European Alternatives to Metabase
Looking for a European alternative to Metabase? Metabase, Inc. is a California company whose hosted-service terms are governed by California law with disputes in the federal or state courts of the Northern District of California, and whose data processing terms allow EEA, UK and Swiss personal data to be transferred to the United States.
Eleven European tools cover the same ground, from open-source self-hosted BI and SQL-first dashboards to embedded analytics, a natural-language BI service and KPI dashboards, from companies in the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, France, Italy and Switzerland.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
11 European Alternatives to Metabase
Lightdash
London open-source BI with a free self-hosted edition, a semantic layer and a hosted cloud
Cluvio
Berlin SQL dashboards with a free plan, published euro prices and an embedding option
Chartbrew
Dashboards on databases and APIs, self-hostable, from $24 a month billed yearly
Luzmo
Leuven embedded analytics with white-label dashboards, one plan from €1,995 a month
Knowage
Open-source (AGPL) analytics suite from Italy's Engineering Group, free to self-host
Embeddable
Code-first embedded dashboards as native web components, flat monthly price by quote
Veezoo
Zurich natural-language BI that answers business questions in charts, with a free trial
ClicData
Lille all-in-one cloud BI with connectors, data prep and dashboards, with a free trial
Panintelligence
Leeds BI platform to run inside your business or embed white-label, quote-based
Geckoboard
London KPI dashboards for teams and TV screens, plans from $79 a month billed yearly
Omniscope
Visokio visual analytics with a free non-commercial edition and Pro from £59 a seat
Key takeaways
- Metabase is a US product from Metabase, Inc. Its hosted terms are governed by California law, with the Northern District of California as the exclusive forum, and its DPA allows EEA, UK and Swiss data to go to the United States.
- There is no one-to-one European replacement. All eleven tools here are partial matches, and they are not interchangeable.
- Lightdash (London), Knowage (Italy) and Chartbrew (UK) are the open-source routes, and Cluvio (Berlin) has a free plan with published euro prices.
- Luzmo (Leuven, from €1,995 a month), Embeddable (UK, quote only) and Panintelligence (Leeds, quote only) are built to embed analytics in your own product. Metabase counts users of your embeds as users on its price list.
- Six of the eleven are British, one is Swiss and four are EU-based, so check your contract entity rather than assuming the EU. ClicData states that your contract might be with a Delaware affiliate.
- We could not verify prices for Veezoo, ClicData, Panintelligence or Lightdash Cloud, or the contracting entity behind Knowage. Ask before you compare.
Why people leave Metabase
Metabase is the BI tool that many teams reach for first. You connect a database, and people without SQL can ask questions by clicking through a visual query builder, while analysts write SQL, and the results land in dashboards that anyone can share. The core is open source under the AGPL and free to self-host with unlimited users, which is a large part of why it spread.
It is run by Metabase, Inc., a US company. For the hosted service, the terms say the agreement is governed by California law, with disputes brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of the Northern District of California. Its data processing terms let Metabase and its subprocessors transfer personal data from the EEA, Switzerland and the UK to the United States, backed by Standard Contractual Clauses.
There is no European copy of Metabase, and this page says so. The eleven tools here each cover a slice: open-source and self-hosted BI, SQL-first dashboards, embedded analytics for your own customers, a plain-language question tool, an all-in-one cloud suite, KPI dashboards and a visual analysis tool. It is a different page from our Tableau and Power BI pages, which are about visual analysis and per-seat licences.
- The hosted contract is Californian If you use Metabase Cloud, you sign with Metabase, Inc. under California law, and the courts are those of the Northern District of California. Its data processing terms permit transfers of EEA, Swiss and UK personal data to the United States under Standard Contractual Clauses. A BI tool reads the numbers a company guards most closely, so which legal system sits behind the contract is worth deciding on purpose. Self-hosting the open-source edition avoids the hosted contract altogether, and several tools below offer that too.
