European Alternatives to SAS Anti-Money Laundering
Looking for a European alternative to SAS Anti-Money Laundering? SAS Institute Inc. is headquartered in Cary, North Carolina, and its AML product combines transaction monitoring, entity resolution, investigation management and regulatory reporting. Institutions that want their compliance data under a European, UK, Swiss or Israeli contracting entity, or want a more modular purchase, look at other vendors.
The European tools below cover transaction monitoring, screening, KYC and case management, from full suites such as Siron One and Trapets to API-first products such as Napier AI and Salv.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Vendors can pay for more visibility, higher up on the review pages; it never affects which tools are listed. Editorial policy
11 European Alternatives to SAS Anti-Money Laundering
Lucinity
Case management and AI agent for financial crime investigations
Trapets
Swedish AML, KYC and market surveillance platform
Salv
Fraud and AML software with a bank-to-bank sharing network
Napier AI
Modular screening and transaction monitoring for AML teams
IMTF
Siron One suite for KYC, AML monitoring and screening
ThetaRay
Cognitive AI transaction monitoring and customer risk scoring
ComplyAdvantage
SaaS risk intelligence and transaction monitoring platform
Feedzai
Real-time fraud and AML platform for banks and issuers
Fenergo
Client lifecycle management with KYC and AML workflows
Scorechain
Blockchain analytics and AML screening for crypto businesses
Elliptic
Crypto compliance screening and on-chain investigation
Key takeaways
- SAS Anti-Money Laundering is sold by SAS Institute Inc. of Cary, North Carolina, and its privacy statement allows personal data to be processed in the United States or any other country where SAS has facilities.
- Trapets is the only tool on this page that states Swedish data centres for customer data, together with ISO 27001 certification since 2018.
- Fenergo (Ireland), Trapets (Sweden), Salv (Estonia), Feedzai (Portugal) and Scorechain (Luxembourg) are EU-registered, while Lucinity is Icelandic, ThetaRay Israeli, and Napier AI, ComplyAdvantage and Elliptic British.
- Elliptic states coverage of more than 65 blockchains and Scorechain more than 25, so both address crypto exposure that a bank-focused monitoring suite handles only as one threat type among many.
- None of the eleven European vendors here publishes a price list, so a switch from SAS replaces one sales process with another.
Why people leave SAS Anti-Money Laundering
SAS Anti-Money Laundering is the compliance product of SAS Institute Inc., the analytics company headquartered in Cary, North Carolina. Its own product page describes one platform that joins transaction monitoring, machine learning, customer due diligence, entity resolution, investigation management and regulatory reporting. Banks tend to meet it as the monitoring engine sitting behind a large compliance programme, configured over months and then left running for years.
People look beyond it for reasons that rarely involve detection quality. SAS describes the product through a request-a-demo button and no price list, the buyer is a US corporation with subsidiaries in many countries, and its privacy statement says personal data may be stored or processed in the United States or any other country where SAS has facilities.
A compliance officer who has to explain to a supervisor where case files and customer risk scores live will want a shorter answer than that.
The other pressure is shape. A monolithic AML suite is hard to buy in pieces, so a payment institution that needs screening and monitoring but already owns case management pays for a platform wider than its problem. The European field has grown around exactly that gap, with vendors that sell by module, by API or by niche, and that contract from Stockholm, Tallinn, Dublin, London or Zurich.
- A US contracting party for data that supervisors ask about The privacy statement is issued by SAS Institute Inc. together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, and it allows personal information to be transferred across borders and processed in the United States or any other country with a SAS facility. For an AML platform, the data is suspicious activity reports, customer risk ratings and beneficial-owner links. Institutions that want those records under a European, UK, Swiss or Israeli entity have a concrete reason to compare.
- Everything arrives as one platform SAS pitches data integration, entity resolution, monitoring, machine learning and case work as a single end-to-end system. That is an advantage when you want one vendor to blame, and a cost when you only need a screening layer or a case manager. Several European products here sell exactly one of those pieces, so a firm can replace the part that hurts without re-platforming the rest.
- Price and hosting are conversations, not pages The product page offers a demo and a features list, but no price and no list of hosting regions. That is normal for enterprise AML, and the European vendors on this page are mostly the same on pricing. The difference is smaller than it looks: if you replace SAS you are trading one quote process for another, so compare scope and contracting entity rather than hoping for a public tariff.
- Configuration depth is a project, not a toggle SAS advertises a low-code, drag-and-drop interface for authoring scenarios, screens and workflows. Even so, a platform that spans data quality, entity resolution and model governance is rarely switched on in a weekend. Smaller institutions often prefer vendors whose rules and thresholds can be edited by compliance staff on day one, which is how Salv and ComplyAdvantage describe their own products.
