European Alternatives to AgencyAnalytics
Looking for a European alternative to AgencyAnalytics? The service is operated by My SEO Tool Inc under the laws of Ontario and Canada, and its privacy policy states that users outside Canada and the USA have their data transferred to and processed in Canada and the USA. Pricing is USD 20 per client per month billed annually, so the bill grows with every client you add.
These European tools cover agency client reports, marketing data connectors for Looker Studio and BI, and SEO reporting, and each one is contracted through a company in the EU, the UK or Switzerland.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
10 European Alternatives to AgencyAnalytics
Whatagraph
Agency reporting with cross-channel data layer and AI agents
Supermetrics
Marketing data connectors into Sheets, Looker Studio and BI
Swydo
Agency reports priced by data source, with unlimited clients
Funnel
Stockholm marketing data hub with a choice of EU data region
Adverity
Vienna marketing data integration for enterprise teams
Windsor.ai
Swiss connectors that feed Looker Studio, Power BI and warehouses
Dataslayer
Madrid marketing connectors for Sheets, Looker Studio and BI
AccuRanker
Danish rank tracker with scheduled SEO client reports
Piwik PRO
Polish analytics suite with tag manager and consent manager
Ruler Analytics
UK marketing attribution tying leads and revenue to channels
Key takeaways
- AgencyAnalytics is operated by My SEO Tool Inc, and its terms are governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and of Canada.
- Its privacy policy says users outside Canada or the USA have their data transferred to Canada and the USA and processed there.
- AgencyAnalytics charges USD 20 per client per month on annual billing, so thirty clients cost USD 600 a month before any add-on.
- Whatagraph (Netherlands) and Swydo (Netherlands) are the two tools on this page that deliver finished white-label client reports from a European contracting entity.
- Supermetrics (Finland), Windsor.ai (Switzerland) and Dataslayer (Spain) move the data into Looker Studio or Sheets, and you build the client report there.
Why people leave AgencyAnalytics
AgencyAnalytics is reporting software built for one buyer, the marketing agency. Its pricing page lists 85+ integrations, unlimited dashboards and reports, unlimited staff accounts, a white-labeled client portal with custom domain and email, report scheduling and approvals, goal tracking, anomaly alerts and an AI assistant called AgencyAI.
The company calls itself a 16-year specialist, and says more than 7,000 agencies run client reporting on it. Those are vendor claims, but the feature list is concrete enough to explain why it is the product other tools get measured against.
The service is owned and operated by My SEO Tool Inc, and its terms are governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and of Canada.
The privacy policy says that a user located outside Canada or the USA has data transferred to Canada and the USA and processed there. Canada is not a US jurisdiction, so the argument for looking elsewhere is not about American surveillance law. It is that an agency reporting on European clients signs a Canadian contract and accepts processing in North America.
That is a position some agencies are happy with and others cannot hold in front of a client. Public-sector clients, healthcare brands and companies with a data protection officer who reads processor lists tend to ask where the ad-account tokens and the performance data sit. Below we look at which European tools answer that question, and at what you give up, because the all-in-one package is hard to rebuild from parts.
- The contract is Canadian and processing is in North America Terms under Ontario law and a privacy policy that moves non-North-American users' data to Canada and the USA mean a European agency is the exporter in every client relationship. You can document that with a data processing agreement and a transfer assessment, and many agencies do. Whatagraph, Swydo, AccuRanker and the connector vendors on this page contract through companies in the EU, the UK or Switzerland, which shortens that paperwork.
- The bill is a function of client count The price is USD 20 per client per month on annual billing, with a discount for 25 or more clients. Thirty clients is USD 600 a month, fifty is USD 1,000, and every won pitch raises the invoice. That suits an agency that adds clients slowly. It is awkward for one that reports on many small accounts, where a per-source tool such as Swydo or a flat-fee connector can cost less.
- Rank tracking and AI visibility are billed on top The core plan covers connectors and reporting. Rank Tracker (USD 41.67 a month per 500 keywords) and the AI Tracker, marked beta (USD 20.83 a month per 250 credits), are add-ons on annual billing. For an SEO-heavy agency the extras can approach the client fee. AccuRanker, a Danish rank tracker with its own scheduled reports, prices that work separately and is hosted in Germany.
- Annual billing locks in a year Monthly plans carry no commitment, but the discount sits on the annual plan, which requires a one-year commitment. The vendor offers a 30-day money-back guarantee and a 14-day trial without a card. If you suspect you will drop clients through the year, read the cancellation terms before choosing the annual rate.
