European Alternatives to Qlik
Looking for a European alternative to Qlik? Qlik directs legal notices to its Legal Department in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, its US customers contract with QlikTech Inc. under Pennsylvania law, and its data processing addendum covers transfers to US affiliates through the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses.
Eleven European tools cover the job: three with a free open-source edition, two self-service analytics tools with public prices, one embedded-analytics platform, one KPI-dashboard tool and four enterprise platforms sold on quote, from companies in Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Italy, Denmark and Switzerland.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
11 European Alternatives to Qlik
Lightdash
London BI built on dbt, with a free open-source edition, a 21-day cloud trial and no per-seat pricing
Cluvio
Berlin SQL and R dashboards with a free plan, published prices and a Frankfurt region
Visokio Omniscope
London data preparation, analytics and reporting in one app, with a free non-commercial licence
Luzmo
Leuven embedded analytics for SaaS products, one plan with white-label included, free trial
Knowage
Open-source (AGPL) analytics suite from Italy's Engineering Group, free to self-host
Geckoboard
London KPI dashboards for teams and TV screens, from $79 a month billed annually, free trial
TARGIT
Aalborg BI suite with an in-memory engine, embedded analytics and Danish-law cloud terms
ReportServer
Wiesbaden reporting and OLAP suite with an open-source Community Edition under the aGPL
Jedox
Freiburg planning and analytics platform for finance teams, sold by quote
Bissantz DeltaMaster
Nuremberg controlling and analysis software with AI-assisted deviation analysis, German-language site
Board
Ticino planning and analytics platform for finance, supply chain and sales, priced on request
Key takeaways
- Qlik contracts through a local entity per billing country (for example QlikTech GmbH in Germany under German law), but legal notices go to King of Prussia, Pennsylvania and transfers to US affiliates rely on the Data Privacy Framework.
- Lightdash (London) is the nearest in spirit for SQL and dbt teams: open-source edition, 21-day cloud trial, Cloud Pro at $3,000 a month with no per-seat pricing, under English law.
- Cluvio (Berlin) has a free plan and published prices at $279 and $669 a month, with a Frankfurt region and German law.
- Visokio Omniscope (London) combines data preparation and dashboards, with a free non-commercial licence and Pro at £59 per seat per month.
- Luzmo (Leuven) is for embedding analytics inside a SaaS product, from €1,995 a month, under Belgian law.
- Jedox, Board and Bissantz fit finance planning and controlling; TARGIT, Knowage and ReportServer are fuller BI suites, TARGIT sold on quote and the other two with open-source editions.
Why people leave Qlik
Qlik is an analytics platform that companies use to pull data from many systems and explore it in interactive dashboards. Its own site groups the product into data integration, analytics, embedded analytics, enterprise reporting and automation. Its US pricing page lists Qlik Cloud Analytics from $300 a month (Starter, 10 users and 10 GB, billed annually) through $825 (Standard, 25 GB) and $2,750 (Premium, 50 GB) to Enterprise on quote from 250 GB.
This page needs a more careful argument than most. Qlik does not hand European customers an American contract.
Its customer agreement names the Qlik entity by billing country: QlikTech GmbH with German law and the courts of Munich for Germany, Austria and Switzerland, QlikTech France SARL with French law for France, a Netherlands entity with Dutch law and arbitration in The Hague for the Netherlands and Belgium, and Swedish law with arbitration in Stockholm for the Nordics and several other countries.
What remains is the parent and the data layer. Legal notices go to Qlik's Legal Department in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US customers contract with QlikTech Inc. under Pennsylvania law, and the data processing addendum rests on the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses for transfers to US group companies.
If that, or the price, is your reason to look elsewhere, eleven European tools cover different parts of what Qlik does, and none of them covers all of it.
- A European contract with a US parent behind it For most European buyers the order form will name a European Qlik subsidiary. The addendum for Germany and Austria applies on top of the standard terms. The parent still sits in Pennsylvania, the DPA lists QlikTech Inc. among its group entities, and transfers to US affiliates run through the Data Privacy Framework. A European vendor removes that layer; it does not change what the contract says about your own country.
