European Alternatives to Octoparse
Looking for a European alternative to Octoparse? Octoparse is operated by Octopus Data Inc., and its terms of service deem the service to be based in California, with disputes settled by arbitration under California law. Paid plans start at $69 per month on annual billing, residential proxies are a $3 per GB add-on, and the Professional plan costs $249 per month (octoparse.com/pricing, 23 October 2026).
The European tools below run scrapers from Latvia, Czechia, Ireland, Lithuania, France and the UK, with a free visual extension, scraping APIs priced per request, or an Actor platform you can code against.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
11 European Alternatives to Octoparse
Apify
Prague platform for running, scheduling and selling scrapers as Actors
Zyte
Cork-based scraping API priced per request by site difficulty
Oxylabs
Vilnius provider of scraper APIs, unblocker and proxy pools
Web Scraper
Latvian point-and-click scraper: free extension plus a cloud runner
Decodo
Former Smartproxy: web data API, ready templates and proxies
Bright Data
Israeli scraping stack: unlocker, scraper APIs, datasets and proxies
ScrapingBee
Paris scraping API returning rendered HTML in one call
ScrapingAnt
Polish scraping API that bills successful requests only
Axiom.ai
UK no-code browser bots that scrape, click and type on a schedule
ZenRows
Anti-bot bypass and browser rendering behind a single API call
ScrapeOps
Irish proxy aggregator with scraper job monitoring
Key takeaways
- Octoparse is operated by Octopus Data Inc., whose terms require individual arbitration and allow it to list customers publicly.
- Octoparse Standard starts at $69 per month and Professional at $249, both on annual billing, with residential proxies at $3 per GB and CAPTCHA solving at $1 to $1.5 per thousand billed separately.
- Web Scraper from Latvia is the closest European match for point-and-click scraping, with a free extension and cloud plans from $50 per month.
- Zyte, Oxylabs, Decodo, ScrapingBee, ScrapingAnt and ZenRows replace the anti-blocking part of Octoparse with an API priced per request or per credit.
- The Octoparse pages checked describe no task export to other tools, so every scraper has to be rebuilt in the replacement.
Why people leave Octoparse
Octoparse is a point-and-click scraping product: you open a site inside the app, click the fields you want, and the tool builds a task that can run on your own machine or in the vendor's cloud. For people who have never written a selector, that is the whole appeal. The free plan allows 10 tasks and 50,000 exported rows a month, which is enough to learn the tool on a real project before anyone approves a budget.
The contract behind it is with Octopus Data Inc. Its terms of service, last updated on 15 April 2023, require individual arbitration instead of court or class action, and the company's privacy notice is also written for Octopus Data Inc. For a buyer in the EU, UK or Switzerland that means a US counterparty, US dispute rules and a vendor that US authorities can compel under the CLOUD Act, which is the first line a procurement or privacy team circles.
The more common reason for leaving is less legal. Teams outgrow the plan ladder: the task cap, the number of concurrent cloud runs and the add-ons that are billed on top (proxies, CAPTCHA solving, ready-made templates) turn a $69 plan into something harder to forecast. At that point many people discover that what they need is an API, or a European visual tool with a different price model, rather than a bigger Octoparse tier.
- US contracting entity, arbitration and a customer-listing clause The terms name Octopus Data Inc., require mandatory individual arbitration with a class action and jury trial waiver, and say that by using the service you allow Octoparse to list you as a customer. The same terms let the vendor end an account or discontinue part of the service at any time, with or without notice. None of this is unusual for a US SaaS contract, but a European legal team will want to know before a scraper that touches business data goes into production.
- The plan fee is only one line of the bill Standard starts at $69 per month and Professional at $249, both quoted on annual billing with a 16 percent saving over monthly. On top, the pricing page lists residential proxies at $3 per GB, pay-per-result templates between $0.001 and $3 per thousand results, CAPTCHA solving at $1 to $1.5 per thousand, custom crawler setup from $399 and a managed data service from $599. A site that needs all of them costs far more than the headline.
- Task caps and concurrency set the ceiling Free allows 10 tasks on one device. Standard is described as 100 tasks with up to 3 concurrent cloud processes, and Professional as 250 tasks with up to 20. Pricing therefore follows how many scrapers you keep and how many run at once, not how many pages you collect. A team with many small scrapers hits a task wall; a team with one large job hits the concurrency wall.