- Embedding for your customers is a paid, per-user feature Metabase's pricing page states that both your internal team and the users of your embeds count as users. Embedding unlimited charts and dashboards and multi-tenant embedded analytics are listed on the Pro plan, from $575 a month with 10 users included and $12 per extra user, and Enterprise starts at $20,000 a year. If your customers are the viewers, the per-user model grows with your user base. Luzmo, Embeddable and Panintelligence price embedding on other terms, and none of them charges per end-user seat in the way the Metabase page describes.
- Open source is a real exit, with limits The AGPL core means you can run Metabase yourself. The enterprise directory of the repository sits under a separate commercial licence, which covers the features that matter for embedding at scale. If your reason to leave is the licence rather than the jurisdiction, Lightdash, Knowage and Chartbrew are the open-source options here, with different licences and different trade-offs.
- The self-service layer is the part you have to replace What people like about Metabase is that a marketer can build a question without a data team. Few tools match that. Veezoo does it by letting people ask in plain language, ClicData and Omniscope are broader visual suites, and Cluvio and Lightdash are better when your team already writes or models SQL. Decide who builds your dashboards before you choose a tool.
What you have to replace, not just match
Start with where Metabase is used. A shared internal dashboard for finance or sales is the easy move: Cluvio, Lightdash or ClicData can host it, and the data stays in your own database. A Metabase embed inside your product is a harder move, because the embed has to be rebuilt in Luzmo, Embeddable or Panintelligence, and your customers see the change.
Do not migrate all at once. Metabase questions and dashboards do not convert to another tool, so rebuild the ten most-opened dashboards, run both tools side by side for a month, then retire the rest. If you self-host the open-source edition today, a first step with little risk is to keep it and move only the hosted or embedded parts.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Lightdash | London, United Kingdom | Free self-hosted / Cloud from about $400/month | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #2 | Cluvio | Berlin, Germany | From about €99/month | EU (Germany) |
| #4 | Luzmo | Leuven, Belgium | From about €900/month; usage-based enterprise pricing | EU (Belgium) |
| #8 | ClicData | Lille, France | Cloud plans (Basic, Team, Enterprise) tiered by user count, storage and monthly table updates; separate Dedicated (private) plans; amounts are not published on the pricing page and require a sales quote | EU (France) |
| #9 | Panintelligence | Leeds, United Kingdom | Custom pricing per registered user, banded by deployment (internal or embedded); no per-query or data-volume charges; amounts not published | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
How each alternative compares to Metabase
- Which law reaches it. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). Metabase is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your own infrastructure, or EU cloud.
- Source code. Open source, as Metabase is.
Best for: Data teams that want open source, self-hosting and a governed semantic layer
Lightdash is run by Telescope Technology Limited, trading as Lightdash, a company registered in England and Wales (number 12774445) with a London registered office. Its pricing page lists an Open Source option that you host yourself, with support through the community Slack only, next to its cloud service.
Its homepage describes a Knowledge Graph as a semantic layer, with AI features on top. That is a heavier, more data-team-oriented approach than Metabase, where an analyst can point at a table and start asking questions.
We could not pull the cloud prices out of the page, so no amount is given here. Ask for a quote or read the pricing page before comparing against Metabase Cloud.
What Lightdash does better than Metabase
- Free self-hosted edition, like Metabase's open-source edition, with a UK-registered company behind the cloud service
- A semantic layer for governed definitions
- Pricing page positioned against per-seat charges
Where Lightdash is a step down from Metabase
- Setup is closer to a data-team project than Metabase's simple start
- Community support only on the open-source edition
- A UK company, not an EU one
- Cloud prices could not be verified
Standout against Metabase. It is the only tool here that pairs a free self-hosted open-source edition with a semantic layer.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). Metabase is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU (Germany).
- Source code. Closed source, where Metabase publishes its code.
