Best European Healthcare & EHR Software

Looking for a European alternative to Epic or Oracle Health? These European healthcare and EHR vendors are built into national health infrastructure — e-prescription, certified hosting, regional records — rather than adapted to it. Led by CompuGroup Medical from Germany.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

17 European Healthcare & EHR Vendors

CompuGroup Medical

Europe's broadest healthcare software group

#1 of 17 in this category
Germany Licence plus service contract
Practice & hospital systemsTelematics infrastructurePharmacy & lab software

Dedalus

Italy's hospital software group, across European health systems

#2 of 17 in this category
Italy Enterprise licence and services
Hospital information systemsClinical & diagnostic softwareRegional health platforms

ChipSoft

The hospital system most Dutch hospitals run on

#3 of 17 in this category
Netherlands Enterprise licence and services
HiX hospital systemIntegrated patient portalDutch & Belgian hospitals

DIPS

The hospital record system most of Norway runs on

#4 of 17 in this category
Norway Public tender licensing
Hospital EHR at national scaleOpenness through openEHRNorwegian hospital deployments

Nedap Healthcare

Records for long-term, disability and home care

#5 of 17 in this category
Netherlands Per client or per user subscription
Long-term & home careCare planning & recordsDutch care billing

Cambio

Nordic electronic health record for whole regions

#6 of 17 in this category
Sweden Enterprise licence and services
COSMIC health recordRegional deploymentsClinical decision support

medatixx

Practice management for German doctors, built to German rules

#7 of 17 in this category
Germany Monthly licence per practice
German practice managementTI and KBV certifiedCloud or local install

Doctolib

Europe's healthcare booking and practice platform

#8 of 17 in this category
France Per practitioner, per month
Patient bookingPractice managementVideo consultations

Cegedim

French health-tech group whose software runs GP, specialist and paramedic practices nationwide

#9 of 17 in this category
France Per-practice licence and subscription, quoted
MonLogicielMedical.com for GPs and specialistsRM Ingénierie suite for nurses, physios, midwivesBase Claude Bernard drug database and DMP integration

Systematic

Danish company behind Columna, an EHR and care suite used across Nordic hospitals and municipalities

#10 of 17 in this category
Denmark Enterprise licence and services, quoted per deployment
Columna CIS electronic medical recordColumna Flow ward and patient-flow managementColumna Cura for municipal and home care

Agfa HealthCare

Belgian imaging-IT platform unifying radiology, cardiology and pathology in one archive

#11 of 17 in this category
Belgium Enterprise licence and services, quoted
Vendor-neutral Enterprise Imaging archiveSingle XERO universal viewer across departmentsTeleradiology and remote reading

SystmOne

UK clinical record holding 61 million patient histories across NHS primary and community care

#12 of 17 in this category
United Kingdom Supplied via NHS and care-sector framework contracts
One shared record across GP, community and mental healthUsed by 300,000+ users at 7,800+ NHS organisationsDeployed across 25+ care settings

Omda

Norwegian specialist health-software group, formerly CSAM Health, for oncology and lab systems

#13 of 17 in this category
Norway Enterprise licence and services, quoted
Cytodose oncology treatment planningLaboratory information management (LIMS)Connected imaging and health analytics

Corilus

Belgian practice-management platform for GPs, pharmacists, dentists and other clinicians

#14 of 17 in this category
Belgium Per-practice subscription by module, quoted
CareConnect modules for 8+ healthcare professionsShared records between GP, pharmacist and specialistIntegrated with Belgian eHealth services

PharmaPartners

Dutch GP and pharmacy record systems built to share one prescription workflow between the two

#15 of 17 in this category
Netherlands Per-practice subscription, quoted
Medicom for general practicePharmacom for pharmaciesBuilt on FHIR, HL7 and Dutch ZIBs

MEDIFOX DAN

German software for ambulatory, inpatient and youth care providers, hosted entirely in Germany

#16 of 17 in this category
Germany Modular licence per care organisation, quoted
MD Ambulant and MD Stationär nursing-care recordsMD Therapie for therapy practicesHosting stated as 100% within Germany

Better

Slovenian openEHR platform for building shared care records instead of buying a closed EHR

#17 of 17 in this category
Slovenia Better Studio free tier; platform licensing quoted per institution
openEHR and FHIR-based clinical data platformBetter Studio low-code environment, free tierDeployed across 30+ markets including NHS trusts

Key takeaways

  • CompuGroup Medical ranks #1 among the European healthcare vendors in this directory, because CompuGroup builds across practices, hospitals, pharmacies and laboratories and connects directly into national infrastructure such as the German Telematikinfrastruktur.
  • Health data is special category data under Article 9 of the GDPR, and member states layer national rules on top — certified health data hosting in France, telematics connectors in Germany, regional procurement in the Nordics.
  • This is one of the few software markets where European vendors still lead their home markets outright, because national billing codes, prescription infrastructure and reporting duties are the product rather than a localisation layer.
  • The right answer depends entirely on setting: ChipSoft for Dutch and Belgian hospitals, Cambio for Nordic regions, Dedalus for Italian and multi-country hospital groups, Nedap for long-term and home care, Doctolib for practice booking.
  • European health IT expands by national system rather than by seat, so a deployment in another country is a fresh implementation rather than a configuration exercise.

