Best European Alternatives to Monday.com
Looking for a European alternative to Monday.com? Monday.com is a powerful work management platform, but it's based in Israel with US operations and processes your data on servers outside the EU. For businesses and teams who value privacy, GDPR compliance, and data sovereignty, European project management alternatives offer compelling options.
We've curated the best privacy-focused project management tools built in Europe. These alternatives provide powerful work management capabilities while keeping your data protected under European law.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
Why Choose a European Alternative to Monday.com?
GDPR Protection
Your project data stays in Europe, protected by the world's strongest privacy laws.
EU Data Centers
Data processed and stored exclusively within the European Union.
End-to-End Encryption
Many European tools offer client-side encryption for sensitive project data.
Open Source Options
Self-host your project management for complete data control.
Best European Alternatives to Monday.com
We've curated the best privacy-focused project management tools from European companies. Each alternative has been evaluated for features, privacy, and GDPR compliance.
Stackfield
Secure project management with end-to-end encryption from Germany
OpenProject
Open-source project management with enterprise features from Germany
Teamleader
All-in-one work management, CRM, and invoicing from Belgium
Zenkit
Flexible project management with multiple views from Germany
MeisterTask
Intuitive task management and mind mapping from Austria
awork
Project management from Hamburg with tracking built in
Teamwork.com
A European alternative to Asana, monday.com, Basecamp
Key takeaways
- monday.com is Israeli, not American, so the CLOUD Act does not apply and Israel holds an EU adequacy decision reconfirmed on 15 January 2024.
- Adequacy can be reviewed and withdrawn, which is the real argument for an EU-established provider rather than an adequate one.
- The free plan stops at two seats, and the useful features sit on the €12 and €19 tiers.
- Stackfield is the only tool here that encrypts content end to end, which monday.com does not.
- Teamleader replaces the customer-facing half of a Work OS; nothing here replaces all four products at once.
Why people leave monday.com
Start with what is not wrong. monday.com Ltd. is an Israeli company, not an American one, so the CLOUD Act does not reach it, and Israel holds an EU adequacy decision that the Commission reconfirmed on 15 January 2024. Transfers from the EU work on the same footing as transfers inside it. If someone told you that using monday.com is a GDPR problem, they were repeating a rule that does not apply here.
The reason to look anyway is that adequacy is a decision rather than a fact. It is granted, reviewed and occasionally withdrawn: the Commission has struck down two successive arrangements for the United States, and civil society organisations including EDRi and Access Now asked it in June 2025 to reassess Israel's. Nothing has changed as of today. The point is that something could, and your processing would change with it.
The second reason has nothing to do with law. monday.com prices from €9 per seat per month on Basic and €19 on Pro, with a free plan that stops at two people, and the capable tiers are where the automations and integrations live. Against European tools starting around €5 to €6.50, the bill is the argument.
- Adequacy is a decision, not a property An adequacy decision says the Commission currently considers a country's protection equivalent. It can be reviewed, and it has been revoked before for another country twice over. An EU-established provider does not depend on one: intra-EEA processing needs no transfer mechanism at all, so there is nothing that can be taken away. For an organisation whose procurement rules distinguish establishment from adequacy, that difference is the whole reason to move.
- The free plan is two people monday.com's free tier stops at two seats, which makes it a trial rather than a plan. Several tools here have free tiers you can actually run a team on, and two are free to self-host without any seat limit. For a small organisation that is not a detail, it is the difference between a budget line and none.
- The capable version is the expensive version Basic is €9 per seat per month billed annually, Standard €12 and Pro €19. Automations and integrations are metered by tier, so the features that make a Work OS worth having sit on the plans that cost the most. Teams frequently discover this after building a process on top of them.
- Broad is not the same as deep monday.com sells itself as a Work OS: projects, CRM, service and development in one place. That breadth is genuinely useful for a company that wants one supplier, and it is why a team using two of those four is paying for a platform where a tool would do. If your monday.com is boards and a couple of automations, most of what you are buying is unused.
What you have to replace, not just match
Sort out which promise you are replacing before comparing anything, because monday.com makes two.
The first is the board: work items, columns, owners, statuses and the automations that move them. Every tool on this page does that, and the choice comes down to hosting, price and how much structure you want.