What you have to replace, not just match
The first thing to replace is the stack of connectors. AgencyAnalytics lists 85+ native integrations, some of which take several accounts per client. Whatagraph lists 68 and Swydo 38+, so agencies on niche platforms should check each client's channels against those lists, not the headline number. Funnel and Adverity list 600+ connectors each and Supermetrics, Windsor.ai and Dataslayer sit between those counts, but none of them draws the report for you.
The second is the client-facing layer: the branded portal where clients log in, the custom domain, the scheduled PDF or slide-deck report, the approval step before a report goes out. Whatagraph and Swydo ship this as a product.
The connector vendors do not; you rebuild it in Looker Studio, Power BI or Sheets and handle sharing and branding yourself. The third is the add-on tooling, namely keyword ranking and the AI assistant, which map to AccuRanker for rankings and to the AI agents inside Whatagraph and Swydo.
Finally, price the whole bundle. A consolidated bill from one vendor often turns into three small bills: connectors, a dashboard tool and a rank tracker. The total can still be lower, particularly for agencies that already pay for Looker Studio's free tier and BI licences, but it is worth writing out client by client before committing to a migration.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Whatagraph | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Max from EUR 999/month billed annually; Prime on request | EU (Netherlands) |
| #2 | Supermetrics | Helsinki, Finland | Starter EUR 39/month billed yearly (EUR 49 monthly); Growth EUR 159 yearly (EUR 199 monthly); Enterprise on request | EU (Finland) |
| #3 | Swydo | Hilversum, Netherlands | EUR 69/month (EUR 62 billed annually) including 10 data sources, then EUR 4.50 per extra source | EU (Netherlands) |
| #4 | Funnel | Stockholm, Sweden | Starter from EUR 280/month billed annually; Business from EUR 560/month billed annually; Enterprise custom | EU (Sweden) |
| #5 | Adverity | Vienna, Austria | No public price list; fully customised quote | EU (Austria) |
| #6 | Windsor.ai | Zurich, Switzerland | Free plan; Basic USD 19/month, Standard USD 99, Plus USD 249, Professional USD 499 (billed annually) | Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #7 | Dataslayer | Madrid, Spain | Starter EUR 29/month annually, Advanced EUR 99, Pro EUR 299 (per pricing FAQ); Business custom | EU (Spain) |
| #8 | AccuRanker | Aarhus, Denmark | Professional USD 224/month (2,000 keywords); Expert USD 764/month (10,000 keywords); Enterprise on request | EU (Denmark) |
| #9 | Piwik PRO | Wroclaw, Poland | Free core plan / paid plans on request | EU (Poland) |
| #10 | Ruler Analytics | Liverpool, United Kingdom | Small up to 10k visits: EUR 344/month (EUR 309 billed annually); Medium up to 50k visits: EUR 575/month (EUR 517 annually); larger tiers listed | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
How each alternative compares to AgencyAnalytics
- Which law reaches it. EU (Netherlands). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Processed in the European Union (Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services).
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: Agencies with enough clients to justify a flat plan and a shared data layer
Whatagraph is the one tool here that matches AgencyAnalytics on the report itself: white-label branding, scheduled PDF emails, KPI overviews with alerts and unlimited users and reports. Where AgencyAnalytics wires each widget to a client's accounts, Whatagraph keeps pre-synced data in its own storage and lets you set metric, blend and currency rules once, so a changed definition flows into every report that uses it.
The contracting party is Whatagraph B.V. in Amsterdam under Dutch law, with processing in the EU on Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services. The cost is the sticking point: the pricing page shows Max from EUR 999 a month billed annually, and the API and custom domain need the quoted Prime plan.
What Whatagraph does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Contract under Dutch law with EU processing
- Cross-channel blends and custom metrics defined once
- Unlimited users and reports without per-client billing
- Agents that draft reports and write commentary
Where Whatagraph is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- A high flat entry price for small agencies
- Fewer integrations than the 85+ listed by AgencyAnalytics
- API and custom domain only on Prime
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. Its shared data layer means one metric definition updates every client report that uses it.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Finland). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Cloud processing on Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services; data residency control on Enterprise.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: Analysts who control the dashboard themselves and need reliable data refreshes
Supermetrics does not replace AgencyAnalytics screen for screen. It replaces the connection layer: sources go in, and Sheets, Excel, Looker Studio or Power BI come out. For an agency that already shows clients a Looker Studio report, it removes the per-client fee and keeps the design in your hands. Its security page says loaded data is not permanently stored unless you use storage features.