European healthcare and EHR software covers electronic patient records, practice and hospital systems built by companies established in Europe, connected into national health infrastructure — e-prescription, certified hosting, regional record exchange — which is something a system has to be designed into rather than integrated with afterwards.

European healthcare & EHR software compared

European healthcare & EHR software tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 CompuGroup Medical Germany Licence plus service contract Practices, hospitals and pharmacies needing connected national systems
#2 Dedalus Italy Enterprise licence and services Hospitals and regional health authorities
#3 ChipSoft Netherlands Enterprise licence and services Hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium
#4 DIPS Norway Public tender licensing Hospitals and health regions replacing a US EHR
#5 Nedap Healthcare Netherlands Per client or per user subscription Care organisations outside the hospital
#6 Cambio Sweden Enterprise licence and services Regional health authorities in the Nordics
#7 medatixx Germany Monthly licence per practice German medical practices and MVZs
#8 Doctolib France Per practitioner, per month Practices and clinics booking patients
#9 Cegedim France Per-practice licence and subscription, quoted; special terms for newly installed practitioners French GPs, specialists and paramedics needing certified national tools
#10 Systematic Denmark Enterprise licence and services, quoted per deployment Hospitals and regions running Columna across the Nordics
#11 Agfa HealthCare Belgium Enterprise licence and services, quoted Hospitals standardising imaging across radiology, cardiology and pathology
#12 SystmOne United Kingdom Supplied to NHS and care organisations via national framework contracts NHS primary, community and mental health services at national scale
#13 Omda Norway Enterprise licence and services, quoted Specialist hospital software for oncology, laboratories and imaging
#14 Corilus Belgium Per-practice subscription by module, quoted Belgian GPs, pharmacists, dentists and allied health professionals
#15 PharmaPartners Netherlands Per-practice subscription, quoted Dutch general practices and pharmacies sharing one patient record
#16 MEDIFOX DAN Germany Modular licence per care organisation, quoted German ambulatory, inpatient and youth care providers
#17 Better Slovenia Better Studio free tier; platform licensing quoted per institution Health organisations building on open, vendor-neutral clinical data

Every European healthcare & EHR software tool reviewed

#1 CompuGroup Medical

Koblenz, Germany Licence plus service contract Demo on request

Best for: Practices, hospitals and pharmacies needing connected national systems

  • Operating company. CompuGroup Medical
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth

CompuGroup Medical is a German healthcare IT group whose software runs in doctors' practices, hospitals, pharmacies, laboratories and dental surgeries across dozens of countries. It is the closest thing Europe has to a full-stack alternative to the American hospital vendors.

Its advantage is national connectedness. German healthcare runs on the Telematikinfrastruktur — the electronic patient record, e-prescription, the connectors and card readers — and CGM builds for that regime directly. A vendor that was not designed into a national health infrastructure cannot meaningfully participate in it.

CompuGroup Medical SE is headquartered in Koblenz and listed in Frankfurt, covering practice management, hospital information systems, pharmacy and laboratory software, e-prescription and telematics connectivity, plus telemedicine. It is sold as licences and service contracts through a partner network rather than as published subscriptions.

What CompuGroup Medical does well

  • Broadest coverage across care settings
  • Built into the German Telematikinfrastruktur
  • Pharmacy and laboratory software alongside clinical
  • Listed German company with scale
  • Present in dozens of national markets
  • E-prescription and telemedicine included

Where CompuGroup Medical falls short

  • Pricing opaque, sold through partners
  • Product breadth means uneven depth
  • Interface modernisation varies by product line
  • Support experience depends on the local partner

Standout feature. Software in the practice, the pharmacy and the lab, all connected to national health infrastructure.

#2 Dedalus

Florence, Italy Enterprise licence and services Demo on request

Best for: Hospitals and regional health authorities

  • Operating company. Dedalus
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Italy)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, Oracle Health, InterSystems

Dedalus is an Italian healthcare software group operating across European health systems, with clinical, diagnostic and administrative software for hospitals and the regional authorities that run them.

It works at the level European healthcare is actually organised: the region. Public health systems procure for networks of hospitals with shared records and referral pathways, and Dedalus builds for that structure rather than for the single-institution model American vendors assume.

Dedalus is headquartered in Florence and has grown by acquiring European health IT businesses, giving it a footprint across several national systems. Its range covers hospital information systems, electronic patient records, laboratory and radiology software, imaging, and regional health information exchange.