What you have to replace, not just match
Replacing SAS means replacing a stack of jobs, and the product page itself lists them. There is the data layer (integration and quality), entity resolution that merges duplicate customers and counterparties, scenario-based and machine-learning monitoring, customer due diligence with enhanced due diligence checklists, network analytics for finding ultimate beneficial owners, and the investigation workspace with regulatory reporting. Write down which of those you actually use before you shortlist, because no European tool on this page covers all of them.
Detection sits at the centre. Napier AI ships over 100 built-in typologies, ThetaRay analyses behaviour, Trapets and IMTF cover monitoring inside wider suites, and Salv lets you edit thresholds yourself. Case handling is a separate purchase decision: Lucinity builds its product around the investigation, whereas Napier AI treats case management as less of a focus. Plan for your analysts to relearn their screens, since alert queues and typology names rarely map one to one.
Two adjacent jobs can be split off. Fenergo takes the onboarding and periodic-review side, which SAS handles through its CDD and EDD capability. Scorechain and Elliptic cover crypto exposure, which SAS mentions on its page as one of the threats its analytics can detect, but which a bank usually wants as a dedicated blockchain data source. Feedzai is the pick if fraud and AML are run by the same team on one platform.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Lucinity | Reykjavik, Iceland | Pricing on request | EEA, not EU (Iceland) |
| #2 | Trapets | Stockholm, Sweden | Pricing on request | EU (Sweden) |
| #3 | Salv | Tallinn, Estonia | Pricing on request | EU (Estonia) |
| #4 | Napier AI | London, United Kingdom | Pricing on request | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #5 | IMTF | Givisiez, Switzerland | Pricing on request | Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #6 | ThetaRay | Hod HaSharon, Israel | Pricing on request | Israel (outside the EU/EEA) |
| #7 | ComplyAdvantage | London, United Kingdom | Pricing on request | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #8 | Feedzai | Coimbra, Portugal | Pricing on request | EU (Portugal) |
| #9 | Fenergo | Dublin, Ireland | Pricing on request | EU (Ireland) |
| #10 | Scorechain | Belvaux, Luxembourg | Pricing on request; free wallet checks offered | EU (Luxembourg) |
| #11 | Elliptic | London, United Kingdom | Pricing on request; free trial offered | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
How each alternative compares to SAS Anti-Money Laundering
Best for: AML teams whose largest cost is analyst time spent working cases rather than generating alerts
Lucinity starts where the SAS investigation module ends: the analyst's screen. Its case manager pulls alerts, a 360 degree customer view and regulatory reports into one workspace, and the Luci agent drafts investigation work for a person to review. Against SAS, which sells investigation as one part of a larger platform, this is a narrower product with the case at its centre.
Detection runs in two ways side by side, scenario-based and AI-based, and the customer configures workflows and dashboards. The group is registered in Iceland and also owns UK and US subsidiaries, so ask which entity signs. Lucinity states ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance and publishes API documentation, but it names no hosting region and no price.
What Lucinity does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Case handling as the core of the product
- Drafting investigation notes with an agent
- Customer-side configuration of workflows
- A European contracting group, in Iceland
Where Lucinity is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Sanctions list screening data
- Entity resolution and network analytics at SAS scale
- A hosting region you can cite
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It is the one product here that is designed around the investigator's screen first and the alert engine second.
Best for: Nordic and wider European banks, investment firms and trading venues that want monitoring, KYC and surveillance from one vendor
Trapets is the nearest like-for-like suite to SAS on this page. It sells transaction monitoring, KYC and due diligence, sanctions and PEP screening, and market surveillance, with one customer view across them. Where SAS leaves hosting open in its public material, Trapets states that customer data stays in Swedish data centres, and it says it has held ISO 27001 certification since 2018.
The registered entity is Trapets AB in Stockholm, and the company aligns its pages with AMLR, GDPR and DORA. A DNB Carnegie quote on its homepage describes the shared customer view. The flip side is audience: the pages name regulated firms, not small startups, and the price and integration list are not public. There is also no stated self-hosted option.
What Trapets does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- A named hosting country for customer data
- Market surveillance alongside AML
- Explicit AMLR and DORA wording
- An EU contracting entity in Sweden
Where Trapets is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Global reach beyond Europe
- A public integration list
- Depth for non-bank or startup buyers
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It is the only tool on this page that names the country where customer data is stored.
