European Alternatives to Vapi
Looking for a European alternative to Vapi? Vapi's terms of service are a contract with Vapi Inc., a Delaware corporation, disputes go to arbitration in San Francisco, and its EU region is available only with the Premier Success Package. Usage is billed per minute on top of separately priced transcriber, model and voice providers, so the final cost depends on the stack you assemble.
The European platforms below sell the same job, answering and placing phone calls with an AI agent, under a contract with an EU, UK or Israeli company, several with a database or hosting region in Europe and some with a flat published price.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Vendors can pay for more visibility, higher up on the review pages; it never affects which tools are listed. Editorial policy
12 European Alternatives to Vapi
sipgate sona
Free-to-start phone agent from a German telephony provider
Famulor
Self-serve voice agent platform with a Frankfurt database
fonio
Phone assistant for small businesses with published plans
telli
Berlin voice platform for sales, service and reactivation calls
GetVocal
Contact-centre agents with a human approval layer
Revox
Outbound calling agents priced per prospect worked
Parloa
Berlin platform for enterprise customer-service agents
VITAS
Nuremberg telephone assistant with ISO 27001 and C5
Synthflow
No-code voice agents on in-house telephony
NiCE Cognigy
Düsseldorf conversational AI for large contact centres
PolyAI
London dialog agents for high-volume inbound calls
AINORA
Managed voice agent service built per deployment
Key takeaways
- Vapi's terms are a contract with Vapi Inc., a Delaware corporation, under California law with arbitration in San Francisco.
- Vapi's documentation states that its EU region is available only with the Premier Success Package.
- Vapi's pay-as-you-go plan charges $0.05 per minute for hosting, with transcriber, model and voice billed on top.
- sipgate sona is free for 500 call minutes a month, according to sipgate, and Famulor publishes EUR 0.15 per minute.
- Revox bills outbound calls at EUR 0.50 per prospect worked after 200 prospects at EUR 100 excluding VAT.
Why people leave Vapi
Vapi is a developer platform for voice agents. You call its API, pick a speech-to-text provider, a language model and a voice, attach a phone number, and Vapi runs the call loop in between. Its documentation covers assistants, tools, squads of several agents, outbound campaigns, evaluations and simulations, and the pricing page says you own and operate your agents, models and data. For an engineering team that wants every component to be swappable, that is a real strength.
The contract behind it is American. Vapi's terms of service are an agreement with Vapi Inc., a Delaware corporation, governed by the law of the State of California, with disputes settled by binding arbitration under American Arbitration Association rules in San Francisco. A European company that records and transcribes its customers' phone calls accepts that arrangement, plus a data processing agreement drawn up under US law, as the baseline.
People look elsewhere for three practical reasons: the EU region is gated, the bill is assembled from four or five separate meters, and some buyers do not want a developer platform at all but a finished receptionist or an outbound caller. The twelve European platforms below cover all three situations, from a free German phone agent to enterprise contact-centre suites.
- The EU region is sold as a premium package Vapi's documentation states that its EU region is available only with the Premier Success Package, and that you contact sales to discuss it. Premier is the custom tier on the pricing page, listed as direct sales only. A team that starts on the pay-as-you-go plan therefore runs in the default region until it signs an enterprise contract, which is a difficult order of events for a company whose legal team wants European hosting from the first test call.
- Residency is a feature of the plan, not a property of the contract The data management section of the terms says data residency control, zero data retention and a HIPAA mode are available depending on the service tier, and that limited cross-border transfers can happen for support, security or maintenance. Model providers that you enable as optional or customer-managed providers sit under their own terms. On a European platform with an EU contracting entity, the baseline is an EU-law agreement before any feature switch is touched.
- The monthly cost is a sum of several meters On 29 October 2026 the pay-as-you-go plan showed a hosting fee of $0.05 per minute, with transcriber, model and voice charged on top at provider rates and carrier charges for Twilio or Vonage numbers added separately. The calculator on the page estimated $82 to $129 for 1,000 minutes. The prices are in dollars. Several European tools quote one figure in euro instead: a monthly plan, a per-minute rate or a price per prospect.