- Pricing is by capacity, and it climbs Qlik Cloud Analytics on its US page starts at $300 a month for 10 users and 10 GB, then $825 for 25 GB, $2,750 for 50 GB, and Enterprise on quote. Lightdash Cloud lists $3,000 a month with no per-seat charge, Cluvio lists $279 and $669 plans, and Visokio lists Pro at £59 per seat. The shapes differ, so compare on your own number of viewers and data volume, not on the headline.
- You may not need the whole platform Qlik bundles data integration, analytics, reporting and automation. If your need is dashboards over a SQL warehouse, KPIs on a wall screen, or analytics inside your own product, a narrower tool is cheaper and quicker to learn. If your need is planning and consolidation for finance, Jedox, Board and Bissantz are built for that, not for open-ended exploration.
- Open source is available here Lightdash, Knowage and ReportServer publish an open-source edition. That gives you a version you can run on your own servers, with the commercial editions for support and extra features. Qlik is a commercial, closed product, so a move to open source also changes who holds the code your reports depend on.
What you have to replace, not just match
List what people actually open in Qlik: how many apps, how many users, which data sources, and whether anyone relies on its associative selections across several tables. Dashboards over one clean SQL model move easily. Apps built around Qlik scripts and many source systems will need rebuilding in a data model, which is the real cost of leaving.
Start with one team and one live dashboard. Run it next to the Qlik app for a month, compare the numbers, and check what your users can do without help. Keep your Qlik subscription until the first renewal date is behind you, and write down the notice period in the order form before you decide.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Lightdash | London, United Kingdom | Free self-hosted / Cloud from about $400/month | United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
| #2 | Cluvio | Berlin, Germany | From about €99/month | EU (Germany) |
| #4 | Luzmo | Leuven, Belgium | From about €900/month; usage-based enterprise pricing | EU (Belgium) |
| #9 | Jedox | Freiburg, Germany | Custom pricing by users and modules | EU (Germany) |
| #11 | Board | Lugano, Switzerland | Custom enterprise pricing | Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA) |
How each alternative compares to Qlik
- Which law reaches it. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). Qlik is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your own infrastructure, or EU cloud.
- Source code. Open source, where Qlik is not: you can read what it does rather than take the description on trust.
Best for: Data teams that model in dbt and want governed metrics and dashboards on top
Lightdash is run by Telescope Technology Limited (trading as Lightdash), registered in England and Wales under number 12774445 at 7 Bell Yard, London. Its terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales with the courts of England and Wales as the exclusive venue. The privacy policy also names Telescope Technologies Inc. as an affiliate, so check which entity your order form names.
It is built around a semantic layer on top of dbt. The pricing page lists an open-source edition you host yourself, with community support, and Cloud Pro at $3,000 a month with unlimited users and no per-seat pricing. A 21-day trial is offered. Embedding is an add-on, priced per load or at $790 a month for 100,000 loads.
What Lightdash does better than Qlik
- Open-source edition you can run yourself, where Qlik is closed and commercial
- No per-seat pricing on Cloud Pro, so many viewers cost the same
- A 21-day trial and public prices, where Qlik Enterprise is on quote
- Metrics defined once in a semantic layer that the whole team shares
Where Lightdash is a step down from Qlik
- Needs a SQL warehouse and dbt, and has no data integration of its own
- Cloud Pro at $3,000 a month costs more than Qlik's Starter and Standard plans
- Smaller reporting and automation scope than Qlik
- The terms are with a UK company, with a US affiliate named in the privacy policy
Standout against Qlik. Dashboards come from metrics defined once in dbt, so a number means the same thing everywhere.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). Qlik is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU (Germany).
- Source code. Closed source, as Qlik is.
Best for: Small data-driven teams that write SQL and want dashboards without a long setup
Cluvio is provided by Cluvio GmbH in Berlin (Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 173385 B). Its terms, updated 18 June 2025, say the contract is governed by the laws of Germany with the German courts as the exclusive venue, with a separate paragraph for customers living outside Germany.
You connect a database, write SQL or R, and share interactive dashboards. The pricing page lists a free plan with 3 dashboards, Pro Team at $279 a month with 50 dashboards and Business at $669 a month with 100 dashboards. Its security page says the platform runs in AWS Frankfurt and in AWS Oregon, so check which region your account is in.
