European No-Code Database Tools

Two European no-code database platforms — the Airtable-style category of tools that put a real relational database behind a spreadsheet interface — each checked for who actually owns the company and where customer data is hosted, not just where the homepage copy is written. Several better-known names in this space, including Grist and NocoDB, were checked and did not qualify; see the FAQ below for why.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

5 European No-Code Database Tools

Baserow

Open-source no-code database platform built in Amsterdam

#1 of 5 in this category
Netherlands Free / $10-$18 per user/month
MIT-licensed, self-hostable coreData hosted in GermanyGrid, gallery, kanban and calendar views

SeaTable

German no-code database and spreadsheet hybrid, hosted in Frankfurt and Munich

#2 of 5 in this category
Germany Free / €7-€14 per user/month
Data never leaves EuropeKanban and Gantt viewsFounder-owned, bootstrapped

Fusioo

Online database and app builder under Bulgarian law, with euro per-user pricing and a free plan

#3 of 5 in this category
Bulgaria Free (2 users, 10 apps); Basic €9 and Standard €19 per user/month billed annually
Free plan for 2 usersWorkflows, reports and web formsZapier, Pabbly and Make integrations

Kinabase

Cambridge business workflow platform with database collections, tasks, workflows and documents

#4 of 5 in this category
United Kingdom Pro £39 and Max £59 per user/month; Enterprise on request
Collections, tasks and workflowsMicrosoft 365 single sign-onUK data storage

Retable

Airtable-style online database from a UK company, with a direct import and London data storage

#5 of 5 in this category
United Kingdom Team $12/user/month; Enterprise on request; 14-day free trial
Airtable importAutomations and webhooksPublic API

Key takeaways

  • Baserow ranks #1 in this directory: Baserow B.V. in Amsterdam, an MIT-licensed core you can self-host, and cloud data stated to sit in Germany. It lists its cloud prices in US dollars despite being a Dutch company.
  • Five tools are listed, from three EU establishments and two UK ones. The Netherlands and Germany have one each (Baserow, SeaTable), Bulgaria has Fusioo, and the United Kingdom has Kinabase and Retable. The UK entries sit outside the EEA under an adequacy decision.
  • Only one tool here is open source: Baserow, under an MIT core with paid premium features. SeaTable has a proprietary engine with some open components, and Fusioo, Kinabase and Retable are cloud only.
  • Three of the five have a free plan: Baserow (3,000 rows), SeaTable (25 users, 10,000 rows) and Fusioo (2 users, 10 apps). Kinabase and Retable offer a trial only, 7 and 14 days.
  • Hosting is stated most precisely by SeaTable (Frankfurt and Munich on Exoscale) and Baserow (Germany). Retable names a London data centre on AWS, and Fusioo names no region at all, only Microsoft Azure in a subprocessor list last updated in 2018.
  • Kinabase is the odd one out: a business workflow platform with database collections, tasks and documents, priced at £39 per user a month, rather than a pure Airtable-style grid.

A European no-code database tool is software that lets a non-developer build a relational database with a spreadsheet-like interface, with linked tables, forms, views and automations, where the company that operates the service is established in Europe. The distinction matters because these tools hold the operational data of a business, customers, orders, inventory, candidates, and the controller obligations for that data fall on the organisation that built the base, with the vendor as its processor.

European No-Code database tools compared

European No-Code database tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Baserow Netherlands Free (3,000 rows, 2GB); Premium $10/user/month and Advanced $18/user/month, both billed yearly; Enterprise on request Teams that want an open-source database they can self-host
#2 SeaTable Germany Free (up to 25 users, 10,000 rows, 2GB); Plus €7/user/month and Enterprise €14/user/month, both billed yearly Teams that want a documented EU hosting chain and a larger free plan
#3 Fusioo Bulgaria Free (up to 2 users, 10 apps); Basic €9/user/month and Standard €19/user/month billed annually (€12 and €26 billed monthly); Enterprise from 50 users on request Small teams building simple business apps on a per-user budget
#4 Kinabase United Kingdom Pro £39/user/month and Max £59/user/month (£421 and £637 per user per year billed annually); Enterprise on request Small businesses replacing several tools with one system
#5 Retable United Kingdom Team $12/user/month (listed at $120/user/year billed yearly); Enterprise on request; add-ons for automations, storage and uploads Airtable users who want a cheap per-user switch

Every European No-Code database tool reviewed

#1 Baserow

Amsterdam, Netherlands Founded 2020 Free (3,000 rows, 2GB); Premium $10/user/month and Advanced $18/user/month, both billed yearly; Enterprise on request Free plan

Best for: Teams that want an open-source database they can self-host

  • Operating company. Baserow B.V.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Where the data sits. Cloud data hosted in Germany
  • Independent checks. EU-only data residency for cloud hosting
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. Airtable, Google Sheets

Baserow B.V. is a Dutch company registered in Amsterdam (KvK 81129254) that publishes the core of its database under the MIT licence. Its pitch is the spreadsheet interface people know, backed by a real relational database, with grid, gallery, kanban and calendar views, row-level permissions, a REST and webhook API and no-code automations between tables.

