Best European Alternatives to Adobe Photoshop
Looking for a European alternative to Adobe Photoshop? Adobe's move to subscription-only left a large and permanently annoyed market behind it — you can no longer buy the software, only rent it, and the price rises on Adobe's schedule.
These European tools cover RAW processing, photo editing, painting and vector design, several with perpetual licences and several that are free and open source.
How we rank these tools — 4-step process
-
1
European ownership, verified
The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.
-
2
Category fit and hands-on review
What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.
-
3
Compliance and pricing check
GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.
-
4
Position on this page
Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. It never buys a good review: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.
Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect which tools appear here and the order they appear in. Editorial policy
7 European Alternatives to Adobe Photoshop
Capture One
Professional RAW processing and tethered studio capture
Photopea
Full PSD editor that runs entirely in your browser
Krita
Open-source painting studio built for digital artists
darktable
Open-source RAW developer and photo workflow manager
Penpot
Open-source design and prototyping in the browser
Photoroom
AI background removal and product photography at scale
Linearity
Vector design and animation for Mac and iPad
Key takeaways
- Adobe does not train generative AI on your content: the terms of use in force say so explicitly, with Adobe Stock submissions excepted. Any comparison page still making that claim is repeating a 2024 news cycle rather than reading the licence.
- Photoshop single app is $22.99 a month with 100GB, and the Photography plan is $19.99 with 1TB and far more generative credits — the cheaper plan is the more generous one.
- New Single App subscribers have had 25 generative credits a month since 1 July 2025, down from 500.
- Capture One and Linearity still sell perpetual licences, which in a category Adobe converted entirely to rental is the structural difference rather than a pricing preference.
- Because Photoshop runs locally, the jurisdiction question only applies to what you sync — so the first move for a privacy-driven switch is to turn off cloud documents, not to change editor.
Why people leave Adobe Photoshop
Let us dispose of two arguments this page could make and should not.
Photoshop is desktop software that edits files on your own disk, so the usual line about an American provider holding your data applies only to what you deliberately put in Creative Cloud.
And the widely repeated claim that Adobe trains generative models on your images does not survive checking: after the terms-of-use row in June 2024, Adobe rewrote them, and the terms in force today say it in as many words — "We will not use your Local or Cloud Content to train generative AI models" — with material submitted to the Adobe Stock marketplace as the stated exception.
What remains is the thing people were actually angry about in the first place. You cannot buy Photoshop. You rent it, the rent rises, and what the rent includes gets adjusted without your involvement. Creative Cloud All Apps became Creative Cloud Pro on 17 June 2025 at $69.99 a month; from 1 July 2025 new Single App subscribers receive 25 generative credits a month where the previous entitlement was 500.
Photoshop on its own is $22.99 a month with 100GB of storage. The Photography plan is $19.99 with 1TB. Neither ever becomes yours, and the day you stop paying, twenty years of PSDs need someone else's software to open them.
- You are renting a tool you use for decades Photoshop files outlive employment, companies and hardware. A photographer with a twenty-year archive is paying a monthly fee for continued read access to their own work, and has been since 2013. Capture One and Linearity both still sell a perpetual licence, and Krita, darktable and Photopea cost nothing at all — on a ten-year view that is not a discount, it is a different relationship with the software.
- The plan changed under the subscribers On 17 June 2025 the All Apps plan was replaced by Creative Cloud Pro at $69.99 a month. Two weeks later, new Single App subscriptions dropped from 500 monthly generative credits to 25. Nobody was consulted, because nobody has a licence to consult — they have a subscription, and a subscription is a set of terms the vendor edits.
- Cloud storage is where the real exposure sits The jurisdiction argument against Photoshop is weak while your files stay local and becomes real the moment they do not. Creative Cloud synchronisation, Libraries and cloud documents put images on Adobe infrastructure, and Adobe's own terms distinguish locally stored content, which it does not review, from cloud-stored content, which may be scanned automatically. If that distinction matters to your work, the practical response is to stop syncing rather than to change editor.
- One application doing five jobs, priced as if you need all five Photoshop is a RAW developer, a retoucher, a painting tool, a mockup tool and a batch image processor, and almost nobody uses more than two of those. The European options are split along exactly those lines, which is why replacing Photoshop usually means installing two free applications rather than buying one expensive one.
