awork
Project management from Hamburg with tracking built in - European alternative based in Germany
Quick Overview
| Company | awork |
|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking Software |
| Headquarters | Hamburg, Germany |
| EU/European | Yes - Germany |
| GDPR Compliant | Yes |
| Main Features | Time tracking inside project management, Capacity planning, ISO 27001, German hosting |
| Pricing | Per user, per month |
| Best For | Agencies whose tracked hours end up on an invoice |
| Replaces | Harvest, Asana + Harvest, Monday.com |
Detailed Review
awork is project management software from Hamburg that merges three things most teams pay for separately: task and project planning, time tracking, and capacity planning across the people doing the work.
What Makes awork Stand Out
Tracking hours in the same place the work is planned is what makes the numbers trustworthy. When a timer starts from the task rather than from a separate app, the timesheet reflects the project plan instead of a reconstruction at the end of the week — which is the difference between billable hours you can defend and hours you estimate.
What the Software Does
Projects with lists, boards and timelines, time tracking from tasks or a timer, workload and capacity planning per person, budgets and billable rates, plus an API and integrations into the common calendar and communication tools.
European Data Protection and Works Councils
awork GmbH is based in Hamburg, ISO 27001 certified and hosted on servers in Germany. Its audience is service businesses — agencies, consultancies, studios — where tracked hours end up on client invoices.
Timesheets are employee data, and in much of Europe that pulls in more than the GDPR: works council agreement, purpose limitation, and strict limits on anything resembling behavioural monitoring. A vendor built inside that framework tends to ship defaults that keep you on the right side of it.
Pricing
Per user per month in tiers, with the time tracking included rather than sold as a module. Cheaper than a project tool plus a separate tracker.
awork vs the US Alternatives
Against Harvest, Asana + Harvest, Monday.com, the European difference is less about the timer and more about what surrounds it: statutory working time rules, accounting exports the local bookkeeper accepts, and a much narrower appetite for surveillance features that would be unlawful to switch on here anyway.
Who Should Use awork
awork suits agencies and project-based teams who want planning and tracking in one system, and who bill for the hours they record.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Time tracking inside the project plan, not beside it
- Capacity and workload planning per person
- Budgets and billable rates on projects
- ISO 27001 certified, hosted in Germany
- Cheaper than a project tool plus a separate tracker
Cons
- More tool than a team that only needs tracking
- Per-user pricing across a whole agency adds up
- Reporting is good rather than deep
- Strongest fit is agencies specifically
Alternatives to awork
Looking for other European time tracking tools? Here are the alternatives worth comparing:
Frequently Asked Questions
awork is based in Germany and operates under European data-protection rules including the GDPR. Timesheet data is employee data, so it stays under European jurisdiction rather than under US legislation.
awork is based in Germany. We list European time tracking tools because timesheets are employee data and, in much of Europe, a works council matter as well.
Projects with lists, boards and timelines, time tracking from tasks or a timer, workload and capacity planning per person, budgets and billable rates, plus an API and integrations into the common calendar and communication tools.
Per user per month in tiers, with the time tracking included rather than sold as a module. Cheaper than a project tool plus a separate tracker.
awork is a European alternative to Harvest, Asana + Harvest, Monday.com, with European working time rules and accounting exports handled as core behaviour.
This is the question to ask of any tool in this category, and the answers differ sharply. Toggl Track deliberately has no screenshots, keystroke logging or activity scoring. Timeular captures activity locally on the employee's own machine. TimeCamp offers automatic capture that needs a clear legal basis and usually works council agreement before you switch it on.