European Proxy & Networking Providers

Proxies power web scraping, data collection, ad verification, brand protection and API integrations - and where that traffic exits matters. These European providers deliver residential, mobile, datacenter and static egress IP proxies from companies headquartered in the EU and UK, so you can keep your networking layer under European jurisdiction and GDPR rather than routing through US-based intermediaries.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

European Purpose may be paid for placements on this page and may earn a commission through links on it. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed or what our review says. Editorial policy

7 European Proxy & Networking Providers

Oxylabs

Enterprise residential & datacenter proxies with scraping APIs

#1 of 7 in this category
Lithuania Residential & datacenter
Residential proxies Web Scraper API Enterprise scale

Smartproxy (Decodo)

Residential & mobile proxies with an easy dashboard

#2 of 7 in this category
Lithuania Residential & mobile
Residential proxies Mobile proxies Scraping APIs

SOAX

Flexible residential, mobile & ISP proxy network

#3 of 7 in this category
United Kingdom Residential & mobile
Residential proxies Mobile proxies ISP proxies

Zyte

Smart proxy management built for web scraping

#4 of 7 in this category
Ireland Smart proxy + API
Smart Proxy Manager Zyte API Anti-ban handling

Apify

Proxy & automation platform for scraping at scale

#5 of 7 in this category
Czech Republic Proxy + automation
Datacenter & residential Scraping Actors Developer platform

OutboundGateway

EU-native static outbound IP proxy for fixed European egress IPs

#6 of 7 in this category
EU-native Static egress IP
Static outbound IP API allow-listing EU jurisdiction

IPRoyal

Lithuanian proxy network with published per-gigabyte pricing and no minimum commitment

#7 of 7 in this category
Lithuania Pay-as-you-go, published per GB
Residential and mobile proxiesPublished pricingNo commitment

Key takeaways

  • Oxylabs ranks #1 among the European proxy and networking providers in this directory, because Oxylabs pairs an enterprise-scale residential and datacentre network with scraping APIs from a Lithuanian company.
  • Two unrelated jobs share this category: rotating many IPs to collect public web data, and holding one fixed IP so somebody else can allow-list it — and five of these six do the first.
  • OutboundGateway is the only one doing the second, giving applications a static European egress IP for the moment a bank or an API says "tell us which addresses your requests come from".
  • Europe is unusually strong here: Oxylabs and Decodo are Lithuanian, Zyte Irish, Apify Czech and SOAX British, so the alternative to a US proxy network is not a compromise.
  • Zyte maintains Scrapy, the open-source scraping framework a large part of this industry is built on, which is a different kind of credential from a marketing page.

European proxy and networking services route your traffic through an IP address that is not your own — either through a large pool of rotating addresses for collecting public web data at scale, or through one fixed European address so partners and APIs can allow-list you.

European proxy & networking compared

European proxy & networking tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Oxylabs Lithuania Enterprise pricing, published per product on request Enterprises collecting web data at scale who need reliability over price
#2 Smartproxy (Decodo) Lithuania Self-serve plans, published on the provider's website Small teams that want residential and mobile proxies without a sales call
#3 SOAX United Kingdom Self-serve plans, published on the provider's website Teams that need proxy-type breadth including mobile and ISP
#4 Zyte Ireland Usage-based, published per product on the provider's website Engineering teams that want to keep their scrapers and stop managing proxies
#5 Apify Czech Republic Free tier with usage-based paid plans Developers who want the scrapers and the infrastructure in one place
#6 OutboundGateway European Union Published on the provider's website Developers and SaaS teams needing a stable European egress IP
#7 IPRoyal Lithuania Pay-as-you-go, published per gigabyte Small teams and individual projects that need proxies without a commitment

Every European proxy & networking tool reviewed

#1 Oxylabs

Vilnius, Lithuania Enterprise pricing, published per product on request Trials by arrangement

Best for: Enterprises collecting web data at scale who need reliability over price

Oxylabs is the enterprise end of this category: a large residential and datacentre proxy network paired with Web Scraper API, aimed at organisations for whom a failed collection run costs more than the subscription. That framing shows up in how it sells — account management, service commitments and compliance processes rather than a signup form and a credit card.

The combination of network and API matters. Raw proxies leave you maintaining rotation, retry and anti-ban logic yourself; a scraping API absorbs that so the team works on what to do with the data instead of on getting it. For a price intelligence or brand protection function running continuously, that difference compounds.