The second is the Work OS promise: the same platform for projects, customers and support. That is the harder one, and the honest answer on this page is that Teamleader replaces the customer-facing half rather than the whole thing. Pairing two focused European tools is usually the realistic route, and it is worth pricing both before deciding the platform was a bad idea.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Stackfield | Munich, Germany | From €4.99 per user per month | EU (Germany) |
| #2 | OpenProject | Berlin, Germany | Free Community Edition / Cloud from about €5.95/user/month | EU (Germany) |
| #3 | Teamleader | Ghent, Belgium | From about €50/month (Focus) / €66/month (Orbit) | EU (Belgium) |
| #4 | Zenkit | Karlsruhe, Germany | Free plan / from about €9/user/month | EU (Germany) |
| #5 | MeisterTask | Munich area, Germany | Free tier / from about €6.50/user/month | EU (Germany) |
| #6 | awork | Hamburg, Germany | From €5/user/month billed annually (€8 monthly), Standard €12, Professional €22 | EU (Germany) |
| #7 | Teamwork.com | Cork, Ireland | Free up to 5 users / $9.99/user/month (Basics) / $24.99 (Accelerate), billed yearly | EU (Ireland) |
| #8 | factro | Bochum, Germany | Free for up to 10 users / from about €7.99/user/month | EU (Germany) |
How each alternative compares to monday.com
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Germany (EU).
- Source code. Closed source, as monday.com is.
- Independently checked. GDPR, end-to-end encryption.
Best for: Teams whose objection is that any supplier can read their project data
Stackfield is built by Stackfield GmbH in Munich, hosted in Germany, and it is the only tool on this page that encrypts content end to end with AES-256. Messages, tasks and files are unreadable to the company running the service.
Against monday.com that is the sharpest difference available. monday.com encrypts in transit and at rest and holds the keys, which is normal and also means the provider can read what you store. Whether that matters depends entirely on what is in your boards.
It is also the cheapest entry here, from €4.99 per user per month, and it combines chat with tasks rather than assuming you also pay for Slack. What it is not is a Work OS: no CRM, no service desk, and a smaller integration catalogue.
What Stackfield does better than monday.com
- End-to-end AES-256 encryption, so the provider cannot read tasks, messages or files, which monday.com by design can
- German company and German hosting, so processing is intra-EEA with no adequacy decision in play
- From €4.99 per user per month against monday.com's €9 entry tier
- Chat and tasks in one product, so the team messaging bill does not sit beside it
Where Stackfield is a step down from monday.com
- Not a Work OS: no CRM, no service desk, no development product beside it
- End-to-end encryption limits search across content and makes integrations harder
- A far smaller integration catalogue than monday.com
- Less polished than monday.com, which affects whether people open it
Standout against monday.com. It is the only tool on this page that removes the provider from the trust equation rather than moving it to a friendlier country.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Germany (EU) or self-hosted.
- Source code. Open source, where monday.com is not: you can read what it does rather than take the description on trust.
Best for: Organisations running projects rather than task lists
OpenProject is AGPL-licensed software from OpenProject GmbH in Berlin, free to self-host and available as a cloud from Germany from about €5.95 per user per month. It is the most capable project tool here and the only one you can run entirely on your own infrastructure.
Against monday.com the difference is depth in one direction rather than breadth in four. Work packages, Gantt charts, baselines, budgets and cost tracking are native, and there is a permissions model built for organisations rather than teams.
What it does not have is monday.com's polish or its integration catalogue, and setup is a project rather than an afternoon. If your monday.com is a friendly board that people enjoy using, this will feel like a different category of software, because it is.
What OpenProject does better than monday.com
- Gantt charts, baselines, budgets and cost tracking built in, where monday.com approximates them
- Self-hostable under AGPL with no seat limit, so the data need never leave your network
- German company and German hosting, so nothing rests on an adequacy decision
- From about €5.95 per user per month on the cloud, against €9 for monday.com Basic
- A permissions model designed for an organisation rather than a workspace
Where OpenProject is a step down from monday.com
- Much heavier than monday.com, and adoption is the usual reason migrations like this fail
- No CRM or service product, so half a Work OS has to be replaced elsewhere
- Setup and administration are real work, especially self-hosted
- The interface is competent rather than enjoyable
Standout against monday.com. It is the only tool here that can run entirely inside your own network, which ends every question about jurisdiction rather than answering it.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Belgium). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. EU.
- Source code. Closed source, as monday.com is.
Best for: Teams whose monday.com is quotes, follow-ups and invoices
Teamleader NV is Belgian, EU-hosted, and built around the sequence that runs a small business: a lead becomes a quote, a quote becomes a project, a project becomes an invoice, and time gets tracked against it. Plans start from about €50 per month.
Against monday.com it is a narrower product aimed at the half that monday CRM approximates with boards. If your workspace is mostly customers and money, this is a better fit than any board tool here, because the objects are quotes and invoices rather than cards you have agreed to call quotes.