- Compliance add-ons are priced separately HIPAA-eligible handling appears on the pricing page as a $2,000 a month add-on, and extra concurrent call lines cost $10 each per month. The Pro package starts at $999 a month, or 10% of the hosting fee if that is higher. A buyer who needs concurrency and retention controls moves up the ladder quickly, while a flat plan such as fonio's Team tier bundles concurrent calls and a SIP trunk into one published price.
What you have to replace, not just match
What you replace when you leave Vapi is less the model than the plumbing. Assistants, tools, webhooks and squads are defined through Vapi's API objects, so every prompt, function schema and routing rule has to be rebuilt in the target platform's builder or API.
Phone numbers are the first dependency: numbers bought from Vapi or ported through Twilio, Vonage or Telnyx have to be re-pointed, and a SIP trunk has to be reissued by the new vendor. Platforms with their own telephony, such as sipgate sona and Synthflow, can supply numbers directly.
Observability is the second piece. Vapi offers evals, simulations, scorecards and call insights, and anything built on its webhooks (call summaries into a CRM, transcripts into a data warehouse) must be wired again. Famulor and telli have simulation and evaluation features; GetVocal and NiCE Cognigy add supervision layers, but they work with their own data models, not Vapi's server events.
Finally, the stack choice moves. With Vapi you pick Deepgram, OpenAI or ElevenLabs by name and pay provider rates. Most European platforms bundle speech, language model and voice, and a few expose a per-workspace region setting for the model. Check which providers process the audio and where, because the legal entity in Europe does not by itself settle that.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | sipgate sona | Düsseldorf, Germany | Base version free: 500 call minutes a month and one phone number; paid tariffs for more minutes or system connections | EU (Germany) |
| #2 | Famulor | Kempten (Allgäu), Germany | Pay as you go from EUR 0.15 per minute with 800 free credits; Plus EUR 27 a month billed yearly (100 minutes, EUR 0.13 per extra minute); Pro EUR 103 a month billed yearly | EU (Germany) |
| #3 | fonio | Vienna, Austria | Phone assistant: Solo EUR 119 a month (EUR 99 billed yearly), Team EUR 359 (EUR 299 yearly), Scale from EUR 599 (EUR 539 yearly); excluding VAT | EU (Austria) |
| #4 | telli | Berlin, Germany | No public prices; demo and discovery call | EU (Germany) |
| #5 | GetVocal | Paris, France | Pricing on request; demo | EU (France) |
| #6 | Revox | Saint-Mandé, France | Starter EUR 100 excluding VAT a month for 200 prospects worked, then EUR 0.50 per prospect; up to 5 call attempts included | EU (France) |
| #7 | Parloa | Berlin, Germany | Custom enterprise pricing; no self-serve tier published, contact sales | EU (Germany) |
| #8 | VITAS | Nuremberg, Germany | Not published on the pages checked | EU (Germany) |
| #9 | Synthflow | Berlin, Germany | Free to build agents in the platform; deployment billed pay-as-you-go, Enterprise plans from about $30,000/year | EU (Germany) |
| #10 | NiCE Cognigy | Düsseldorf, Germany | Pricing on request | EU (Germany) |
| #11 | PolyAI | London, United Kingdom | Per-minute usage pricing, quoted on request | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #12 | AINORA | Lithuania, Lithuania | Fixed quote after a 30-minute consultation; no published price list | EU (Lithuania) |
How each alternative compares to Vapi
Best for: German-speaking small businesses that want a working agent this week without engineers.
Against Vapi, sipgate sona changes the starting point. Vapi hands you components and a meter; sona sits on top of a telephony account that sipgate already runs for its business customers, and the free base version includes 500 call minutes a month and one number. There is no model provider to choose, because sipgate says the models, servers and telephony are its own.
The agent can read CRM or ERP data before a call, book appointments and create tickets during it, and a dashboard shows live calls and frequent topics. What you give up is Vapi's room for custom orchestration. The product page is in German, supported languages were not verified, and the paid tariffs were not visible on the pages we checked.
