European Alternatives to Mode
Looking for a European alternative to Mode? Mode is owned by ThoughtSpot, and its terms name ThoughtSpot Inc. as the provider, apply California law and send disputes to binding JAMS arbitration in San Francisco before a panel of three arbitrators.
Eleven European tools cover the same ground, from collaborative SQL and Python canvases and dbt-based open-source BI to SQL dashboards, embedded analytics and plain-language questions, from companies in the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Italy, France and Switzerland.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
11 European Alternatives to Mode
Count
London collaborative canvas for SQL and Python cells, free for 3 editors, Pro from $49 per editor a month
Lightdash
London open-source BI on a dbt semantic layer, with a free self-hosted edition and a hosted cloud
Cluvio
Berlin SQL dashboards with a free plan, euro prices from EUR 249 a month and a 14-day trial of Business
Chartbrew
Dashboards on databases and APIs, self-hostable, from $24 a month billed yearly, 14-day trial
Luzmo
Leuven embedded analytics with white-label dashboards, one plan from EUR 1,995 a month
Knowage
Open-source (AGPL) analytics suite from Italy's Engineering Group, free to self-host
Omniscope
Visokio visual analytics with a free non-commercial edition and Pro from GBP 59 a seat a month
Veezoo
Zurich natural-language BI that answers business questions in charts, with a free trial
Embeddable
Code-first embedded dashboards as native web components, flat monthly price by quote
ClicData
Lille all-in-one cloud BI with connectors, data prep and dashboards, with a free trial
Panintelligence
Leeds BI platform to run inside your business or embed white-label, quote-based
Key takeaways
- Mode is owned by ThoughtSpot, its terms name ThoughtSpot Inc. as provider, apply California law and send disputes to JAMS arbitration in San Francisco.
- Count (London) is the closest in style: a shared canvas with SQL and Python cells, a free plan for 3 editors, and published prices of $49 and $69 per editor a month.
- Lightdash (London) is the pick if you already use dbt and want open-source BI you can host yourself.
- Cluvio (Berlin) is a SQL dashboard tool with a free plan and euro prices from EUR 249 a month, under German law.
- Six of the eleven are from the United Kingdom, one each from Germany, Belgium, Italy, France and Switzerland, and the UK and Switzerland are outside the EU.
- None of the eleven has Mode's mix of SQL, R, Python, Visual Explorer and custom data apps in one product.
Why people leave Mode
Mode is a BI platform built around analysts. You write SQL in an editor, continue in Python or R notebooks on the same results, and publish the output as reports and interactive dashboards that colleagues can open without code. Its Studio plan is free for up to 3 users, and its newer pieces include a Visual Explorer for drag-and-drop charts, governed datasets and an AI Assist.
It was acquired by ThoughtSpot in 2023, and the legal pages say so in small ways. The terms of service (last updated 1 September 2023) are written for ThoughtSpot Inc., apply California law, and send disputes to binding arbitration in San Francisco run by JAMS before three arbitrators, with no judge or jury. The data processing addendum still names Mode Analytics, Inc. and relies on Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers of EEA, UK and Swiss data.
There is no European copy of Mode. The eleven tools here each cover a part of it: a collaborative SQL and Python canvas, open-source BI on a dbt model, SQL dashboards, embedded analytics, a plain-language question tool and broader suites. The two closest to Mode's analyst-first style are Count and Lightdash, and this page says where the others fall short.
- The contract is Californian, and disputes go to arbitration Mode's terms say the Service is made available by ThoughtSpot Inc., that California law governs, and that any dispute is decided by JAMS arbitration in San Francisco before a panel of three arbitrators, with provisional remedies from a court still possible. Small-claims matters are carved out. For a European company this is a very different forum from a local court, and it is worth deciding on purpose. Which entity signs a paid order form is not public, so ask before you assume.
- Your warehouse data passes through a US vendor A tool like Mode runs queries against your warehouse and stores the results and the people who read them. The DPA says that transfers of personal data from the EEA, UK and Switzerland to a country without an adequate level of protection are covered by Standard Contractual Clauses and the UK addendum. That is the usual lawful route, but it is a transfer mechanism, not a European location. Count states that its servers are in the EU and the US, and the self-hosted tools below keep everything on your own servers.