The privacy policy names Supermetrics Group in Helsinki, and the terms use Finnish law, but the terms refer to the entity on the order form, so confirm which company you sign with. Starter at EUR 39 a month is low, yet allows only two data sources, so agencies reach Growth at EUR 159 quickly.
What Supermetrics does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Flat plans that do not grow with client count
- Freedom to design the report in any BI tool
- No permanent storage of loaded data by default
- Destinations including Power BI and Excel
Where Supermetrics is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- No client portal or white-label report of its own
- Source limits on Starter and Growth
- Region control only on Enterprise
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It treats data delivery as the product and leaves the dashboard to the tool you already own.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Netherlands). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: Agencies with many small clients on Google, Meta and a few other mainstream platforms
Swydo turns the AgencyAnalytics pricing logic upside down. You pay per connected data source, not per client, so ten clients each on Google Ads and Meta Ads count as 20 sources. Unlimited clients, users, dashboards and reports are included, together with full white-labeling and a custom domain. Templates for Google Ads, GA4 and Meta Ads, goal tracking and data source health checks cover the weekly routine.
Swydo B.V. in Hilversum is the named party, and the terms refer to Dutch law. The catch is breadth: 38+ integrations is under half of what AgencyAnalytics lists, and the pages we checked do not state where data is hosted, so ask before you rely on a particular region.
What Swydo does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Price predictability for agencies with many clients
- No per-client charge at all
- Data source health checks that flag broken connections
- Dutch contracting entity
Where Swydo is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- Fewer integrations than AgencyAnalytics
- Cost rises with channels per client
- Hosting location not stated on the pages we read
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It bills by connected source, so a client with two channels costs less than one with eight.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Sweden). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Customer choice of EU, US or global data region.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: In-house teams or large agencies running many channels across markets
Funnel is a step up in scale from what AgencyAnalytics does. It collects advertising and analytics data, applies business rules in a semantic layer and sends the result to dashboards, Power BI, Tableau or a warehouse. The Starter plan lists 117 connectors and 13 destinations, Business 579 connectors and 46 destinations, and customers can choose an EU, US or global data region.
Funnel AB in Stockholm contracts under Swedish law with European customers, while customers in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand contract with Funnel, Inc. in Boston. It does not produce white-label client decks, and Starter at EUR 280 a month is already above Supermetrics or Dataslayer, so it fits teams with a data analyst rather than a reporting assistant.
What Funnel does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Connector count far above 85+
- Choice of EU data region
- ISO 27001 stated by the vendor
- Warehouse and BI destinations on higher plans
Where Funnel is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- No client portal or white-label reports
- Higher entry price than most connector tools
- Needs a BI layer on top for client-facing output
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It states that customers choose their data region within the EU, the US or globally.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Austria). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: Holding-company agencies and brand marketing departments with governed pipelines
Adverity sits at the far end from AgencyAnalytics. Connect handles extraction, harmonisation and monitoring; Atlas is the vendor's layer for AI use. The homepage claims 600+ maintained connectors, and it describes absorbing platform schema changes before they reach customer data. Security pages list ISO 27001 and a SOC 2 Type 2 report.
The Impressum names Adverity GmbH in Vienna, registered at the Commercial Court of Vienna. There is no public price list and no self-service trial on the pages we read, only a demo request, so a small agency cannot evaluate it quickly. It is also a data layer, not a tool for building a client-facing report.
What Adverity does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Pipeline monitoring and data harmonisation
- Scale across brands and markets
- Austrian entity with public register details
Where Adverity is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- No published pricing
- Not a client report builder
- Slower to start than a self-service trial
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It is built around monitoring pipelines continuously, where AgencyAnalytics lists alerts and anomaly detection on metrics.
- Which law reaches it. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: Freelancers and small agencies who want a free tier and low entry cost
Windsor.ai pulls from 350+ platforms and sends the data to Looker Studio, Power BI, BigQuery, Sheets and AI chats. A free plan exists, and paid plans start at USD 19 a month billed annually, which is far below the cost of a few AgencyAnalytics clients. Every plan lists unlimited BI syncs, and Professional adds automatic adding of all accounts for agencies.
The contracting entity is Windsor Group AG under Swiss law with arbitration in Zurich, and the vendor states a SOC 2 Type II audit. Lower tiers cap data sources, prices are in US dollars, and the pages we read give no hosting location. Switzerland has an EU adequacy decision, but it is outside the EEA.