What Dedalus does well

  • Built for regional health system structures
  • Clinical, diagnostic and administrative in one group
  • Laboratory and radiology software included
  • Presence across several national systems
  • Regional health information exchange platforms

Where Dedalus falls short

  • Growth by acquisition means varied product lineage
  • Integration between acquired products varies
  • Public tender sales cycles
  • Pricing not published

Standout feature. Software procured and deployed at regional scale, the way European health systems actually buy.

#3 ChipSoft

Amsterdam, Netherlands Enterprise licence and services Demo on request

Best for: Hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium

  • Operating company. ChipSoft
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, Oracle Health

ChipSoft builds HiX, the hospital information system used by the large majority of Dutch hospitals and a growing number of Belgian ones — an integrated electronic patient record covering clinical, administrative and financial processes in one system.

Its position rests on that word integrated. HiX is one system rather than a suite of integrated products, which removes the interface layer where most clinical IT programmes lose their money and their timelines. That is the main reason Epic has made limited headway in the Dutch market.

ChipSoft is headquartered in Amsterdam and builds specifically for the Dutch and Belgian healthcare systems — their funding models, coding standards and reporting duties — with a patient portal and mobile apps alongside the clinical system.

What ChipSoft does well

  • One integrated system rather than an interfaced suite
  • Dominant installed base in Dutch hospitals
  • Built for Dutch and Belgian funding and coding
  • Patient portal and mobile apps included
  • Amsterdam-based, national market focus

Where ChipSoft falls short

  • Effectively limited to the Netherlands and Belgium
  • Large implementation programme
  • Market dominance limits competitive pressure
  • Pricing not published

Standout feature. One system rather than an interfaced suite — which is where hospital IT programmes usually fail.

#4 DIPS

Bodø, Norway Public tender licensing Demo on request

Best for: Hospitals and health regions replacing a US EHR

  • Operating company. DIPS
  • Jurisdiction. EEA, not EU (Norway)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, Cerner (Oracle Health), MEDITECH

DIPS is the electronic health record used across the majority of Norwegian hospitals — a full clinical system for specialist care rather than a practice management tool, developed in Bodø since the 1980s.

DIPS Arena is built on openEHR, which matters more than it sounds. Clinical content is modelled in open archetypes rather than in a vendor's private schema, so the record stays readable and portable — the exact property a hospital loses when a proprietary EHR becomes the only thing that can open twenty years of its own data. Documentation, orders and results, medication, referrals and surgery planning sit on top of it.

DIPS AS is based in Bodø in northern Norway — EEA rather than EU, so GDPR applies directly. For hospital records, which are special category data under Article 9, the vendor's jurisdiction is a legal constraint rather than a preference.

What DIPS does well

  • Proven at national scale across Norwegian hospitals
  • openEHR archetypes keep the record portable
  • Full specialist care scope, not a practice system
  • Integrates with national health infrastructure
  • Norwegian vendor, EEA jurisdiction and GDPR direct

Where DIPS falls short

  • Procured through public tender, not bought off a price list
  • Deployment is a multi-year programme
  • Norwegian market focus shapes the product
  • Little relevance to an outpatient practice

Standout feature. An openEHR-based record, so the hospital's own history stays readable without the vendor.

#5 Nedap Healthcare

Groenlo, Netherlands Per client or per user subscription Demo on request

Best for: Care organisations outside the hospital

  • Operating company. Nedap Healthcare
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. PointClickCare, WellSky, Netsmart

Nedap Healthcare builds electronic care records for the part of healthcare that hospital systems handle badly: long-term care, disability services, mental health and home care, where the record follows a client over years rather than an admission over days.

Long-term care has a different shape from acute care — care plans, goal-setting, shift handovers and funding streams rather than diagnoses and discharges — and Nedap builds for it directly, including the Dutch care funding and billing rules that determine whether the organisation gets paid.

Nedap is headquartered in Groenlo in the eastern Netherlands, covering client records and care planning, scheduling and time registration for care staff, mobile access for community workers, and client and family portals. Care records combine health data with details of someone's home life and dependence.

What Nedap Healthcare does well

  • Built for long-term and home care specifically
  • Care planning and goal-setting rather than episodes
  • Mobile access for community staff
  • Dutch care funding and billing built in
  • Client and family portals

Where Nedap Healthcare falls short

  • Primarily a Dutch market product
  • Not suited to acute hospital care
  • Funding model tied to Dutch regulations
  • Smaller international footprint

Standout feature. A record that follows a client for years, built around care plans rather than admissions.

#6 Cambio

Stockholm, Sweden Enterprise licence and services Demo on request

Best for: Regional health authorities in the Nordics

  • Operating company. Cambio
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Sweden)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, Oracle Health

Cambio builds COSMIC, an electronic health record deployed across Swedish regions and into Denmark and the UK, designed for the Nordic model where a region runs hospitals and primary care as one connected system.

It is built for regional continuity rather than institutional record-keeping. When a patient moves between primary care, a district hospital and a specialist clinic inside the same region, the record follows — which is the actual design requirement of a Nordic health system rather than a feature added to a hospital product.