- The prices of the paid plans are not published Mode's comparison page lists Studio as free and sends Pro and Enterprise to "Schedule a demo", with no amounts. Count publishes $49 per editor per month for Pro and $69 for Scale, Cluvio publishes euro prices from EUR 249 a month, and Omniscope publishes GBP 59 per seat. Lightdash, Knowage and Chartbrew can be run on your own servers. If you have to budget before a sales call, a published price helps.
- The notebook part is the hard part to replace Most European BI tools are good at dashboards. Fewer give analysts SQL and Python in the same place. Count does, with SQL and Python cells on a shared canvas. Lightdash and Cluvio are SQL-first and stronger on governed dashboards than on exploratory notebooks. If your team lives in Mode's Python and R notebooks, check that part first.
What you have to replace, not just match
List what Mode is used for. Reports that analysts run and share are the easy move: Cluvio, Lightdash or Count can take them, and the SQL carries over with small changes for each dialect. Scheduled emails and Slack posts need a check, because the schedule, the permissions and the sharing are set per tool. Custom data apps and the Python notebooks are a bigger job, and you may end up keeping them in a notebook environment you run yourself.
Do not migrate everything at once. Mode reports do not convert into another tool, so pick the ten most-opened reports, rebuild them, run both tools side by side for a month and then retire the rest. If your warehouse and your dbt project are already in order, a semantic-layer tool such as Lightdash can replace many ad hoc reports with a handful of governed metrics.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | Lightdash | London, United Kingdom | Free self-hosted / Cloud from about $400/month | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #3 | Cluvio | Berlin, Germany | From about €99/month | EU (Germany) |
| #5 | Luzmo | Leuven, Belgium | From about €900/month; usage-based enterprise pricing | EU (Belgium) |
| #10 | ClicData | Lille, France | Cloud plans (Basic, Team, Enterprise) tiered by user count, storage and monthly table updates; separate Dedicated (private) plans; amounts are not published on the pricing page and require a sales quote | EU (France) |
| #11 | Panintelligence | Leeds, United Kingdom | Custom pricing per registered user, banded by deployment (internal or embedded); no per-query or data-volume charges; amounts not published | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
How each alternative compares to Mode
Count
the closest in style, a shared SQL and Python canvas from London
Best for: Analyst teams that want to explore, model and present on one shared canvas
Count is provided by Count Technologies Ltd, registered in England and Wales (company number 10061321, active at Companies House since 14 March 2016). The terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales with the courts of England and Wales as the exclusive forum, and the servers that store your content are in the European Union and the United States.
Its pricing page lists Free at $0 with up to 3 editor seats, 3 canvases, Python and SQL cells and the Count AI agent; Pro at $49 per editor a month with 75 collaborators and 2 database connections; and Scale at $69 per editor a month, minimum 15 editors, with 250 collaborators and unlimited database connections. Viewers are included in every tier.
The Terms and the privacy policy give two different registered office addresses (Liverpool and London). Companies House shows the London address.
What Count does better than Mode
- UK company under English law, where Mode is a ThoughtSpot contract under California law
- SQL and Python cells on a shared canvas, like Mode's notebooks
- Free plan and published per-editor prices
- No arbitration clause in the terms; the courts of England and Wales have exclusive jurisdiction
Where Count is a step down from Mode
- No R, and no equivalent of Mode's custom data apps that we could verify
- Free plan allows 3 canvases and CSV connections only
- Servers are in the EU and the US, and the terms do not let you choose the EU only
- Scale needs at least 15 editor seats
Standout against Mode. It is the only tool on this page that puts SQL and Python cells on one shared canvas, with its prices on the page.
- Which law reaches it. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). Mode is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your own infrastructure, or EU cloud.
- Source code. Open source, where Mode is not: you can read what it does rather than take the description on trust.
Best for: Teams that already model data in dbt and want governed metrics with a free self-hosted option
Lightdash is provided by Telescope Technology Limited, trading as Lightdash (company number 12774445), 7 Bell Yard, London, under the laws of England and Wales. Its open-source edition is self-hosted and, on its pricing page, listed as "Hosted by you" with community Slack support.