- The shape of the product may not fit the job any more A visual builder suits a stable page layout and a person who maintains the task. Heavily protected sites, shifting layouts or collection that has to be wired into an application are usually handled with an API where the vendor absorbs the blocking. That is a different product category, and several of the European tools below sell exactly that, with a request price you can read before you commit.
What you have to replace, not just match
Start with an inventory of the tasks you actually run. For each one note whether it needs a person to click through a site (a pagination you cannot express as a URL pattern, a login, a form), whether it runs on a schedule, and where the rows go afterwards.
The Octoparse pages checked mention no task export into another tool, so plan to rebuild every task in the new one, and let the inventory tell you which rebuilds are worth doing.
Then separate the pieces Octoparse bundles. The visual builder maps to Web Scraper or Axiom.ai. The cloud runs and schedules map to Web Scraper Cloud, Apify or a scheduler of your own.
The anti-blocking layer (IP rotation, residential proxies, CAPTCHA solving) maps to a scraping API such as Zyte, Oxylabs, Decodo, ScrapingBee, ScrapingAnt or ZenRows. The exports to Excel, CSV, JSON, Google Sheets, S3 or a database map to whatever your downstream tools already read. Octoparse's paid crawler-building and data services, if you used them, have no counterpart except a managed service such as Zyte Data or a dataset purchase from Bright Data.
Finally decide how much code you will accept. If nobody on the team writes code, only Web Scraper and Axiom.ai are real replacements, and the rest of the list is out of reach. If one developer can own the work, the API tools usually cost less per page and need less upkeep than a visual task that breaks whenever a site changes its layout.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Apify | Prague, Czech Republic | Free plan with $5 usage; Starter $19/month, Scale $199/month, Business $999/month plus pay-as-you-go usage | EU (Czech Republic) |
| #2 | Zyte | Cork, Ireland | Pay as you go from $0.13 per 1,000 HTTP requests (tier 1) to $16.08 per 1,000 browser-rendered requests (tier 5); monthly commitments from $100; $5 free credit | EU (Ireland) |
| #3 | Oxylabs | Vilnius, Lithuania | Subscriptions from $30/month; Scrape endpoint from $0.50 per 1,000 results; $5 welcome credits; enterprise plans from $2,500/month | EU (Lithuania) |
| #4 | Web Scraper | Ādaži, Latvia | Extension free; Cloud Project $50/month, Professional $100/month, Scale from $200/month (billed annually, 7-day free trial) | EU (Latvia) |
| #5 | Decodo | Vilnius, Lithuania | Web Data API from $0.15 per 1,000 requests; residential proxies from $2/GB; Site Unblocker from $0.95 per 1,000 requests; free trial | EU (Lithuania) |
| #6 | Bright Data | Netanya, Israel | Unlocker, Crawl and SERP APIs from $1 per 1,000 requests; Browser API from $5/GB; datasets from $250 per 100K records; free tiers on some products | Israel (outside the EU/EEA) |
| #7 | ScrapingBee | Paris, France | Hobby $19/month (75,000 credits, 25 concurrent) / Freelance $49/month (250,000, 50 concurrent) / Startup $99/month (1,000,000, 100 concurrent) / Business $249/month (3,000,000, 200 concurrent) / Business+ $599/month (8,000,000, 400 concurrent); all prices exclusive of VAT; custom plans on request | EU (France) |
| #8 | ScrapingAnt | Poland | Enthusiast $19/month (100,000 credits) / Startup $49/month (500,000) / Business $249/month (3,000,000) / Business Pro $599/month (8,000,000) / Custom from $699+ (10M+); 10,000 free credits/month, no card required; residential and datacenter proxies billed separately by bandwidth | EU (Poland) |
| #9 | Axiom.ai | United Kingdom | Starter $15/month (5 hours), Pro $50 (30 hours), Pro Max $150 (100 hours), Ultimate $250 (250 hours); 2 free hours of runtime | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #10 | ZenRows | Getxo, Bizkaia, Spain | Free 5,000 credits per month / from $16 per month | EU (Spain) |
| #11 | ScrapeOps | Ireland | Web Scraping API Aggregator: 1,000 free credits, paid plans on request; Residential Proxy Aggregator: 100MB free, paid plans on request; monitoring, job scheduling and AI scraper builder included at no charge | EU (Ireland) |
How each alternative compares to Octoparse
Apify
Platform for running ready-made or custom scrapers, replacing Octoparse cloud and templates
Best for: Teams who want a store of ready scrapers today and room to write their own code later
Apify answers the Octoparse template library with Apify Store, where published Actors extract data from well-known sites without any code. The difference from Octoparse is that the same platform also runs code you write yourself in Python, JavaScript or TypeScript, so the first scraper can be a store Actor and the tenth can be your own.