What Cluvio does better than Qlik
- A free plan and public prices, where Qlik starts at $300 a month
- A German company under German law and a Frankfurt region
- Quick to start: connect a database and write SQL
- Alerts on conditions you define, such as a drop in orders
Where Cluvio is a step down from Qlik
- Needs SQL skills, so it suits analysts more than business users
- No data integration or associative exploration like Qlik
- Prices are in US dollars and capped by dashboard counts
- Part of the platform runs in a US AWS region, so choose your region on purpose
Standout against Qlik. It is the quickest of the group to go from a database connection to a shared dashboard, on a free plan.
Visokio Omniscope
data preparation and dashboards in one app, with a free licence for non-commercial use
Best for: Analysts who want to prepare data and publish dashboards without separate tools
Omniscope is made by Visokio. Companies House lists VISOKIO (UK) LIMITED, number 04580403, in London, while the site terms name Visokio Ltd. We could not confirm that these are the same entity, and the terms we read name no governing law, so ask which entity and law your order form uses.
Its pricing page lists a Free licence for non-commercial projects, Pro at £59 per seat per month billed annually (£69 monthly) with server deployment on-premises or in the cloud, and Business at £99 per editor seat plus £30 per viewer seat. A currency selector offers dollars and euros. A free trial of the paid plans is offered.
What Visokio Omniscope does better than Qlik
- Data preparation, analysis and reporting in one tool
- A free licence for non-commercial work and published prices
- On-premises server deployment on Pro, so you choose where it runs
- Viewer seats at £30, which is cheaper than editor seats for wide audiences
Where Visokio Omniscope is a step down from Qlik
- The entity and governing law could not be confirmed from the terms we read
- The free licence excludes commercial use
- Smaller partner network and user community than Qlik
- Per-seat pricing adds up for large teams
Standout against Qlik. It handles data preparation, analytics and report publishing in the same visual workflow.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Belgium). Qlik is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU hosting.
- Source code. Closed source, as Qlik is.
Best for: Product teams that want to put dashboards inside their own application
Luzmo NV is a Belgian limited company at Martelarenlaan 38 in Leuven, registered with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises under 0640.944.227. Its terms are governed by Belgian law, with the competent courts of Leuven.
Its pricing page describes one plan, "Embedded Everywhere", from €1,995 a month billed annually, with white-label, self-service for end users and AI included, and a usage-based part tied to customer adoption. The licence includes 500 AI conversations and 100 million rows of its Warp engine. A free trial gives the full product.
What Luzmo does better than Qlik
- Built only for embedding, where Qlik also covers internal analytics
- One plan with every feature, so there is no upgrade tier to negotiate
- Belgian company with Belgian law and Leuven courts
- Free trial of the complete product
Where Luzmo is a step down from Qlik
- Not a tool for internal business users exploring data across the company
- Starts at €1,995 a month, more than Qlik's lowest plans
- The usage-based part makes the final bill depend on customer adoption
- No data integration or reporting automation like Qlik's wider platform
Standout against Qlik. White-label and self-service for your customers come in the single plan, not as an upgrade.
Knowage
an open-source analytics suite from an Italian IT group
Best for: Organisations that want to host their own BI suite and can run server software
Knowage is released under the AGPL-3.0 and developed by Engineering Group. Its company information page names ENGINEERING INGEGNERIA INFORMATICA S.P.A. with its registered office in Rome. The Enterprise Edition is "provided and guaranteed" by Engineering Group with a commercial offering; the terms of that offering are not public, so we cannot confirm a contract or governing law.
The site describes charts, maps, KPIs and interactive dashboards across heterogeneous sources, an AI virtual assistant, and an option to run it standalone or embedded in other applications. Its Community edition is free to install; the editions differ in features and support.
What Knowage does better than Qlik
- Free open-source edition you can inspect and host, where Qlik is closed
- Data stays inside your own perimeter when you self-host
- Can be embedded into third-party applications
- Backed by a large Italian IT group
Where Knowage is a step down from Qlik
- You run and maintain it yourself unless you buy the Enterprise Edition
- Enterprise terms and price are not public
- Smaller community than Qlik, and less polished self-service
- The AI assistant is listed as an Enterprise feature
Standout against Qlik. A full BI suite whose source code you can read, under the AGPL, from a European group.