It turns a dbt project into a semantic layer, so metrics and dimensions are defined once and used in charts and dashboards by people who do not write SQL. The hosted Cloud amounts could not be read from the pricing page, so no figure is quoted here.
It is built for dashboards on defined metrics. It is not a notebook environment for free-form Python or R.
What Lightdash does better than Mode
- Self-host the open-source edition for free, with data on your own servers
- UK company under English law, where Mode's terms are Californian with arbitration
- Governed metrics defined once in dbt and reused everywhere
- Business users can explore without writing SQL
Where Lightdash is a step down from Mode
- No notebooks for Python or R exploration
- Needs a dbt project to get the most from it
- Open-source edition has community support only
- Cloud prices could not be verified
Standout against Mode. Its free, self-hosted edition turns a dbt project into a semantic layer that non-analysts can query.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). Mode is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU (Germany).
- Source code. Closed source, as Mode is.
Best for: Small teams that write SQL and want shareable dashboards with prices they can read
Cluvio is provided by Cluvio GmbH, Friedrichstr. 79, Berlin. Its terms apply German law, with exceptions for customers who live outside Germany.
The pricing page lists Free, Pro at EUR 249 a month, Business at EUR 599 and Enterprise from EUR 1,999, and a 14-day trial of Business without a credit card. External sharing and embedding sit in Business.
It is a SQL-first dashboard tool. It does not offer Python or R notebooks.
What Cluvio does better than Mode
- German company under German law, in the EU
- A free plan and published euro prices
- SQL-first dashboards that analysts can build quickly
- Embedding and external sharing on Business
Where Cluvio is a step down from Mode
- No Python or R notebooks
- Pro starts at EUR 249 a month, higher than a per-editor entry on Count
- Embedding needs the Business plan
- Fewer exploration features than Mode's Visual Explorer
Standout against Mode. It combines a permanent free plan with published euro prices for every paid tier, under German law.
Chartbrew
dashboards on databases and APIs, self-hostable
Best for: Developer-led teams that want dashboards on databases and APIs, hosted or on their own servers
Chartbrew is provided by Depomo Ltd, a Scottish company (SC562290 at Companies House, incorporated 3 April 2017). Its source code is on GitHub under a custom licence, which GitHub shows as "Other", so treat it as source-available rather than a standard open-source licence.
The pricing page lists Starter at $29 a month ($24 billed yearly), Growth at $99 ($83) and Professional at $299 ($249), with a 14-day trial and no credit card. It builds charts and reports from databases and APIs, and charts can be embedded.
It is a dashboard tool rather than an analysis workbench.
What Chartbrew does better than Mode
- UK company with prices on the page, where Mode lists none for Pro
- Can be run on your own servers
- Connects to APIs as well as databases
- Embeddable charts and reports
Where Chartbrew is a step down from Mode
- No notebooks for Python or R
- The licence is a custom one, not a standard open-source licence
- Smaller analytics features than Mode
- Prices are in US dollars
Standout against Mode. It sits between a dashboard tool and an API connector, with a self-host option and prices from $24 a month.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Belgium). Mode is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU hosting.
- Source code. Closed source, as Mode is.
Best for: SaaS teams that want to show analytics inside their own product, white-labelled
Luzmo is provided by Luzmo NV, Tiensevest 102 bus 201, Leuven, Belgium (KBO 0640.944.227). It is a Belgian company and sells an embedded analytics platform.
Its pricing page shows one plan from EUR 1,995 a month, billed yearly, with white-label included, and a free trial.
This is a different job from Mode. Mode serves analysts inside a company; Luzmo serves the customers of a software product. It fits when you used Mode's embedding or custom data apps for customer-facing dashboards.
What Luzmo does better than Mode
- Belgian company inside the EU
- One published price with white-label included
- Built for embedding in your own product
- Free trial
Where Luzmo is a step down from Mode
- Not an analyst workbench: no SQL and Python notebooks
- Starts at EUR 1,995 a month, a lot for an internal team
- Narrower than Mode for ad hoc analysis
- Aimed at product teams, not at data analysts
Standout against Mode. It publishes a single price for white-label embedded analytics, from a Belgian entity.