What sipgate sona does better than Vapi
- Costs nothing for the first 500 minutes a month
- Contract with a German company, and sipgate says data stays in Germany
- Setup in a dashboard, without writing code
- Telephony and agent come from one vendor
Where sipgate sona is a step down from Vapi
- Fewer building blocks for custom conversation logic
- Language list not verified and the page is German
- Paid tariff prices not seen on the checked pages
Standout against Vapi. sipgate sona is the only tool on this page where the telephony carrier and the agent are the same company.
Best for: Agencies and small teams that build their own flows and want a visible per-minute rate.
Famulor is where a Vapi user most easily lands. Agents are assembled in a visual builder, tested with simulated calls and then published, with a REST API and an MCP connector next to it. The price is one line: EUR 0.15 per minute with 800 free credits, or the Plus plan at EUR 27 a month billed yearly with 100 minutes included, against Vapi's hosting fee plus three provider meters.
The database, files and sign-in sit in Frankfurt, and the contract is with BEK Service GmbH in Kempten. The caveat is the AI region: it is a workspace setting between Global, EU and US, and the model list names GPT, Gemini, Grok and DeepSeek. Pricing changed in August 2026, so confirm the current terms before migrating.
What Famulor does better than Vapi
- One published euro rate instead of several stacked meters
- German operator under EU-law terms
- White-label option for reselling agents
- Live listen-in, whisper and takeover during calls
Where Famulor is a step down from Vapi
- EU-only processing must be selected deliberately
- Smaller provider choice than Vapi's open stack
- Platform and prices changed recently
Standout against Vapi. Famulor is the one builder here that lets an agency resell the platform under its own brand.
Best for: Practices, offices, trades and shops that want an answering assistant on a flat monthly plan.
fonio drops the developer layer. The assistant is configured with opening hours, company information and a calendar, and the account can add a WhatsApp bot or website chat. Three phone plans are published: Solo at EUR 119 a month (EUR 99 billed yearly) with 1,000 minutes, Team at EUR 359 with 3,600 minutes, and Scale from EUR 599, all excluding VAT.
That is easier to budget than Vapi's per-minute stack, and the site is written for medical practices, law firms, tax advisers and trades. The trade-offs are concrete: the pages checked do not state where audio is processed, zero data retention appears only in Scale, and Solo has no concurrent calls, so a second caller hears a busy line.
What fonio does better than Vapi
- Three published plans with minutes included
- 60+ languages and 120+ voices in one price
- Calendar booking without custom tool code
- Austrian company with a Vienna imprint
Where fonio is a step down from Vapi
- Processing region not stated on the checked pages
- No zero data retention below Scale
- Little room for custom call logic
Standout against Vapi. fonio is the only tool on this page that sells inbound phone assistants in three fixed tiers by minutes.
Best for: Sales and service operations that place or receive many calls and use Salesforce or HubSpot.
telli covers the use case that many Vapi projects grow into: lead qualification, win-back and appointment calls at volume. Its no-code studio changes conversations through natural-language edits, an assistant named Charlie helps build agents, and parallel calling runs from a single line to thousands. Salesforce and HubSpot links and call outcomes with evaluations are part of the product, where Vapi leaves you to build them through webhooks.
The cost is transparency. telli publishes no prices, the privacy policy we read names no hosting region or sub-processors, and the home page quotes both 20+ and 30+ languages. The company is telli technologies GmbH in Berlin, so the contract is European even though hosting is unconfirmed.
What telli does better than Vapi
- CRM actions during calls without custom webhooks
- Smart dialing and parallel calls for outbound
- German contracting entity
- Outcome evaluations built into the product
Where telli is a step down from Vapi
- No public prices, a demo is the entry point
- Hosting region and sub-processors not stated
Standout against Vapi. telli is the Berlin platform that pairs a no-code studio with an AI assistant that helps build agents.
Best for: Regulated contact centres and outsourcers that need a human to approve AI decisions.
GetVocal answers a different question from Vapi. Instead of how fast a developer can wire an agent, it asks who signs off when the agent decides something. The Agent Control Tower lets a supervisor monitor agents, override one and audit each decision, and the deployment options include on-premise, self-hosted and EU-hosted setups, which Vapi does not describe.