If your monday.com is production planning or a content calendar, this is the wrong tool on this page and one of the project tools above it is the answer.
What Teamleader does better than monday.com
- Quotes, invoices and time tracking as real objects rather than boards renamed after them
- Belgian company with EU hosting, so processing is intra-EEA
- One system from lead to invoice, where monday.com needs the CRM product alongside work management
- Priced per company rather than escalating with every seat added to a workspace
Where Teamleader is a step down from monday.com
- Not a project board: the delivery side is thinner than monday.com's
- No end-to-end encryption and no self-hosting
- Aimed at small and mid-sized businesses, so a large organisation will find the governance light
- A narrower integration catalogue than monday.com
Standout against monday.com. It is the only tool here where an invoice is a first-class object. For a monday.com workspace that is really an order book, that is the difference between a tool and a workaround.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Germany (EU).
- Source code. Closed source, as monday.com is.
- Independently checked. GDPR.
Best for: Teams that chose monday.com because everyone could see the work their own way
Zenkit comes from Axonic Informationssysteme GmbH in Karlsruhe and is hosted in Germany. Its premise is close to the part of monday.com people actually like: the same records shown as a board, a table, a calendar, a mind map or a hierarchy, with each person picking a view.
It is smaller than monday.com, and deliberately so. There is no CRM product beside it and no service desk, but there is also no platform to buy when what you needed was flexible tables.
The free plan is real rather than a trial, which against monday.com's two-seat limit is the difference between trying it and running on it.
What Zenkit does better than monday.com
- German company and German hosting, so nothing depends on an adequacy decision being renewed
- A free plan you can run a team on, where monday.com stops at two seats
- The same records as a board, table, calendar, mind map or hierarchy without a tier upgrade
- Part of a suite, so notes and databases sit beside the projects rather than in a second subscription
Where Zenkit is a step down from monday.com
- No CRM or service product, so a full Work OS is not replaced by this alone
- No self-hosting and no end-to-end encryption
- Fewer integrations than monday.com by a wide margin
- Less polished, which matters for the teams that chose monday.com for exactly that
Standout against monday.com. It gives you monday.com's best idea, many views over one set of records, without the platform underneath it or the seat price attached to it.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Germany (Frankfurt).
- Source code. Closed source, as monday.com is.
- Independently checked. ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA.
Best for: Teams who want the simplest possible board, hosted in Frankfurt
MeisterTask is built by MeisterLabs GmbH near Munich, hosted in Frankfurt, and holds ISO 27001 alongside GDPR and CCPA compliance. It is the simplest tool on this page and the only one with an externally audited security certification.
Against monday.com it deliberately does less. There is no CRM, no service desk and no Work OS pitch: a board, automations for stage transitions, time tracking, and an interface people use without a rollout plan.
It ranks last here not because it is weak but because a team leaving monday.com is usually leaving for something specific, encryption, depth, customers or cost, and MeisterTask answers only the last one. If what you want is less software rather than different software, it is the right answer.
What MeisterTask does better than monday.com
- ISO 27001 certified with external audit, which nothing else on this page holds
- Hosted in Frankfurt by a German company, so processing is intra-EEA
- From about €6.50 per user per month against monday.com's €9 entry
- Adoption is close to free: a monday.com user needs no training to use it
Where MeisterTask is a step down from monday.com
- Far less capable than monday.com: no CRM, no service desk, no dashboards worth the name
- The free tier caps at three members per project
- No self-hosting and no end-to-end encryption
- Reporting across projects is thin
Standout against monday.com. It is the only board on this page with an externally audited ISO 27001 certificate and a named German data centre behind it.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Germany, on Microsoft infrastructure.
- Source code. Closed source, as monday.com is.
- Independently checked. ISO 27001.
Best for: Agencies deciding whether they can take the next job
awork is built by awork GmbH in Hamburg and hosted on ISO 27001 certified Microsoft servers in Germany. It is projects with phases, time tracked against them, and a workload view showing who is over-committed before the week starts.
Against monday.com it trades breadth for one thing done properly. monday.com will let you build a capacity board out of columns and formulas, and somebody will maintain it. awork ships capacity as a feature, because that is the question agencies get wrong most expensively.
One precise note on hosting, since this page is partly about jurisdiction. The company is German and the servers are in Germany, but the infrastructure provider is Microsoft. For most buyers that is fine; for anyone whose procurement rules reach the subprocessor, check it before you sign.