Knowage
an open-source analytics suite from Italy
Best for: Organisations that want a self-hosted, open-source suite and have the staff to run it
Knowage is an open-source analytics suite published under AGPL-3.0, developed by Engineering Group in Italy. Its homepage links to eng.it, and the GitHub repository is KnowageLabs/Knowage-Server.
It combines data from relational databases, big data, NoSQL, open data and flat files, and offers charts, maps, KPIs and dashboards with self-service features. It supports several virtual instances for multi-company or multi-department use.
The contracting entity for paid editions and the ownership of the group could not be verified from the site, so none is stated here.
What Knowage does better than Mode
- Free to self-host under the AGPL-3.0 licence
- Italian developer, with no US contracting party needed for the open-source edition
- Covers many data source types
- Multi-instance support for several departments or companies
Where Knowage is a step down from Mode
- Contracting entity for paid editions not verified
- Heavier to set up and run than a hosted tool
- No SQL and Python notebooks of Mode's kind
- Not centred on analysts writing SQL the way Mode is
Standout against Mode. It is a full open-source analytics suite that you can run entirely on your own servers.
Omniscope
visual analytics and data prep from the UK, with a free edition
Best for: Analysts who want data preparation and visual analysis in one desktop or server app
Omniscope is made by Visokio (UK) Limited (company number 04580403 at Companies House). The terms and privacy policy were not opened for this page, so no governing law is stated.
Its pricing page lists a free edition for non-commercial use and Pro at GBP 59 per seat a month billed yearly or GBP 69 monthly. It runs on Windows, Mac and Linux and can be used on a server.
It combines data preparation and visual analysis in one application rather than a SQL editor with notebooks.
What Omniscope does better than Mode
- Free edition and published per-seat prices
- UK company with data that can stay on your own machine or server
- Data preparation and visuals in one app
- Runs on Windows, Mac and Linux
Where Omniscope is a step down from Mode
- The free edition is for non-commercial use only
- Not a SQL-first, notebook-style platform like Mode
- Per-seat pricing grows with the team
- Governing law could not be verified
Standout against Mode. It offers data preparation and visual analysis in one app, with a free edition and a stated seat price.
Veezoo
ask questions in plain language, from Zurich
Best for: Business users who would rather ask a question than write SQL
Veezoo is provided by Veezoo AG, Hohlstrasse 511, 8048 Zurich. Its terms (version of 16 March 2026) apply Swiss law, with the ordinary courts of Zurich as the exclusive forum.
It answers business questions in charts, from a knowledge graph of your data model. The pricing page offers Pro and Enterprise with a free trial and no amounts.
It is aimed at the people who read Mode reports, not at the analysts who write them.
What Veezoo does better than Mode
- Plain-language questions without SQL
- Swiss company under Swiss law with clear terms
- Free trial
- Fewer people needed to answer routine questions
Where Veezoo is a step down from Mode
- Not a SQL or Python workbench for analysts
- Prices are not published
- Switzerland is outside the EU
- Needs a data model to be set up first
Standout against Mode. People ask a question in words and get a chart back, instead of writing a query.
Embeddable
code-first dashboards that live inside your own app
Best for: Product teams that want dashboards as native components in their own web app
Embeddable is provided by TMD Technology Limited, a UK limited company (Companies House). The business terms apply the laws of the United Kingdom. The company number was not verified.
It ships dashboards as native web components, with your data staying in your database. Pricing is a flat monthly price by quote.
It is for developers building customer-facing analytics, not for analysts exploring data in a notebook.
What Embeddable does better than Mode
- UK company under UK law
- Dashboards as native components in your own front end
- Your data can stay in your own database
- A flat price instead of per-user pricing
Where Embeddable is a step down from Mode
- No analyst workbench, SQL editor or notebooks
- Pricing only by quote
- Company number not verified
- Needs developers to implement
Standout against Mode. It is code first, so charts become part of your own front end.
- Which law reaches it. EU (France). Mode is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Customer-selected Azure region (including Europe, UK and elsewhere); data is not moved between regions without consent.