Cloud data is hosted exclusively in Germany, which the company states in its documentation. Self-hosting the open-source core is free and has no row limit, while premium views and automations require a paid licence. The cloud plans are Free with 3,000 rows and 2GB, Premium at $10 per user a month and Advanced at $18, billed yearly, and Enterprise on request.

Its 2022 seed round was led by INKEF Capital in Amsterdam with firstminute capital, Seedcamp and Frontline, all European funds. The oddities are small: prices are listed in dollars despite the Dutch company, and a free tier of 3,000 rows is tight. Against SeaTable it is the stronger choice for self-hosting.

What Baserow does well

  • MIT-licensed core, free to self-host with no row cap
  • Dutch B.V. with a KvK registration and European investors
  • Cloud data hosted in Germany, stated in the documentation
  • Grid, gallery, kanban and calendar views plus an API and automations
  • A free cloud plan to start with

Where Baserow falls short

  • Premium views and automations need a paid licence, even when self-hosting
  • Cloud pricing is listed in US dollars
  • The free tier caps at 3,000 rows
  • Smaller template and integration library than Airtable

Standout feature. A genuinely open-source core with the cloud data kept in Germany, stated as policy rather than as a default.

#2 SeaTable

Mainz, Germany Founded 2020 Free (up to 25 users, 10,000 rows, 2GB); Plus €7/user/month and Enterprise €14/user/month, both billed yearly Free plan

Best for: Teams that want a documented EU hosting chain and a larger free plan

  • Operating company. SeaTable GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Frankfurt and Munich (DE-FRA-1, DE-MUC-1), run by Exoscale
  • Independent checks. Data never leaves Europe, per vendor security page
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Airtable, Google Sheets

SeaTable GmbH was incorporated in Mainz in July 2020 (Amtsgericht Mainz, HRB 49723) by Ralf and Christoph Dyllick-Brenzinger, who previously built the Seafile file-sync tool. It is a no-code database and spreadsheet hybrid with kanban, Gantt and gallery views, an automation engine and forms for outside collaborators.

Its security page names the exact data centres, DE-FRA-1 in Frankfurt and DE-MUC-1 in Munich, run by Exoscale, and says user data never leaves Europe. The free plan covers up to 25 users with 10,000 rows and 2GB, Plus is €7 per user a month and Enterprise €14, billed yearly, all in euros.

The licensing needs reading carefully. SeaTable can be self-hosted, but the core engine is proprietary even though some components are Apache or AGPL, and the free self-hosted edition is capped at three users. Its ecosystem of integrations is smaller than Airtable's and Baserow's. For a hosted, euro-priced database it is the more generous free option.

What SeaTable does well

  • German GmbH with a Handelsregister entry, founder-owned and bootstrapped
  • Named data centres in Frankfurt and Munich on Exoscale
  • Free plan for up to 25 users
  • Prices published in euros
  • Kanban, Gantt and calendar views on the base grid

Where SeaTable falls short

  • Core database engine is proprietary, not open source
  • Free self-hosted edition is capped at three users
  • Smaller integration library than Airtable
  • Rows are limited to 10,000 on the free plan

Standout feature. A named hosting chain rather than a vague EU claim: exact data centres and the exact provider, stated on the security page.

#3 Fusioo

Sofia, Bulgaria Founded 2013 Free (up to 2 users, 10 apps); Basic €9/user/month and Standard €19/user/month billed annually (€12 and €26 billed monthly); Enterprise from 50 users on request Free plan

Best for: Small teams building simple business apps on a per-user budget

  • Operating company. Fusioo Technologies LTD
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Bulgaria)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated by region; the subprocessor list (last updated 2018) names Microsoft Azure for infrastructure
  • Independent checks. Data stored on ISO 27001/27002 certified servers (vendor statement)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Airtable, Smartsheet

Fusioo is an online database and app builder operated by Fusioo Technologies LTD, whose terms and data processing agreement are governed by the laws of Bulgaria. The footer lists an office in Sofia and also an Italian address in Turin with an Italian VAT number. The site says it was founded in 2013 and launched its product in 2015, with a team of ten or more.