Cambio is headquartered in Stockholm, covering the record across hospital and primary care with clinical decision support, medication management, referral and care pathway coordination, and regional reporting. Nordic health systems are publicly run and procured under national rules with health legislation layered over the GDPR.

What Cambio does well

  • Spans hospital and primary care in one record
  • Built for regional deployment
  • Clinical decision support included
  • Referral and care pathway coordination
  • Track record across Swedish regions

Where Cambio falls short

  • Nordic focus with limited reach elsewhere
  • Public procurement sales cycles
  • Regional deployments are multi-year programmes
  • Pricing not published

Standout feature. The record follows the patient across the whole region, which is how Nordic care is organised.

#7 medatixx

Eltville am Rhein, Germany Monthly licence per practice Demo on request

Best for: German medical practices and MVZs

  • Operating company. medatixx
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks

medatixx is one of the German practice information systems — the software a doctor's surgery runs on for records, billing and the mandated connections to the German health telematics infrastructure.

This category is decided by certification, not by features. A German practice system must implement KBV requirements and connect to the Telematikinfrastruktur for e-prescriptions and the electronic patient record; a US-built EHR cannot simply be localised into that, which is why the German market is served by German vendors. Records, quarterly billing, appointment and resource planning and specialty modules follow from there.

medatixx GmbH & Co. KG is based in Eltville am Rhein with German hosting for its cloud products, available as a local install or hosted, and supported through a regional partner network.

What medatixx does well

  • KBV-certified and connected to the Telematikinfrastruktur
  • e-prescription and electronic patient record supported
  • Local install or hosted, both German
  • Specialty modules per discipline
  • Regional partner network for installation and support

Where medatixx falls short

  • Only relevant inside the German system
  • Licensed per practice through partners, not self-serve
  • Interface follows regulation more than usability
  • Migration between German practice systems is painful

Standout feature. Certification for the German system, which is the requirement rather than a feature.

#8 Doctolib

Paris, France Per practitioner, per month Demo on request

Best for: Practices and clinics booking patients

  • Operating company. Doctolib
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Zocdoc, Mindbody, Calendly for clinics

Doctolib is the booking and practice platform European healthcare runs on at the patient-facing end, with tens of millions of patients across France, Germany and Italy using it to find and book appointments.

It solves a different problem from the record systems here. Patients already have accounts and already search there, so a practice joining becomes findable rather than merely bookable — and the practice management around it covers schedules, reminders that cut no-shows, documents and video consultations.

Doctolib is headquartered in Paris and hosts health data with certified health data hosting providers in Europe, which is a legal requirement rather than a marketing point: the fact of an appointment can reveal the condition. It appears here cross-listed from Appointment Scheduling, where its page lives.

What Doctolib does well

  • Patients already search and book there
  • Practice management alongside booking
  • Reminders that measurably cut no-shows
  • Video consultations included
  • Certified health data hosting

Where Doctolib falls short

  • Not an electronic health record for hospitals
  • Network value varies by country
  • Per-practitioner subscription
  • Platform dependence once patients book through it

Standout feature. The patient-facing half of healthcare IT — a network rather than a booking form.

#9 Cegedim

Boulogne-Billancourt, France Per-practice licence and subscription, quoted; special terms for newly installed practitioners Demo on request

Best for: French GPs, specialists and paramedics needing certified national tools

  • Operating company. Cegedim SA
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks

Cegedim is one of France's largest health-technology groups, and its healthcare division sells the software layer French ambulatory care actually runs on: MonLogicielMedical.com (MLM) for GPs and specialists, and a family of RM Ingénierie products — Kiné+, Infi+, Ortho+ and Medi+ — for physiotherapists, nurses, speech therapists and midwives. Between them these cover most of the health professions that touch a French patient outside hospital, which is a different kind of breadth from a single-discipline EHR.

The products are built for French administrative reality rather than adapted to it: LAP-certified prescribing linked to the Base Claude Bernard drug database, DMP integration that publishes patient summaries automatically, secure messaging (MSS) with other providers, and electronic invoicing to the health insurance system. Simply Vitale adds a tablet-based Carte Vitale reader for mobile and home visits.

Cegedim SA is headquartered in Boulogne-Billancourt and listed on Euronext Paris, which gives it a scale and balance-sheet stability most single-product vendors in this category lack — and also means healthcare software is one line of business among several rather than the sole focus. No public price list is published; access runs through a sales conversation, with stated preferential terms for newly installed practitioners.

What Cegedim does well

  • Covers GPs, specialists and four paramedical professions
  • LAP-certified prescribing tied to the Base Claude Bernard drug database
  • DMP and secure messaging (MSS) built in
  • Publicly listed French group with financial scale
  • Special terms for newly installed practitioners

Where Cegedim falls short

  • No public price list
  • Healthcare is one division within a larger, more diversified group
  • Interface conventions vary between the MLM and RM Ingénierie product lines
  • Primarily built for the French system

Standout feature. One vendor across GPs, specialists, nurses, physiotherapists and midwives, all tied to the same French drug database and DMP.

