European Alternatives to Smartling
Looking for a European alternative to Smartling? Smartling, Inc. is a New York company whose master services agreement is governed by the laws of the State of New York with binding arbitration, and it relies on its certification to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework for data received from Europe. Every string, glossary and translation memory you put into it sits with a US-law contracting party.
The European tools below cover the same workflow of translation memory, glossaries, machine translation and Git or CMS integrations, from vendors in Germany, Estonia, the Czech Republic, Austria and elsewhere, and several can be self-hosted or hosted in the EU.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
13 European Alternatives to Smartling
Phrase
Translation management for products that keep changing continuously
Crowdin
Localization platform with 700+ integrations and Git sync
Weblate
Open source localization platform tied to your repository
Tolgee
Open source localization with in-context editing in your app
LingoHub
Austrian TMS with AI translation grounded in your glossary
Localazy
Localization platform with unlimited seats, projects and languages
XTM International
UK translation management platform for enterprise language teams
memoQ
Budapest CAT tool with translation memory and term bases
Wordbee
Luxembourg TMS combining CAT editor and business management
translate5
Open source translation system hosted in Germany or on-premises
Gridly
Spreadsheet-style content and localization platform from Sweden
Weglot
Paris service that translates a website without touching code
Trados
Professional CAT software from RWS for translators and agencies
Key takeaways
- Smartling, Inc. is a New York company whose master services agreement is governed by New York law with binding arbitration.
- Smartling relies on its certification to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework for personal data it receives from Europe.
- Weblate (Czech Republic) is GPL-3.0, free to self-host, and its hosted service stores customer data and backups in the EU from €47 per month.
- LingoHub (Austria) publishes fixed euro plans from €45 per month with unlimited seats and hosts on AWS in Ireland.
- Phrase, Crowdin and XTM International are the closest European matches for enterprise Git, CMS and agency workflows.
Why people leave Smartling
Smartling is a translation management platform sold by Smartling, Inc. of New York. Companies use it to pull product strings, website copy and documents out of their systems, run them through translation memory, glossaries, machine translation and human review, and push the finished text back. The category exists because shipping in ten languages by email and spreadsheet stops working somewhere around the second language.
People start looking past it for a contractual reason before a functional one. Smartling's master services agreement is governed by the law of the State of New York and sends disputes to binding arbitration, and data that arrives from Europe is covered by the company's certification to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. For a platform that holds your unreleased product text, your glossaries and years of translation memory, a legal team reads those two facts carefully.
There is also a structural point. A translation management system keeps the memory you built, in a format only that system fully understands. The longer you stay, the more of your terminology and past decisions sit inside it. Choosing a European vendor now costs less than moving later, and it puts the contract under a court and a regulator in your own legal system.
- The contract is New York law with arbitration The Smartling master services agreement names New York law and binding arbitration as the way disputes are settled. A European customer who has a disagreement about data handling or service levels therefore argues it under a foreign legal system, in a forum chosen by the vendor. Weblate, Tolgee, Localazy and LingoHub contract under Czech or Austrian law, which your own lawyers can read and your own courts can apply.
- Transfers rest on a framework, not on location Smartling relies on its certification to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework for personal data received from Europe. That is a legitimate mechanism today, but it is an adequacy arrangement between governments, and earlier ones (Safe Harbor, then Privacy Shield) were struck down by the EU Court of Justice. A tool that keeps processing in the EU, or that you host yourself, does not depend on the next ruling.
- Self-hosting is possible with European tools, not with Smartling Nothing on the pages we could verify suggests Smartling can run on your own servers. Weblate is GPL-3.0 and free to self-host, Tolgee has a free self-hosted edition on an Apache 2.0 core, translate5 installs on-premises or runs in a German data centre, and LingoHub offers on-premises on its Enterprise plan. For regulated teams that decides the question outright.
- The translation memory is the lock-in A decade of approved segments, glossaries and style rules is the real asset in any localization platform, and it is the part a vendor has no incentive to make portable. Ask for a TMX export of your memory before you sign anything with any vendor. European tools such as Crowdin, Phrase and memoQ all work with the standard exchange formats, so the memory can follow you.