The entry is a 30-minute demo; no price list or trial was visible. The footer names GetVocal AI Ltd while the legal terms name GetVocal SAS in Paris, so confirm the contracting company, and the compliance list (including the EU AI Act and ISO 27001) is the vendor's own claim. Small teams will find it heavier than they need.
What GetVocal does better than Vapi
- On-premise and self-hosted deployment options
- Audit logs and human override as core features
- French company with Paris legal terms
Where GetVocal is a step down from Vapi
- No self-serve start, pricing or trial
- Two different company names on the site
- Less suited to quick experiments than Vapi's free credit
Standout against Vapi. GetVocal is the only listed platform where a human supervisor can approve an agent's decision before it is carried out.
Best for: Outbound sales teams and agencies that want a fixed price per lead.
Revox narrows the problem to outbound calls and prices it by outcome. The Starter plan is EUR 100 excluding VAT a month for 200 prospects worked, extra prospects cost EUR 0.50, and each prospect gets up to five call attempts. With Vapi, five attempts of unpredictable length turn into minutes, models and carrier fees; here they are one line item.
An MCP connector lets assistants such as Claude or ChatGPT create voice assistants and place calls, and sample calls are published by sector. Revox does no inbound reception, a long conversation can cost more per prospect than per minute would, and the vendor, Daigest SAS in Saint-Mandé, is young. Hosting is described as France and Europe without a named provider.
What Revox does better than Vapi
- Predictable cost per prospect
- Retries included in the price
- Data hosted in France and Europe, per the vendor
- Sample calls to judge the voice before buying
Where Revox is a step down from Vapi
- Outbound only, no inbound agent
- No certification list on the checked pages
- Per-prospect pricing may cost more for long calls
Standout against Vapi. Revox is the only tool on this page that counts a prospect, not a minute, as the unit of price.
Best for: Large insurers, airlines and retailers with SAP landscapes and procurement requirements.
Parloa sits at the opposite end of Vapi's range. There is no free credit or public price: every evaluation starts with a demo request, and the buyers named on the site are Allianz, Booking.com and IKEA. The platform covers design, testing, scaling and optimisation of agents, with real-time translation so one agent can serve several markets.
The compliance stack on its tool page runs to ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 1 and 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA and DORA, plus an SAP Endorsed App Premium certification. Case-study figures such as the 90% switchboard reduction are the vendor's own and unaudited. For a team that wants to try a voice agent this afternoon, Vapi is the faster start.
What Parloa does better than Vapi
- Broader certification list, including DORA
- SAP integration and endorsement for enterprise stacks
- Berlin GmbH contract for EU buyers
Where Parloa is a step down from Vapi
- No self-serve tier or published price
- Slower to start than a credit-funded Vapi account
- Case-study results are vendor-reported
Standout against Vapi. Parloa carries an SAP Endorsed App Premium certification, which none of the other platforms here lists.
Best for: German practices, care providers and offices that want standard calls structured for staff.
VITAS is not a platform for building conversational agents the way Vapi is. The assistant takes routine requests, such as appointment requests and absence notifications, in natural speech and presents them on a dashboard in structured form. The site mentions callers who no longer press keys through a menu.
Its news section reports ISO 27001 renewed in October 2025 and a C5 attestation in March 2026; C5 is the German federal cloud security catalogue, which matters to public-sector and healthcare buyers. The site is in German, prices and hosting region are not stated, and no builder or outbound calling is described. It replaces an answering machine, not a developer toolkit.
What VITAS does better than Vapi
- C5 attestation and ISO 27001, both reported by the vendor
- German company with a full imprint
- Structured hand-over of routine requests
Where VITAS is a step down from Vapi
- No builder, API or outbound calling described
- Prices and hosting region not published
- German-language site only
Standout against Vapi. VITAS is the one tool here that reports a C5 attestation.
Best for: Operations teams that want no-code agents and a choice between EU and US hosting.