- Source code. Closed source, as Mode is.
- Independently checked. ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS.
Best for: Teams that want connectors, data preparation and dashboards in one cloud service
ClicData is provided by ClicData SAS, 5-9 Rue du Palais Rihour, Lille, France. Its terms add that your contract might be with its affiliate ClicData Inc. in Delaware, and billing is in US dollars.
The homepage lists connectors, a data warehouse, data preparation and dashboards, and a free trial. No prices are published.
It is a broader BI suite than Mode and less centred on SQL and notebooks.
What ClicData does better than Mode
- Many connectors and data prep in one service
- French company with the SAS named in the terms
- Free trial
- A built-in data warehouse option
Where ClicData is a step down from Mode
- The contract might be with a Delaware affiliate, so check your order
- Billing in US dollars
- No published prices
- Less suited to code-first analysts than Mode
Standout against Mode. It packs connectors, data preparation and dashboards into one cloud service, from Lille.
- Which law reaches it. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). Mode is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. UK or EEA where applicable; the platform reads source data in place rather than copying it.
- Source code. Closed source, as Mode is.
Best for: Software companies that want white-label analytics in their own product, or an internal BI platform
Panintelligence is provided by Panintelligence Limited in Leeds (Companies House number 09009972). The privacy policy quotes a different number that belongs to another company, so the number from Companies House is used here.
Its site describes running the platform inside your business or embedding it white-label, with data queried in place. It lists no prices and asks you to get in touch.
This suits a product team more than a stand-alone analyst team.
What Panintelligence does better than Mode
- UK company with a verified Companies House record
- White-label embedding, with data queried in place
- Can run inside your own environment
- Reporting and dashboards for customer-facing use
Where Panintelligence is a step down from Mode
- No prices on the site
- No SQL and Python notebooks of Mode's kind
- Sales-led, no free plan
- The privacy policy contains a wrong company number
Standout against Mode. It queries data in place and can be embedded white-label, which suits software vendors.
What actually breaks when you switch
The hard part of leaving Mode is the work built on top of the SQL. The queries move with small dialect changes, but schedules, permissions, Slack and email sharing, and any Python or R notebooks do not. Take a list of every scheduled report and who receives it before you cancel.
Check the limits of the exact plan you need. Count's free plan allows 3 canvases and 3 editors, Cluvio puts embedding in Business, Omniscope's free edition is non-commercial, and Count's Scale plan needs at least 15 editors.
A few of these are in the UK or Switzerland, which are outside the EU. If your rule is EU only, the choice narrows to Cluvio, Luzmo, ClicData and Knowage, and for Knowage and ClicData you should confirm the entity on your own order.
Is there a European tool that works like Mode?
Count is the nearest. It is a collaborative canvas with SQL and Python cells, a free plan with up to 3 editors, and an AI agent on top. Lightdash is the other close one, but it works from a dbt model rather than free-form notebooks.
Neither offers R, and none of the eleven has a counterpart to Mode's custom data apps. If those matter to you, plan to keep a notebook environment next to the BI tool.
Which of these can I try for free?
Count has a free plan with up to 3 editor seats and 3 canvases. Cluvio has a Free plan and a 14-day trial of Business. Omniscope has a free non-commercial edition. Lightdash and Knowage can be self-hosted for free, and Chartbrew can be self-hosted as well.
Chartbrew, Veezoo, ClicData and Luzmo offer a trial rather than a free plan. Embeddable and Panintelligence work by quote.
What does the contract with Mode say that matters to a European company?
The terms name ThoughtSpot Inc. as provider and apply California law. Disputes go to binding arbitration in San Francisco with three JAMS arbitrators, apart from small claims. The data processing addendum covers transfers from the EEA, UK and Switzerland with Standard Contractual Clauses and the UK addendum.
These documents are dated 1 September 2023, so ask Mode or ThoughtSpot which version and which entity apply to your order form before you decide.
Can I keep my data in Europe?
It depends on the tool. Self-hosting Lightdash, Knowage or Chartbrew keeps everything on servers you choose. Count states that its servers are in the European Union and the United States, and the terms do not let you force the EU region, so ask before you rely on it.
