Better

Slovenian openEHR platform for building shared care records instead of buying a closed EHR

Quick Overview

Company Better, programska oprema, d.o.o.
Category Healthcare & EHR Software
Headquarters Ljubljana, Slovenia
EU Presence EU (Slovenia)
Open Source No
Pricing Better Studio free tier; platform licensing quoted per institution
Free Option Free tier for Better Studio; demo on request for the platform
Replaces InterSystems HealthShare, Oracle Health, custom-built EHR integration platforms

Detailed Review

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • openEHR and FHIR-based, avoiding a proprietary clinical data model
  • Better Studio offers a free low-code entry point
  • Deployed in 30+ markets including NHS trusts and Nordic university hospitals
  • Slovenian company with offices in the UK and Germany
  • Modular: platform, medication management and PROMs sold separately

Cons

  • A platform to build on, not a finished EHR out of the box
  • Requires implementation effort a turnkey system does not
  • Platform licensing not published; quoted per institution
  • Value depends on having the capacity to build or commission applications

Alternatives to Better

See all healthcare & EHR software →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Better?

Better takes a different approach from every other entry in this category: instead of selling a finished EHR, it sells an openEHR- and FHIR-based platform — Better Platform plus Better Studio, a low-code environment — on which a hospital, region or vendor builds its own clinical applications, shared care records, medication management (Better Meds) and patient-reported outcome tools.

The clinical data itself is stored in open, vendor-neutral archetypes rather than a proprietary schema, the same underlying idea as DIPS's openEHR-based record already in this directory, but offered as a platform rather than a finished product.

Where is Better based?

Better operates from Ljubljana, Slovenia, which places it under EU (Slovenia).

What does Better cost?

Better Studio free tier; platform licensing quoted per institution. Free tier for Better Studio; demo on request for the platform.

Who is Better best for?

Health organisations building on open, vendor-neutral clinical data. The clinical record is stored in open openEHR archetypes, so a hospital building on Better is not locked into Better's own applications.

What are the drawbacks of Better?

A platform to build on, not a finished EHR out of the box. Requires implementation effort a turnkey system does not. Platform licensing not published; quoted per institution. Value depends on having the capacity to build or commission applications.

Who worked on this review

Three people touch every tool page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's own documentation.

Ingrid Halvorsen
Written by

Ingrid Halvorsen

Managing Editor · Oslo, Norway

Runs the review process and decides when a page is ready to publish or needs another pass.

Sebastiaan Smits
Edited by

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder & Editor · Netherlands

Selects the tools, writes the reviews, and checks where each company is actually established.

Marta Kowalczyk
Fact-checked by

Marta Kowalczyk

Senior Analyst, Infrastructure & Developer Tools · Warsaw, Poland

Covers hosting, developer tooling and the practical side of moving workloads to European providers.

Read our editorial process for how we source, verify and update these pages — and how we keep affiliate income separate from what we recommend.

Go to Better