAuth, and LDAP. This integration allows organizations to manage office suite access through their central directory, applying consistent policies and simplifying user lifecycle management. When employees join or leave, their office suite access automatically adjusts based on directory changes. OnlyOffice and Collabora Online both support enterprise identity integration.

Permission models control who can view, edit, comment on, or share documents. Basic permissions distinguish viewers from editors, while advanced models support role-based access, folder-level permissions, and document classification schemes. Organizations with compliance requirements around information handling should verify that permission granularity meets their needs.

Audit logging records document access and modifications for compliance and security monitoring. Logs typically capture who accessed which documents, when, and what changes they made. European data protection regulations sometimes require such logging, while other contexts demand that logging be optional or anonymized. European office suites generally provide configurable logging that accommodates various requirements.

Administrative dashboards give IT teams visibility into usage, storage consumption, and system health. These interfaces support user management, policy configuration, and troubleshooting. Self-hosted deployments provide complete administrative control, while cloud-hosted options offer managed administration with varying levels of customization.

Data retention and deletion policies help organizations manage document lifecycles and comply with retention requirements. Automatic deletion of documents after specified periods, legal hold capabilities, and export tools support data governance programs. European providers typically offer stronger retention controls than US alternatives, reflecting European regulatory expectations.

Multi-tenancy features support organizations managing separate workspaces for departments, clients, or projects. Tenant isolation ensures that users in one workspace cannot access another tenant's documents, even if sharing the same infrastructure. This capability proves essential for consulting firms, agencies, and other organizations serving multiple distinct groups.

Pricing comparison for businesses: what to expect

Office suite pricing models vary significantly between providers, affecting total cost depending on organization size, usage patterns, and deployment preferences. Understanding pricing structures helps evaluate true costs rather than being surprised by hidden fees or required upgrades.

Per-user subscription pricing dominates the cloud office market. Google Workspace starts around $6 per user monthly, while Microsoft 365 business plans begin at similar levels. European alternatives often price lower, with OnlyOffice Cloud plans starting at $4 per user monthly and scaling based on storage and feature requirements. CryptPad offers a generous free tier with paid plans starting at $5 monthly for individuals.

Self-hosted deployment eliminates per-user subscription costs but introduces infrastructure and maintenance expenses. OnlyOffice Community Server is free for organizations willing to host their own infrastructure, while commercial licenses remove branding and add support. Collabora Online's open-source version likewise costs nothing beyond hosting, with commercial subscriptions providing professional support and guaranteed compatibility.

Infrastructure costs for self-hosting vary based on user count and performance requirements. Small deployments might run adequately on a single server costing $20-50 monthly, while enterprise deployments require more substantial infrastructure. Managed hosting providers offer middle-ground options with simplified administration at predictable costs.

Feature tiering affects which capabilities require premium subscriptions. Basic document editing often appears in free or low-cost tiers, while advanced features like enhanced security, priority support, extended storage, and administrative controls require higher tiers. Organizations should map their feature requirements to specific tiers before comparing headline prices.

Storage costs add to base subscription prices when organizations exceed included allowances. Cloud providers typically include modest storage per user, charging additional fees for excess usage. Self-hosted deployments shift storage costs to infrastructure, where economics differ significantly. Organizations with large document archives should model storage costs carefully.

Support and training expenses don't appear in subscription prices but affect total cost of ownership. European providers generally offer responsive support, though premium support tiers with guaranteed response times cost extra. Training users on new systems involves temporary productivity loss even with intuitive interfaces. These soft costs deserve consideration alongside subscription fees.

Self-hosted vs cloud: choosing the right deployment model

The choice between self-hosted and cloud deployment affects control, responsibility, and cost in ways that vary based on organizational capabilities and requirements. European office suites uniquely offer genuine choice between these models, unlike US providers that generally mandate cloud deployment.

Self-hosted deployment provides maximum control over data location, security configuration, and system customization. Organizations maintain complete authority over their documents, with no external party having access. This model suits organizations with stringent data protection requirements, existing infrastructure capabilities, and IT staff to manage deployments. Government agencies, healthcare providers, and financial institutions often prefer or require self-hosting.