Oxylabs operates from Vilnius, so the company sits under GDPR in an EU member state — which for a data collection vendor is a substantive point, since compliance processes and know-your-customer checks are what separate a reputable proxy network from a problematic one. Pricing is enterprise and quoted rather than published, so evaluation means a sales conversation, and the residential network raises the question every buyer should ask directly: where the consumer IPs come from and how consent was obtained.

What Oxylabs does well

  • Enterprise-scale residential and datacentre network
  • Web Scraper API removes rotation and anti-ban logic
  • Lithuanian company, EU jurisdiction under GDPR
  • Compliance and know-your-customer processes
  • Built for continuous, high-volume collection

Where Oxylabs falls short

  • Enterprise pricing, quoted rather than published
  • Sales-led rather than self-serve
  • Overkill for small or occasional collection
  • Ask directly how residential IP consent is obtained

Standout feature. Network and scraping API from one vendor — you stop maintaining the retry logic that eats the project.

#2 Smartproxy (Decodo)

Vilnius, Lithuania Self-serve plans, published on the provider's website Self-serve signup

Best for: Small teams that want residential and mobile proxies without a sales call

Decodo, formerly Smartproxy, covers much of the same ground as Oxylabs from the same city and sells it differently: a self-serve dashboard, published plans and an onboarding designed to have you running the same afternoon rather than after a procurement cycle. For a small team or a single project, that is the difference between starting and not.

Its network covers residential and mobile proxies, with mobile being the harder type to block precisely because thousands of real users share a carrier address, alongside scraping APIs for teams that would rather call an endpoint than manage rotation.

It operates from Vilnius under GDPR, like Oxylabs, so the EU-establishment argument holds. The trade-off against the enterprise end is what you would expect: less account management, less bespoke service commitment, and support that scales with the plan rather than with the relationship. The same question about residential IP sourcing and consent applies here as everywhere in this part of the category.

What Smartproxy (Decodo) does well

  • Self-serve with published plans and a usable dashboard
  • Residential and mobile proxies with scraping APIs
  • Running the same day rather than after procurement
  • Lithuanian company, EU jurisdiction under GDPR
  • Suited to small teams and single projects

Where Smartproxy (Decodo) falls short

  • Less account management than the enterprise tier
  • Support scales with plan rather than relationship
  • Ask directly how residential IP consent is obtained
  • Rebrand from Smartproxy still confuses search results

Standout feature. Mobile proxies on a self-serve plan — the hardest type to block, without a sales cycle to reach it.

#3 SOAX

United Kingdom Self-serve plans, published on the provider's website Self-serve signup

Best for: Teams that need proxy-type breadth including mobile and ISP

SOAX carries the widest range of proxy types among these providers: residential, mobile and ISP on one network. That breadth is the reason to choose it, because different targets defeat different types and having all three in one account means changing approach without changing vendor.

ISP proxies are the type most people have not used and often the right answer: addresses registered to consumer ISPs but hosted in datacentres, so they combine datacentre speed and stability with the appearance of a residential connection. For sustained sessions where residential rotation is too slow and datacentre traffic gets refused, that is exactly the gap they fill.

SOAX is British, which places it under UK GDPR and an EU adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing — lawful for transfers from the EU without additional safeguards, and worth knowing if procurement rules name EU member states. Plans are self-serve and published. As with every residential network here, ask directly where the consumer IPs come from and how consent was obtained.

What SOAX does well

  • Residential, mobile and ISP proxies on one network
  • ISP proxies combine datacentre speed with residential appearance
  • Change proxy type without changing vendor
  • Self-serve with published plans
  • Flexible targeting across the network

Where SOAX falls short

  • UK rather than EU jurisdiction
  • No scraping platform of its own like Apify
  • Ask directly how residential IP consent is obtained
  • Less enterprise service depth than Oxylabs

Standout feature. ISP proxies: datacentre speed on addresses that read as residential — the type most people have not tried.

#4 Zyte

Ireland Usage-based, published per product on the provider's website Free tier on Zyte API

Best for: Engineering teams that want to keep their scrapers and stop managing proxies

Zyte sells proxy management rather than proxies, and for a team that already has working scrapers that is a better product. Smart Proxy Manager and Zyte API handle rotation, retries, throttling and anti-ban behaviour automatically, so the logic that decides which address to use next and what to do when a request is refused stops being code you maintain.