Best for: Teams that write SQL and want shareable, scheduled dashboards at a published price
Cluvio is provided by Cluvio GmbH in Berlin, and its terms say the contract is governed by German law with German courts having exclusive jurisdiction, with some exceptions for customers outside Germany. Its pricing page shows a Free plan, then Pro at €249 or $279, Business at €599 or $669, and Enterprise from €1,999 or $2,250 a month.
Every paid plan starts with a 14-day trial of the Business plan, no credit card needed. Business is the plan that lists external sharing and embedding.
It is built around SQL, so it suits an analyst or developer more than a colleague who wants to click through a query builder.
What Cluvio does better than Metabase
- German entity and law with euro prices on the page
- A free plan and a 14-day trial of Business
- Clear plan ladder with embedding listed under Business
Where Cluvio is a step down from Metabase
- SQL is the main way in, so less friendly than Metabase's query builder
- Paid plans cost more than Metabase Starter
- Smaller feature set for data exploration
Standout against Metabase. It is the only tool here with a free plan, euro prices and a German contracting entity on the same page.
Chartbrew
dashboards on databases and APIs, from $24 a month, self-hostable
Best for: Small teams and agencies that want API and database dashboards, with the option to self-host
Chartbrew is run by Depomo Ltd, a UK company that Companies House lists as DEPOMO LTD, number SC562290. Its terms say Depomo Ltd is the service provider and that its data infrastructure is in the UK.
Its pricing page shows Starter at $29 a month ($24 billed yearly), Growth at $99 ($83) and Professional at $299 ($249), with a 14-day trial and no credit card. Embedded charts and reports are listed on the plans.
The source is on GitHub under its own licence, which GitHub shows as "Other", so check the terms before you build something commercial on it.
What Chartbrew does better than Metabase
- Low published prices from $24 a month billed yearly
- Works with APIs as well as databases
- Open source code for self-hosting
Where Chartbrew is a step down from Metabase
- A smaller product than Metabase, aimed at smaller teams
- A UK company, not an EU one
- A custom licence rather than a standard open-source one
Standout against Metabase. It is the cheapest paid option here, and the only one built around API data sources.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Belgium). Metabase is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU hosting.
- Source code. Closed source, where Metabase publishes its code.
Best for: SaaS companies that put dashboards in front of their own customers
Luzmo NV is a Belgian public limited company in Leuven, registered in the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises under number 0640.944.227. Its pricing page shows one plan from €1,995 a month, billed yearly, with white-label, self-service for end users and AI included.
It is built for the case where your customers are the viewers. That is where Metabase's per-user counting, including users of embeds, gets expensive.
It is not a tool for a finance team that wants an internal dashboard, and the price starts well above Metabase Starter.
What Luzmo does better than Metabase
- Belgian entity with the company number in its privacy statement
- One plan, with white-label and self-service included from the start
- Priced on customer usage, not on a count of users
Where Luzmo is a step down from Metabase
- Starting at €1,995 a month is far above Metabase's entry prices
- No free self-hosted edition
- Aimed at embedding, not internal BI
Standout against Metabase. It is the only one here that is a Belgian public limited company built solely for embedded analytics.
Knowage
an AGPL open-source analytics suite backed by Engineering Group in Italy
Best for: Organisations that want open-source BI from a European software group, and can run it themselves
Knowage describes itself as the open-source business intelligence and analytics platform by Engineering Group, an Italian digital transformation company. The code is on GitHub under AGPL-3.0, and the repository was updated on 5 October 2026.
The licence is the same family as Metabase's core, so the self-hosting terms will feel familiar. We did not find the contracting entity for paid editions or its ownership on its own pages, so we cannot say who signs your contract.
We did not test its usability. If your people expect Metabase's simple query builder, plan a pilot.
What Knowage does better than Metabase
- A European group behind an open-source suite
- AGPL-3.0, the same licence family as Metabase's core
- Free to run on your own servers
Where Knowage is a step down from Metabase
- Contracting entity and ownership could not be checked
- Smaller community than Metabase on GitHub (about 450 stars against about 49,600 for Metabase)
- No published price list for paid support
Standout against Metabase. It is the only AGPL-licensed full BI suite here from a European software group.