What you have to replace, not just match
The first thing to list is not features but connections. A Smartling setup usually touches a code repository for strings, a CMS or help centre for web copy, a design tool such as Figma, and sometimes a content delivery step that ships translations without a release.
Each of those has to be rebuilt in the new tool, and the Git-first products (Crowdin, Weblate, Tolgee, Localazy, LingoHub) are strongest here, while Weglot covers the website case without code and the CAT tools cover document-heavy work.
The second thing is the human side. If a language service provider or an in-house team of linguists works inside Smartling today, they need accounts, permissions, a review workflow and glossary access on day one of the new platform. XTM International, Wordbee and translate5 are built around that vendor-management and linguist-review model. memoQ and Trados are desktop and cloud CAT tools that translators often already know, which shortens retraining.
The third is the data you have to carry over: translation memory, term bases, style guides, string keys with their context and screenshots, and the history of which text was approved. Plan to export all of it as TMX, TBX and your native resource files before the old contract ends, and test the import on one project before you move the rest.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Phrase | Hamburg, Germany and Prague, Czech Republic | Quote-based; no public price list | EU (Germany and Czech Republic) |
| #2 | Crowdin | Tallinn, Estonia | 14-day Team trial and 30-day Enterprise trial; free licences for open source and academic projects; paid plans priced by hosted words and managers, see website | EU (Estonia) |
| #3 | Weblate | Cvikov, Czech Republic | Hosted Weblate from €47/month (10,000 hosted strings) up to €616/month (10,240,000); yearly €470 to €6,160; 14-day free trial; self-hosting free; Libre plan free for public libre projects | EU (Czech Republic) |
| #4 | Tolgee | Brno, Czech Republic | Free plan €0 (30,000 words, 3 seats); Optimise €133/month billed annually (unlimited seats, 400,000 MT credits); Manage and Enterprise on request; on-premises licence on request | EU (Czech Republic) |
| #5 | LingoHub | Linz, Austria | Starter €45/month; Team €115/month; Pro €345/month; Enterprise on request; all with unlimited seats | EU (Austria) |
| #6 | Localazy | Brno, Czech Republic | Free 14-day trial; plans scale with managed source keys, see website; Localazy AI averages $0.005 per word | EU (Czech Republic) |
| #7 | XTM International | Beaconsfield, United Kingdom | Quote-based across every product (XTM Platform, XTM TMS, XTM XTRF, XTM Rigi, XTM Transifex); no published tiers | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #8 | memoQ | Budapest, Hungary | Starter from €2,750/year (1 PM licence + 5 linguist subscriptions); Essential, Professional and Enterprise tiers by quote | EU (Hungary) |
| #9 | Wordbee | Belvaux, Luxembourg | Essential, Smart and Enterprise from about €150/power user/month billed annually (Enterprise tier published; Essential and Smart not priced on the page); Infinity by quote; Agentic AI add-on from €450/month | EU (Luxembourg) |
| #10 | translate5 | Mössingen, Germany | User-based €2,400 or €4,440 per year (1 main user plus 10 linguists, unlimited volume); volume-based €10,900 per year including 2,000,000 words; flat rate on request; 30-day cloud trial | EU (Germany) |
| #11 | Gridly | Sweden (city not stated on pages checked), Sweden | Basic: CMS from €99/month, TMS from €50/month, CAT from €140/month; Team: €249, €125 and €280/month; Enterprise on request; 14-day trial | EU (Sweden) |
| #12 | Weglot | Paris, France | Free tier / paid plans by translated word count | EU (France) |
| #13 | Trados | Maidenhead, United Kingdom | From about €155/year | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
How each alternative compares to Smartling
Best for: Product companies with many languages, many repositories and a procurement process that tolerates quote-based pricing.
Phrase was formed when Memsource of Prague and PhraseApp of Hamburg were unified under one name in 2022, and it covers the same ground as Smartling: continuous localization from Git and Figma, translation memory, glossaries and a workflow for linguists. Against Smartling the legal position is different, with a German and Czech contracting entity instead of a New York one.