That logic is where scraping projects rot. It works when written, degrades quietly as targets change their defences, and turns into an unowned maintenance burden nobody wants. Handing it to a service that does nothing else is a defensible architectural decision rather than a convenience.

The credential worth knowing: Zyte maintains Scrapy, the open-source scraping framework a large part of this industry is built on. That is a different kind of signal from a marketing page — the vendor is a maintainer of the ecosystem rather than only a seller into it. Zyte is Irish, so EU-established under GDPR, with usage-based pricing and a free tier on Zyte API. It sells managed access rather than raw proxy pools, so a team wanting addresses to use its own way is buying the wrong thing.

What Zyte does well

  • Managed rotation, retries and anti-ban handling
  • Maintains Scrapy, the open-source scraping framework
  • Irish company, intra-EEA processing under GDPR
  • Free tier available on Zyte API
  • Removes the maintenance burden that rots scraping projects

Where Zyte falls short

  • Sells managed access rather than raw proxy pools
  • Less control over individual address selection
  • Usage-based pricing needs modelling at volume
  • Not aimed at non-scraping proxy use

Standout feature. The company maintaining Scrapy also sells the proxy layer — the ecosystem's maintainer, not just a vendor into it.

#5 Apify

Prague, Czech Republic Free tier with usage-based paid plans Free tier

Best for: Developers who want the scrapers and the infrastructure in one place

Apify sells the whole stack rather than the network under it. Scraping Actors are runnable, shareable scrapers on a developer platform, with datacentre and residential proxies underneath and scheduling, storage and an API around them — so a team that would otherwise write scrapers and then find somewhere to run them gets both from one place.

The Actor model is the interesting part: scrapers are packaged units that others can run, which means common targets frequently already have a working scraper you can use rather than build. For a project that needs data from a well-known site next week, that is the difference between a sprint and an afternoon.

Apify operates from Prague under GDPR, with a free tier and usage-based paid plans, which makes it the easiest entry point in this category for a developer with a specific job to do. The trade-offs follow from the model: usage-based pricing needs watching once volume is real, the platform is opinionated about how scrapers are packaged, and a team wanting only proxies is paying for a platform it will not use.

What Apify does well

  • Scrapers and infrastructure on one platform
  • Actor model means common targets already have scrapers
  • Datacentre and residential proxies included
  • Czech company, intra-EEA processing under GDPR
  • Free tier with usage-based paid plans

Where Apify falls short

  • Usage-based pricing needs watching at volume
  • Opinionated about how scrapers are packaged
  • Paying for a platform if you only want proxies
  • Ask directly how residential IP consent is obtained

Standout feature. Someone has probably already written the scraper you need — and it runs on the same platform as the proxies.

#6 OutboundGateway

European Union Published on the provider's website See provider

Best for: Developers and SaaS teams needing a stable European egress IP

OutboundGateway does the opposite of everything else in this category. The five providers above it exist to give you many addresses; this one exists to give you exactly one, and never change it.

That requirement arrives as a sentence from a partner — tell us which IP addresses your requests will come from so we can allow-list them — and cloud applications cannot answer it, because the hosting provider assigns addresses that change on a restart, a scaling event or a region move. Routing outbound traffic through one stable dedicated address means the third party allow-lists one IP and the integration survives everything that happens to your own infrastructure. Banks, payment providers and enterprise partners ask for this routinely.

It is EU-native: the egress IPs and the service both sit within Europe, so outbound traffic exits from European infrastructure rather than through a US provider — the last hop a deliberately European stack usually forgets to move. It is a young, single-purpose service with less public track record than the larger names here, so evaluate the SLA, redundancy, throughput and pricing directly before putting a production integration behind it.

What OutboundGateway does well

  • Fixed European outbound IP for allow-listing
  • EU-native — egress and service both inside Europe
  • Keeps the outbound leg consistent with a European stack
  • Removes a brittle, hard-to-debug integration failure mode
  • Built for applications rather than individual users

Where OutboundGateway falls short

  • Single-purpose — useless without that specific need
  • Young service with limited public track record
  • Sits in the path of production traffic, so the SLA matters
  • Not a scraping or rotating-proxy service at all

Standout feature. The one provider here selling a single unchanging address — the exact opposite of what the other five sell.