Pricing is published in euros per user. Free covers 2 users and 10 apps, Basic is €9 a month billed annually and Standard €19, or €12 and €26 billed monthly, and Enterprise starts from 50 users on request. Higher tiers add workflows, reports, web forms, integrations through Zapier, Pabbly and Make, and an API.

The weak spot is transparency about where data lives. The how-it-works page says data sits on ISO 27001/27002 certified servers, replicated across data centres, but gives no region. The subprocessor list, last updated in April 2018, names Microsoft Azure and Braintree, a US payments provider. For a regulated use, that needs a written answer.

What Fusioo does well

  • EU company under Bulgarian law, with a DPA published on the site
  • Per-user prices published in euros, with a free plan
  • Workflows, reports, web forms and calendar integrations
  • Lite users with read-only access are not limited in number
  • Servers described as ISO 27001/27002 certified

Where Fusioo falls short

  • No hosting region stated, and a subprocessor list dated 2018
  • Infrastructure is Microsoft Azure, a US-owned provider
  • Record limits per app on every plan below Enterprise, 30,000 on Standard
  • Smaller ecosystem than Airtable

Standout feature. Low per-user prices in euros with a free plan, aimed at teams that want a simple app builder rather than a developer tool.

#4 Kinabase

Cambridge, United Kingdom Founded 2021 Pro £39/user/month and Max £59/user/month (£421 and £637 per user per year billed annually); Enterprise on request 7-day free trial on Pro and Max, no credit card

Best for: Small businesses replacing several tools with one system

  • Operating company. Cambridge Kinetics Ltd (trading as Kinabase)
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Primary data storage in the United Kingdom, per the terms
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Airtable, Monday.com

Kinabase is operated by Cambridge Kinetics Ltd, a company incorporated in England in March 2021 (company number 13235481). Its about page says it was founded after the founder graduated from the University of Cambridge. It is a business workflow platform with collections for data, tasks, activities, workflows, automations, documents and portals for clients.

Pricing is published per user in pounds: Pro is £39 a month, or £421 a year, and Max is £59 a month, or £637 a year, with Enterprise on request. Pro adds automations, workflows, Microsoft 365 single sign-on, custom roles and audit logging, and Max adds a native document editor, accounting integrations and developer API access. Pro and Max have a 7-day free trial without a credit card.

The terms say primary data storage remains in the United Kingdom and are governed by English law. It is a UK company, outside the EEA under an adequacy decision, and a different product from Baserow: more process and documents, less raw grid. It costs more per user than the other tools here.

What Kinabase does well

  • UK company with a Companies House number and English governing law
  • Primary data storage stated as the United Kingdom
  • Collections, tasks, workflows and documents in one platform
  • Microsoft 365 single sign-on and audit logging from the Pro tier
  • Prices published in pounds, with a 7-day trial

Where Kinabase falls short

  • From £39 per user a month, the highest entry price in this category
  • Outside the EEA, covered by an adequacy decision
  • No free plan listed
  • Less of a spreadsheet-style grid than a business platform

Standout feature. One system for data, tasks, workflows and documents, with Microsoft 365 sign-on built into the entry plan.

#5 Retable

London, United Kingdom Founded 2021 Team $12/user/month (listed at $120/user/year billed yearly); Enterprise on request; add-ons for automations, storage and uploads 14-day free trial

Best for: Airtable users who want a cheap per-user switch

  • Operating company. Retable Limited
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. AWS data centre in London, United Kingdom, per the privacy policy
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Airtable, Google Sheets

Retable is an online database and spreadsheet tool operated by Retable Limited, a company incorporated in England in February 2021 (company number 13178392, London registered office at Companies House). Its terms give a registered office in Maidenhead, which differs from the Companies House entry. It sells itself directly against Airtable, with a fast import for Airtable bases.

Pricing is published in dollars: Team is $12 per user a month, listed at $120 per user a year, with unlimited workspaces, 50,000 records per project, automations, webhooks, custom branding and a public API. Add-ons raise automation counts, storage and upload limits, and Enterprise offers on-premise or dedicated cloud. A 14-day free trial is offered, and the page shows no permanent free plan.

The privacy policy says the service runs on Amazon Web Services and that data is stored exclusively in a data centre in London certified to ISO 27001. That is UK hosting on a US-owned provider. The company page says little about the team, so the trial is worth testing with real data.