Best for: Banks, EMIs and payment providers that want to tune thresholds in-house and share cases with other institutions
Salv replaces the SAS configuration project with rules, thresholds and segments that compliance staff edit without vendor tickets. It also adds dynamic customer risk scoring and screening with auto-clearance. Where SAS promises a low-code interface on a wide platform, Salv's pitch is a more focused AML and fraud product for instant, card and account-to-account payments.
Its distinguishing feature is Salv Bridge, a network where banks work on cross-institution cases and clear sanctions hits together. That only pays off when your counterparties also join, and the site says more than 130 institutions in 30 jurisdictions use Salv. Salv Technologies OÜ is registered in Tallinn. Price and hosting region are not given on its pages.
What Salv does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Editing rules without vendor involvement
- Bank-to-bank case sharing through Bridge
- Running fraud and AML at one vendor
- A smaller, faster starting point
Where Salv is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Trade finance and market surveillance
- Breadth of the SAS data and analytics stack
- Value that depends on network adoption
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. Bridge is the only cross-bank case network among the tools here.
Best for: Banks, payment firms and wealth managers that want to buy screening and monitoring separately from case management
Napier AI answers the SAS everything-in-one approach with modules. Client screening covers sanctions, PEPs and adverse media in real time and batch, transaction monitoring comes with over 100 built-in typologies, and a continuous client risk assessment sits on top. It can be bought as an enterprise platform, a plug-and-play version, or APIs that slot into workflow tools you already own.
Napier Technologies Limited is registered in England and Wales (company number 09901129), so UK GDPR applies instead of the EU regime, and an EU institution should treat it as a third-country supplier. The site claims more than 150 financial institutions. Case management is less of a focus than at Lucinity, and neither price nor hosting region is published.
What Napier AI does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Buying screening and monitoring as separate modules
- API-only deployment for existing workflow tools
- Typology coverage out of the box
- Lower integration surface than a full suite
Where Napier AI is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Case management depth
- An EU contracting entity
- Entity resolution and network analytics breadth
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It is the tool here that can be adopted purely as an API behind your own case system.
Best for: Private banks and wealth managers that want one compliance suite across onboarding, monitoring and reporting
IMTF is the other full-suite option beside SAS. Siron One lists KYC and client lifecycle management, AML transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, real-time fraud detection, trade finance compliance, tax compliance and document management as use cases, and institutions pick the ones they need. The site states the platform is containerised, no-code configurable and used by more than 1,000 institutions.
Informatique-MTF SA is based in Givisiez, Switzerland, so an EU buyer contracts with a Swiss supplier under Swiss law. IMTF describes combining rules, machine learning and RPA and claims a low total cost of ownership, which is a vendor claim to check in a pilot. A suite this wide may be heavy for small firms, and no price or hosting region is published.
What IMTF does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Trade finance and tax compliance modules
- Private banking and wealth management focus
- Choosing modules instead of a fixed bundle
- A containerised deployment model
Where IMTF is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- An EU contracting entity
- Weight for small teams
- Published pricing or hosting detail
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It is the suite on this page that includes tax compliance and trade finance next to AML.
Best for: Payment firms and banks with cross-border flows that want fewer alerts from behavioural detection
ThetaRay sells the RAY platform for transaction monitoring and dynamic customer risk assessment. Against SAS's scenario library plus machine learning, its message is cognitive AI that looks for subtle changes in behaviour, transaction trends and relationships, with the stated aim of cutting unnecessary alerts. Customer risk updates as behaviour changes rather than at fixed review dates.
ThetaRay Ltd. lists its international headquarters in Hod HaSharon, Israel, with a London office, and its customer stories name Shift4 and Onafriq, both payment companies. Israel counts as European for this directory but it is not an EU jurisdiction. Its pages give little technical detail, no price and no hosting region, so a pilot on your own data matters more here than anywhere else.
What ThetaRay does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Behaviour-led detection that updates customer risk continuously
- Focus on payment-company use cases
- A smaller product to deploy than a full suite
Where ThetaRay is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Case management, where Lucinity is stronger
- Public technical documentation
- An EU contracting entity
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. Its customer risk score is described as updating with behaviour instead of waiting for a review date.
Best for: Fintechs and banks that want screening data and monitoring on one cloud platform without self-hosting
ComplyAdvantage packages its own risk intelligence data with transaction monitoring in a SaaS platform called Mesh. Rules can be written in natural language, and the page states that agents auto-remediate 65 to 85 percent of false positives. Next to SAS, which describes a cloud-native architecture but a long configuration path, this is a product designed for quick onboarding of digital businesses.
The legal entity named in its terms and privacy notice is IVXS UK Limited, trading as ComplyAdvantage, with an address on Paul Street in London. That makes it a UK contract, outside the EU, and it is SaaS only with no self-hosting stated. The false-positive figures are the vendor's own, and neither price nor hosting region is published.