Geckoboard
simple live KPI dashboards for teams and TV screens
Best for: Teams that want a handful of live numbers on a wall, not deep exploration
Geckoboard is Datachoice Solutions Limited, registered in England and Wales under number 05958505 at 71-75 Shelton Street, London. Its terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales, with the English courts having exclusive jurisdiction, and they describe a free trial account.
The pricing page lists Essentials from $79 a month billed annually, with 2 dashboards, 1 editor and 1 screen, and higher plans above it. It lists more than 90 integrations and a Metrics MCP server for working with your metrics in AI tools.
What Geckoboard does better than Qlik
- Much cheaper to start than Qlik, with a free trial and a clear price
- TV dashboards and shareable links with unlimited viewers
- English company under English law
- Plans start with a free trial and no sales call
Where Geckoboard is a step down from Qlik
- A KPI tool, not an exploration or data-modelling platform
- Essentials is capped at 2 dashboards and 1 editor
- No data integration or scripting like Qlik
- Prices are in dollars on the page we read
Standout against Qlik. It is built to put a few trusted numbers in front of a team, live, with almost no setup.
TARGIT
a Danish BI suite with a Danish-law cloud contract
Best for: Mid-sized companies, notably in automotive and equipment, that want a full BI suite with partner support
TARGIT A/S, Gasvaerksvej 24 in Aalborg, is the contracting party in its Cloud General Terms (version May 2023), which are governed by Danish law. The legal page carries a banner saying TARGIT is now a Forterro company, and we did not verify what that changes for new contracts.
The product is the TARGIT Decision Suite, with reporting, an in-memory server, data integration, embedded analytics and AI features on its feature list. The cloud terms say the in-memory data warehouse is hosted on Microsoft Azure. Prices are not published; the site offers a free demo.
What TARGIT does better than Qlik
- Cloud terms under Danish law with a Danish contracting company
- A complete suite with its own in-memory engine, like Qlik
- Published legal documents in several languages, including the data processing agreement
- Industry packages, for example for automotive and equipment rental
Where TARGIT is a step down from Qlik
- No public prices and no self-service sign-up
- Hosted on Microsoft Azure, a US provider's platform
- The Forterro ownership banner was not checked
- Smaller global ecosystem than Qlik
Standout against Qlik. Its cloud, DPA and security documents are public and sit under Danish law.
ReportServer
an open-source reporting and OLAP suite from Wiesbaden
Best for: IT teams that want pixel-perfect reports, ad-hoc analysis and OLAP on their own servers
ReportServer is made by InfoFabrik GmbH in Wiesbaden (Amtsgericht Wiesbaden, HRB 29555). The English imprint page we opened showed template text, so the registry details come from the German imprint. We did not find terms with a governing law.
The site presents a business intelligence suite that integrates Jasper, BIRT and Crystal reports, with ad-hoc reporting, Excel and Word output, multidimensional OLAP and scripting. The Community Edition is open source under the aGPL; an Enterprise Edition adds features, and a free trial and live demo are offered.
What ReportServer does better than Qlik
- Open-source Community Edition, where Qlik is closed
- Strong in formatted reporting and exports, including Excel and Word
- Brings existing Jasper, BIRT and Crystal reports into one place
- German company with registry details published
Where ReportServer is a step down from Qlik
- Less modern dashboard exploration than Qlik
- Needs technical staff to install and run
- Enterprise price and governing law not found
- Smaller community and partner network
Standout against Qlik. It brings several report engines and OLAP under one open-source roof.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). Qlik is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU cloud or your own infrastructure.
- Source code. Closed source, as Qlik is.
Best for: Finance teams that need budgeting, forecasting and reporting in one governed platform
Jedox GmbH is in Freiburg im Breisgau (Amtsgericht Freiburg, HRB 723467), as its legal page states. We found no public customer terms or governing law, so the contract and its law are to be confirmed on your order form.
Its pricing page offers subscription plans and add-ons, with a request for a quote, not figures. It positions the platform around planning, budgeting, forecasting and analysis, and it points to a trust centre. It is not a general-purpose dashboard explorer.
What Jedox does better than Qlik
- Planning, budgeting and forecasting are the core, where Qlik is mainly analytics
- German company with registry details published
- A public trust centre
- Subscription plans designed for finance teams
Where Jedox is a step down from Qlik
- No public prices; you request a quote
- Governing law and terms not found
- Not aimed at open-ended data exploration
- Aimed at finance-led projects, not self-service for every team
Standout against Qlik. It is the one here built around the finance planning cycle rather than ad-hoc dashboards.
