European Alternatives to Kantata
Looking for a European alternative to Kantata? Kantata, Inc. states in its privacy policy that the services and systems for its platform are housed on servers in the United States, and it publishes no prices: its pricing page is a request form. Its privacy policy also lists Mavenlink, Inc. and Kimble Applications, Inc. among its US entities.
The European PSA tools below are run by companies in Estonia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Switzerland and the UK, and most of them publish per-user prices.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Vendors can pay for more visibility, higher up on the review pages; it never affects which tools are listed. Editorial policy
11 European Alternatives to Kantata
Scoro
Modular PSA covering quotes, projects, resourcing and billing
TimeLog
Project time, resourcing and invoicing with servers in Denmark
Visma Severa
CRM, projects, hours and invoicing for expert businesses
MOCO
Agency time tracking, planning and invoicing in one place
Projektron BCS
Project management and ERP for service firms, cloud or on-premise
awork
Planning, time tracking and workload for agencies
Teamwork.com
Client work from brief to invoice, run from Cork
Resource Guru
Resource scheduling, leave and timesheets without the full PSA
Timewax
Resource planning for IT, accountancy and consultancy firms
Teamleader
CRM, projects and invoicing in one platform from Ghent
Teamdeck
Lightweight resource scheduling and timesheets for small teams
Key takeaways
- Kantata's privacy policy states that its services and systems are housed on servers in the United States.
- Kantata publishes no prices: its pricing page is a request form answered by a PSA advisor.
- Scoro, TimeLog and Visma Severa publish per-user prices, starting at €15, €14 and €25 per user per month.
- Only Projektron BCS among the eleven European tools on this page offers an on-premise licence next to a cloud edition.
- Resource Guru, Timewax and Teamdeck plan and schedule people but, on the pages checked, do not issue client invoices, so they replace one part of Kantata rather than the whole.
Why people leave Kantata
Kantata, Inc. sells a professional services automation platform from San Francisco. Its own site describes an "AI-driven PSA" with resource management and forecasting, financial management, project management and a layer of AI agents, and a version that runs on top of Salesforce. The customer names it shows on the home page (Deloitte, Sage, Hitachi) point at large services organisations, and the vendor says it was named a Leader in an IDC MarketScape for AI-enabled PSA applications.
People start looking elsewhere for dull reasons. The pricing page is a form: you describe the firm and a "PSA Advisor" comes back with a plan, so nobody can set a Kantata quote next to a published rate card before a call has taken place. The privacy policy then says that the services and systems for the site are housed on servers in the United States, and that the data is processed and stored there.
A PSA is also an unusually revealing dataset. It holds bill rates, cost rates, utilisation per person, project margins and the names of the clients behind them. A European firm that has spent years keeping salary and customer data under a European contract tends to ask where this one system sits. The answer from Kantata, in its own words, is the United States, under a privacy framework rather than under European law.
- The servers are in the United States by the vendor's own account Kantata's privacy policy states that the services and systems are housed on servers in the United States and that information is processed and stored there, and it asks non-US users to consent to the transfer. Transfers rely on the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, which the policy lists. Against that, TimeLog states Danish servers and Projektron BCS cloud runs in German data centres.
- No price until a conversation has happened The Kantata pricing page contains a request form and the sentence that plans are tailored to company size and goals. Scoro publishes combinations from €15 per user per month, TimeLog lists €14, €34.5 and €53, and Visma Severa lists €25 to €69. A firm that wants to compare three quotes in a week finds it easier with published numbers.
- Several US legal entities sit behind the brand The privacy policy names Mavenlink, Inc. and Kimble Applications, Inc. as US entities that adhere to the same framework. A buyer who asks which company is the processor, and which other companies can see the data, gets a list of US corporations and a contract under US terms. The European tools each name one contracting company, in Tallinn, Copenhagen, Berlin or Amsterdam.
- The product is aimed above the small firm Kantata's own pages talk about mid-market and enterprise services firms, forecasting from live pipeline data and more than 1,200 prebuilt connectors. A twelve-person agency pays for that reach in set-up and in a sales process. MOCO, awork or Teamleader start from the timesheet and the invoice, which is closer to what a small firm runs on a Monday.