What Retable does well

  • UK company with a Companies House number
  • Data stored in a London data centre, stated in the privacy policy
  • Airtable import and a public API
  • Per-user pricing starting at $12 a month
  • 14-day free trial

Where Retable falls short

  • Runs on AWS, a US-owned provider
  • Prices in US dollars, with no free plan
  • Outside the EEA, covered by an adequacy decision
  • Limited public information about the company and team

Standout feature. An Airtable-shaped product with a direct import, at a flat per-user price and UK-only data storage.

What separates a no-code database from a spreadsheet?

A spreadsheet is one grid with formulas. A no-code database is several tables with typed fields, links between records, permissions per view and an API, which is what lets a small team run something like a CRM or an inventory without code.

In practice the line is relations and views. Baserow and SeaTable give you linked tables with grid, gallery, kanban and calendar views over the same rows. Fusioo and Retable work the same way, and Kinabase calls its tables collections and adds tasks, workflows and documents around them.

If your data is one flat list that one person edits, a spreadsheet is still the right answer. The move to a database pays off when several people edit linked records and you need an audit trail and roles.

Where does your data actually sit with these tools?

Ask for the region and the provider, because "European" is not an answer. SeaTable publishes the exact data centres (DE-FRA-1 and DE-MUC-1 in Frankfurt and Munich, operated by Exoscale) and says user data never leaves Europe. Baserow states cloud hosting in Germany.

Retable names a data centre in London on AWS, which is UK soil with a US-owned provider. Kinabase says primary storage stays in the United Kingdom and that transfers to third-party providers happen only for legitimate platform functions.

Fusioo is the least precise. Its terms and DPA are under Bulgarian law, and the subprocessor list, last updated in April 2018, names Microsoft Azure for infrastructure without a region. For anything sensitive, ask for the current list in writing.

Self-hosting or cloud?

Self-hosting is available on two of the five, and it works differently. Baserow's core is MIT licensed and free to run with no row cap, with premium views and automations behind a paid licence. SeaTable can be self-hosted too, but its engine is proprietary and its free self-hosted edition is capped at three users.

Fusioo, Kinabase and Retable are cloud services. Retable lists on-premise or dedicated cloud on its Enterprise plan, which is a sales conversation rather than a download.

Running your own instance removes the processor but adds backups, upgrades and monitoring to your list. For a team without an administrator the managed cloud is usually the better trade.

How we selected and ranked these 5 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Every page is researched and drafted with AI assistance, and the compliance and pricing claims are checked against the vendor's documentation before it is published under the founder's editorial responsibility. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

Baserow holds #1 in this directory: Baserow B.V. in Amsterdam, an MIT-licensed core, a free plan with 3,000 rows and cloud hosting in Germany. SeaTable from Mainz is the closest competitor, with a more generous free plan of 25 users and 10,000 rows and published data centres in Frankfurt and Munich. For a business-process platform rather than a grid, Kinabase from Cambridge is the alternative.

Yes. Baserow is free for up to 3,000 rows and 2GB, SeaTable is free for up to 25 users and 10,000 rows, and Fusioo is free for up to 2 users and 10 apps. Baserow can also be self-hosted under its MIT core at no licence cost. Kinabase and Retable offer free trials of 7 and 14 days instead of a free plan.

Baserow, whose MIT-licensed core can be self-hosted without a row cap, and SeaTable, which has a self-hostable edition with a proprietary core and a three-user free cap. Retable mentions on-premise or dedicated cloud on its Enterprise plan. Fusioo and Kinabase are cloud only.

Kinabase (Cambridge Kinetics Ltd, England) and Retable (Retable Limited, England) are United Kingdom companies. The UK is outside the EEA but covered by an EU adequacy decision. Baserow is Dutch, SeaTable is German and Fusioo is registered under Bulgarian law, so those three are EU establishments.

Fibery, which calls itself a U.S. company on its security page, NocoDB, Teable and Grist, whose terms name Inc. entities, and Sheetgo, which contracts through Sheetgo, Inc. in Delaware for some customers. Under this directory's rule that a US contracting entity or parent disqualifies a tool, none of them qualify.

None of them matches Airtable's breadth of integrations and templates, and the ecosystems are smaller. Fusioo does not state a hosting region, Retable lists prices in US dollars, Baserow's premium features need a paid licence even when self-hosted, and Kinabase is a business platform rather than a lightweight grid. Only Baserow has a fully open-source core.