#10 Systematic

Aarhus, Denmark Enterprise licence and services, quoted per deployment Demo on request

Best for: Hospitals and regions running Columna across the Nordics

  • Operating company. Systematic A/S
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Denmark)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, Oracle Health, InterSystems

Systematic is a Danish software company whose healthcare division builds Columna, a suite covering the clinical record (Columna CIS), hospital patient flow and bed management (Columna Flow), and municipal social and home care (Columna Cura). It sits in the same regional-deployment category as Cambio and Dedalus already in this directory: Danish regions, Norwegian trusts and Swedish institutions such as Karolinska University Hospital run Columna at the scale of a health system rather than a single hospital.

The Cura side is the less common half. Where most hospital vendors stop at discharge, Columna Cura continues into municipal social and elderly care, and Danish municipalities including several in the greater Copenhagen area have extended their Cura contracts specifically for that continuity between hospital and home. Columna Flow adds real-time patient tracking and task management for wards and emergency departments, used at Aalborg University Hospital among others.

Systematic A/S is headquartered in Aarhus and, unusually for a company this size, remains privately held rather than venture- or PE-backed. It also builds defence and public-safety software, so healthcare is one industry line rather than the whole business. Pricing is enterprise and quoted per deployment; there is no self-serve tier for a hospital system of this kind.

What Systematic does well

  • Spans hospital records, patient flow and municipal care in one suite
  • Deployed at national and regional scale across Denmark, Norway and Sweden
  • Cura extends care coordination into municipal and home care
  • Privately held Danish company, not PE-backed
  • Used at leading hospitals including Karolinska University Hospital

Where Systematic falls short

  • Enterprise procurement only, no published pricing
  • Nordic-language support and workflows are the primary focus
  • Multi-year implementation for a hospital-wide deployment
  • Healthcare is one of several industries the company serves

Standout feature. Columna Cura is the rare hospital-grade record that keeps working after discharge, into municipal home and social care.

#11 Agfa HealthCare

Mortsel, Belgium Enterprise licence and services, quoted Demo on request

Best for: Hospitals standardising imaging across radiology, cardiology and pathology

  • Operating company. Agfa HealthCare N.V.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Belgium)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. GE Healthcare PACS, Philips IntelliSpace, Sectra

Agfa HealthCare is the imaging-IT half of the Agfa-Gevaert group, and its Enterprise Imaging Platform is built to be the one place a hospital keeps every image regardless of department — radiology, cardiology, breast imaging, digital pathology, molecular imaging and point-of-care ultrasound all land in the same vendor-neutral archive instead of five separate department systems, each with its own viewer and its own copy of the same study.

That consolidation is the actual sell: fewer systems to maintain, one place for a clinician to find any image on a patient, and a single XERO universal viewer rather than one per specialty. RUBEE, Agfa's AI layer, sits on top for workflow prioritisation rather than diagnosis, and teleradiology and streaming access cover remote and multi-site reading.

Agfa HealthCare N.V. is registered in Mortsel, Belgium, part of the Agfa-Gevaert group listed on Euronext Brussels — a multinational with three decades of imaging IT behind it rather than a recent entrant. Pricing is enterprise and quoted; the honest trade-off is that Agfa HealthCare is an imaging platform rather than a full clinical or hospital administration record, so it typically sits alongside a separate EHR rather than replacing one.

What Agfa HealthCare does well

  • One vendor-neutral archive across radiology, cardiology, pathology and more
  • Single universal viewer instead of one per department
  • Three decades of imaging IT experience
  • Part of the listed Agfa-Gevaert group, Euronext Brussels
  • Teleradiology and remote reading built in

Where Agfa HealthCare falls short

  • Imaging platform, not a full clinical or hospital record system
  • Pricing not published
  • Large legacy install base means uneven modernisation across modules
  • Best value appears at multi-department, multi-site scale

Standout feature. Every imaging department shares one archive and one viewer, instead of radiology, cardiology and pathology each keeping their own.

#12 SystmOne

Leeds, England, United Kingdom Founded 2000 Supplied to NHS and care organisations via national framework contracts Demo on request

Best for: NHS primary, community and mental health services at national scale

  • Operating company. The Phoenix Partnership (Leeds) Ltd
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS Health

SystmOne is the clinical system behind a striking amount of NHS activity: TPP's own figures put 61 million electronic health records on the database, accessed by more than 300,000 users across roughly 7,800 NHS organisations spanning more than 25 care settings — general practice, community nursing, mental health, prisons and hospices among them.

That single shared record is the actual product: a district nurse, a GP and a mental health team can see the same patient history rather than three separate ones.

The single-database design is unusual in this category. Rather than integrating separate systems per care setting, SystmOne runs one record that different services view through different modules, which is what makes cross-organisation handover work without a separate interoperability project layered on top.