What you have to replace, not just match
Work out which Photoshop you own before comparing anything, because this page lists seven tools and not one of them does everything Photoshop does.
There is the RAW developer, which is where photographers spend ninety per cent of their time and which Capture One and darktable both cover completely. There is the pixel editor — layers, masks, compositing, retouching — which is Photopea, and Krita for anything involving a brush. There is the mockup and layout work, which is Penpot. And there is the production line: hundreds of product photographs that need the same thing done to them, which is PhotoRoom.
The pairing that replaces most working photographers' Photoshop is a RAW developer plus a pixel editor, and both halves are available for nothing. The pairing that replaces a designer's Photoshop is a vector tool plus a pixel editor, and that is Linearity plus Photopea.
The alternatives compared
| Position | Tool | Headquarters | Pricing | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Capture One | Copenhagen, Denmark | Perpetual licence from about €299 / subscription from about €20/month | EU (Denmark) |
| #2 | Photopea | Prague, Czech Republic | Free with ads / Premium from about €5/month | EU (Czech Republic) |
| #3 | Krita | Netherlands | Free and open source; funded by donations | EU (Netherlands) |
| #4 | darktable | Germany / distributed | Free and open source | EU (Germany) |
| #5 | Penpot | Madrid, Spain | Free and open source, unlimited users / paid cloud tiers | EU (Spain) |
| #6 | PhotoRoom | Paris, France | Free tier / Pro from about €12.99 per month | EU (France) |
| #7 | Linearity | Vienna, Austria | Free tier / Pro from about €8/month / perpetual licence available | EU (Austria) |
How each alternative compares to Adobe Photoshop
- Which law reaches it. EU (Denmark). Adobe Photoshop is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your own computer.
- Source code. Closed source, as Adobe Photoshop is.
Best for: Photographers whose Photoshop is really a RAW workflow with a subscription attached
Capture One A/S has been in Copenhagen since 1991 and sells a perpetual licence from about €299 beside a subscription from roughly €20 a month. Against a product that stopped being purchasable in 2013, that is the structural difference: the licence overtakes a year or so of Photoshop subscription and after five years it is not close.
For photographers the substitution is cleaner than it looks, because most of what they open Photoshop for happens before Photoshop. Layers and masking sit inside the RAW process here, so the round trip to a pixel editor that defines the Adobe workflow mostly disappears, and tethered shooting — the industry reference implementation — is something Photoshop never did at all.
What it will not do is composite. Serious retouching, multi-image montage and pixel-level work belong in Photopea or Krita, and Capture One's asset management on very large libraries is weaker than Lightroom's. Budget for the second application rather than expecting one purchase to end the subscription.
What Capture One does better than Adobe Photoshop
- A perpetual licence from about €299, where Photoshop cannot be bought at any price
- Files stay on your own computer with no cloud document layer to disable
- Tethered capture that Photoshop has no equivalent for, and that studios depend on
- Layers and masking inside the RAW workflow, removing the round trip Photoshop exists to serve
- A Danish operating company, so the counterparty sits inside the EU
Where Capture One is a step down from Adobe Photoshop
- No compositing or retouching worth the name, which is exactly what Photoshop is for
- About €299 up front against $22.99 a month, so the first year costs more
- Steeper to learn than Lightroom, let alone Photoshop
- Closed source, as Photoshop is, and asset management on huge libraries is weaker
Standout against Adobe Photoshop. It is the only tool here aimed at professionals that you can still own: pay once, keep the version, and stop paying without losing access to your own work.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Czech Republic). Adobe Photoshop is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your browser — files are processed locally.
- Source code. Closed source, as Adobe Photoshop is.
Best for: Anyone who needs to open a layered PSD on a machine they do not control
Photopea is the single most direct substitution on this page. It reads and writes PSD files with layers, masks and smart objects, uses a layout that Photoshop users recognise immediately, and opens Sketch, XD, Figma and Illustrator files as well.
The property that matters against Adobe is where the work happens. Photopea looks like a cloud service and is not: files are processed in the browser rather than uploaded, so a confidential document can be opened on a client's laptop, a locked-down workstation or a borrowed machine without it leaving that machine and without an installation, an account or a subscription.