Do not read that as EU-only processing. The platform runs on AWS, with Phrase Studio on Google Cloud, and no EU-only region is documented. The company answers to European law while the data sits with two American hyperscalers, which a legal reviewer should weigh alongside the Smartling alternative they are replacing.
What Phrase does better than Smartling
- Contracting entity in Germany and the Czech Republic rather than New York
- ISO 27001 certification and GDPR positioning stated on its own pages
- Long product lineage in both software localization and agency tooling
Where Phrase is a step down from Smartling
- No documented EU-only hosting region, unlike Weblate or translate5
- Pricing goes through sales, so there is no number to compare in advance
- Heavy for teams that only translate occasional documents
Standout against Smartling. It is the only European option here that grew out of both a developer tool and a translator tool.
Best for: Software, mobile and game teams that want translations flowing through Git and over-the-air updates.
Crowdin is run by Crowdin OÜ in Tallinn and lists more than 700 integrations, over 100 file formats and 40-plus machine translation engines, or your own AI key. For a team that connects Smartling to repositories and design tools, the list of connectors is the part to check first, and here it is long. Mobile apps can receive text over the air without a new release.
The data position is mixed. Crowdin's terms state that processing may take place in the EU, the United States and Ukraine, with transfer safeguards, so a European contracting entity does not mean EU-only processing. There is no self-hosting. It does give free licences to open source and academic projects.
What Crowdin does better than Smartling
- Estonian contracting entity rather than a New York one
- Free licences for open source and academic projects
- Bring-your-own AI key alongside 40-plus MT engines
- Over-the-air delivery of translations to mobile apps
Where Crowdin is a step down from Smartling
- Processing may happen in the United States and Ukraine as well as the EU
- No self-hosted edition
- Hosted-word pricing rises with every added language
Standout against Smartling. More than 700 listed integrations is the largest connector catalogue of the tools on this page.
Best for: Open source projects and companies that want to decide where localization runs and who can read the source.
Weblate is licensed GPL-3.0 and built around a connection to your repository. Weblate s.r.o. offers a hosted service whose customer data and backups are stored and processed in the EU, starting at €47 per month for 10,000 hosted strings, and you can run the same software yourself at no licence cost. Smartling offers neither route.
The trade is operational. Self-hosting needs someone to run it, and hosted pricing climbs with target languages because each one multiplies the string count. It is a tool for software and community translation, so vendor management for agencies is thin compared with Smartling or XTM International.
What Weblate does better than Smartling
- Open source code you can inspect, fork and run yourself
- Hosted customer data and backups stored in the EU
- Published euro prices from €47 to €616 per month
- A free Libre plan for public libre projects
Where Weblate is a step down from Smartling
- Few agency and vendor-management features
- Self-hosting requires your own operations capacity
- Cost per language grows quickly on hosted plans
Standout against Smartling. It is the only option here where the software, the hosting and the contract can all be yours.
Best for: Developers who want in-context editing in their own app, a free start and the option to self-host later.
Tolgee's distinctive feature is in-context translation: a translator or developer opens the running application and edits the text where it appears. Compared with a Smartling workflow built around a separate web editor, that cuts the questions about where a string is used. The cloud has a free plan with 30,000 words and 3 seats, and the Optimise plan is €133 per month billed annually.
The core is Apache 2.0 and can be self-hosted for free, with a paid on-premises licence available. Enterprise directories sit under a separate licence. The pages we checked do not state the cloud hosting region, so a buyer with strict residency needs should ask before choosing the hosted version.
What Tolgee does better than Smartling
- Czech contracting entity rather than a New York one
- Free cloud plan and free self-hosting
- In-context editing inside your own app
- Unlimited keys on every plan
Where Tolgee is a step down from Smartling
- Fewer enterprise vendor-management features than XTM or Wordbee
- Cloud hosting region not stated on the pages checked
Standout against Smartling. Translating in the live interface is the feature no other tool on the page leads with.
Best for: Product and marketing teams that want fixed monthly euro prices and AI translation tied to their own glossary.
lingohub GmbH in Linz publishes three plans, Starter at €45, Team at €115 and Pro at €345 per month, all with unlimited seats, and hosts on AWS in the Ireland region. For a team that is used to asking sales for a Smartling quote, a price list and a seat-free model are a different way of buying.