Embeddable
code-first embedded dashboards with a flat price, from a UK company
Best for: Product teams that want dashboards as native components in their own app
Embeddable is operated by TMD Technology Limited, a UK company. Its business terms say they are governed by the laws of the United Kingdom, and Companies House lists the company. We did not check its company number.
Dashboards, data models and components live in your own repository and are pushed through an SDK, so developers own the result. Pricing is a flat monthly subscription with unlimited usage, quoted on request, so no amount is shown here.
It is a developer product. A business user who wants to click through a question builder is not its customer.
What Embeddable does better than Metabase
- Flat monthly price rather than per-user counting
- Native web components with no iframes
- Dashboards stay in your own version control
Where Embeddable is a step down from Metabase
- Requires developers, with no question builder for business users
- Price is by quote only
- A UK company, not an EU one
Standout against Metabase. It is the only one here where dashboards are written as code in your own repository.
Veezoo
plain-language BI from Zurich, contracting under Swiss law
Best for: Business teams that want to ask questions without SQL or a query builder
Veezoo AG is a Zurich company, and its general terms (version of 16 March 2026) say they are governed by Swiss law with the ordinary courts of Zurich having exclusive jurisdiction. Its site describes asking a question, getting charts and dashboards, and monitoring the business with agents.
It has a free trial and a Pro and an Enterprise plan, but its pricing page shows no amounts. SSO and column-level security are listed under Enterprise.
Plain-language answers raise a question that a visual query builder does not: how do you check what the answer was based on. Test it on questions you already know the answer to.
What Veezoo does better than Metabase
- Closer to Metabase's "anyone can ask" idea than a SQL tool
- Swiss law and Zurich courts named in its terms
- Free trial
Where Veezoo is a step down from Metabase
- No published prices
- Switzerland is not an EU member, though it has an adequacy decision
- A less transparent way to build a question than a visual builder
Standout against Metabase. It is the only tool here built around asking questions in plain language.
- Which law reaches it. EU (France). Metabase is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Customer-selected Azure region (including Europe, UK and elsewhere); data is not moved between regions without consent.
- Source code. Closed source, where Metabase publishes its code.
- Independently checked. ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS.
Best for: Teams that want connectors, data preparation and dashboards in one cloud product
ClicData SAS is registered in Lille, France. Its terms add that your contract might be with its affiliate ClicData Inc, a Delaware company, and that invoices are billed in US dollars. That caveat matters for a page about jurisdiction, so check the entity on your order form.
The product covers connectors, a data warehouse, transformation and dashboards in one cloud suite, with a free trial. It does not publish prices that we could read.
It is broader than Metabase, which assumes your data is already in a database.
What ClicData does better than Metabase
- Includes connectors, a warehouse and data preparation
- French company with a free trial
- Suits teams without a data warehouse
Where ClicData is a step down from Metabase
- Your contract may be with a Delaware affiliate
- Billed in US dollars
- No published prices
- No self-hosted open-source edition
Standout against Metabase. It is the only one here that brings the data connectors and the warehouse as well as the dashboards.
- Which law reaches it. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). Metabase is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. UK or EEA where applicable; the platform reads source data in place rather than copying it.
- Source code. Closed source, where Metabase publishes its code.
Best for: Companies that want one platform for internal reporting and for their customers
Panintelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales, with a registered office at Concordia Works in Leeds. Its privacy policy quotes company number 06524399, which Companies House shows as another company, so the number on its own page looks wrong. A search of Companies House gives 09009972.
Its site offers PiDashboard, PiReport and PiPredict, and describes running it inside your own business, embedding it in a product you sell, or both on the same platform. Pricing is "Contact us", so no amount is shown.
It is a larger sales process than signing up for Metabase Starter.