It is free with advertising and about €5 a month without, against Photoshop's $22.99. The honest limits are scale and continuity: very large files strain the browser, there is no offline mode, no collaboration, and it is effectively one developer in Prague. For occasional heavy work that is fine. For a studio standard it is a judgement call.
What Photopea does better than Adobe Photoshop
- Opens and saves layered PSD files better than anything else outside Adobe
- Nothing to install and no account, where Photoshop needs a Creative Cloud installation and a login
- Files are processed locally in the browser rather than uploaded to a service
- Free with ads, or about €5 a month against $22.99 for Photoshop alone
- Also reads Sketch, XD, Figma and Illustrator files, which Photoshop does not
Where Photopea is a step down from Adobe Photoshop
- Struggles with very large documents where Photoshop keeps working
- No offline mode, so a browser tab is the only way in
- No Firefly-class generative tools, and no equivalent of generative fill
- A one-developer project, which is a continuity risk a business should weigh
Standout against Adobe Photoshop. A full layered editor that appears in a browser tab and leaves the file on your disk — which is the one thing a Creative Cloud installation can never be.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Netherlands). Adobe Photoshop is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your own computer.
- Source code. Open source, where Adobe Photoshop is not: you can read what it does rather than take the description on trust.
Best for: Anyone whose Photoshop use involves a stylus more than a histogram
Krita is made by the Krita Foundation inside the KDE community in the Netherlands, GPLv3-licensed, funded by donations and free. Its brush engines are the reason it belongs on a page about Photoshop: for painting, illustration, concept art and comics, it is not a cheaper option, it is frequently the better one.
Around that sit the things a working illustrator needs and Photoshop charges for — frame-by-frame animation, wrap-around mode for seamless textures, HDR painting, ICC colour management, and PSD support so files travel to and from clients who are still on Adobe.
It is deliberately weak where Photoshop is strong. Photo retouching and RAW work are not what it is for, the interface needs configuring before it feels right, and the development pace follows donations. Put it beside darktable or Capture One rather than instead of them.
What Krita does better than Adobe Photoshop
- Free under GPLv3 with no subscription and no account, against $22.99 a month
- Brush engines that match or beat what Photoshop charges for, for painting work
- Frame-by-frame animation included, which Photoshop handles awkwardly at best
- No telemetry and no cloud component, so nothing about your work reaches anyone
- Dutch foundation under EU jurisdiction, with the source open to inspection
Where Krita is a step down from Adobe Photoshop
- Weak for photo retouching and compositing, which is why many people open Photoshop
- No RAW development, so photographers need a second application
- Occasional stability problems, and an interface that needs work before it feels right
- Donation-funded, so the release pace is not a commercial vendor's
Standout against Adobe Photoshop. It is the only tool here whose core capability genuinely exceeds Photoshop's in a professional discipline, and it costs nothing.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Germany). Adobe Photoshop is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your own computer.
- Source code. Open source, where Adobe Photoshop is not: you can read what it does rather than take the description on trust.
Best for: Photographers who want full control and refuse on principle to rent it
darktable is a German-led community project under GPLv3 that gives away a complete non-destructive RAW workflow: scene-referred processing, filmic and sigmoid tone mapping, parametric masks that select on colour and luminance rather than shape, tethering and colour management.
Against Photoshop the comparison is really against the Photography plan, because that is what a photographer is actually paying $19.99 a month for. darktable does the developing half of that for zero, on your own machine, with no account and no telemetry, and treats Linux as a first-class platform rather than an afterthought.
The price is paid in patience. The learning curve is steep and often frustrating, performance degrades on large catalogues, and the interface is dense enough to put people off before they reach the image quality underneath. It is the best value on this page and it is not the easiest thing on it.
What darktable does better than Adobe Photoshop
- Free under GPLv3 where the Photography plan is $19.99 every month, indefinitely
- Scene-referred processing and parametric masking that no free Adobe tier offers
- Runs entirely offline with no account, no cloud documents and no telemetry
- Linux is a first-class platform, which Adobe has never supported at all
- Open source, so the processing pipeline can be inspected rather than trusted
Where darktable is a step down from Adobe Photoshop
- A steep and genuinely frustrating learning curve compared with Adobe's
- No compositing or retouching, so it replaces half the workflow at most
- Slows down noticeably on very large catalogues
- Community support only: no vendor to call when a release breaks something
Standout against Adobe Photoshop. It gives away the modern tone-mapping pipeline that separates a real RAW developer from a curves panel, which is the part of Adobe's photography offer people assume has to be paid for.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Spain). Adobe Photoshop is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your own infrastructure, or Penpot cloud.