What ComplyAdvantage does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Natural language rule creation
- Screening data supplied with the platform
- Faster start for digital businesses
- Agent-based alert handling
Where ComplyAdvantage is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Self-hosting or on-premise options
- An EU contracting entity
- Verified performance figures
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It supplies its own risk data and a monitoring engine under one login.
Best for: Banks, issuers and large payment firms where one team runs fraud and AML together
Feedzai approaches the problem from the fraud side. Its RiskOps platform groups fraud and scam prevention, identity protection through behavioural and device intelligence, and AML with transaction monitoring. A bank that uses SAS for AML and a separate vendor for card fraud can look at consolidating both on Feedzai, with the Farol agent drafting work on rules, alerts and suspicious activity reports.
The controller named in its privacy policy is Feedzai - Consultadoria e Inovacao Tecnologica, S.A. in Coimbra, so the parent is EU-based, though the group also has entities outside Europe, and one policy mentions an Australian company. The product targets large institutions, offers a demo instead of a self-serve plan, and states no price, founding year or data location on the pages read.
What Feedzai does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Fraud, scam and AML in one platform
- Behavioural and device intelligence
- A Portuguese parent entity
Where Feedzai is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Fit for small or mid-sized firms
- Pure AML case depth
- Clarity on which group entity signs
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It is the tool here whose home page leads with fraud and scam prevention before AML.
Best for: Banks with complex corporate onboarding that need a governed record of every client check
Fenergo takes over the customer due diligence half of SAS. Its platform runs onboarding journeys from KYC and risk assessment through outreach and sanctions screening, with pre-packaged rules that apply policy and regulation per client type. The Fen-AI and KYRA agents automate high-volume onboarding tasks, and deployment can be end-to-end or modular.
Fenergo Limited has an office at North Wall Quay in Dublin, with other offices in London, Dubai and New York, so check which entity actually signs. It is not a transaction monitoring engine, so on its own it does not replace SAS detection, and enterprise implementations are projects. The site links to transaction monitoring, but prices and hosting regions are not published.
What Fenergo does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Corporate onboarding workflow and KYC rules
- Periodic review governance
- A system of record for client checks
- An EU entity in Ireland
Where Fenergo is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Transaction monitoring depth
- Lightweight deployment
- Clear signing entity, given the US office
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It is the only tool here built around the client file instead of the transaction.
Best for: Crypto exchanges, wallets and asset managers that need wallet screening and tracing under an EU entity
Scorechain covers a threat that SAS lists on its page, virtual currencies, with a dedicated product. Addresses are screened through an API or the platform to flag sanctions exposure and risky counterparties, and analysts can follow funds across blockchains and map counterparties. The site also offers free wallet checks, a quick way to test its data.
Scorechain S.A. is registered in Luxembourg (RCS B199146) with its address in Belvaux, and the homepage states coverage of more than 25 blockchains and more than 200 organisations supported. It handles crypto-asset compliance only, so it does not replace bank transaction monitoring, and Elliptic states a larger number of chains. Business pricing and hosting region are not published.
What Scorechain does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Dedicated wallet screening and fund tracing
- A Luxembourg EU entity
- Free wallet checks for a first test
Where Scorechain is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Traditional bank transaction monitoring
- Number of covered blockchains versus Elliptic
- Published business pricing
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. It is the only EU-registered crypto analytics provider on the page.
Best for: Banks, exchanges and payment firms exposed to crypto flows that want broad blockchain coverage
Elliptic is a specialist beside SAS, not a replacement. Its three product areas are crypto compliance (screening and monitoring of wallets and transactions), stablecoin risk management and investigations that trace funds across chains and produce evidence reports. The homepage lists banks, crypto companies, payment service providers, governments and law enforcement as audiences.
The company states coverage of more than 65 blockchains, wider than Scorechain, and offers a free trial. Elliptic Enterprises Limited is registered in England and Wales (company number 08458210), which puts it outside the EU. Banks still need a general monitoring tool for traditional payments, since Elliptic covers crypto only, and neither price nor hosting region is published.
What Elliptic does better than SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Blockchain coverage, at 65-plus chains as stated
- Stablecoin issuer and exposure assessment
- Evidence reports for investigations
- A free trial to test the data
Where Elliptic is a step down from SAS Anti-Money Laundering
- Traditional payments monitoring
- An EU contracting entity
- Published business pricing
Standout against SAS Anti-Money Laundering. Its stablecoin risk product is a separate offer that no other tool on the page has.