Synthflow is legally AgentFlow AI GmbH in Berlin, and it is the closest European match to Vapi's build-first model: you design the call flow from an industry template or from scratch at no cost, and charges start when the agent takes real calls. Deployment is billed pay-as-you-go, and the Enterprise plan starts at about $30,000 a year.
Hosting for deployed agents can be EU or US, and the tool page lists SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS and ISO 27001. The 65 million monthly calls figure is the vendor's claim. Against Vapi's $29 Core package the entry cost is far higher, and the marketing is aimed at US and UK enterprises, so the German registration is easy to overlook.
What Synthflow does better than Vapi
- Free to build and test before deployment fees
- Choice of EU or US hosting for deployed agents
- No-code builder with industry templates
Where Synthflow is a step down from Vapi
- Enterprise plan from about $30,000 a year
- No self-serve price beyond the free build stage
Standout against Vapi. Synthflow is free to build in, with billing starting only once an agent goes live.
Best for: Large contact centres on Genesys, Avaya, 8x8 or NiCE that need agents plus agent assist.
NiCE Cognigy fits enterprises that already run a contact-centre platform and want AI agents inside it. Integrations are listed for Avaya, AWS, Genesys, NiCE, Microsoft and 8x8, and the product adds agent assist for human staff and Agent Studio for building. Lufthansa, Toyota, DHL, Frontier Airlines and Lidl appear in its customer stories.
Vapi works as a standalone voice layer with SIP; Cognigy works alongside the platforms that route calls. The legal notice names Cognigy GmbH in Düsseldorf while the site carries NiCE branding, so check which entity signs your contract. No prices are published and hosting was not stated on the checked pages.
What NiCE Cognigy does better than Vapi
- Links to Genesys, Avaya, 8x8 and NiCE platforms
- Voice, chat and agent assist in one product
- Agent evaluation tooling for enterprises
Where NiCE Cognigy is a step down from Vapi
- No public price and no self-serve start
- Contracting entity unclear after NiCE branding
- Overkill for a single phone line
Standout against Vapi. NiCE Cognigy is the platform on this page built around integrations with other vendors' contact-centre systems.
Best for: Enterprises automating high-volume inbound customer service calls.
PolyAI was founded in 2017 as a Cambridge spin-out and builds voice assistants for enterprise customer service, naming Marriott, Caesars Entertainment, UniCredit and Foot Locker. Pricing is custom and per-minute, and the tool page notes that implementation takes design work before launch.
The company is in London, so the legal basis for EU data flows is the adequacy decision for the UK, not EU establishment. That is a smaller step away from Vapi's US contract than a German or French one would be, but a different footing from the EEA-based tools. There is no self-serve entry, so it competes with Vapi's Premier tier, not with its free usage plan.
What PolyAI does better than Vapi
- Built voice-first for enterprise inbound calls
- Full context passed to human agents on escalation
- UK company with adequacy decision, not a US contract
Where PolyAI is a step down from Vapi
- Outside the EEA, adequacy rather than EU establishment
- No published rates or self-serve start
- Needs design work before launch
Standout against Vapi. PolyAI is the only UK-based platform here, so EU transfers rest on an adequacy decision.
Best for: Clinics, hospitality and service firms that want the agent built and tuned for them.
AINORA replaces Vapi's do-it-yourself model with a project. After a 30-minute consultation you receive a written scope and a fixed quote, roughly two weeks of build and testing follow, and an account manager reviews transcripts weekly. Nothing goes live without your sign-off on test recordings, and Lithuanian, English and Russian are standard with 90+ languages on request.
Servers are in Germany and Finland, but the standard setup also processes calls in the US under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses; full-EU processing has to be requested. The company is AINORA, MB in Lithuania, no registration number was found, and the demo number on the site is American. There is no price list or self-serve option.
What AINORA does better than Vapi
- Weekly transcript review by a person
- Fixed quote before any build starts
- Suitable for non-technical owners
Where AINORA is a step down from Vapi
- Standard setup also processes in the US
- No price list and no self-serve trial
- No company registration number found
Standout against Vapi. AINORA is the only service on this page where an account manager reviews call transcripts every week.