#7 IPRoyal

Lithuania Pay-as-you-go, published per gigabyte No minimum commitment

Best for: Small teams and individual projects that need proxies without a commitment

IPRoyal is the accessible end of this category. Published per-gigabyte pricing, no minimum commitment and no sales conversation, which for a developer testing whether an approach works at all is the difference between starting today and filling in a contact form.

The network is substantial despite that positioning — a residential pool reported in the tens of millions of addresses across essentially every country, plus mobile and datacentre options. For most collection work the practical question is whether a given country and city are covered at the volume you need, and at this size the answer is usually yes.

IPRoyal describes its residential addresses as ethically sourced, which is the claim that matters most in this part of the category and the one every buyer should press on: residential proxies route your traffic through real people's home connections, and whether those people knowingly agreed is a question with a real answer that varies by provider. Ask for specifics rather than accepting the adjective. IPRoyal is Lithuania-based, so EU jurisdiction under GDPR. It is a smaller operation than Oxylabs with less enterprise service depth and no scraping platform of its own.

What IPRoyal does well

  • Published per-gigabyte pricing with no commitment
  • Large residential pool with wide country coverage
  • Residential, mobile and datacentre options
  • Lithuanian company, EU jurisdiction under GDPR
  • Accessible to individual developers, not just enterprises

Where IPRoyal falls short

  • Less enterprise service depth than Oxylabs
  • No scraping platform or managed rotation
  • Press for specifics on how residential IPs are sourced
  • Support scales with plan rather than relationship

Standout feature. Published per-gigabyte pricing and no minimum — you can find out whether the approach works before anyone quotes you.

Rotating pool or fixed address?

These are opposite requirements and picking the wrong one wastes a procurement cycle, so name yours first.

A rotating pool: you are collecting public web data at scale — prices, availability, search results, listings — and the sites you read will block a single address quickly. You want many addresses, distributed across countries and networks, and you want them to look like ordinary consumer connections. That is Oxylabs, Decodo, SOAX, Zyte and Apify.

A fixed address: you are calling somebody else's API and they will only accept traffic from addresses they have allow-listed. You want one stable IP that never changes. That is OutboundGateway.

No product does both well, because the two requirements are exact opposites: one is defined by variety, the other by never varying.

What are the different proxy types actually for?

Four types appear across these providers and the differences decide whether the work succeeds.

Residential proxies route through real consumer connections, so requests look like an ordinary person browsing. That is what gets through on sites that block obvious datacentre traffic, and every provider here except OutboundGateway offers them.

Datacentre proxies come from server hosting, which makes them faster and cheaper and easier to detect. Fine for targets that do not care, wasteful for targets that do. Oxylabs and Apify both carry them alongside residential.

Mobile proxies route through mobile carrier networks, the hardest type to block because thousands of real users share the same carrier address — Decodo and SOAX both offer them. ISP proxies, which SOAX also carries, sit in between: datacentre speed on addresses registered to consumer ISPs.

Where does the proxy stop and the platform start?

Three of these providers sell more than addresses, and for most teams that is the part worth paying for.

Zyte builds around smart proxy management rather than raw proxies: its Smart Proxy Manager and Zyte API handle rotation, retries and anti-ban behaviour automatically, so you stop maintaining the logic that decides which address to use next and what to do when a request is refused. Zyte also maintains Scrapy, the open-source framework much of this industry runs on.

Apify goes further and sells the automation as well as the network: scraping Actors are runnable, shareable scrapers on a developer platform, with datacentre and residential proxies underneath. For a team that would otherwise build and host its own scrapers, that is the whole stack.

Oxylabs sits at the enterprise end with Web Scraper API alongside the network, and Decodo pairs scraping APIs with a dashboard aimed at getting a small team running quickly rather than at procurement.

What does a fixed European egress IP solve?

The moment a partner asks which addresses your requests will come from and you cannot answer.

Cloud applications send outbound requests from whatever IP the hosting provider assigns, and it changes without warning — on a restart, a scaling event, a region move. Dynamic addresses make an allow-list impossible to honour, and the failure is nasty because it works until it silently does not.

OutboundGateway routes outbound traffic through one stable dedicated address. You hand that IP to the bank, the payment provider or the enterprise partner, they allow-list it, and the integration survives changes to your own infrastructure. It is EU-native, so the outbound leg exits from European infrastructure rather than through a US proxy — the last hop a European stack usually forgets.