Bissantz DeltaMaster
controlling-oriented analysis software from Nuremberg, in German
Best for: German-speaking controlling and sales teams that want guided analysis and reporting
Bissantz & Company GmbH is in Nuremberg (Amtsgericht Nuernberg, HRB 15590), and its imprint also lists Bissantz AG in Spreitenbach, Switzerland. We did not find customer terms or a governing law.
DeltaMaster is described as a power tool for controlling, with DeltaApp for dashboards on phone and browser, extensions for Power BI including planning, and AI for explaining deviations. The site is in German and does not publish prices.
What Bissantz DeltaMaster does better than Qlik
- Designed for controlling, with automatic explanation of deviations
- German company, with a Swiss company (Bissantz AG) in its imprint
- AI functions in analysis, planning and reporting on its own site
- Dashboards for phone and browser through DeltaApp
Where Bissantz DeltaMaster is a step down from Qlik
- The site and probably the support are German-language
- No public prices or terms found
- Narrower than Qlik's general analytics platform
- Business-intelligence functions for non-finance teams are less prominent on its site
Standout against Qlik. It focuses on telling controllers what changed and why, not only on showing charts.
- Which law reaches it. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA). Qlik is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. European data centres available.
- Source code. Closed source, as Qlik is.
Best for: Larger organisations that plan, budget and forecast across finance, supply chain and sales
Board International SA has its registered office at Via Maestri Comacini 4 in Chiasso, Ticino, Switzerland, as its privacy policy states, and the policy lists other companies in the Board Group. We did not find customer terms with a governing law.
Its site calls Board an agentic planning platform covering financial planning and analysis, consolidation, sales and operations planning and demand planning, and says it is a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Financial Planning Software, which is its own statement. Prices are on request. The privacy policy says data may be processed outside the EEA, including the United States.
What Board does better than Qlik
- A Swiss company with a published registered office, where Qlik sends notices to Pennsylvania
- Planning, consolidation and supply chain planning in one platform
- Industry use cases listed for retail, manufacturing, consumer goods and financial services
- Wide finance, supply chain and sales use cases on its site
Where Board is a step down from Qlik
- Price on request only, and aimed at larger organisations
- Not a self-service dashboard tool like Qlik
- Governing law and customer terms not found
- Switzerland is not in the EU, and the policy mentions processing in the US
Standout against Qlik. It plans across finance, supply chain and sales in one platform, which Qlik does not set out to do.
What actually breaks when you switch
The hard part of leaving Qlik is the data model, not the dashboards. Qlik apps often hold load scripts and associations across many tables. Rebuild that logic once, in SQL or a semantic layer, and write down which fields mean what before you start.
Check what each European tool does not include. Lightdash, Cluvio and Geckoboard need data to be somewhere queryable already. Luzmo is for embedding. Jedox, Board and Bissantz are for planning. Only TARGIT, Knowage and Visokio come close to a single tool for preparing and exploring data.
Ask for the contracting entity, the governing law and the data region in writing, because several tools here publish only part of this. For Visokio, Knowage Enterprise, Jedox, Board, Bissantz and ReportServer we could not confirm the law that applies.
Is there a European tool that does everything Qlik does?
Not in one product. Qlik covers data integration, analytics, embedded analytics, reporting and automation. TARGIT and Knowage are the nearest to a full BI suite, with their own data engines, dashboards and embedded options.
The others split the job: Lightdash and Cluvio sit on a SQL warehouse, Luzmo is for embedding, Geckoboard is for KPI screens, and Jedox, Board and Bissantz are for planning and controlling. Pick the part you actually use.
Which of these can I try without a sales call?
Lightdash has a 21-day cloud trial and an open-source version. Cluvio has a free plan. Visokio has a free non-commercial licence and a free trial. Luzmo and Geckoboard offer free trials. Knowage and ReportServer have open-source editions you can install yourself.
TARGIT, Jedox, Bissantz and Board are sold through demos and quotes.
Which have published prices?
Lightdash ($3,000 a month for Cloud Pro), Cluvio ($0, $279, $669 a month), Visokio (£0, £59 and £99 per seat), Luzmo (from €1,995 a month) and Geckoboard (from $79 a month) publish figures on their own pages. Currency and billing period vary, so read the page for your case.