The contract is with Apify Technologies s.r.o. in Prague under Czech law. Billing is where it differs most from Octoparse: a plan fee of $19, $199 or $999 per month, plus usage in compute units and per-event prices set by each Actor publisher, so the invoice has more moving parts than a flat task ladder.
What Apify does better than Octoparse
- Mixes ready-made Actors and custom code on one platform, which Octoparse tasks cannot
- Free plan with $5 of prepaid usage instead of a task cap
- Open-source Crawlee library lets local scripts move to the cloud
- Czech contract and law instead of US arbitration
Where Apify is a step down from Octoparse
- No point-and-click builder for a non-technical user
- Usage-based billing is harder to forecast than a plan with a task limit
- Store Actors are third-party code outside Apify's own services
Standout against Octoparse. The only tool in this comparison where a scraper can be bought, run or written on the same platform.
Best for: Developers collecting from protected sites who want to price each target by difficulty
Zyte replaces the part of Octoparse that fights blocking. You send a URL to Zyte API and receive the response, with rotation and ban handling done on the vendor side, instead of tuning proxies and CAPTCHA add-ons per task. Pay-as-you-go ranges from $0.13 per 1,000 HTTP requests to $16.08 per 1,000 browser-rendered requests, depending on the tier of the target site.
The contracting entity is Zyte Group Limited in Cork, with Irish law for customers outside the United States. The sub-processor list and privacy policy mention processing in the United States as well, so the European label covers the contract more than the data path. Existing Scrapy spiders can be hosted in Scrapy Cloud, and Zyte Data covers full outsourcing.
What Zyte does better than Octoparse
- Request price is tied to target difficulty, not to a task count
- No overage penalty beyond your discounted rate on a commitment
- Managed Zyte Data option covers what Octoparse sells as a data service
- Irish law for non-US customers instead of California arbitration
Where Zyte is a step down from Octoparse
- No visual builder at all, so a non-coder cannot use it alone
- Real cost appears only after testing your own target sites
- Some advanced features carry extra usage costs
Standout against Octoparse. Prices each request by how hard the target site is, which no visual tool does.
Best for: Developer teams wanting scrape endpoints and proxy pools under one subscription
Oxylabs covers what Octoparse sells as paid proxy add-ons, but at the scale of a proxy provider. A single subscription (Starter $30, Basic $100, Flexible $500 per month, enterprise from $2,500) opens the Scrape endpoint from $0.50 per 1,000 results, the Web Unblocker and residential, mobile, ISP and datacenter proxies.
The agreement is with oxylabs, UAB in Vilnius under Lithuanian law, with Lithuanian courts holding exclusive jurisdiction. There is a playground and documentation, but no visual builder, so a team arriving from Octoparse needs a developer to wire it into a crawler. The pages checked state no data-centre region for scraping jobs.
What Oxylabs does better than Octoparse
- Residential, mobile and ISP proxies from the vendor that runs the API
- Per-1,000 prices published by endpoint, falling above 10 million results
- One subscription spans the products instead of separate add-ons
- Lithuanian law and courts instead of US arbitration
Where Oxylabs is a step down from Octoparse
- No point-and-click builder, which is the main thing Octoparse offers
- Prices vary by target, so bills need modelling on real URLs
- Entry plan of $30 per month assumes developer use
Standout against Octoparse. Sells both the scraper API and the proxy network it runs on, under a single Lithuanian contract.
Best for: Analysts and small teams moving a point-and-click workflow off a US vendor
Web Scraper is the most direct swap for an Octoparse user who does not want to write code. The free extension for Chrome, Firefox and Edge records a sitemap by clicking elements, and Web Scraper Cloud then runs it on a schedule and delivers the rows to Google Sheets, Google Drive, Dropbox or Amazon S3. Project costs $50 per month for 5,000 URL credits and 2 concurrent scrapers.
