Webropol

Finnish survey and feedback platform for organisations, hosted in Finland since 2002

Quick Overview

Company Webropol Oy
Category Survey Tools
Headquarters Helsinki, Finland
Founded 2002
EU Presence EU (Finland)
Data Location Finland: redundant ISO 27001-certified server environment (provider not named); no processing outside the EU/EEA
Open Source No
Compliance ISO 27001 (server environment), Cyber Essentials, Katakri TL III compliance, WCAG 2.1 AA
Pricing Custom quote; no published prices
Free Option Demo on request
Replaces Qualtrics, SurveyMonkey, Microsoft Forms

Detailed Review

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • ISO 27001-certified server environment in Finland, with no processing outside the EU/EEA
  • Cyber Essentials, Katakri TL III compliance and WCAG 2.1 AA stated by the vendor
  • Collection by web, email, SMS and QR code in one platform
  • AI text analysis and real-time BI View dashboards
  • Helsinki company, in the Finnish register since July 2002

Cons

  • No prices published at all — every plan runs through a demo request
  • The operator of the Finnish servers is not named, and no subprocessors are listed
  • No shareholders named on the site or in the Finnish register's open data
  • Closed source, with no self-hosted option
  • Built for organisations; there is no self-serve sign-up

Alternatives to Webropol

See all survey tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Webropol?

Webropol is the oldest company in this list after Enalyzer: Webropol Oy at Huovitie 3 in Helsinki, business ID FI-17739602, registered in the Finnish trade register on 18 July 2002 and still active at the same address. It covers collection by web, email, SMS and QR code, AI text analysis on open answers, and real-time BI View dashboards — a feedback platform for organisations rather than a form builder for a marketing team.

Where is Webropol based?

Webropol operates from Helsinki, Finland, which places it under EU (Finland). Compliance: ISO 27001 (server environment), Cyber Essentials, Katakri TL III compliance, WCAG 2.1 AA.

What does Webropol cost?

Custom quote; no published prices. Demo on request.

Who is Webropol best for?

Finnish public-sector and organisational feedback where procurement asks for Katakri. Katakri TL III and WCAG 2.1 AA stated up front — written for a public-sector procurement form, and priced by one too.

What are the drawbacks of Webropol?

No prices published at all — every plan runs through a demo request. The operator of the Finnish servers is not named, and no subprocessors are listed. No shareholders named on the site or in the Finnish register's open data. Closed source, with no self-hosted option. Built for organisations; there is no self-serve sign-up.

Who worked on this review

Three people touch every tool page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's own documentation.

Sebastiaan Smits
Written by

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder & Editor · Netherlands

Selects the tools, writes the reviews, and checks where each company is actually established.

Ingrid Halvorsen
Edited by

Ingrid Halvorsen

Managing Editor · Oslo, Norway

Runs the review process and decides when a page is ready to publish or needs another pass.

Daniel Brandt
Fact-checked by

Daniel Brandt

Privacy & Compliance Researcher · Berlin, Germany

Checks the compliance claims: where the company is established, where the data sits, and what the DPA actually says.

Read our editorial process for how we source, verify and update these pages — and how we keep affiliate income separate from what we recommend.

Go to Webropol