The Phoenix Partnership (Leeds) Ltd, trading as TPP, is based in Horsforth, Leeds, and has been incorporated since 2000; Companies House lists Tpp Finance Limited, a UK entity at the same address, as the company's sole person with significant control, so ownership sits inside the UK.

SystmOne is supplied to NHS and care organisations through national and regional framework contracts rather than sold off a public price list, and the UK sits outside the EEA under an adequacy decision rather than inside EU jurisdiction directly.

What SystmOne does well

  • 61 million patient records on a single shared database
  • Used across 7,800+ NHS organisations and 25+ care settings
  • One record spans GP, community, mental health and more
  • UK-owned, with no non-UK parent in the ownership chain
  • Two and a half decades of continuous NHS deployment

Where SystmOne falls short

  • Sold through NHS framework procurement, not a public price list
  • United Kingdom jurisdiction, outside the EEA
  • Built around NHS workflows, limited relevance outside the UK
  • Onboarding a new organisation is a formal NHS IT project

Standout feature. One database behind 61 million records: SystmOne is built so a district nurse and a GP already share the same patient file.

#13 Omda

Oslo, Norway Enterprise licence and services, quoted Demo on request

Best for: Specialist hospital software for oncology, laboratories and imaging

  • Operating company. Omda AS
  • Jurisdiction. EEA, not EU (Norway)
  • Independent checks. ISO 13485:2016
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Oracle Health, Epic, GE Healthcare

Omda is the current name of what was CSAM Health Group until a 2023 rename — the Norwegian Business Register's own history for the entity shows it was registered in 2012 as CSAM Invest AS, renamed CSAM Health Group AS in 2020 and Omda AS in 2023.

The product line is specialist rather than general-purpose: Cytodose for oncology treatment planning, laboratory information management, connected imaging, maternity and fertility software, and emergency response systems, sold to hospitals that already run a general EHR and need depth in one department.

That specialism is the actual pitch. A general hospital information system treats oncology as one module among many; Omda's Cytodose is built only for chemotherapy dosing and treatment planning, which is the kind of depth a department buys as a second system rather than expects from its EHR vendor.

Omda AS is headquartered in Oslo and holds ISO 13485:2016 certification, the quality-management standard for medical device software, which matters for treatment-planning software specifically. Norway is in the EEA and fully inside the GDPR though outside the EU itself. Pricing is enterprise and quoted, and the company's history of renames is worth knowing before searching for "CSAM" and finding an old product page.

What Omda does well

  • ISO 13485:2016 certified, relevant for treatment-planning software
  • Deep specialist modules: oncology, LIMS, imaging, maternity
  • Norwegian company, EEA and GDPR jurisdiction
  • Sold as a department-level complement to an existing EHR
  • Continuous operating history since 2012 under different names

Where Omda falls short

  • Norway is EEA, not EU
  • Renamed twice (CSAM Invest, CSAM Health Group, now Omda), which complicates research
  • Pricing not published
  • Specialist modules rather than a general hospital record

Standout feature. Cytodose treats only oncology dosing, which is the depth a cancer department needs and a general EHR rarely has.

#14 Corilus

Ghent, Belgium Per-practice subscription by module, quoted Demo on request

Best for: Belgian GPs, pharmacists, dentists and allied health professionals

  • Operating company. Corilus NV
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Belgium)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen

Corilus sells CareConnect, a modular practice-management platform used across an unusually wide span of Belgian healthcare professions: general practitioners, pharmacists, dentists, physiotherapists, nurses, midwives, ophthalmologists and specialists including dermatologists, cardiologists and paediatricians. Rather than one product per discipline built independently, the modules share patient records and integrate with Belgian eHealth services, so a GP and a pharmacist can see the same medication history through their own interface.

Scale is the evidence for that model working: Corilus reports more than 47,000 customers across roughly 540 employees, which for a Belgian-only vendor is a substantial share of the country's primary care software market — a position closer to CompuGroup Medical's breadth-across-settings approach than to a single-discipline EHR.

Corilus NV is registered in Ghent, Belgium (enterprise number 0428.555.896). No public price list is available; access is quoted per practice and module, consistent with how most of this category sells.

What Corilus does well

  • One platform across eight or more healthcare professions
  • Shared records between GPs, pharmacists and specialists
  • Integrated with Belgian eHealth services
  • Large installed base: 47,000+ customers
  • Breadth across Belgian primary and allied care

Where Corilus falls short

  • Pricing not published
  • Primarily a Belgian product
  • Breadth across professions means each module is narrower than a dedicated specialist system
  • Module pricing adds up for a multi-discipline practice

Standout feature. The same patient record follows a GP, a pharmacist and a physiotherapist, each through a module built for their own profession.

#15 PharmaPartners

Oosterhout, Netherlands Per-practice subscription, quoted Demo on request

Best for: Dutch general practices and pharmacies sharing one patient record

  • Operating company. PharmaPartners B.V.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Epic ambulatory

PharmaPartners builds Medicom, the practice-management system a large share of Dutch general practitioners use for records, prescribing and scheduling, and Pharmacom, its counterpart for pharmacies. The two are built to work together rather than merely to exchange files: a prescription written in Medicom is built to reach Pharmacom without a separate interface project, which is the specific problem a GP-only or pharmacy-only EHR does not solve.