What you have to replace, not just match
Replacing Kantata means replacing a chain, not a screen. Its pages describe four blocks that talk to each other: resourcing and forecasting (who is available, which skills fit, what the bench costs), financial management (budgets, billing, revenue), project management, and a reporting layer with AI features on top. Before you shortlist anything, write down which of those blocks your firm actually uses every week.
The second thing to replace is the integration web. Kantata states more than 1,200 prebuilt connectors, secure APIs and MCP support, plus a version that sits on Salesforce. If your CRM is Salesforce and your quotes live there, a European tool with its own CRM (Scoro, Visma Severa, Teamleader) means moving the pipeline too, while a planning-only tool (Timewax, Resource Guru, Teamdeck) leaves the CRM where it is and adds nothing for quotes.
The third is the data you would be exporting: project history, rate cards, timesheets with approval trails, invoices already issued. Decide early which of it has to be migrated and which only has to be archived. Finance usually needs the invoices and the open work-in-progress, while delivery needs the open projects and the staffing plan, and everything older can sit in an export file that nobody opens after the audit.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Scoro | Tallinn, Estonia | Combinations from €15 per user per month, Quote to Cash €25, End-to-end €52, minimum 5 users | EU (Estonia) |
| #2 | TimeLog | Denmark | Starter €14, Growth €34.5, Professional €53 per user per month; Enterprise on request | EU (Denmark) |
| #3 | Visma Severa | Lappeenranta, Finland | Basic €25, Business €39, Platinum €49, Enterprise €69 per user per month, excluding VAT | EU (Finland) |
| #4 | MOCO | Binz (Zurich), Switzerland | Per user, per month | EU (Germany) |
| #5 | Projektron BCS | Berlin, Germany | BCS on-premise licence €300 to €350 per user; BCS.light €200 per licence or €20 per month in the cloud, excluding VAT | EU (Germany) |
| #6 | awork | Hamburg, Germany | From €5/user/month billed annually (€8 monthly), Standard €12, Professional €22 | EU (Germany) |
| #7 | Teamwork.com | Cork, Ireland | Free up to 5 users / $9.99/user/month (Basics) / $24.99 (Accelerate), billed yearly | EU (Ireland) |
| #8 | Resource Guru | United Kingdom | Grasshopper $5, Blackbelt $8, Master $12 per person per month (USD, billed monthly); lower with annual billing | UK (England and Wales) |
| #9 | Timewax | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Per scheduled FTE, quoted on request | EU (Netherlands) |
| #10 | Teamleader | Ghent, Belgium | From about €50/month (Focus) / €66/month (Orbit) | EU (Belgium) |
| #11 | Teamdeck | Poznan, Poland | Full Member $6 and Light Member $2 per month (USD); Enterprise on request | EU (Poland) |
How each alternative compares to Kantata
Best for: Firms of five or more that want quote, project, time and invoice on one data model.
Against Kantata, Scoro is the tool that most resembles the "one system from deal to invoice" idea, built by Scoro Software OÜ in Tallinn. Its eight apps (Do, Deliver, Track, Resource, Sell, Estimate, Spend, Invoice) share one data model, so hours flow into budgets and invoices without a sync. You start with a combination and add apps later, which is the opposite of a quote that arrives after a call.
The vendor lets each client pick the hosting region, and its security page lists Frankfurt and Stockholm among them. The cost sits on the same page: combinations from €15, Quote to Cash at €25 and End-to-end at €52 per user per month, with a minimum of five users. The page does not state the billing period behind those figures.
What Scoro does better than Kantata
- Published per-user prices instead of a request form
- A hosting region you choose, including two in the EU
- Pick-your-apps pricing, so a firm pays for the blocks it uses
- An Estonian contracting entity under EU law
Where Scoro is a step down from Kantata
- Kantata's AI forecasting and staffing layer has no counterpart in what Scoro documents
- Runs on AWS, so a US provider sits under the Estonian company
- Minimum of five users and paid onboarding above 15 people
Standout against Kantata. It is the only tool here where you assemble the PSA from apps and see the price of each combination.