The company behind it is "Web Graph" SIA in Ādaži, Latvia, and its about page dates the extension to 2013. Cloud plans are billed annually and carry a 7-day free trial, which compares with Octoparse's 5-day money-back guarantee. Datacenter proxies are included, residential proxies are an add-on, and heavily interactive sites may need a code-based tool.
What Web Scraper does better than Octoparse
- Extension is free with no account, so the build step costs nothing
- Entry cloud plan of $50 per month sits below Octoparse Standard at $69
- Exports straight to Sheets, Drive, Dropbox and S3
- Latvian contracting company with a published registration number
Where Web Scraper is a step down from Octoparse
- Fewer ready-made templates than Octoparse's preset library
- Cloud billed annually and capped by URL credits and concurrency
- Sitemaps are built in a browser extension, which struggles on interactive sites
Standout against Octoparse. A free visual builder that runs in your own browser before any cloud plan is bought.
Best for: Developers who want templates for named sites and an API from the same vendor
Decodo is the Smartproxy company under a new name since April 2025. Its Web Data API offers four endpoints (scrape, search, map and crawl), priced from $0.15 per 1,000 requests, and templates for named targets let someone without code start a scraper with a few clicks, which echoes Octoparse's preset library.
The contracting entity is UAB "Data troops" in Vilnius. Proxy products remain, with residential from $2 per GB and Site Unblocker from $0.95 per 1,000 requests, alongside Python, TypeScript and Go SDKs. Prices are starting figures that rise with target complexity, and the governing-law clause of the licence agreement was not located on the pages checked.
What Decodo does better than Octoparse
- Residential proxies from $2 per GB against Octoparse's $3 per GB add-on
- Output as HTML, JSON, CSV or Markdown from a single endpoint
- SDKs and a CLI for pipelines that Octoparse tasks cannot join
Where Decodo is a step down from Octoparse
- No general visual builder, only templates for listed sites
- The rebrand makes older reviews and forum answers confusing
Standout against Octoparse. Four endpoints (scrape, search, map, crawl) behind one API, plus an MCP server.
Best for: Organisations collecting at scale that accept an Israeli contract and want ready datasets
Bright Data is broader than Octoparse in every direction: Unlocker, SERP and Crawl APIs from $1 per 1,000 requests, Browser API from $5 per GB, Scraper Studio and datasets from $250 per 100K records. Several products carry a free tier label, and for a common target it can be cheaper to buy the finished records than to run any scraper.
The Master Service Agreement is with Bright Data Ltd in Netanya under Israeli law, with Tel Aviv-Jaffa courts, and the site counts Israel as European. Clients located in the United States contract with Bright Data, Inc. in New York, and an order form can override the default entity, so check the name on your invoice.
What Bright Data does better than Octoparse
- Datasets sold by the record can replace running a scraper at all
- Free tiers on several APIs to test before paying
- Published starting prices per product across a wide range
Where Bright Data is a step down from Octoparse
- The product range is large, which makes comparison and budgeting harder
- Israeli law and courts apply, not EU ones
- Entity depends on location and invoice
Standout against Octoparse. Sells already-collected datasets by the record, so you can skip the scraping altogether.
Best for: Developers who want one call to return a rendered page and a published certification
ScrapingBee returns rendered HTML in one API call, with rotating proxies and anti-bot bypass behind it. Plans run from Hobby at $19 per month (75,000 credits, 25 concurrent) to Business+ at $599 (8,000,000 credits, 400 concurrent), all exclusive of VAT, and 1,000 free credits cover a first test.
VostokInc SAS in Paris is the contracting company, and the listing carries a SOC 2 Type II attestation. As with the other API tools, exit nodes are global, so EU status applies to the company and contract rather than to where requests appear to originate. Credit cost needs modelling against your real requests.
What ScrapingBee does better than Octoparse
- Concurrency is a published plan limit, up to 400 on the top tier
- SOC 2 Type II attestation on a French contracting entity
- Entry price of $19 per month is well below Octoparse Standard
Where ScrapingBee is a step down from Octoparse
- No recurring free tier, only 1,000 one-off credits
- No visual builder or template library
Standout against Octoparse. A French scraping API with a SOC 2 Type II attestation, one of the older ones in its niche.