What Windsor.ai does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Free plan and USD 19 entry point
- Unlimited BI syncs on every plan
- Swiss law and Zurich arbitration
- SOC 2 Type II audit stated
Where Windsor.ai is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- No report builder or client portal
- Source caps on lower tiers
- Prices in US dollars
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It is the only connector tool here with a free plan beside its paid tiers.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Spain). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: Marketers moving ad data into Sheets and Looker Studio on a tight budget
Dataslayer connects Google Ads, GA4, Meta Ads, Shopify and similar sources to Sheets, Excel, Looker Studio and Power BI, with BigQuery, Snowflake and Redshift as enterprise destinations. Starter at EUR 29 a month billed annually (taken from its pricing FAQ) has three connectors and one user. Advanced and Pro add data blending, AI insights and MCP access for assistants.
DATASLAYER S.L. is registered in Madrid and its legal notice points to Spanish law and jurisdiction. It states ISO 27001 on the homepage. There is no white-label report layer, row limits apply to warehouse destinations, and the pricing page mixes plan cards with an FAQ, so confirm the current price before purchase.
What Dataslayer does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Low entry price compared with per-client billing
- 15-day trial without a card
- A one-click path for Supermetrics users
- Spanish entity with register details
Where Dataslayer is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- No client-facing reports
- Row limits on warehouse destinations
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It offers a one-click import of Supermetrics setups, which no other tool on this page lists.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Denmark). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Hosted in Germany (always within the EU).
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: SEO agencies whose reports revolve around keyword positions
AccuRanker covers the Rank Tracker add-on and nothing else. It tracks keywords daily, builds in-app reports with drag and drop, schedules deliveries to recipients and connects to Looker Studio, BigQuery and an API. AccuLLM follows visibility in LLM answers, which is the nearest thing to AgencyAnalytics' AI Tracker beta.
AccuRanker ApS in Aarhus is the contracting party under Danish law, and the privacy policy says the platform is hosted in the EU, currently in Germany. Pricing is in US dollars and scales with keyword volume, from USD 224 a month for 2,000 keywords. It does not report on paid media or social, so most agencies will pair it with another tool on this page.
What AccuRanker does better than AgencyAnalytics
- EU hosting stated in the privacy policy
- Dedicated tracking depth for rankings
- LLM visibility tracking in the same product
- Danish entity with registry number
Where AccuRanker is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- SEO only, no paid or social data
- Higher entry price for small keyword sets
- Looker Studio template tied to the Expert plan
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It does one job, rankings, with EU hosting stated in the privacy policy.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Poland). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. EU-only data centres, no US transfers for EU customers.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
- Independently checked. GDPR.
Best for: Agencies serving public bodies, healthcare or finance clients with strict hosting rules
Piwik PRO is on this page because AgencyAnalytics reports often draw on Google Analytics. It replaces the source, not the reporting layer: analytics, a tag manager, a customer data platform and a consent manager from Piwik PRO S.A. in Wroclaw, with EU-only data centres and no US transfers for EU customers according to its tool page.
It will not give an agency a multi-client report with branding, and it is more product than a small site needs. A free core plan exists and paid plans are quoted. Consider it for clients who are leaving Google Analytics for compliance reasons, then pair it with a reporting tool above.
What Piwik PRO does better than AgencyAnalytics
- EU-only hosting for the analytics data itself
- Consent manager and measurement from one vendor
- A free core plan to test with
Where Piwik PRO is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- Not a multi-client agency reporting tool
- Paid plans quoted rather than published
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It can remove Google Analytics from the client stack, which no reporting tool here does.
Ruler Analytics
Revenue attribution for lead-generation clients, not a replacement for dashboards
- Which law reaches it. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). AgencyAnalytics is operated from Canada, outside the EU and without an adequacy decision, so transfers rest on contractual safeguards rather than on the data staying inside the EEA.
- Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked.
- Source code. Closed source, as AgencyAnalytics is.
Best for: B2B and lead-gen agencies who must tie ad spend to CRM revenue
Ruler Analytics answers one question that AgencyAnalytics handles loosely: which channel produced the revenue. It uses first-party tracking, multi-touch attribution and CRM data, and adds offline conversions and a budget scenario planner. The reporting is ROI and ROAS views, not branded client decks.
Ruler Analytics Limited has company number 09691646 and a registered office in the Royal Liver Building, Liverpool, and its terms follow the laws of England and Wales. Plans scale with site visits, from EUR 309 a month billed annually for up to 10k visits. The UK is outside the EU, and the pages we checked state no hosting location.
What Ruler Analytics does better than AgencyAnalytics
- Multi-touch attribution tied to CRM revenue
- Offline conversions sent back to ad platforms
- Published prices in euro, pound and dollar
Where Ruler Analytics is a step down from AgencyAnalytics
- Cannot pull dozens of ad platforms for dashboards
- Price scales with site traffic
- No hosting location stated on the pages we read
Standout against AgencyAnalytics. It connects offline and CRM revenue to channels, which a client portal alone cannot show.
