Every European endpoint protection tool reviewed
Bratislava, Slovakia
Founded 1992
Per seat per year, published for business tiers
Free 30-day trial
Best for: Any organisation that wants proven detection with a console a normal IT team can run
ESET, spol. s r.o. has been writing detection software in Bratislava since 1992, which makes it older than most of the American vendors it now competes with and older than the category as a marketing term. The engine is the reason to take it seriously: it sits at or near the top of AV-Comparatives and AV-TEST year after year, with a consistently low false-positive rate, which matters more in practice than a headline detection percentage because false positives are what makes an IT team switch the product off.
What makes it the pick here rather than merely a good option is the combination of that engine with a product a normal team can actually operate. The console is manageable without a security specialist, the agent is light enough that people do not notice it, business pricing is published rather than quoted, and there is a real EDR tier for organisations that grow into needing one. The limits are the ones that come with breadth: it is not the deepest threat-hunting platform on this list, and a large enterprise with its own security operations centre will find TEHTRIS or WithSecure aimed more precisely at them.
What ESET does well
- Consistently near the top of independent AV-Comparatives and AV-TEST results
- Low false-positive rate, which is what keeps it switched on
- Published business pricing rather than a quote
- Light agent and a console a general IT team can run
- Slovak company, EU processing, building detection since 1992
Where ESET falls short
- Not the deepest threat-hunting platform here
- EDR tier is priced separately from the base protection
- Aimed at broad usability rather than at a mature security team
Standout feature. Thirty years of engine, not thirty months: the detection has been tested publicly and independently for longer than most competitors have existed.
Bucharest, Romania
Founded 2001
Per seat per year, published
Free trial
Best for: Companies wanting top-tier detection with strong managed and MSP options
S.C. Bitdefender S.R.L. in Bucharest is the other European vendor that consistently tops independent testing, and on raw detection there is very little between it and ESET. Where it differs is the shape of the business around the product: a large managed detection and response offering, a deep MSP channel, and a habit of licensing its engine to other security vendors, which is why Bitdefender technology turns up inside products that do not carry its name.
For a company without security staff, the managed option is the genuinely interesting part, because it answers the question the rest of this category leaves open — who reads the alerts. The trade-offs are worth knowing: the product range is wide enough to be confusing at first, some capabilities sit behind tiers that are not obvious from the pricing page, and the console has more in it than a small IT team will use. None of that touches the detection, which is excellent.
What Bitdefender does well
- Detection scores at the very top of independent testing
- Strong managed detection and response for companies without security staff
- Deep MSP channel and published per-seat pricing
- Romanian company, EU processing
Where Bitdefender falls short
- Wide product range that takes work to navigate
- Capabilities split across tiers in ways the pricing page does not make obvious
- Console offers more than a small team needs
Standout feature. Someone else reads the alerts: the managed option answers the question that sinks most endpoint detection projects.
Paris, France
Founded 2010
Enterprise pricing on request
Demo on request
Best for: European organisations with real security maturity and sovereignty requirements
TEHTRI-Security SAS in Paris built its platform for organisations where the sovereignty question is not a preference but a requirement — French public sector, defence-adjacent industry, critical infrastructure. It covers endpoints, servers, mobile and containers under one detection and response platform, with components qualified by ANSSI, the French national cybersecurity agency, and a stated position of not sending data outside France.
That focus explains both the appeal and the limits. For a European organisation that has to demonstrate where its security telemetry lives, this is a far shorter conversation than with any American vendor, and the platform is genuinely broad. But it assumes you have people who can run a detection and response platform, pricing is quoted per engagement, and outside France the brand and the partner network are much thinner than ESET or Bitdefender. It is not a product to buy because it looked good in a comparison table.
What TEHTRIS does well
- Detection and response across endpoints, servers, mobile and containers
- ANSSI-qualified components and a clear French data position
- Built for organisations with sovereignty requirements rather than preferences
- French company, French processing
Where TEHTRIS falls short
- Assumes a security team that can run it
- Enterprise pricing on request
- Thin partner network outside France
Standout feature. Sovereignty as a specification: ANSSI qualification is an external check on the claim rather than a marketing line about it.
Montrouge, France
Founded 2020
Free and open source / paid plans for the threat feed
Free
Best for: Teams protecting internet-facing servers who want shared threat intelligence without a licence
CrowdSec SAS in Montrouge is the odd one in this category and belongs here anyway. It is open source under MIT, it runs on servers rather than laptops, and it works by reading your logs, spotting attack behaviour, and blocking the addresses behind it — then sharing that signal with everyone else running CrowdSec, so an address hammering a server in Poland is blocked in Portugal before it arrives. Think of it as Fail2ban with a community behind it and a modern architecture.