Best for: Consultancies and engineering offices that tie timesheets to project accounting and payroll.
TimeLog A/S starts from the timesheet and walks it to the invoice. Against Kantata, the difference you notice first is that hours also feed salary administration and project accounting, which suits a firm whose controller drives the purchase. The Starter plan is €14 per user per month, Growth €34.5 and Professional €53, so the full ladder is visible before anyone calls.
The security page says that all servers are in Denmark with the hosting partner Global Connect and that both companies hold ISAE 3402 declarations. A Multiple Legal Entities module covers firms with several companies or countries. Integrations and the API only arrive with Growth, so the cheapest plan fits fewer migrations than the headline price suggests.
What TimeLog does better than Kantata
- Servers in Denmark where Kantata states the United States
- A visible price ladder with three tiers
- Salary administration inside the same system as hours
- A module for firms with several legal entities
Where TimeLog is a step down from Kantata
- Support hours in the terms are weekdays 8 to 16 CET, while Kantata advertises 24/7 support
- No AI forecasting layer comparable to Kantata's
- Aimed at finance-led firms rather than creative workflow
Standout against Kantata. Its hosting statement names a country, a partner and an audit standard on one page.
Best for: Consulting, architecture and engineering firms, especially in the Nordics, that want sales and delivery together.
Visma Severa covers the same chain Kantata sells: a pipeline, quotes, projects with phases, work hours with approval, resourcing and invoicing. It is offered in four packages (Basic €25, Business €39, Platinum €49, Enterprise €69 per user per month, excluding VAT), so an owner can see what resourcing costs by looking at where it starts, in Business.
The privacy statement names Visma Solutions Oy of Lappeenranta, Finland, and the security page puts the servers in the Azure North Europe region. Severa passes invoice data to accounting and names Netvisor and Fortnox, which matters for firms on Nordic bookkeeping software that US-built tools rarely support.
What Visma Severa does better than Kantata
- Published packages with a visible upgrade path
- Integrations with Nordic accounting such as Netvisor and Fortnox
- A 30-day trial without a card, where Kantata starts with a form
- A Finnish controller entity inside the EU
Where Visma Severa is a step down from Kantata
- Microsoft Azure sits under the Finnish entity
- Revenue recognition and multi-currency only from Platinum
- Part of a large group, so it is not an independent vendor
Standout against Kantata. It is the only full PSA here that comes from a group of Visma's size, with an ISO 27001 framework behind it.
Best for: Agencies and consultancies of five to a hundred people that want a timer-to-invoice flow without a PSA project.
MOCO comes from the small-agency end of the market, and against Kantata that is the point. Time tracking, project budgets, resource planning, offers and invoices live in one record, so project profitability is a report. The imprint names everii Switzerland GmbH in Binz, Canton Zurich, registered since 2014, as provider and developer.
Exports for DATEV and other German accounting systems are part of the product, with an API for the rest. The pricing is per user per month without a figure we could verify against a published price page, so request the current number. A firm of that size has far less to configure than with Kantata, and far less forecasting to lean on.
What MOCO does better than Kantata
- Much shorter to set up than an enterprise PSA
- DATEV and German accounting exports built in
- Planning and invoicing included rather than tiered apart
- A Swiss entity with a public commercial-register entry
Where MOCO is a step down from Kantata
- Nothing resembling Kantata's forecasting or skills matching
- German market focus, with fewer cross-border billing features
- More system than a solo freelancer needs
Standout against Kantata. It is the shortest route from a timer to an invoice that an auditor can follow.
Best for: German-speaking IT, engineering and consulting firms that want PSA and ERP functions and may need on-premise.
Projektron BCS is the one tool on this page where the answer to "where is the data" can be "on our own server". Against Kantata, which states US servers, Projektron GmbH of Berlin sells an on-premise licence at €300 to €350 per user and a cloud edition hosted exclusively in German data centres with dogado GmbH. The company registers at the Amtsgericht Charlottenburg.