What actually breaks when you switch
Expect to rebuild, not import. Dashboards, report templates, goals and alerts live inside AgencyAnalytics, and none of the European tools reads them. Plan one pass per client: reconnect the accounts, recreate the template once, then clone it. Give yourself a reporting cycle with both tools running so the new numbers can be checked against the old ones, and export past reports as PDF before cancelling so clients keep their history.
Contracts and logins need as much attention as data. Annual plans require a one-year commitment, so time the move to the renewal date.
Client portals have their own URLs and branding, which means every client gets a new login link and a new custom domain setup; tell them before the first report arrives from a different address. If you move to a connector tool, decide who owns the Looker Studio file, because the report no longer lives in a platform the agency controls end to end.
Is it a problem for GDPR if an EU agency keeps using AgencyAnalytics?
Not automatically. The GDPR allows transfers to processors outside the EU when a legal basis exists, such as standard contractual clauses or an adequacy decision. Whether the vendor's terms and policy give you that basis is a question to put to the vendor in writing, because the pages we read describe the transfer to Canada and the USA but do not by themselves show the mechanism.
What a European contract changes is the starting point. With a Dutch, Swedish or Austrian processor you begin inside the EU and ask about sub-processors. With AgencyAnalytics you begin outside and ask for the safeguards. Both can pass an audit; the second takes more documents, and your client's DPO may ask for them.
At what client count does AgencyAnalytics stop being the cheaper option?
Against Whatagraph, which lists one price point from EUR 999 a month billed annually, AgencyAnalytics is cheaper below about 50 clients, if you ignore the currency difference and its add-ons. Against Swydo, the answer depends on channels per client: ten clients each on two sources is 20 sources, which is the EUR 69 plan plus ten extra sources at EUR 4.50, so EUR 114 a month.
Past 25 clients AgencyAnalytics offers volume pricing on request, so the list price is not the final comparison. Ask for that quote before deciding, then price the alternatives with your real source count, including the second Google Ads account that some clients insist on.
Which one to pick
An agency that wants the AgencyAnalytics experience from a European company should start with Swydo if its clients use mainstream channels and Whatagraph if they use many sources and the budget exists. Swydo wins on cost per client, Whatagraph on breadth of metric handling and automation. Add AccuRanker when rankings are central to the reports.
An agency that already builds in Looker Studio or Sheets should use a connector: Windsor.ai for the lowest cost, Dataslayer for a Spanish contract and an import path, Supermetrics for the Finnish contract and the widest set of destinations.
Teams with a data analyst and many markets should speak to Funnel or Adverity. Piwik PRO and Ruler Analytics solve narrower problems, namely compliant analytics and revenue attribution, and sit beside a reporting tool rather than replace it. If none of this is needed, staying on AgencyAnalytics and signing a data processing agreement is a legitimate outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions
For finished white-label client reports, Whatagraph and Swydo are the closest, both contracted through Dutch B.V. companies. Whatagraph costs from EUR 999 a month with unlimited users and reports, while Swydo starts at EUR 62 a month billed annually and charges per data source with unlimited clients. If you only need the data pipeline, Supermetrics, Windsor.ai and Dataslayer feed Looker Studio and Sheets.
Its terms name My SEO Tool Inc, governed by the laws of Ontario and Canada, so the contracting party is Canadian. The privacy policy adds that users outside Canada or the USA have data processed in both countries. The pages we read do not name a head office city, which is why this page looks at the contract and the processing location instead.
Not all of them. AgencyAnalytics lists 85+ integrations. Whatagraph lists 68 and Swydo 38+, while Funnel and Adverity list 600+ connectors each, aimed at data teams. Check the channels each client actually uses, including niche platforms and local ad networks, against the vendor's integration list before you migrate, and ask about custom connectors.
Yes. AccuRanker, a Danish tracker hosted in Germany, offers daily keyword tracking and scheduled reports, with plans from USD 224 a month for 2,000 keywords. AgencyAnalytics sells its tracker as an add-on at USD 41.67 a month per 500 keywords on annual billing, so compare on your keyword volume and on how many client reports need ranking data.
Report templates and historic dashboards do not transfer. Connect each client's accounts in the new tool, rebuild the template once, and keep a PDF export of past reports for client records. Run both tools for one reporting cycle so numbers can be compared before you cancel, remembering that annual billing locks in a full year.
Related comparisons
About the author
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.