Best for: Small teams who want a recurring free tier and no charge for failed requests
ScrapingAnt bills credits only for successful requests, so a blocked or timed-out scrape costs nothing. A standard Chrome-rendered request with default proxies costs 10 credits, and 10,000 free credits arrive every month without a card, a recurring allowance where Octoparse offers a free plan capped by tasks.
The entity is DATAANT sp. z o.o. under Polish law. Plans go from Enthusiast at $19 per month (100,000 credits) to Business Pro at $599 (8,000,000), with residential and datacenter proxies billed separately by bandwidth. It has a smaller public track record than ScrapingBee or ZenRows and publishes no certification of its own.
What ScrapingAnt does better than Octoparse
- Failed requests are free, so blocks do not eat the budget
- A recurring free tier of 10,000 credits, no card required
- Polish company under GDPR instead of US arbitration
Where ScrapingAnt is a step down from Octoparse
- Shorter public track record than the two older credit-based APIs
- No visual builder, so it needs a developer
Standout against Octoparse. Pay-per-success credits: a blocked request costs nothing.
Best for: Operations staff who need scraping combined with clicking and typing on a schedule
Axiom.ai is a better match for Octoparse users whose tasks include logging in, filling a form or copying values between web apps than for bulk collection. Bots are built in a Chrome extension, step by step or by describing them to an AI, and run either in the cloud or on your own computer through the desktop app.
Axiom Ai Limited is a UK company, outside the EEA but under a UK adequacy decision, and plans are measured in runtime hours: Starter $15 for 5 hours up to Ultimate $250 for 250 hours. Pricing by time means slow pages use the allowance, and cloud runs on Pro are limited to one bot at a time.
What Axiom.ai does better than Octoparse
- Desktop runs keep data on your own machine
- Handles clicks, typing and form filling beyond extraction
- Free 2 hours of runtime to test before paying
Where Axiom.ai is a step down from Octoparse
- Not built for high-volume collection
- Runtime-hour billing is a poor fit for large page counts
Standout against Octoparse. Bots can run entirely on your own desktop, so scraped data never has to leave the machine.
Best for: Developers testing anti-bot bypass cheaply before committing to a larger plan
ZenRows hands back the HTML of a URL after handling rotation, browser rendering and anti-bot checks in one call. It starts with 5,000 free credits a month and no card, then $16 per month for 45,000 credits, which is the lowest published entry price among the API tools here.
ZenRows, S.L. in Getxo, Bizkaia is the controller, and its privacy policy cites the Spanish LOPDGDD alongside GDPR. Exit nodes are global, so jurisdiction covers the company, not the route. Credit pricing is hard to predict on irregular workloads, and an abstraction gives less control than raw proxies on awkward sites.
What ZenRows does better than Octoparse
- Free tier renews monthly and needs no card
- Cheapest published paid entry among the API tools at $16
- Controller sits inside the EU under Spanish law
Where ZenRows is a step down from Octoparse
- Less control when a site needs custom handling
- No point-and-click interface for non-developers
Standout against Octoparse. Sells the unblocked page rather than the proxies, with a free tier that resets every month.
Best for: Teams already running scrapers who want monitoring and routing across many providers
ScrapeOps owns no proxy network. It routes requests across more than 20 third-party proxy and scraping-API providers and adds free job scheduling, a monitoring dashboard and an AI-assisted scraper builder. Compared with Octoparse's task monitoring, which sits in the Professional plan, the monitoring here is free and usable on its own.
ScrapeOps Limited is an Irish company. The jurisdiction of an individual request depends on whichever underlying provider handles it, and several of those are not European. Paid pricing beyond 1,000 free credits and 100MB of proxy traffic is not published, so budget questions go to the vendor.
What ScrapeOps does better than Octoparse
- Monitoring and scheduling are free, not tied to a higher plan
- Avoids choosing one provider by routing across many
Where ScrapeOps is a step down from Octoparse
- Not a replacement for a visual builder or a proxy network
- Paid pricing is not published
- Underlying providers are not all European
Standout against Octoparse. The only entry here that sells no proxies of its own and picks between other vendors for you.