What actually breaks when you switch
The first thing that breaks is the call flow. Vapi assistants, tool definitions and squad handoffs are configuration objects with their own schema, so nothing exports into a competitor's builder as it stands. Budget time to rewrite prompts, test them against recorded calls and compare transcripts, and keep the Vapi account running in parallel until the new agent has handled real traffic.
The second is contracts and numbers. Vapi's Core and Pro packages are prepaid and the Pro minimum is $999 a month, so check renewal dates before cancelling. Numbers bought through Twilio, Vonage or Telnyx stay with those carriers, which makes them portable if the new vendor accepts SIP; Vapi-issued numbers do not travel. Zero data retention and the 14, 30 or 180 days of raw data retention at Vapi mean transcripts should be exported before the account closes.
Does choosing an EU region at Vapi make the contract European?
No. The region decides where Vapi hosts and runs your resources, using endpoints such as api.eu.vapi.ai, but the party on the other side of the terms remains Vapi Inc. and the governing law remains California. The EU region also needs the Premier Success Package, so it is a negotiated enterprise setup and not a switch in the dashboard.
If the aim is an EU-law processing agreement and a supervisory authority your data subjects can reach, the contracting entity matters more than the hosting address. Every platform on this page contracts through a company in the EU, the UK or Israel, which removes the question and leaves hosting as a separate item to verify per vendor.
Which European option replaces Vapi for a developer team?
Famulor is the nearest in spirit: a flow builder, a REST API, an MCP connector, simulations and per-minute pricing, with a Frankfurt database. Synthflow and telli offer no-code builders instead of an API-first model, and telli adds Salesforce and HubSpot integrations.
None of the twelve exposes the full provider-by-provider choice that Vapi does. If you need to pick each speech and language component yourself, test the target platform with your actual call flows before committing, because that flexibility is the main thing that gets traded away.
Which one to pick
For a small business that wants a working phone line, start with sipgate sona (free tier), fonio (fixed monthly plans) or VITAS (structured intake with ISO 27001 and C5). For a builder who liked Vapi's flexibility, Famulor and Synthflow are the closest, with Famulor cheaper to enter and Synthflow aimed at enterprise volumes. For outbound campaigns, telli suits volume operations and Revox suits teams that want a price per prospect.
For regulated and enterprise contact centres, GetVocal brings supervisor approval and on-premise options, Parloa the largest compliance list, NiCE Cognigy the contact-centre integrations and PolyAI a voice-first UK platform. AINORA fits firms that want the agent built for them. Vapi remains the stronger option when you need to choose each speech and model component yourself and have engineers to run it.
Frequently Asked Questions
It depends on the job. For a free start, sipgate sona offers 500 minutes a month. For a builder with a published per-minute price, Famulor. For a fixed monthly receptionist plan, fonio. For outbound sales volume, telli or Revox. For regulated contact centres, GetVocal, Parloa and NiCE Cognigy. No single tool covers every Vapi use case.
For small volumes, yes. sipgate sona has a permanent free tier, Famulor starts at EUR 0.15 per minute with 800 free credits, and fonio's Solo plan includes 1,000 minutes for EUR 119 a month (EUR 99 billed yearly). Compare against Vapi's all-in figure, not only its $0.05 hosting fee, because transcriber, model, voice and carrier charges add to it.
Numbers ported from or bought through a carrier such as Twilio, Vonage or Telnyx can be pointed at a new platform that accepts SIP trunking. fonio's Team plan includes a dedicated SIP trunk, and telli lets you bring numbers through SIP trunking. Free Vapi numbers are tied to Vapi and have to be replaced.
Some do. Famulor's pricing page names GPT, Gemini, Grok and DeepSeek among its models, and AINORA's standard setup processes calls in the EU and the US. sipgate states that its models are its own. Ask each vendor for the sub-processor list for the model and speech layers before you rely on the EU entity alone.
Yes, according to its pricing and terms: ZDR is included with the addition of a success package, and the free usage plan keeps raw data for 14 days. The Core package keeps it for 30 days and Pro for 180. fonio, by comparison, limits zero data retention to its Scale tier.
Related comparisons
About the author
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.