For the hosted tools without a stated region, such as Cluvio, Veezoo and ClicData, check the hosting and subprocessor pages for the plan you would buy.
Which one to pick
If you want the nearest thing to Mode, with SQL and Python in one place, Count is the one to try first, and its free plan lets you do that without a card.
If you already use dbt and want an open-source tool on your own servers, Lightdash is the stronger pick. If you mainly need SQL dashboards with prices you can read, Cluvio is the simpler choice, and Chartbrew is worth a look when your data is in APIs as well as databases.
Luzmo, Embeddable and Panintelligence are for software companies that put analytics into a product. Veezoo is for business users who prefer asking questions. Omniscope, Knowage and ClicData are broader suites, each with a different trade-off, and none of them is built around SQL and notebooks.
Be realistic about the gap. None of the eleven matches Mode's mix of a SQL editor, R and Python notebooks, Visual Explorer, governed datasets and custom data apps in one product, and none imports Mode reports. Switch if you want a European or UK contracting party and a court close to home, and keep Mode if your analysts depend on its notebooks and apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
Count is the closest in shape, because it combines SQL and Python cells on a shared canvas, with a free plan and published prices. Lightdash is the better pick if you work in dbt and want an open-source tool you can host. Cluvio is the simpler choice if you mainly need SQL dashboards.
ThoughtSpot. Mode's own homepage carries the banner "ThoughtSpot acquires Mode", and its terms of service say the Service is made available by ThoughtSpot Inc. The privacy statement gives the address Mode Analytics c/o ThoughtSpot, Inc., 444 Castro Street, Mountain View, California.
Studio is free for up to 3 users, with SQL, Python and R, 10 MB per query and private database connections. Pro and Enterprise are listed as "Schedule a demo" with no amounts on the comparison page, so the price depends on a sales conversation.
Count lists Free at $0 for up to 3 editors, Pro at $49 per editor a month and Scale at $69 per editor a month with a minimum of 15 editors, viewers included. Cluvio lists Free, Pro at EUR 249, Business at EUR 599 and Enterprise from EUR 1,999 a month. Omniscope lists a free non-commercial edition and Pro at GBP 59 per seat a month billed yearly or GBP 69 monthly.
Chartbrew lists Starter at $29 a month ($24 on yearly billing), Growth at $99 ($83) and Professional at $299 ($249), with a 14-day trial. Luzmo has one plan from EUR 1,995 a month billed yearly, with white-label included and a free trial.
No. Lightdash builds charts and dashboards from a dbt semantic layer, so people ask questions of defined metrics. It is strong when your analytics engineers model the data, and weaker for free-form Python or R exploration. Its open-source edition is free to host yourself and the company is Telescope Technology Limited in London.
Lightdash and Knowage describe open-source editions you can run yourself, and Knowage uses the AGPL-3.0 licence. Chartbrew publishes its source code on GitHub under its own licence rather than a standard open-source one. Count, Cluvio, Luzmo, Veezoo, ClicData, Embeddable, Panintelligence and Omniscope are commercial products.
Cluvio (Germany), Luzmo (Belgium), ClicData SAS (France) and Knowage (Italy, with the contracting entity not verified). Count, Lightdash, Chartbrew, Omniscope, Embeddable and Panintelligence are in the United Kingdom, and Veezoo is in Switzerland. The UK and Switzerland are outside the EU but have EU adequacy decisions for personal data.
Its terms name ClicData SAS in Lille, France, and add that your contract might be with its affiliate ClicData Inc. in Delaware, with billing in US dollars. Check which entity is on your order before you sign if a US contracting party would be a problem.
Not automatically. Mode reports, queries and dashboards are not exported in a format another tool imports. The SQL is portable with small dialect changes, so a move means copying queries, rebuilding charts and setting up schedules and permissions again.
Lightdash, Knowage and Chartbrew can be self-hosted. Omniscope's Pro plan runs on your desktop or on a server you operate. Panintelligence describes running inside your own business or embedded white-label. For the others, the queries run on the vendor's cloud.
Related comparisons
About the author
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.