The scope is wider than a PSA: ticketing, quotations, invoicing, CRM, expenses, documents and personnel. It supports PRINCE2, IPMA, Scrum and Kanban. The vendor says more than 850 companies use BCS. That breadth means a longer project to introduce it, and training and consulting are separate services.
What Projektron BCS does better than Kantata
- On-premise operation is possible
- Cloud hosting in German data centres rather than the United States
- Licence prices on the editions page
- PSA and ERP functions in one product
Where Projektron BCS is a step down from Kantata
- Slower to introduce than a SaaS-only tool
- The SaaS price for BCS is given as a share of the licence price, with no period stated
- German-speaking market focus
Standout against Kantata. It is the only tool on this page that you can buy as a licence and run in your own building.
awork
A designer-friendly project and workload tool, cheaper than a PSA but without the finance chain
Best for: Agency teams of designers and account managers who need phases, time and workload but not a full ledger.
awork GmbH in Hamburg built its product for agency work: projects with phases, time tracked against them and a workload view that shows who is over-committed before a deadline is promised. Against Kantata, its draw is how quickly non-specialists use it. Pricing starts at €5 per user per month on annual billing (€8 monthly), then Standard €12 and Professional €22.
The company states that its infrastructure runs on ISO 27001 certified Microsoft servers in Germany, and the tool page records ISO 27001 as a certification. It is a project and planning tool, not a billing system, so a firm that bills through awork usually pairs it with an accounting package.
What awork does better than Kantata
- Much lower price per user than any enterprise PSA
- German servers instead of the United States
- A workload view that non-technical staff pick up quickly
- Time tracking included, not sold as an add-on
Where awork is a step down from Kantata
- No quote-to-cash chain, so finance stays outside the tool
- Microsoft infrastructure under a German company
- Fewer integrations than Kantata's 1,200 connectors
Standout against Kantata. The workload view answers who is booked before you commit to a date.
Teamwork.com
An established client-work tool with billing and audits, with AWS regions in the US and EU
Best for: Agencies that sell retainers and billable hours and want SOC 2 and ISO 27001 evidence in the procurement file.
Teamwork Crew Limited has been in Cork since 2007, and against Kantata its strength is that client work and money meet inside the project: billable time, retainers, budgets and invoicing sit next to the tasks. It holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2, which a Kantata buyer in procurement will recognise as the usual evidence pair.
There is a free plan for up to five users, then $9.99 per user per month for Basics and $24.99 for Accelerate, billed yearly. The detail to read: the vendor states that its servers are with AWS, hosted in both the US and the EU, so choose the region deliberately when you sign.
What Teamwork.com does better than Kantata
- An Irish contracting entity under EU law
- A free plan for small teams and published tiers
- Audit evidence that a procurement team can file
- Billable time and invoicing inside the project tool
Where Teamwork.com is a step down from Kantata
- AWS in both US and EU regions leaves a US provider in the chain
- Less depth in skills-based staffing and forecasting
- A dense interface carrying a long product history
Standout against Kantata. It is the only tool on this page that pairs a free plan for five users with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 on its tool page.
Best for: Agencies and consultancies that only need to book people and equipment and track leave.
Resource Guru Limited, registered in England and Wales, replaces only the resourcing part of what Kantata does. People, equipment and rooms are booked on a shared calendar, clashes and leave show up, and a timesheet fills itself from what was booked. Prices are in US dollars: Grasshopper $5, Blackbelt $8 and Master $12 per person per month, billed monthly, with a lower annual rate.
The security page claims SOC 2 Type II compliance and Google Cloud hosting, and does not name a region. On the pages checked there are no client quotes or invoices, so billing stays in your accounting software. The vendor relies on an EU representative in Ireland because it is established in the UK.