PharmaPartners states figures of roughly 2,500 GP practices and 1,200 pharmacies on its systems, reaching more than eight million patients, and describes the platform as built on open standards including FHIR, HL7 and the Dutch government's zorginformatiebouwstenen (ZIBs) — the structured data building blocks Dutch health information exchange is standardising around. MijnGezondheid/MedGemak adds a patient portal on top for appointments and secure messaging with a provider.

PharmaPartners B.V. is based in Oosterhout, Netherlands, with a stated 45-plus years in Dutch primary care digitisation behind it. No public pricing is available; access is quoted per practice, which is consistent with the rest of this category and with ChipSoft and Nedap Healthcare already in this directory.

What PharmaPartners does well

  • GP and pharmacy records built to share one prescription workflow
  • Built on open standards: FHIR, HL7 and Dutch ZIBs
  • Reaches an estimated 8 million+ Dutch patients
  • Patient portal (MijnGezondheid/MedGemak) included
  • Decades in the Dutch primary care market

Where PharmaPartners falls short

  • Pricing not published
  • Dutch market only
  • Two product names (Medicom, Pharmacom) to keep straight when evaluating
  • Smaller international footprint than the hospital vendors in this directory

Standout feature. A prescription written in Medicom is designed to reach Pharmacom directly, without a bolt-on interface between GP and pharmacy.

#16 MEDIFOX DAN

Hildesheim, Germany Modular licence per care organisation, quoted Demo on request

Best for: German ambulatory, inpatient and youth care providers

  • Operating company. MEDIFOX DAN GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Germany
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. PointClickCare, WellSky, Netsmart

MEDIFOX DAN covers the part of German healthcare IT that the hospital-focused vendors in this directory do not: ambulatory nursing care (MD Ambulant), inpatient and residential care (MD Stationär), therapy practices (MD Therapie) and youth welfare services (MD Jugendhilfe), plus Care.One for admissions and smartAware for staff training. It sits in the same long-term and home-care category as Nedap Healthcare, already in this directory, but for the German rather than Dutch market and regulatory framework.

The company states more than 20 years developing software specifically for German care providers, with 8,000-plus customers and over 100,000 daily users across its products — a scale that reflects how fragmented and locally regulated German long-term care software still is, and how much of that fragmentation MEDIFOX DAN alone now covers.

MEDIFOX DAN GmbH is registered in Hildesheim, Germany (Handelsregister HRB 202124, Amtsgericht Hildesheim), and states that its cloud products are hosted entirely in Germany. No public price list is available; licensing is quoted per organisation and module. The name reflects a 2019 merger of two previously separate German care-software companies, MEDIFOX and DAN.

What MEDIFOX DAN does well

  • Covers ambulatory, inpatient, therapy and youth care in one group
  • Hosting stated as 100% within Germany
  • Large installed base: 8,000+ customers, 100,000+ daily users
  • Staff training platform (smartAware) included alongside records
  • Two decades focused specifically on German care regulation

Where MEDIFOX DAN falls short

  • Pricing not published
  • German market and regulatory framework only
  • Product family spans several distinctly named modules to navigate
  • Not suited to acute hospital care

Standout feature. One vendor covers ambulatory nursing, residential care and youth welfare, the fragmented middle of German care that hospital EHRs skip.

#17 Better

Ljubljana, Slovenia Better Studio free tier; platform licensing quoted per institution Free tier for Better Studio; demo on request for the platform

Best for: Health organisations building on open, vendor-neutral clinical data

  • Operating company. Better, programska oprema, d.o.o.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Slovenia)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. InterSystems HealthShare, Oracle Health, custom-built EHR integration platforms

Better takes a different approach from every other entry in this category: instead of selling a finished EHR, it sells an openEHR- and FHIR-based platform — Better Platform plus Better Studio, a low-code environment — on which a hospital, region or vendor builds its own clinical applications, shared care records, medication management (Better Meds) and patient-reported outcome tools.

The clinical data itself is stored in open, vendor-neutral archetypes rather than a proprietary schema, the same underlying idea as DIPS's openEHR-based record already in this directory, but offered as a platform rather than a finished product.

That openness is the actual argument for choosing it: an organisation that builds its shared care record on Better is not locked into Better's own application layer the way it would be with a closed EHR, because the data model is a published open standard rather than a private one. Deployments span more than 30 markets, including NHS trusts in England, university hospitals in Sweden, Germany and Switzerland, and national programmes in Slovenia, Greece and Ireland.

Better, programska oprema, d.o.o. is headquartered in Ljubljana, Slovenia, with additional offices in Cardiff and Hamburg. Better Studio has a free entry point; the platform itself is licensed to healthcare institutions on a quoted basis. The honest trade-off is that a platform is not a turnkey EHR — an organisation still has to build or commission the applications that run on it, which is a materially different commitment from buying a finished record system.