What Panintelligence does better than Metabase
- One platform for internal use and white-label embedding
- Reporting and forecasting modules available alongside dashboards
- Not priced by a published per-user count on its page
Where Panintelligence is a step down from Metabase
- No prices and no free tier
- Slower to try than Metabase or Cluvio
- A UK company, and the company number on its privacy page is wrong
Standout against Metabase. It is the only one here pitched at both internal reporting and white-label embedding on one platform.
Geckoboard
simple KPI dashboards for teams and TV screens, from a London company
Best for: Teams that want a shared KPI wall rather than ad-hoc data exploration
Geckoboard is Datachoice Solutions Limited, trading as Geckoboard, a company incorporated in England and Wales (number 05958505) with a registered office in Covent Garden, London. Its terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales, with the English courts having exclusive jurisdiction.
Its pricing page shows Essentials from $79 a month billed yearly, with 2 dashboards, 1 editor and 1 screen, then Performance and Enterprise on request. It is built for showing live numbers to the people who move them.
It does not offer the SQL and exploration depth of Metabase, so we rank it last but one.
What Geckoboard does better than Metabase
- Simple to set up for non-technical teams
- TV and screen dashboards
- Published prices from $79 a month billed yearly
Where Geckoboard is a step down from Metabase
- Not a data exploration or SQL tool
- Limited dashboards and editors on the entry plan
- A UK company, not an EU one
Standout against Metabase. It is the only one here designed for shared KPI screens.
Omniscope
a visual analytics tool from Visokio in London with a free non-commercial edition
Best for: Analysts who want a visual data tool that runs on their own machine or server
Omniscope is made by Visokio, and Companies House lists VISOKIO (UK) LIMITED, number 04580403, incorporated on 4 November 2002. Its pricing page shows a free non-commercial edition, Pro at £59 per seat a month billed yearly (£69 monthly), and it runs on Windows, Mac and Linux.
It is a data preparation and visual analytics tool aimed at analysts, closer to a workbench than to Metabase's question-and-dashboard model. We did not re-open its terms or privacy policy, so we do not name its governing law.
It is last because it overlaps least with Metabase, and because we could not check its contract terms.
What Omniscope does better than Metabase
- A free edition and a published per-seat price
- Runs locally on Windows, Mac and Linux
- Data preparation and visual analytics in one tool
Where Omniscope is a step down from Metabase
- Free edition is non-commercial only
- Governing law not confirmed here
- Per-seat pricing, like the model you may be leaving
Standout against Metabase. It is the only one here that runs as a local desktop tool with a free edition.
What actually breaks when you switch
The hard part of leaving Metabase is not the data, which stays in your own database, but the questions and dashboards. They do not convert, so each one has to be rebuilt, and the saved questions people have built over the years often hide logic nobody remembers.
Metabase's visual query builder is the feature few European tools copy. If your colleagues use it without SQL, moving to Cluvio, Lightdash or Chartbrew means giving the building to analysts, so budget for training or a data engineer.
Check the legal entity and the hosting region before you sign. Six of the eleven are British, one is Swiss, and ClicData names a Delaware affiliate as a possible contracting party.
Is there a European tool that works exactly like Metabase?
Not one we could verify. Lightdash is the closest in spirit: an open-source BI tool with a free self-hosted edition and a cloud service, built around a semantic layer. Cluvio is the nearest for teams that write SQL, with a free plan and dashboards you can share and schedule.
What Metabase does that is hard to copy is the visual query builder for people who do not write SQL. If that is what your colleagues use, run a pilot with Veezoo or ClicData before committing.
Which of these can I self-host?
Lightdash has an open-source edition you host yourself, and its pricing page lists it as free with community support only. Knowage is AGPL-licensed software you run on your own servers. Chartbrew publishes its code on GitHub, so you can host it yourself. Omniscope runs as a desktop and server application on Windows, Mac and Linux.
Cluvio, Luzmo, Embeddable, Veezoo, Geckoboard and Panintelligence are services you subscribe to, so the vendor hosts them. Ask each about its hosting region before you sign.