- Source code. Open source, where Adobe Photoshop is not: you can read what it does rather than take the description on trust.
Best for: Teams still building interface mockups in a pixel editor
Penpot is on this page for a specific and slightly embarrassing reason: a lot of Photoshop licences exist because somebody designs screens in it. That was normal in 2010 and it is now the most expensive way to produce a mockup that a developer cannot use.
Kaleidos in Madrid built Penpot for that job — components, shared libraries, prototyping, developer handoff and design tokens, in the browser, open source under MPL 2.0, free for any number of users and self-hostable if you want it on your own servers.
It does nothing else. There is no retouching, no RAW development, no brush work and no PSD editing. If your Photoshop is photography, this entry is not for you and the four above it are.
What Penpot does better than Adobe Photoshop
- Built for interface design, where Photoshop is a pixel editor doing that job badly
- Free for unlimited users, against a Photoshop seat for every person who makes a mockup
- Developer handoff and design tokens that a PSD handed to an engineer cannot provide
- Self-hostable under MPL 2.0 or run from Spain, so the files need not sit with a US vendor
Where Penpot is a step down from Adobe Photoshop
- No photo editing at all: no retouching, no compositing, no RAW
- Cannot open or edit PSD files, so it replaces the habit rather than the archive
- Less mature than commercial design tools on very large files
- Self-hosting is operational work somebody has to take on
Standout against Adobe Photoshop. It is the only entry here that replaces a Photoshop use case by making it somebody else's job entirely — the mockup stops being an image and becomes a design with handoff attached.
- Which law reaches it. EU (France). Adobe Photoshop is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. EU (France).
- Source code. Closed source, as Adobe Photoshop is.
- Independently checked. GDPR.
Best for: E-commerce sellers whose Photoshop is the same cut-out done over and over
PhotoRoom, from Paris, attacks the least interesting part of product photography: cutting the product out and putting a usable background behind it. It does that at a quality that until recently required somebody with a pen tool and an afternoon.
The reason it belongs beside Photoshop rather than beneath it is batch processing and the API. A seller with a catalogue turns a week of manual selections into an afternoon, and the same processing can be wired into an e-commerce platform or an import pipeline — which is work Photoshop can be scripted to do and almost nobody actually scripts.
It is narrow on purpose. There is no retouching, no compositing and no general editing, it is a cloud service rather than a local application, and the useful tiers are subscriptions from about €12.99 a month. For anything that is not product imagery, look at Photopea instead.
What PhotoRoom does better than Adobe Photoshop
- Batch background removal across a whole catalogue, where Photoshop processes one image at a time unless somebody writes the script
- An API so the same processing runs inside another system entirely
- A French operating company with EU processing, against a US vendor holding synced assets
- About €12.99 a month against $22.99, for the specific job most sellers open Photoshop to do
Where PhotoRoom is a step down from Adobe Photoshop
- Narrow: product imagery only, with no retouching or compositing
- A cloud service, so images are uploaded rather than processed on your own machine
- Subscription only for the tiers that are actually useful
- Closed source, as Photoshop is, so the claims rest on the vendor's word
Standout against Adobe Photoshop. It is the only tool here designed around a catalogue rather than an image, which is the difference between a creative tool and a production line.
- Which law reaches it. EU (Austria). Adobe Photoshop is run from the United States, so the CLOUD Act obliges the provider to hand over data on a valid order regardless of which country the servers are in.
- Where the data sits. Your device; optional cloud sync.
- Source code. Closed source, as Adobe Photoshop is.
Best for: Designers on Mac and iPad who want to own the tool rather than rent it
Linearity GmbH in Vienna builds Curve for vector design and Move for animation, sells them with a free tier, a Pro tier from about €8 a month and — unusually in this market — a perpetual licence. It was built for the iPad rather than squeezed onto it, which anyone who has used a ported desktop application on a tablet will recognise as a large difference.
Against Photoshop the overlap is partial and deliberate: this is the vector and motion work that people do in Photoshop because Illustrator is another subscription. Lottie export puts animations into apps and websites as vector animation rather than video, which is what developers actually want and what a PSD cannot supply.
