Mopinion

Dutch platform for collecting feedback inside websites and apps at the moment something goes wrong

8.1

Quick Overview

Company Mopinion BV
Category Survey Tools
Headquarters Rotterdam, Netherlands
Founded 2014
EU Presence Yes - Netherlands (EU)
Data Location EU
Open Source No
GDPR Compliant Yes
Self-Hosting No
Main Features In-app and website feedback forms, event and behaviour triggers, NPS and CES, text analytics, dashboards, analytics integrations, mobile SDKs
Pricing From about EUR 259/month
Best For Digital, e-commerce and product teams improving specific user journeys
Replaces Hotjar surveys, SurveyMonkey, Qualtrics website feedback

Detailed Review

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Feedback captured in context, as it happens
  • Behaviour-based triggering
  • Text analytics on open responses
  • Mobile SDKs and analytics integrations
  • Dutch company, EU hosting

Cons

  • Expensive relative to general survey tools
  • Not suited to research or HR surveys
  • Needs developer involvement to implement

Alternatives to Mopinion

Other European survey tools worth comparing before you decide:

Typeform

Spain · Conversational forms with the best completion rates in the category

Tally

Belgium · Free forms that work like writing a text document

LimeSurvey

Germany · Open-source surveys you can host on your own server

Netigate

Sweden · Employee and customer feedback with EU data storage

See all European survey tools or compare them directly against Hotjar surveys on our alternatives page.

Frequently Asked Questions

It collects feedback inside your website or app at a moment triggered by user behaviour, rather than sending a questionnaire afterwards. The response comes with context and the response rate is much higher.

Yes, with iOS and Android SDKs that bring the same triggered feedback approach into native applications.

No. It is built for digital customer journeys. For employee engagement use Netigate; for research instruments use LimeSurvey.

In the EU, by a Dutch company, which keeps in-session feedback — which often contains volunteered personal information — under an EU processor.

Who worked on this review

Three people touch every tool page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's own documentation.

Daniel Brandt
Written by

Daniel Brandt

Privacy & Compliance Researcher · Berlin, Germany

Checks the compliance claims: where the company is established, where the data sits, and what the DPA actually says.

Ingrid Halvorsen
Edited by

Ingrid Halvorsen

Managing Editor · Oslo, Norway

Runs the review process and decides when a page is ready to publish or needs another pass.

Marta Kowalczyk
Fact-checked by

Marta Kowalczyk

Senior Analyst, Infrastructure & Developer Tools · Warsaw, Poland

Covers hosting, developer tooling and the practical side of moving workloads to European providers.

Read our editorial process for how we source, verify and update these pages — and how we keep affiliate income separate from what we recommend.

Go to Mopinion