What Resource Guru does better than Kantata
- Published low entry price per person
- A 30-day trial without a card
- Leave, equipment and room booking in one calendar
- A scheduling tool you can introduce in days
Where Resource Guru is a step down from Kantata
- No quotes or invoices on the pages checked
- Hosting region not stated, on Google Cloud
- No forecasting from live pipeline data
Standout against Kantata. It does one job, scheduling, and its price list fits on one line.
Best for: Planners at IT, accountancy and consultancy firms that already run an ERP such as AFAS or Exact.
Timewax B.V. in Amsterdam replaces the resourcing and forecasting piece of Kantata for firms that keep finance elsewhere. Planners drag people onto projects, see skills and availability, and compare planned hours with actuals so utilisation and expected margin show while a project runs. It syncs with Outlook and warns about double bookings.
The price model is unusual: the pricing page says you pay per scheduled FTE and not per user, so everyone can look at the plan without raising the bill. Amounts are given on request and onboarding carries a fixed setup fee. The integration list (AFAS, Exact Online, Dynamics, Autotask, Simplicate) leans toward Dutch software.
What Timewax does better than Kantata
- Billing per scheduled person, not per login
- Integrations with AFAS, Exact Online and Simplicate
- A planning interface built around drag and drop
- A Dutch contracting entity inside the EU
Where Timewax is a step down from Kantata
- No published prices and a setup fee, similar to Kantata
- No invoicing on the pages checked
- Hosting location not stated
Standout against Kantata. Looking at the plan costs nothing, because licences follow scheduled FTE rather than viewers.
Best for: Service SMBs of two to fifty people in Benelux, Germany, France, Spain or Italy that need VAT and local accounting links.
Teamleader NV in Ghent, founded in 2012, covers the front half of a services business: CRM, quotes, invoices, projects and time tracking. Against Kantata, which is built for delivery at scale, Teamleader is the choice when the sales process and the invoice matter more than the staffing algorithm. The six active markets are Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain and Italy.
Pricing is by plan, from €50 per month for Focus and from €66 per month for Orbit, and the Orbit plan adds capacity planning and project profitability. Project management is lighter than that of a dedicated tool, and the tool page says CRM depth is below a sales-first product.
What Teamleader does better than Kantata
- European VAT handling and local accounting links
- A flat plan price for small teams
- A CRM and quote flow in the same system
- A Belgian company under EU law
Where Teamleader is a step down from Kantata
- Resourcing only arrives with Orbit
- Project management is lighter than a PSA
- Not made for firms that staff by skills across hundreds of people
Standout against Kantata. It is the only tool here that begins from the customer record and ends at a European VAT-correct invoice.
Best for: Small software teams and creative agencies that need a resource calendar, leave and timesheets.
Teamdeck sp. z o.o. in Poznan has the narrowest scope here. A resource calendar, timesheets, availability, leave and reports, with two seat types: Full Members at $6 per month who plan and manage, and Light Members at $2 who log time and see their own plan. Against Kantata's quote-based pricing, that is a price list you can read in ten seconds.
Reports cover utilisation, budgets and revenue forecasts, with rates per project or per resource and several currencies. There is no invoice generation on the pages checked, and the prices are in US dollars without a stated period. The data protection policy lists Amazon Web Services among the processors, and no region is given.
What Teamdeck does better than Kantata
- Seat prices far below any PSA quote
- A 14-day trial and a visible price list
- A Polish controller entity under EU law
- Budget and revenue forecast reports at small-team scale
Where Teamdeck is a step down from Kantata
- No invoices or quotes
- AWS as processor, region not stated
- Far less depth than a PSA for firms above a few dozen people
Standout against Kantata. The $2 Light Member seat makes it cheap to give every freelancer a timesheet.
What actually breaks when you switch
Expect the pain in three places. First, the data: ask Kantata for a full export of projects, timesheets, rate cards and invoices early, in a format your finance team can read, and decide which of it is imported and which is archived.
A firm that imports everything usually spends longer cleaning than it saved by switching. Second, the integrations. Kantata states more than 1,200 connectors and a Salesforce edition, so list every system that reads or writes to it before you pick a successor, and check each against the new tool's API and the accounting packages it names.