The constraints are clear. Apple platforms only, so a Windows or Linux designer is ruled out immediately, and it is less capable than Illustrator for serious print production. It is also a small company that has repositioned before, which is worth weighing for a tool you intend to build a workflow around.
What Linearity does better than Adobe Photoshop
- A perpetual licence is available, which Adobe discontinued across the entire Creative Cloud line
- Files sit on your device with cloud sync optional, rather than a cloud document layer switched on by default
- Vector design and animation in one chain, where Photoshop needs two more Adobe subscriptions
- Lottie export for real vector animation in apps and on the web
- An Austrian operating company, so the vendor sits inside the EU
Where Linearity is a step down from Adobe Photoshop
- Mac and iPad only, so it is not an option for most of the market
- Not a pixel editor: no retouching, no compositing, no PSD editing
- Weaker than Illustrator for serious print work
- A small vendor with a history of repositioning, which matters over a decade
Standout against Adobe Photoshop. It is the only tool on this page where design and animation share one document, and one of only two you can still buy outright.
What actually breaks when you switch
The first thing that hurts is not the software, it is the client. Layered PSDs move both ways in this industry, and while Photopea and Krita read them well, a complicated document with smart objects and adjustment layers can come back subtly different. Test the round trip on your ugliest real file before you promise anybody anything.
The second is that one application becomes two. Photoshop's value was always that it did the developing, the retouching, the painting and the mockups badly enough to be acceptable in all four. Replacing it means installing a RAW developer and a pixel editor, learning both, and accepting that some work now crosses an export step it did not cross before.
The third is generative editing, and there is no way to dress it up. Firefly's generative fill has no equivalent here. If your retouching workflow now assumes it, either keep one Photoshop seat for that work or plan to do it by hand again, and decide which before you cancel rather than after.
Does Adobe use my images to train its AI?
No, on the evidence available. The June 2024 controversy came from a terms-of-use update whose licence language read badly to a profession already suspicious of it, not from a change in what Adobe was doing. Adobe responded that it had never trained generative AI on customer content and rewrote the terms to state that explicitly; the current version on adobe.com/legal/terms.html still carries the sentence, with content submitted to the Adobe Stock marketplace as the acknowledged exception.
What the terms do say is that cloud-stored content may be scanned automatically for illegal material, while locally stored content is not reviewed. That is a different claim from AI training and it is one worth understanding on its own terms, because it applies to anything you put in Creative Cloud.
If you want the training question to be unanswerable rather than answered, the tools here that run entirely on your own machine — Capture One, darktable, Krita, Photopea — remove the need to trust anybody's statement of policy.
Can I actually buy image software outright any more?
Yes, from two companies on this page. Capture One sells a perpetual licence from about €299 alongside a subscription from roughly €20 a month, and Linearity sells one beside its €8-a-month tier. In both cases the version you buy keeps working indefinitely; what you stop receiving is future versions.
The arithmetic against Photoshop is straightforward and rarely done, and it is worth doing in one currency rather than two: €299 for Capture One against Photoshop at $22.99 a month is a crossover at about thirteen months, or about fifteen against the Photography plan at $19.99, after which the licence costs nothing at all until you choose to upgrade. Check your own local list price before you quote either figure back at anyone.
The genuine risk of a perpetual licence is camera support. A RAW developer needs updating for new sensors, so a photographer who buys a camera every three years ends up on a de facto upgrade cycle. For anyone shooting the body they already own, that risk is theoretical.
What does Photoshop do that nothing here does?
Three things, and being clear about them saves a month. The first is generative fill and the wider Firefly toolset, which is genuinely ahead of anything free and is the reason some retouchers will not move. The second is the ecosystem: actions, panels, plug-ins and every tutorial written in the last twenty years assume Photoshop.
The third is that Photoshop is the interchange format. A client sends a layered PSD and expects a layered PSD back, and while Photopea reads and writes them remarkably well, "remarkably well" is not the same as "identically" once smart objects and adjustment layers get complicated.
What people expect to miss and generally do not is raw capability. Layers, masks, curves, channels, healing and compositing all exist in the alternatives, and for most working photographers the honest gap is muscle memory rather than function.
Where does the privacy argument against Photoshop actually apply?