What actually breaks when you switch
The first thing that breaks is the task library. The Octoparse pages checked mention no export into another tool, so each scraper is rebuilt and tested against the live site. Field rules and pagination you set up inside a task have to be recreated as sitemap selectors or as code, and any data-cleaning steps go with them. Run the old and new scraper side by side for a cycle or two and compare row counts before you cancel.
Then contracts and billing. Octoparse plans are quoted on annual billing, so check your renewal date before moving, and the 5-day money-back window only covers the start of a term.
On the other side, credit-based APIs charge from the first request, Web Scraper Cloud bills annually, and runtime-hour plans punish slow pages. Retraining is the smallest cost with Web Scraper or Axiom.ai, which look similar to Octoparse, and the largest with an API tool, where a person has to write and maintain code.
Can I move my Octoparse tasks into a European tool?
Not as files, as far as the pages checked show. A task is built and stored inside Octoparse, and none of the European tools on this page lists an Octoparse import. What carries over is the knowledge in the task: the start URLs, the fields, the pagination logic and the schedule. Write those down first, then rebuild.
Web Scraper describes its definitions as sitemaps that you can reuse locally, so the rebuild there is mostly clicking the elements again. API tools such as Zyte or ZenRows need a short script per target. Budget a day for the first scraper and much less for the rest.
Is a European vendor automatically better for scraping compliance?
No. What a European contract changes is who you contract with, which law governs the agreement and which supervisory authority you can complain to. It does not change what you are allowed to collect. Scraping personal data, bypassing a login or copying protected content raises its own questions under GDPR, database rights and the target site's terms, whichever tool does the fetching.
The tools also differ on routing. Several state that their exit nodes are global, so the European part is the company and the contract, not the path the request takes. If the location of the traffic matters to you, ask the vendor in writing.
Which one to pick
If your team clicks rather than codes, move to Web Scraper first. It is the closest in workflow, the extension costs nothing to try, and Web Scraper Cloud from $50 per month covers scheduling and exports. Add Axiom.ai when the task is really a browser workflow, and Apify when you want ready-made scrapers from a store with the option of writing your own later.
If your sites block you, or you need volume, stop thinking in tasks and move to an API. ZenRows and ScrapingAnt are the cheapest to try, ScrapingBee brings a SOC 2 Type II attestation, Zyte prices by target difficulty, and Oxylabs or Decodo fit when you also want proxy pools. Choose Bright Data when buying a dataset is cheaper than scraping, and add ScrapeOps if you already run scrapers and want monitoring across vendors.
Frequently Asked Questions
For the same click-to-extract workflow, Web Scraper from Latvia is the nearest match: a free browser extension builds the sitemap and Web Scraper Cloud runs it on a schedule from $50 per month. Apify suits people who want ready-made scrapers or their own code, and Axiom.ai fits when scraping is one step of a browser workflow. If sites block you, a scraping API such as Zyte or ScrapingBee fits better than a visual tool.
Octoparse lists a free plan, Standard from $69 per month and Professional from $249, with add-ons such as residential proxies at $3 per GB billed apart. Web Scraper Cloud starts at $50 per month, ScrapingBee at $19, ScrapingAnt at $19 with 10,000 free credits a month, and ZenRows at $16 with a free tier. The models differ (tasks, credits, requests, runtime hours), so compare on your own volume.
It depends on the target. Scraping APIs like Zyte, ScrapingBee, ScrapingAnt and ZenRows include rotation and anti-bot handling in the request price. Web Scraper includes datacenter proxies in its plans and sells residential proxies as an add-on. Oxylabs and Decodo sell proxy pools as separate products, which suits you if you keep your own crawler.
Yes, with Web Scraper or Axiom.ai. Both are built in a browser extension without code. Decodo also offers templates for named targets such as Amazon, Google and Idealo. The API-first tools assume a developer, so a non-technical team that picks one of them will end up asking someone to write the calls.
Bright Data Ltd is based in Netanya, Israel, and its agreement names Israeli law, so it counts as eligible on this site. Clients located in the United States contract with Bright Data, Inc. in New York instead. It is a much larger product range than Octoparse, from unlocker APIs to purchasable datasets, and the entity on your invoice is worth confirming.
Related comparisons
About the author
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.