What Better does well

  • openEHR and FHIR-based, avoiding a proprietary clinical data model
  • Better Studio offers a free low-code entry point
  • Deployed in 30+ markets including NHS trusts and Nordic university hospitals
  • Slovenian company with offices in the UK and Germany
  • Modular: platform, medication management and PROMs sold separately

Where Better falls short

  • A platform to build on, not a finished EHR out of the box
  • Requires implementation effort a turnkey system does not
  • Platform licensing not published; quoted per institution
  • Value depends on having the capacity to build or commission applications

Standout feature. The clinical record is stored in open openEHR archetypes, so a hospital building on Better is not locked into Better's own applications.

Why have European hospitals not simply bought Epic?

Many have looked, and several have bought. The recurring obstacle is not clinical features but national fit.

Billing codes differ by country and are frequently the mechanism by which a hospital is funded at all. E-prescription runs on national infrastructure with its own connectors, cards and certification. Mandatory reporting to national registries has country-specific formats and deadlines. None of this is configuration; it is implementation.

The result is that an American system has to be reimplemented into each national regime, at a cost several European health systems have judged unaffordable relative to a vendor already built into it. That calculation, rather than any judgement about clinical quality, is why ChipSoft still holds most Dutch hospitals.

Where Epic has won in Europe it has usually been at large academic centres with the budget to absorb that implementation, which is a different proposition from a district hospital or a regional health authority.

Which setting are you buying for?

This category covers at least four different products, and they are not interchangeable.

Acute hospital care: an integrated electronic patient record covering clinical documentation, orders, results, theatre planning, medication and billing. ChipSoft's HiX, Cambio's COSMIC and Dedalus's hospital systems live here.

Ambulatory and primary care: practice management for doctors, dentists and physiotherapists, connected to prescription and insurance infrastructure. CompuGroup Medical is the broadest across this, with Doctolib covering booking and the patient-facing side.

Long-term, disability, mental health and home care: records that follow a client over years rather than an admission over days, with care plans, goals, shift handovers and funding streams. Nedap Healthcare is built for exactly this, and hospital systems handle it badly.

And regional exchange: connecting those settings so a patient's record follows them between primary care, a district hospital and a specialist clinic. Cambio and Dedalus both work at that level.

What does the GDPR actually require for health data?

Health data is special category data under Article 9, which prohibits processing unless a specific condition applies — such as the provision of health care under a professional obligation of secrecy. That is a stricter starting position than ordinary personal data.

Member states may add further conditions, and many have. France requires health data hosting by certified providers. Germany runs the Telematikinfrastruktur with its own certification for connected systems. The Nordics procure regionally with national security requirements attached.

The practical consequence for a buyer is that a general-purpose cloud vendor cannot simply assert compliance; the hosting itself has to meet a national certification. That is a structural advantage for vendors built inside the regime rather than adapting to it.

The European Health Data Space adds another layer, aimed at secondary use and cross-border exchange. This is a summary rather than legal advice, and health IT procurement should have proper counsel attached.

How we selected and ranked these 17 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on the setting, which is the honest answer here. For hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium, ChipSoft's HiX is effectively the reference system. For Nordic regions, Cambio's COSMIC. For Italian and multi-country hospital groups, Dedalus. CompuGroup Medical is the broadest across practices, pharmacies and laboratories rather than hospitals.

Many have looked, and the recurring obstacle is national fit rather than clinical features. Billing codes, e-prescription infrastructure, funding streams and mandatory reporting differ by country, and reimplementing an American system into each of them is expensive enough that several European health systems have judged it unaffordable against a vendor already built into the regime.

Nedap Healthcare, which is built for the setting hospital systems handle badly: records that follow a client over years rather than an admission over days, care plans and goals rather than diagnoses and discharges, mobile access for community staff, and billing against long-term care funding streams.

Yes. Health data is special category data under Article 9, which prohibits processing unless a specific condition applies, and member states may add further conditions — which many have. In practice that means certified health data hosting in France, connection to the Telematikinfrastruktur in Germany, and national rules elsewhere. This is a summary, not legal advice.

Increasingly, through HL7 and FHIR, and the European Health Data Space is pushing further in that direction. In practice interoperability still depends more on national infrastructure and regional agreements than on the standard itself, so check what a vendor is actually connected to in your country rather than which standards it lists on paper.

Not as a configuration exercise. European health IT vendors expand by national system, because each country's billing codes, prescription infrastructure and reporting duties are a separate implementation and often a separate certification. Check which national markets a vendor is actually certified and connected in before assuming a cross-border rollout.

Not on this list?

If you build a European healthcare & ehr software tool that belongs here, tell us about it. Every suggestion is checked against the same criteria as the tools above: European ownership and hosting, a real product, and pricing we can verify. A listing is editorial, and we say so on this page where placement is paid.

Suggest your tool