What awork does better than monday.com
- A real workload view across people, where monday.com asks you to build one
- Time tracking included rather than a separate app or integration
- German company with German servers and ISO 27001 certification
- From EUR 5 per user per month on annual billing, against monday.com's EUR 9 entry tier
Where awork is a step down from monday.com
- Runs on Microsoft infrastructure, so a US provider sits under a German company
- No CRM or service product, so half a Work OS is not replaced
- No free plan at all, only a trial, where monday.com gives you two seats
- A smaller integration catalogue
Standout against monday.com. Capacity is a feature rather than a spreadsheet you maintain, which is the report monday.com customers are usually building by hand.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Ireland). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. AWS, in both US and EU regions.
- Source code. Closed source, as monday.com is.
- Independently checked. ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2.
Best for: Client services teams billing for what they track
Teamwork Crew Limited has run from Cork since 2007, which makes it the most established European alternative to monday.com by a wide margin, and it holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2.
What it has that monday.com does not is the commercial half as native objects: billable time, retainers, budgets and invoicing sitting beside the tasks. A monday.com board can be shaped into that with columns and automations, and then someone reconciles it against the accounting package every month anyway.
The honest caveat is infrastructure. Teamwork states its servers are with AWS in both US and EU regions. The company is Irish and outside the CLOUD Act; the hosting provider is not, so the chain has an American link in it.
What Teamwork.com does better than monday.com
- Billable time, retainers and invoicing as first-class objects rather than board columns
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2, a stronger audit position than monday.com puts in front of you
- Irish company, so the contracting party sits inside the EU
- A free plan for five users, where monday.com stops at two
- Eighteen years of product, so the edges are worn smooth
Where Teamwork.com is a step down from monday.com
- Hosted on AWS across US and EU regions, so a US provider is in the chain
- The interface carries its history and feels denser than monday.com
- Aimed at client work, so an internal team uses maybe half of it
- Fewer integrations than monday.com
Standout against monday.com. It is the only tool here where an invoice is an object rather than a column named after one, which is the half of agency work monday.com never modelled.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). monday.com is operated from Israel, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Germany (exclusively).
- Source code. Closed source, as monday.com is.
- Independently checked. GDPR.
Best for: German-speaking organisations that must name a single jurisdiction
factro is built by Schuchert Managementberatung in Bochum and hosted exclusively in Germany. Free up to ten users, then about EUR 7.99 per user per month.
Against monday.com the argument is not features, it is the answer to one procurement question. monday.com is Israeli with an adequacy decision, which is fine and rests on a Commission decision that gets reviewed. factro is a German company on German servers, so the question does not arise.
It is also a different shape: a work breakdown structure with phases and responsibilities rather than boards and automations. Teams that liked monday.com for the flexibility will find it stricter.
What factro does better than monday.com
- Company, servers, support and law all in Germany, with nothing resting on an adequacy decision
- Free for up to ten users, where monday.com's free tier is two
- A project tree with real phases, which monday.com approximates with groups
- Cheaper per seat than monday.com at every comparable tier
Where factro is a step down from monday.com
- Far less flexible than monday.com: no Work OS, no CRM, no custom app building
- Strongest in German-speaking markets
- A modest integration catalogue
- No self-hosting
Standout against monday.com. It is the only entry here whose company, servers and support sit in one country, which turns a jurisdiction discussion into a single sentence.
What actually breaks when you switch
Automations are the work. monday.com exports boards to Excel and CSV and every tool here imports CSV, so items, statuses, owners and dates arrive in an hour. Automation recipes, connected apps and dashboard widgets do not export at all, and on a mature account they are most of what you built.
The second problem is that monday.com is often two systems. Work management and CRM sitting in one place means a migration has to land in two, and the schedule usually assumes one. Decide early whether you are pairing Teamleader with a project tool or accepting a thinner customer side.
And weigh adoption honestly. monday.com is more polished than anything on this page, and people notice. A tool that is cheaper and more private but gets opened half as often has not solved the problem you were solving.
Is monday.com actually a GDPR problem?
No, and it is worth being precise, because the opposite is widely assumed. monday.com Ltd. is established in Israel, which has held an EU adequacy decision since 2011, reconfirmed by the Commission on 15 January 2024. Personal data can move from the EU to an adequate country without additional safeguards.
It is also not subject to the US CLOUD Act, which is the mechanism behind most of the arguments on this site. An Israeli company has no obligation under American law.
What remains is a question about durability rather than compliance. Adequacy is a Commission decision, subject to periodic review, and in June 2025 a group of civil society organisations asked for Israel's to be reassessed. Whether that is a risk you carry depends on how long your processing arrangements need to outlive a political decision.
So why would I move at all?