Knowage Enterprise, TARGIT, Jedox, Bissantz and Board do not publish a price, and ReportServer's Enterprise price was not checked.
Does a European tool mean my data stays in Europe?
Not automatically. Cluvio runs in AWS Frankfurt and in Oregon, so check which region your account uses. TARGIT's cloud terms say its in-memory data warehouse is hosted on Microsoft Azure, a US provider's platform. Board's privacy policy says data may be processed outside the EEA, including the United States.
If location matters, ask each vendor for the region and the sub-processor list in writing, and consider the self-hosted options (Lightdash, Knowage, ReportServer), where you choose the server.
Which one to pick
If your data lives in a SQL warehouse and your team can write SQL or work with dbt, start with Lightdash or Cluvio. Both can be tried without a sales call, and both publish prices. If you want data preparation and dashboards in one app, try Visokio Omniscope.
If you need analytics inside your own product, Luzmo is the specialist. If you need a fuller internal BI suite, look at TARGIT and Knowage, and at ReportServer for reporting-heavy work. If the real need is finance planning, Jedox, Board and Bissantz are the ones to demo.
Be realistic about the gap. Qlik is a single platform for integration, analytics and automation with a large partner network, and none of these eleven replaces all of it. Switch if the US parent, the transfer layer or the price is the problem, and keep Qlik where your associative apps and Qlik-specific skills are central.
Frequently Asked Questions
It depends on what you use. For SQL and dbt teams, Lightdash is the easiest to try, with an open-source edition and a 21-day trial. For a free start with published prices, Cluvio. For a fuller BI suite, TARGIT or Knowage. For embedded analytics in your own product, Luzmo.
Its customer agreement sends legal notices to the Legal Department at 211 S. Gulph Rd., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, and US customers contract with QlikTech Inc. under Pennsylvania law. European customers contract with a local Qlik entity chosen by billing country, such as QlikTech GmbH under German law or QlikTech France SARL under French law.
It follows the billing country in Table 1 of the Qlik Customer Agreement. Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Liechtenstein: German law and the courts of Munich. France: French law and Paris. The Netherlands, Belgium and several others: Dutch law with arbitration in The Hague. The UK and Ireland: the law of England and Wales. Sweden, Denmark, Finland and the Baltics, and countries not listed: Swedish law with arbitration in Stockholm. The order form can name a different entity.
On its US pricing page, Qlik Cloud Analytics Starter is from $300 a month for 10 users and 10 GB, billed annually. Standard is from $825 a month with 25 GB of data, Premium from $2,750 a month with 50 GB, and Enterprise starts at 250 GB on quote. Extra users or data are bought separately.
Lightdash lists an open-source self-hosted edition and Cloud Pro at $3,000 a month with unlimited users, plus embedding add-ons. Cluvio lists a free plan with 3 dashboards, Pro Team at $279 a month with 50 dashboards, and Business at $669 a month with 100 dashboards.
Visokio Omniscope lists a free non-commercial licence, Pro at £59 per seat per month billed annually, and Business at £99 per editor seat and £30 per viewer seat. Luzmo lists one plan from €1,995 a month billed annually, with a usage-based part. Geckoboard lists Essentials from $79 a month billed annually, with 2 dashboards and 1 editor.
Lightdash has an open-source self-hosted edition. Knowage is released under the AGPL-3.0, with a commercial Enterprise Edition from Engineering Group. ReportServer's Community Edition is open source under the aGPL, with an Enterprise Edition. The others are commercial products.
They are French in origin, but they are not on this page. The English SaaS terms we read for Toucan Toco are with Toucan toco Inc. in Boston under Massachusetts law, and ClicData's terms say your contract might be with its Delaware affiliate. Where the contracting entity is not European, a tool does not qualify here.
Jedox (Freiburg), Board (Chiasso) and Bissantz DeltaMaster (Nuremberg). Their own sites emphasise planning, budgeting, forecasting and controlling. They are sold on quote, so expect a demo, not a self-service sign-up.
Luzmo is built for it: white-label is included in its single plan, with self-service for your end users. Lightdash lists embedding as an add-on, Cluvio has an embedded analytics page, and TARGIT lists embedded analytics among its features.
Related comparisons
Who worked on this review
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.