It connects to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Figma, Azure DevOps, Zendesk and Storyblok, and its AI translation draws on your glossary, translation memory and style guide. Usage is capped by linguistic credits and hosted characters, and the data sits with AWS, a company with a US parent, even if physically in Ireland.
What LingoHub does better than Smartling
- Fixed euro plans with unlimited seats
- Austrian GmbH contracting entity
- Data kept in Ireland, with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II listed
- Help migrating from other TMS tools
Where LingoHub is a step down from Smartling
- No open source option and on-premises only on Enterprise
- Credit and character caps push heavy MT users to higher plans
Standout against Smartling. It is the only tool here with three public euro price points and unlimited seats on all of them.
Best for: Product teams with many contributors, designers and reviewers who do not want to count seats.
Localazy s.r.o. in Brno gives every plan unlimited seats, projects, words and languages, and supports more than 50 frameworks and file formats. If your Smartling invoice grew with the number of people who needed to open a string, this model removes that lever. It also offers a language CDN so translations can reach an app without a release, plus branching, webhooks and a Figma integration.
The unknowns are practical. Plan prices are not in the page source, so you work out cost with the page calculator or by asking sales, and AI translation credits are billed at $1 each, in dollars. SSO is Enterprise only, and the cloud hosting region was not stated on the pages checked.
What Localazy does better than Smartling
- No seat counting on any plan
- Czech contracting entity under Czech law
- Language CDN that delivers text without a release
Where Localazy is a step down from Smartling
- AI credits are denominated in US dollars
- No self-hosted edition and SSO only on Enterprise
- Smaller platform than Phrase or Crowdin
Standout against Smartling. Unlimited seats on every plan is the clearest pricing departure from a seat-based TMS.
Best for: Large localization departments that run vendors, linguists and review stages through one platform.
XTM International sits closest to Smartling's enterprise end: translation management with more than 80 integrations, vendor and linguist workflows, and pricing on request. It is a British company, so the contract falls under UK jurisdiction and not under an EU establishment, which is the same limitation Trados has.
There are no published tiers and no self-service trial, only a demo booking, so the first step of an evaluation is a sales call, much as with a US enterprise platform. Its fit is a language team with a procurement process, not a developer who wants to try something on Friday.
What XTM International does better than Smartling
- British contracting entity rather than a New York one
- Built around agency and linguist workflows
- Wide integration list for an enterprise TMS
Where XTM International is a step down from Smartling
- Fully quote-based with no self-service trial
- UK jurisdiction, not an EU establishment
- Several XTM-branded products make comparison confusing
Standout against Smartling. Of the options here it asks for the most sales process before you see the product.
Best for: Translation teams and agencies whose work is documents and translator productivity more than code strings.
memoQ comes from memoQ Translation Technologies in Budapest, under Hungarian and EU jurisdiction. It centres on translation memory, term bases and LiveDocs, with a desktop editor and a browser editor. Against Smartling it is a different shape of product: stronger for the person translating a long document, lighter on the repository connectors that drive a software release.
It publishes a Starter licence at €2,750 per year for one project manager and five linguist subscriptions, with a free trial. Essential, Professional and Enterprise tiers are quoted. It is not open source and has the learning curve you expect from a professional CAT tool.
What memoQ does better than Smartling
- Hungarian company under EU jurisdiction
- Published entry price for a small team
- Desktop and browser editors translators already know
Where memoQ is a step down from Smartling
- Not a full business-management platform for agencies
- Higher tiers move to quote-only pricing
- Weaker fit for continuous delivery of app strings
Standout against Smartling. It is the one with a published €2,750 team starter licence and a desktop editor.
Best for: Language service providers and in-house teams that manage vendors and translators in one system.
Wordbee, from Luxembourg, joins a CAT editor with the business side of translation projects: power users manage workflows and vendors, linguists translate inside the same product. Against Smartling it replaces the combination of a TMS and a separate vendor management tool, and it connects to GitHub, Sitecore and WordPress among more than fifteen integrations.