To Creative Cloud, not to Photoshop. The editor runs on your computer and opens files from your disk; there is no server involved in applying a curve. What involves a server is cloud documents, Libraries, synced settings, Adobe Fonts and the generative features, which by definition send the image to Adobe to process.
For a photographer under a non-disclosure agreement, or a studio handling unreleased product shots, that distinction is the whole practical matter. Turning off cloud sync and working locally puts you in nearly the same position as the desktop alternatives here, without changing software.
Where changing software does help is generative editing. Every generative feature in Photoshop is a round trip to Adobe. If your work cannot leave the building and you want that class of tool, nothing here offers it locally either — so the honest answer is that you do without, rather than that you switch.
Which one to pick
If you are a photographer, the honest recommendation is darktable if you want it free and Capture One if you want it excellent, plus Photopea for the occasions that need layers. That combination replaces the Photography plan entirely and, in Capture One's case, does it with a licence you keep.
If you paint or illustrate, Krita is not a compromise and has not been for years. It is the one place on this page where leaving Adobe is an upgrade rather than a trade.
If your Photoshop is a production line of product images, PhotoRoom does that job better than Photoshop does, because it was designed around a catalogue instead of an image.
And if what you actually needed was a perpetual licence rather than a different country, buy Capture One or Linearity and stop there. The reason to leave Adobe in 2026 is that you cannot own what you use every day — not a data protection story that, for desktop software editing local files, was never the strongest argument against it.
Frequently Asked Questions
It depends which Photoshop you use. Capture One if you are a photographer who mostly develops RAW files. darktable if you want the same work done for nothing. Photopea if you need layers, masks and PSD compatibility without an installation. Krita if you paint. PhotoRoom if your Photoshop is four hundred product photographs a week. Most people end up with two of these rather than one.
No. Adobe's terms of use, rewritten after the June 2024 backlash, state that customer content is not used to train generative AI, with content submitted to Adobe Stock as the exception. The claim persists because the June 2024 news cycle travelled further than the correction did, and it is the most common false statement on comparison pages in this category.
Photoshop as a single application is $22.99 a month on an annual commitment with 100GB of storage and 25 generative credits. The Photography plan is $19.99 with Lightroom included, 1TB of storage and 1,000 credits, which makes it better value than the single app for most people. Creative Cloud Pro, which replaced All Apps in June 2025, is $69.99 a month.
Yes, and Photopea is the best answer available anywhere: it opens and saves PSD files with layers, masks and smart objects in a browser tab, and also reads Sketch, XD, Figma and Illustrator files. Krita opens PSDs too. Complex documents leaning heavily on smart filters and adjustment layers are where fidelity starts to slip, so test your worst file rather than your simplest one.
Not in Photoshop's sense. PhotoRoom does AI background removal and generated replacement backgrounds at commercial quality, which covers the single most common generative task in product photography. Inpainting a fence out of a landscape, in one click, to Firefly's standard, is not something anything on this page matches — that is the real capability you give up.
Dramatically, for most people. Krita, darktable and Photopea's browser version cost nothing; Photopea Premium is about €5 a month against Photoshop's $22.99; Linearity starts near €8 and PhotoRoom near €12.99. Capture One is the exception: about €299 for a perpetual licence, which is more up front and roughly a year of Photoshop thereafter.
Capture One, darktable, Krita and Linearity are desktop applications that need no connection to do their work, and their files stay on your own machine. Photopea runs in a browser but processes files locally rather than uploading them, which is not the same as offline and is close to it in the way that matters. PhotoRoom is a cloud service and does need the network.
The images move trivially and the edits do not. RAW adjustments are stored in each application's own way, so a catalogue moved to Capture One or darktable arrives as unedited originals plus whatever you exported as JPEG or TIFF. The usual approach is to export finished versions of anything you care about before you go, and re-develop only the handful of images you genuinely revisit.
It is ad-supported, with an ad-free tier at roughly €5 a month, and it is effectively the work of one developer in Prague. Files are processed in your browser rather than uploaded, so it is unusually appropriate for a confidential PSD on a machine you do not control. The limits follow from the same facts: very large files struggle, there is no offline mode, and a one-developer project carries a continuity risk a studio should weigh.
Who worked on this review
Explore More European Alternatives
Discover privacy-focused European alternatives to other popular US tech services.