What actually breaks when you switch
The first thing to break is the data feed. SAS ingests transaction, account and customer data through its own integration layer, and every replacement needs a new mapping from core banking and payment systems.
Budget for reconciliation: run old and new engines on the same month of transactions, and expect differences in what counts as an alert before you can say the new tool misses anything. Historic alerts, case notes and audit trails also have to be exported or retained for the period your regulator requires.
The second is people and tuning. Analysts know SAS queues, scenario names and escalation paths, and every vendor here names typologies differently. Thresholds that were tuned over years do not carry over, so alert volume usually rises before it falls. Contracts matter as well: check notice periods, data-return clauses and who owns the models and scenarios you built, and agree an exit format with the new vendor before signing, not after.
Can a European AML tool match the detection depth of SAS?
Depth is hard to compare from outside, and the honest answer is to run a pilot. SAS stresses AI and machine learning, network analytics and explainable models for auditors. The European vendors state their own strengths: Napier AI lists 100-plus built-in typologies, IMTF says it combines rules, machine learning and RPA, and ThetaRay describes cognitive AI that looks for changes in behaviour.
The way to settle it is a replay. Give two or three vendors a sample of your historical alerts and confirmed cases, compare alert volume and what each one misses, and ask how the model decisions are explained to your regulator. Claims such as ComplyAdvantage's false-positive reduction range are vendor figures, so treat them as a hypothesis for the pilot and not as a result.
Is it realistic to leave SAS in one go?
For a large bank, rarely. Monitoring logic, thresholds tuned over years and links to core banking are costly to reproduce, and regulators expect continuity. The usual route is to move one function at a time: onboarding and periodic review to Fenergo, crypto flows to Scorechain or Elliptic, case handling to Lucinity, then monitoring last, with the old engine running in parallel until alert quality is proven.
For a smaller firm that adopted SAS mainly for transaction monitoring, a single-vendor swap to Trapets, Salv or Napier AI is more plausible. Ask for the migration plan in writing, including how historic alerts, case notes and audit trails will be kept or exported, since your retention obligations do not stop when the licence does.
Which one to pick
For a regulated bank or investment firm that wants to replace the whole stack, start with Trapets and IMTF, the two suites, and compare them on module fit, contracting entity and hosting. If your problem is mostly analyst time, add Lucinity to the pilot. If you run fast payment products and want to edit rules yourself, Salv and Napier AI are the practical shortlist, and ComplyAdvantage fits digital businesses that are happy with SaaS only.
Pick narrower tools when only one part of SAS is the issue. Fenergo takes onboarding and reviews, Feedzai suits teams that merge fraud and AML, ThetaRay is the behavioural option, and Scorechain or Elliptic add crypto coverage. If a signed EU entity is a hard requirement, strike Napier AI, IMTF, ThetaRay, ComplyAdvantage and Elliptic from the list. If SAS already works and the only worry is jurisdiction, ask SAS for its deployment region and contracting entity first.
Frequently Asked Questions
It depends on which part of the SAS product you rely on. Trapets from Sweden and IMTF from Switzerland are the closest suites, covering monitoring, KYC and screening in one platform. Salv from Estonia and Napier AI from the UK suit teams that want editable rules or modular screening and monitoring. Lucinity from Iceland is strongest where investigators spend most of their time, and Fenergo from Ireland takes over customer onboarding and reviews.
The product page we read does not name hosting regions, and the SAS privacy statement says personal information may be transferred and stored or processed in the United States or any other country in which SAS or its affiliates maintain facilities. That statement covers SAS websites and services generally, so ask SAS for the deployment region and contracting entity that apply to your own agreement.
Based on the registered entities we checked, Trapets (Sweden), Salv (Estonia), Feedzai (Portugal), Fenergo (Ireland) and Scorechain (Luxembourg) are EU companies. Lucinity is in Iceland, which is in the EEA but not the EU. Napier AI, ComplyAdvantage and Elliptic are British, IMTF is Swiss, and ThetaRay is Israeli, so those contracts sit under UK, Swiss or Israeli law.
Scorechain, registered in Luxembourg, screens wallet addresses through an API and traces funds, and states coverage of more than 25 blockchains. Elliptic in London states more than 65 blockchains and adds a stablecoin risk product and investigation reports. Both are crypto-only, so a bank would run either next to a general monitoring engine, not instead of one.
No. On the pages we checked, all eleven vendors list pricing on request, and most sell through a demo. Scorechain offers free wallet checks and Elliptic a free trial, which lets you test the data, but business pricing remains a quote. Ask each shortlisted vendor for the pricing unit (per transaction, per customer, per module) so you can compare quotes on the same basis.
Related comparisons
About the author
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.