Third, people and contracts. Project managers who built their reports in Kantata have to rebuild them, and utilisation figures will differ for a quarter because definitions differ.
Check your current contract for term length, notice period and what happens to your data after the end date, because the pricing page offers no public terms to read. Plan a parallel run of one billing cycle: invoices from the old and the new system should match to the cent before you switch off the old one.
Is Kantata's EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework certification enough for a European firm?
It is a legal basis for transfers, and for many firms that is all a data protection officer needs on paper. Kantata's privacy policy lists the framework, names an arbitration provider (JAMS) and says the company is subject to the enforcement powers of the US Federal Trade Commission. A framework like that can be reviewed or invalidated, as its predecessors were, and the contract stays under US terms.
What the framework does not change is the location. The policy says the servers are in the United States. If your clients ask for EU hosting in their own supplier questionnaires, a PSA that states Danish servers (TimeLog) or a chosen AWS region such as Frankfurt or Stockholm (Scoro) answers the question without an annex.
Can a European tool really replace Kantata for a larger firm?
For a firm of fifty to a few hundred people, yes in several cases. Scoro, TimeLog, Visma Severa and Projektron BCS all cover time, projects, resourcing and invoicing, and Projektron adds ERP functions. The vendors say that Scoro supports multiple entities and currencies and that TimeLog has a Multiple Legal Entities module, which is what a cross-border firm needs.
For a global consultancy with AI-driven staffing across thousands of people, Kantata is stronger, and none of the European vendors on this page claim to match its forecasting layer. If that is your situation, the honest result of this comparison may be a longer pilot with one of the larger European tools rather than a switch in one quarter.
Which one to pick
If you want the nearest functional match, shortlist Scoro, TimeLog and Visma Severa and put the same five projects through each trial. Scoro suits a firm that wants to buy apps one at a time, TimeLog suits one led by its controller, and Visma Severa suits one that sells through a CRM and already uses Nordic accounting software. Projektron BCS belongs on the list if on-premise operation or ERP depth is a requirement.
If you used only a slice of Kantata, buy only that slice. MOCO, awork, Teamwork.com and Teamleader cover small-agency work at much lower cost, Timewax, Resource Guru and Teamdeck cover scheduling only, and each leaves invoicing to your accounting package. If your firm leans on AI staffing at the scale Kantata targets, keep Kantata for now and ask for written hosting and data terms instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
For a full PSA with quotes, projects, resourcing and invoices, look first at Scoro (Estonia), TimeLog (Denmark) and Visma Severa (Finland). Projektron BCS (Germany) goes into ERP territory and can be run on-premise. MOCO, awork, Teamwork.com and Teamleader suit smaller agencies, and Timewax, Resource Guru and Teamdeck cover resource planning only. All eleven are run by companies in the EU, the UK or Switzerland.
No. The pricing page on kantata.com is a form, and the page says plans are tailored to company size, goals and the way the team works, with a PSA advisor following up. Of the European tools here, Scoro, TimeLog, Visma Severa and Projektron BCS publish per-user or per-licence prices, while Timewax quotes per scheduled FTE on request.
Kantata's privacy policy says the services and systems for its site are housed on servers in the United States and that the information it collects is processed and stored there. It relies on the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework for transfers. The policy does not offer a European region on the pages checked, so ask for one in writing if you need it.
Only if you want the replacement to own the sales side as well. Scoro, Visma Severa and Teamleader include a CRM and quotes. Projektron BCS has a CRM module. TimeLog, Timewax, Resource Guru and Teamdeck do not set out a CRM on the pages checked, so a firm that keeps Salesforce usually keeps it and connects the PSA by API.
Among published prices, Teamdeck starts at $2 for a Light Member and $6 for a Full Member per month, Resource Guru at $5, awork at €5 per user per month on annual billing and Teamwork.com is free for up to five users. Those are scheduling or project tools. Of the full PSAs, TimeLog starts at €14 and Scoro at €15 per user per month, Scoro with a five-user minimum.
Related comparisons
About the author
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.