Three reasons, in the order that usually decides it. Cost, because €9 to €19 per seat per month against €4.99 to €9 adds up across a department. Structure, because a Work OS is a lot of platform for a team that uses boards and two automations.
And establishment over adequacy, if your procurement rules make that distinction. An EU-established provider processes inside the EEA with no transfer mechanism in play, and nothing about that can be revoked.
If none of those three describes you, staying on monday.com is a defensible decision and this page is not trying to talk you out of it.
What replaces the CRM side of monday.com?
Teamleader, and it is the reason it sits third on this page rather than lower. It is Belgian, EU-hosted, and built around the work that follows a customer: quotes, invoices, projects and time, in one system.
It is not a board tool with a CRM bolted on, which is what monday CRM is. That means the fit is better if your monday.com is mostly quotes and follow-ups, and worse if it is mostly production planning.
For teams using both halves, pairing Teamleader with one of the project tools here costs less than monday Pro per seat and gives you two products that were each designed for their job.
Does anything here encrypt content the way monday.com does not?
Stackfield does, and it is the single feature that separates it from everything else on this page. Content is encrypted end to end with AES-256, so the provider cannot read messages, tasks or files. monday.com encrypts in transit and at rest, and holds the keys.
The cost of that is the same cost every end-to-end encrypted tool pays: server-side search across content is limited, and integrations that need to read your data are harder or absent.
For a team whose objection is "our supplier can read our project data", that is the answer on this page. For a team that just wants a cheaper board, it is an unnecessary trade.
Which one to pick
If your reason for leaving is that a supplier can read your project data, Stackfield is the only answer here and the encryption is worth the search limitations.
If it is that your work has budgets, phases and a reporting line, OpenProject is the serious choice, and self-hosting it removes the jurisdiction question entirely rather than relocating it.
If your monday.com is really customers, quotes and invoices, Teamleader replaces it better than any board tool can, and pairing it with one of the project tools above costs less per seat than monday Pro.
And if you like monday.com, use two of its four products, and your procurement rules accept adequacy, there is no urgent reason to move. The honest reading of Israel's status is that it is valid today and rests on a decision that can be reviewed, which is a risk to weigh rather than a rule you are breaking.
Frequently Asked Questions
Stackfield if you want the provider unable to read your content. OpenProject if you need real project management with Gantt charts and budgets, or want to self-host. Teamleader if your monday.com is mostly customers, quotes and invoices. Zenkit if the appeal was the many views over the same data. MeisterTask if you want the simplest board your team will actually open.
No. monday.com Ltd. is an Israeli company headquartered in Tel Aviv. That matters for this site, because the CLOUD Act applies to US corporations and not to Israeli ones. Israel also holds an EU adequacy decision, reconfirmed on 15 January 2024, so transfers from the EU do not need additional safeguards.
One, and it is about durability rather than today's compliance. Adequacy is a Commission decision that gets reviewed and can be withdrawn; it happened twice to arrangements covering the United States, and in June 2025 civil society organisations asked the Commission to reassess Israel's. An EU-established provider does not rely on such a decision at all, because processing inside the EEA needs no transfer mechanism.
Generally yes. monday.com starts at €9 per seat per month on Basic and reaches €19 on Pro, billed annually. Stackfield starts from €4.99 per user per month, OpenProject's cloud from about €5.95, MeisterTask from about €6.50, Zenkit from about €9. OpenProject and Taiga can also be self-hosted for free, where the cost is an administrator instead.
The items yes, the automations no. monday.com exports boards to Excel and CSV, and every tool here imports CSV, so items, statuses, owners and dates arrive intact. Automation recipes, integrations and dashboard widgets have to be rebuilt, and on a heavily automated account that is most of the work.
Not in one product, and anyone claiming otherwise is overselling. monday.com sells work management, CRM, service and development as one platform. The realistic European route is two focused tools, typically Teamleader for the customer side and one of the project tools here for delivery, which together usually cost less than monday Pro per seat.
Two things honestly. The interface is more polished than anything on this page, and that matters for adoption more than feature lists suggest. And the integration catalogue is far larger, so a connection to a tool you already run may exist there and nowhere else. Check that list before you commit.
OpenProject, fully: it is AGPL-licensed with a free Community Edition and no seat limit. The others here are cloud products hosted in the EU, mostly in Germany. Self-hosting removes the provider from the question entirely, at the price of someone owning the server, the upgrades and the backups.
A single team with a few boards is an afternoon. An account with dozens of boards, automation recipes and connected apps takes weeks, and almost all of that is rebuilding automations and reconnecting other systems. The boards themselves export and import in an hour.
Who worked on this review
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.