What if I mostly embed dashboards in my own product?
Luzmo, Embeddable and Panintelligence are built for that. Luzmo has a single plan from €1,995 a month with white-label included. Embeddable is a code-first approach where dashboards live in your own repository as web components, with a flat monthly price on quote. Panintelligence can be white-labelled and also run for internal reporting.
Chartbrew and Cluvio also let you embed or share charts, but they are aimed at smaller needs. Compare the price per customer, not just the headline price.
How do the open-source options compare on features?
Lightdash and Knowage are the closest to a full BI tool. Chartbrew is lighter, built around dashboards on databases and APIs. None of them copies Metabase's question builder exactly, and we have not tested feature parity. Run each against your real data before deciding.
Licences differ. Knowage is AGPL like Metabase's core, while GitHub shows Chartbrew and Lightdash under their own licence files, so read them if you plan to embed or resell.
Which one to pick
If you want open source and self-hosting, Lightdash is the nearest in spirit and Knowage the closest AGPL suite from a European group. If you want SQL dashboards with published euro prices, Cluvio is the clearest choice.
If your problem is embedding analytics in your own product, Luzmo, Embeddable and Panintelligence price it on other terms than Metabase's per-user count. If your colleagues need to ask questions without SQL, test Veezoo or ClicData.
If you only need KPI screens, Geckoboard is far simpler than a BI tool. Whichever you choose, ask which legal entity signs your order form, because that is the fact this whole page is about.
Frequently Asked Questions
Lightdash is the closest for teams that want open source and self-hosting, and Cluvio is the best fit for SQL-first dashboards with published prices. For embedding in your own product, look at Luzmo. No single tool replaces every Metabase use case.
Yes. The hosted service terms are between you and Metabase, Inc., governed by California law, with disputes in the federal or state courts of the Northern District of California. The open-source software itself is AGPL and can be self-hosted.
The open-source edition is free with unlimited users when you host it yourself. Metabase Cloud lists Starter at $100 a month ($90 billed yearly) with 5 users and $6 per extra user, Pro at $575 a month with 10 users and $12 per extra user, and Enterprise from $20,000 a year. Users of your embeds count as users. Check metabase.com/pricing for current figures.
In parts. Lightdash's self-hosted edition and Knowage are free to run yourself, Chartbrew is open source with a paid cloud, and Cluvio has a free plan, though it is limited. Omniscope has a free non-commercial edition. None of them is a free, full replacement.
Cluvio is the most transparent, with Pro at €249, Business at €599 and Enterprise from €1,999 a month. Chartbrew is $24 to $249 a month billed yearly, Luzmo has one plan from €1,995 a month, Geckoboard starts at $79 a month billed yearly, and Omniscope Pro is £59 per seat a month billed yearly. Embeddable, Panintelligence, Veezoo and ClicData do not publish prices.
Cluvio (Berlin), Luzmo (Leuven) and ClicData (Lille) are EU companies, and Knowage is supported by Engineering Group in Italy. Veezoo is Swiss (Zurich). Lightdash, Chartbrew, Embeddable, Panintelligence, Geckoboard and Omniscope are British. Switzerland and the UK have EU adequacy decisions, but they are not EU members.
ClicData SAS is registered in Lille, but its terms say your contract might be with its affiliate ClicData Inc, a Delaware company, and that invoices are billed in US dollars. Check which entity is named on your order form before you sign.
Veezoo is built around that: you ask a business question and it answers in charts and dashboards. It is a Zurich company contracting under Swiss law, with a free trial. We could not find published prices.
Only for one use. Geckoboard shows key metrics on shared dashboards and TV screens for teams that do not want to build queries. It does not offer the SQL and exploration depth of Metabase, which is why it ranks low here.
No. None of these vendors says it imports Metabase content, so expect to rebuild your dashboards. Your database connections stay as they are, since these tools query the same data sources.
Related comparisons
Who worked on this review
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.