It is a single-purpose service. Its value is entirely a function of whether you have that specific requirement, and it is worth checking the SLA, redundancy and throughput before putting a production integration behind it.

What is legal and what is not?

Worth being precise, because this category attracts a reputation it does not entirely deserve.

Collecting publicly accessible data is broadly lawful in Europe, and it is how price comparison, market research, brand protection and academic research have always worked. What changes the answer is the data and the method: personal data pulls in GDPR regardless of whether it was public, terms of service create contractual obligations that a court may or may not enforce, and rate limits that degrade a site's service for its actual users are a separate problem from the legal one.

The reputable providers here are explicit about this. Enterprise proxy networks operate compliance and know-your-customer processes precisely because their networks can be misused, and the difference between a vendor that asks what you are doing and one that does not is the clearest quality signal in the category.

The residential networks raise a second question worth asking your provider directly: where the consumer IPs come from, and whether the people whose connections carry your traffic consented knowingly. Ask it before you sign, not after.

How we selected and ranked these 7 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

Oxylabs holds #1 among the European proxy and networking providers in this directory, pairing an enterprise-scale residential and datacentre network with Web Scraper API, from a Lithuanian company under GDPR. Decodo, formerly Smartproxy, is the more self-serve Lithuanian alternative, Zyte from Ireland is strongest on managed proxy rotation, Apify from Czechia adds a full automation platform, and SOAX from the UK carries residential, mobile and ISP proxies.

Several, and Europe is unusually well served here. Oxylabs and Decodo are both Lithuanian, Zyte is Irish, Apify is Czech, and SOAX is British. All five offer residential proxies with scraping capability, so the choice is between enterprise scale (Oxylabs), self-serve simplicity (Decodo), managed rotation (Zyte), a full automation platform (Apify) and proxy-type breadth including mobile and ISP (SOAX).

Residential proxies route through real consumer connections so requests look like ordinary browsing, which is what gets through on sites that block datacentre traffic. Datacentre proxies come from server hosting: faster and cheaper, easier to detect. Mobile proxies route through carrier networks and are hardest to block, because thousands of real users share the same address. ISP proxies sit in between — datacentre speed on addresses registered to consumer ISPs.

Apify, from Prague, which sells the automation rather than only the network: scraping Actors are runnable, shareable scrapers on a developer platform with datacentre and residential proxies underneath, on a free tier with usage-based paid plans. Zyte is the alternative if you want to keep your own scrapers but stop maintaining rotation logic — its Smart Proxy Manager and Zyte API handle retries and anti-ban behaviour automatically.

A service that routes your application's outbound traffic through one stable dedicated IP address instead of whatever your hosting provider assigns at the time. You give that address to a third party, they allow-list it, and the integration keeps working while your infrastructure changes underneath. OutboundGateway is the one provider here doing this, and it is EU-native, so the outbound leg exits from European infrastructure.

Because an allow-list of source addresses is a simple, effective control: only traffic from known addresses is accepted, so a stolen credential alone is not enough. Banks, payment providers and enterprise partners commonly require it before accepting integration traffic, and the requirement usually surfaces late — during integration, when "our IPs are dynamic" is not an acceptable answer. OutboundGateway exists for exactly that moment.

Collecting publicly accessible data is broadly lawful and underpins price comparison, market research and academic work — but three things change the answer. Personal data pulls in GDPR whether or not it was public. Terms of service create contractual obligations a court may or may not enforce. And request rates that degrade a site for its real users are a separate problem from the legal one. Reputable providers run compliance and know-your-customer processes for this reason.

Zyte, the Irish company at #4 in this category, which is a more meaningful credential than most marketing claims — a large part of the web scraping industry runs on a framework this vendor maintains in the open. Alongside it Zyte sells Smart Proxy Manager and Zyte API, which handle proxy rotation, retries and anti-ban behaviour automatically, with a free tier available on Zyte API.

Oxylabs and Decodo are Lithuanian, Zyte Irish, Apify Czech and OutboundGateway EU-native, so all five are EU-established and process under GDPR directly. SOAX is British, operating under UK GDPR and an EU adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing. Note that headquarters is not the same as exit-node location: a residential network routes through consumer connections worldwide, which is a separate question worth asking your provider.