Pricing is published for the Enterprise tier at about €150 per power user per month billed annually, while Essential and Smart are not priced on the page. The agentic AI add-on, which lets you plug in your own OpenAI, Claude, Mistral or Gemini key, costs from €450 per month on top, and the ecosystem is smaller than Phrase or XTM.
What Wordbee does better than Smartling
- Luxembourg entity under EU law
- Bring-your-own-key AI rather than one model provider
- Vendor and project management in the same login as the editor
Where Wordbee is a step down from Smartling
- Only the Enterprise tier price is published
- Agentic AI is a separate and expensive add-on
- Smaller ecosystem than Phrase or XTM International
Standout against Smartling. The only tool here that lets you attach your own key for four named AI providers.
Best for: Language service providers and organisations with data sovereignty requirements and a team of linguists.
translate5 is maintained by MittagQI in Mössingen, Germany. The cloud edition runs in an OVH data centre in Limburg, and the same software can be installed on-premises or in a hybrid setup. Smartling has no equivalent for keeping the whole translation workflow inside your own network or inside one named German facility.
Prices are published: user-based plans of €2,400 or €4,440 per year, or a volume plan of €10,900 per year including 2,000,000 words. The cheapest user-based plan leaves out AI, TermPortal and the customer portal, and excludes API use, and the site is mostly in German, so check what an English-speaking team can read before you commit.
What translate5 does better than Smartling
- Open source with German hosting or on-premises installation
- Published euro prices for users and for volume
- TermPortal and in-country review with layout preview
- REST API covering all interface functions
Where translate5 is a step down from Smartling
- Site is mostly German, only some pages in English
- Cheapest plan excludes AI, TermPortal and API
- Not a developer-first Git platform like Crowdin
Standout against Smartling. It is the only tool here that publishes a yearly volume price with a stated word allowance.
Best for: Teams that keep multilingual content in tables, such as game dialogue, item names and UI strings.
Gridly AB in Sweden sells a spreadsheet-style platform as separate CMS, TMS and CAT modules, with branches and dependencies so parallel versions of content can coexist. If your Smartling projects are structured tables more than prose, this feels natural. It connects to Google Sheets, MySQL and PostgreSQL.
Modules are priced separately: Basic CMS from €99, TMS from €50 and CAT from €140 per month, so a complete setup costs more than the lowest figure. Basic plans cap API requests at 3,000 per month. The city and hosting region were not stated on the pages checked.
What Gridly does better than Smartling
- Swedish company under Swedish law
- Branches and dependencies for parallel content versions
- Modular euro pricing, with a 14-day trial
Where Gridly is a step down from Smartling
- Complete setup costs more than the headline price
- Basic plans cap API requests and automated updates
- Better for structured content than long documents
Standout against Smartling. Branches and dependencies on a grid are its answer to parallel product versions.
Best for: Marketing sites that need translated pages with correct URLs and hreflang, without developer time.
Weglot SAS of Paris, founded in 2016, works on websites on almost any CMS and adds translated pages with their own indexable URLs and hreflang tags. If your Smartling use is mostly website copy, it replaces that with something a marketer can run, and it has a free tier. It is not a general localization platform.
Pricing follows translated word count, so large catalogues cost far more than the entry plan suggests, and quality is machine-first unless you pay for edits. It also puts a dependency in front of your site, which is a trade-off an app team would not accept.
What Weglot does better than Smartling
- No-code setup on any CMS
- French entity under EU jurisdiction
- Handles multilingual SEO automatically
Where Weglot is a step down from Smartling
- Word-count pricing grows quickly on large sites
- Machine-first quality unless you pay for editing
- Not suited to app strings or documents
Standout against Smartling. It needs no developer work, which no Git-based tool on this page can say.
Best for: Freelance translators and agencies who receive projects in Trados formats from their clients.
Trados is developed by RWS in Maidenhead, United Kingdom. It began as Trados GmbH in Stuttgart in 1984 and became the reference translation memory tool of the profession. Compared with Smartling, it is a translator's workstation first and a company platform second, with desktop and cloud versions.
Entry pricing starts from about €155 per year, which is far below any enterprise TMS. As a UK product it falls under the UK Data Protection Act 2018 rather than an EU establishment, and RWS offers data hosting in European data centres for its cloud services. It is not a developer-centred Git pipeline.
