Lightdash
British open-source BI that reads metrics straight from your dbt project, so definitions live in one place instead of two
Quick Overview
| Company | Lightdash Ltd |
|---|---|
| Category | Business Intelligence |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2021 |
| EU Presence | Yes - United Kingdom; self-hostable anywhere |
| Data Location | Your own infrastructure, or EU cloud |
| Open Source | Yes (MIT) |
| GDPR Compliant | Yes |
| Self-Hosting | Yes - fully self-hostable |
| Main Features | dbt-native metrics, charts and dashboards, self-service exploration, version-controlled definitions, Slack integration, API, scheduled delivery |
| Pricing | Free self-hosted / Cloud from about $400/month |
| Best For | Data teams already modelling in dbt who want BI without duplicate definitions |
| Replaces | Looker, Power BI, Metabase, Tableau |
Detailed Review
Every BI tool asks you to define metrics inside it. If you already define them in dbt, you now maintain two definitions of revenue, and eventually they disagree — usually in a board meeting. Lightdash removes that by reading metrics directly from the dbt project.
It is a British company, MIT-licensed and fully self-hostable, which makes it the natural BI layer for a European data stack built on dbt and a warehouse of your choice.
Definitions in Version Control
Metrics and dimensions are declared in dbt YAML alongside the models, reviewed in pull requests and versioned with everything else. Lightdash exposes them for exploration, so analysts and business users self-serve against definitions that engineers control.
That governance model — one definition, reviewed, versioned — is what Looker popularised, and Lightdash provides it without Looker's cost or Google's ownership.
Self-Hosting
A Docker deployment on your own European infrastructure keeps the whole analytics layer under your control. Combined with a warehouse in an EU region, no analytical data or metric definition needs to leave European jurisdiction at any point.
Practical Features
Charts, dashboards, scheduled delivery, Slack alerts on metric thresholds, and an API for embedding. The exploration interface is aimed at business users who should not have to write SQL, while analysts can drop into SQL when needed.
Limitations to Consider
Lightdash is only sensible if you use dbt — without it, the central advantage disappears and Metabase or Cluvio will be a better fit. It is a young product with a smaller feature surface than Tableau or Power BI, particularly for complex visualisation and pixel-perfect reporting. Self-hosting means you operate it.
Who Should Use Lightdash
Data teams with a modern stack — warehouse plus dbt — who want self-service BI with governed definitions, and European organisations that want the analytics layer self-hosted rather than with a US vendor.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Metrics come from dbt, defined once
- Definitions version-controlled and reviewed
- MIT-licensed and fully self-hostable
- Self-service exploration for non-SQL users
- British company, EU-deployable
Cons
- Only makes sense if you already use dbt
- Younger with fewer features than Tableau
- Self-hosting is your operational burden
Alternatives to Lightdash
Other European business intelligence worth comparing before you decide:
Jedox
Germany · Planning, budgeting and BI in one Excel-friendly platform
Board International
Switzerland · Decision-making platform joining BI, planning and simulation
Luzmo
Belgium · Embedded analytics for SaaS products
Pyramid Analytics
Netherlands · Decision intelligence with no-code data preparation
See all European business intelligence or compare them directly against Looker on our alternatives page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Effectively yes. Lightdash reads metrics and dimensions from your dbt project, which is its whole advantage. Without dbt, Metabase or Cluvio are better choices.
Because otherwise revenue is defined once in dbt and again in the BI tool, and the two eventually disagree. Keeping the definition in version control means one source of truth, reviewed like code.
Yes, it is MIT-licensed and deploys via Docker on any European infrastructure, which keeps the entire analytics layer under your control.
Similar governance model — governed metric definitions with self-service exploration — but open source, self-hostable, far cheaper and not owned by Google.