The operational burden of self-hosting includes server maintenance, security patching, backup management, and capacity planning. Organizations must budget staff time and expertise for these responsibilities. Reliability depends on internal capabilities rather than provider SLAs. Small organizations without dedicated IT staff often find this burden impractical, making cloud deployment more appropriate.

Cloud deployment transfers operational responsibility to the provider, who manages infrastructure, applies updates, and ensures availability. This model suits organizations preferring to focus resources on core activities rather than infrastructure management. European cloud providers host data within European jurisdiction, providing data sovereignty without self-hosting complexity.

Hybrid approaches combine cloud convenience with selective self-hosting for sensitive materials. Organizations might use cloud-hosted office suites for general documents while maintaining self-hosted instances for confidential content. This approach balances convenience and control, though managing multiple systems adds complexity.

Migration between deployment models should factor into decisions. Starting with cloud deployment and later migrating to self-hosting (or vice versa) involves data export, system reconfiguration, and user transition. European providers using standard formats facilitate migration, but some disruption is inevitable. Organizations anticipating deployment model changes should verify migration paths before committing.

Scalability differs between models. Cloud deployments scale automatically as organizations grow, with providers managing capacity. Self-hosted deployments require proactive capacity management, potentially causing service degradation during unexpected growth. Organizations anticipating rapid scaling often find cloud deployment more appropriate until growth stabilizes.

Integration with other European tools and services

Office suites rarely operate in isolation, typically integrating with file storage, email, project management, and other business applications. European office suites integrate particularly well with European alternatives in adjacent categories, creating coherent privacy-focused technology stacks.

Nextcloud integration represents perhaps the most important connection for European office suites. Collabora Online and OnlyOffice both offer deep Nextcloud integration, embedding document editors directly into Nextcloud's interface. Users can create, edit, and collaborate on documents without leaving the Nextcloud environment. This combination provides a complete file storage and collaboration platform comparable to Google Drive or Microsoft OneDrive.

Email integration enables workflows like attaching documents to messages, previewing attachments, and editing documents received via email. European email providers like Proton Mail and Tutanota focus on end-to-end encrypted email, with document workflows typically handled through separate storage systems. European office suites complement these email services rather than directly integrating.

Project management tools benefit from document editing integration for team collaboration on project materials. European project management solutions like OpenProject and Taiga can link to documents stored in systems accessible to European office suites. These integrations typically work through shared file storage rather than direct office suite connections.

API access enables custom integrations for organizations with specific workflow requirements. European office suites provide APIs for document creation, conversion, and manipulation. Developers can build custom applications that generate reports, process form submissions, or automate document workflows. API documentation and support quality varies between providers.

Single sign-on integration simplifies user experience by allowing one authentication for multiple applications. European office suites support standard protocols that work with both commercial and open-source identity providers. Organizations using European identity solutions like Keycloak can build unified authentication across their privacy-focused technology stack.

Calendar and scheduling integration helps with document-centric meetings and deadlines. While direct calendar integration is less common than with integrated suites like Google Workspace, European office suites work alongside European calendar solutions through standard protocols. Meeting documents can be attached or linked through shared storage systems.

Making the Transition: Practical Considerations

Migrating from Google Docs or Microsoft 365 to European alternatives requires planning but typically proceeds more smoothly than organizations anticipate. Both Google and Microsoft provide document export capabilities, and European office suites import these documents with good fidelity. The larger challenge involves changing workflows and user habits developed around specific platforms.

A phased transition approach reduces risk and allows organizations to validate the new platform before full commitment. Starting with new projects on the European platform while maintaining existing documents in the legacy system lets teams build familiarity gradually. As confidence grows, legacy documents can be migrated systematically.

User training deserves investment proportional to the interface differences between old and new platforms. European office suites intentionally maintain familiar interfaces that minimize learning curves, but some adjustment period is inevitable. Identifying power users who can champion the new platform and support colleagues accelerates adoption.

The long-term benefits of European office suites extend beyond privacy to include cost savings, European ecosystem support, and freedom from vendor lock-in. Organizations investing in European alternatives contribute to a more diverse software landscape while protecting their most sensitive information under European legal frameworks. For teams serious about data protection, the transition effort delivers lasting value. European office suites work particularly well alongside European cloud storage and cloud computing solutions for a complete privacy-focused technology stack.