What Trados does better than Smartling
- Low entry price compared with enterprise TMS licences
- Standard format many agencies and translators already use
- European data centre hosting available for cloud services
Where Trados is a step down from Smartling
- UK jurisdiction rather than an EU establishment
- Not built for continuous localization from repositories
Standout against Smartling. Its project formats are the ones many translators already receive from clients.
What actually breaks when you switch
The expensive part of leaving a TMS is rarely the export. It is the connectors. Every repository, CMS and design tool wired to Smartling has to be reconnected, each key mapping checked, and webhooks and CI jobs updated.
Run old and new side by side for one release cycle on a single product before you cut over. Expect string keys, plural forms and placeholders to behave differently between tools, so run each platform's QA checks against a sample before you trust the import.
The human costs come next. Translators and reviewers lose their saved shortcuts and personal glossaries, and in-house reviewers need to learn a new editor. Agencies that bill by match rate need to be told which memory they are working against. Contracts matter too: check notice periods and data return clauses in the Smartling agreement before announcing a move, and ask for deletion confirmation once the exports are verified.
How do I move my translation memory out of Smartling?
Request an export of every translation memory and glossary in a standard format (TMX for memory, TBX or CSV for terms) while your contract is still active, and keep a copy outside any vendor system. Export the source resource files and their keys too, because the context attached to a string often matters as much as the translation.
Import into the new platform on a single low-risk project first and check that match rates for repeated segments come back as expected. Only then move the remaining projects and switch off the old connectors.
Is the EU-US Data Privacy Framework enough for a localization platform?
It is a valid transfer mechanism at present, and a US vendor certified under it can lawfully receive personal data from the EU. What it does not do is change who the contracting party is or which law governs the contract. In Smartling's case that remains New York law with arbitration.
Whether that is acceptable depends on what passes through the platform. Marketing copy that is already public carries little risk. Unreleased product text, contract language or customer messages justify a closer look, and a European or self-hosted option removes the question.
Which one to pick
For a software company with repositories and several product languages, start with Crowdin or Phrase if you need broad integrations, Weblate or Tolgee if you want open source and self-hosting, and LingoHub or Localazy if fixed euro pricing and no seat counting appeal. Weglot suits a website with no development resource, and Gridly suits structured game or app content.
For a language team that works with agencies, linguists and vendors, look at XTM International, Wordbee, memoQ and Trados, and at translate5 if the workflow has to stay in Germany or on your own servers. Whichever you choose, ask where the data is processed, request a TMX export test during the trial, and read the contract for governing law before you sign.
Frequently Asked Questions
For software teams, Phrase (Germany and Czech Republic) and Crowdin (Estonia) are the closest functional matches: both connect to Git, Figma and CMS platforms and manage translation memory and glossaries. For language teams that work with agencies and vendors, XTM International (United Kingdom) and Wordbee (Luxembourg) cover that workflow. Weblate and Tolgee are the open source choices.
Yes. Weblate is GPL-3.0 and free to self-host, with a hosted EU service from €47 per month. Tolgee has an Apache 2.0 core, a free cloud plan of 30,000 words and 3 seats, and a free self-hosted edition. translate5 from Germany is open source and runs in a German data centre or on your own servers.
Weblate lists hosted plans from €47 to €616 per month, LingoHub lists €45, €115 and €345 per month with unlimited seats, Tolgee lists €133 per month for its Optimise plan, and translate5 publishes yearly prices. Phrase, XTM International and Crowdin do not show full plan prices in the pages we checked.
Weglot, from Paris, translates a site without code changes and handles separate URLs and hreflang tags for search. Pricing follows translated word count, with a free tier, so a large catalogue costs noticeably more than the entry plan. For application strings in a repository, use one of the Git-based platforms instead.
Not all of them. Weblate's hosted service keeps data and backups in the EU, LingoHub uses AWS in Ireland and translate5 uses an OVH data centre in Germany. Crowdin states that processing may take place in the EU, the United States and Ukraine, and Phrase runs on AWS and Google Cloud with no EU-only region documented.
Related comparisons
About the author
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.