It does not scan files, it does not protect laptops, and comparing it with ESET on malware detection is comparing two different jobs. What it does do is remove a whole class of noise from internet-facing infrastructure for nothing, with paid plans only for the enriched threat feed and enterprise features. The catch is the usual open-source one: you run it, you configure the scenarios, and the quality of what you get out depends on the attention you put in.
What CrowdSec does well
- Free and open source under MIT, with paid tiers only for the enriched feed
- Community threat intelligence: one attacker blocked everywhere at once
- Built for servers and internet-facing services
- French company, EU processing
Where CrowdSec falls short
- Not endpoint anti-malware; it does not protect laptops
- You run and tune it yourself
- Young company compared with the rest of this list
Standout feature. The network effect turned defensive: every participant blocking an attacker makes the block faster for everyone else.
Bochum, Germany
Founded 1985
Per seat per year, published
Free 30-day trial
Best for: German organisations that want detection built and processed entirely in Germany
G DATA CyberDefense AG has been in Bochum since 1985 and claims, with a reasonable case, to have shipped one of the first anti-virus products at all. Everything about the company is built around a German position: development in Germany, data processing in Germany, and a published no-backdoor guarantee alongside the German TeleTrusT "IT Security made in Germany" seal, which is an external commitment rather than a slogan.
For a German public body or a Mittelstand company with procurement rules that ask where software is written and where the telemetry goes, that combination is the whole argument, and it is a strong one. Elsewhere the case is narrower: detection is good but not consistently at the ESET and Bitdefender level in independent testing, the interface is functional rather than modern, and the international partner network is smaller. Bought for the right reason it is an excellent fit; bought on a feature comparison it will look middling.
What G DATA does well
- Developed and processed entirely in Germany
- Published no-backdoor guarantee and TeleTrusT seal
- Independent since 1985, one of the oldest vendors in the field
- Published per-seat pricing and a 30-day trial
Where G DATA falls short
- Detection scores solid but below ESET and Bitdefender in recent testing
- Interface is functional rather than modern
- Smaller partner network outside German-speaking markets
Standout feature. A written no-backdoor guarantee: a commitment almost nobody else in this market is willing to put in writing.
Helsinki, Finland
Founded 1988
Per seat, quoted through partners
Trial on request
Best for: Mid-sized and larger European organisations buying through a partner
WithSecure Corporation in Helsinki is the business half of what used to be F-Secure, separated in 2022 so the consumer and corporate sides could go their own ways. It sells almost entirely through partners and managed service providers, with endpoint protection, EDR and co-monitored detection where WithSecure analysts watch alongside your team — which is a sensible middle ground between running detection yourself and handing it over completely.
The partner-led model is the thing to plan around. It means the quality of what you get depends substantially on which partner you buy through, pricing is quoted rather than published, and a small company buying direct is not really the target. For a mid-sized European organisation that already works with an IT partner, it is a strong and unusually mature option from a company that has been doing this since 1988.
What WithSecure does well
- Co-monitored detection: their analysts alongside your team
- Long track record, established 1988, Finnish company
- Mature partner and managed-service channel across Europe
- EU processing
Where WithSecure falls short
- Sold through partners, so your experience depends on which one
- Quoted pricing rather than published
- Not aimed at small companies buying direct
Standout feature. Co-monitoring rather than all-or-nothing: their analysts watch with you instead of instead of you.
Hanover, Germany
Founded 2007
Per seat per month, quoted
Free trial
Best for: Microsoft 365 tenants where the real risk arrives by email
Hornetsecurity GmbH in Hanover comes at endpoint security from the direction most compromises actually take: the inbox. The product set is built around Microsoft 365 — email filtering, advanced threat protection, backup for mailboxes and SharePoint, security awareness training and permission management — rather than around an agent on the laptop.
Listing it here needs the caveat stated plainly: it is not an endpoint anti-malware suite and will not replace ESET or Bitdefender on your machines. It sits in front of them, and for many organisations it prevents more incidents than the endpoint agent ever will, because phishing and business email compromise do not arrive as files to be scanned. Pricing is quoted per seat through partners, and the whole proposition assumes you are on Microsoft 365, which makes it either a perfect fit or irrelevant.
What Hornetsecurity does well
- Aimed at where compromise actually starts, which is email
- Backup, awareness training and permission management alongside filtering
- German company, EU processing, ISO 27001
- Deep Microsoft 365 integration
Where Hornetsecurity falls short
- Not endpoint anti-malware; it complements rather than replaces it
- Only relevant if you run Microsoft 365
- Quoted pricing through partners
Standout feature. It guards the door the attackers use: for most organisations the inbox compromises more machines than the machines do.