Autenti

Polish e-signature platform that is itself a qualified trust service provider for registered e-delivery

Quick Overview

Company Autenti S.A.
Category E-Signature Software
Headquarters Poznań, Poland
Founded 2012
EU Presence EU (Poland)
Data Location EEA, in data centres subject to European law; country and operator not named by Autenti
Open Source No
Compliance QTSP on the Polish EU trusted list for qualified electronic registered delivery and qualified validation (not for signature certificates); ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301
Pricing PRO €20/month billed annually (€30 monthly) / PREMIUM €35/month billed annually (€55 monthly), 1 seat, net of VAT / Corporate and Enterprise on request
Free Option 14-day free trial, no credit card
Replaces DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign

Detailed Review

Autenti is on the Polish EU trusted list as a qualified trust service provider, and it is worth reading what for, because the marketing shorthand hides the distinction.

Autenti is qualified for electronic registered delivery, granted in March 2024, and for qualified validation, granted in March 2026. It is not qualified to issue signature certificates: QES on the platform comes from InfoCert, SimplySign or mSzafir. So the qualified status is real and independently granted, and it covers a different thing from signing.

That different thing is useful. Qualified registered delivery is the eIDAS equivalent of registered post — evidence of what was sent, to whom, and when it arrived, with the same presumption in law. Most tools in this category prove that a document was signed and leave the delivery to email. Autenti also holds ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 22301, the business continuity standard, which few of its competitors bother with.

Autenti S.A. works from Poznań and has been trading since 2012, when it was registered as Autenti Sp. z o.o.; it converted to a joint-stock company in June 2026.

Seat pricing is published: PRO at €20 a month billed annually or €30 monthly, PREMIUM at €35 billed annually or €55 monthly, one seat each, net of VAT, with Corporate and Enterprise quoted.

There is a fourteen-day trial and no card is asked for. The weak point is location: Autenti says its data sits in the EEA in data centres subject to European law, and names neither the country nor the operator — which, for a buyer whose whole reason for shortlisting European tools is knowing where the documents are, is the sentence that needs finishing.

What Autenti does well

  • On the Polish EU trusted list as a qualified trust service provider
  • Qualified electronic registered delivery, which most signing tools do not offer
  • ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 22301
  • Published seat prices: PRO €20/month and PREMIUM €35/month billed annually
  • Polish company trading since 2012, 14-day trial without a card

Where Autenti falls short

  • The qualified status covers registered delivery and validation, not signature certificates
  • QES is issued by InfoCert, SimplySign or mSzafir rather than by Autenti itself
  • Hosting is given only as the EEA, with neither country nor operator named
  • Corporate and Enterprise pricing is on request
  • Not open source

Standout feature. Qualified registered e-delivery: Autenti is on a trusted list for proving a document arrived, not only for signing it.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • On the Polish EU trusted list as a qualified trust service provider
  • Qualified electronic registered delivery, which most signing tools do not offer
  • ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 22301
  • Published seat prices: PRO €20/month and PREMIUM €35/month billed annually
  • Polish company trading since 2012, 14-day trial without a card

Cons

  • The qualified status covers registered delivery and validation, not signature certificates
  • QES is issued by InfoCert, SimplySign or mSzafir rather than by Autenti itself
  • Hosting is given only as the EEA, with neither country nor operator named
  • Corporate and Enterprise pricing is on request
  • Not open source

Alternatives to Autenti

See all E-Signature software →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Autenti?

Autenti is on the Polish EU trusted list as a qualified trust service provider, and it is worth reading what for, because the marketing shorthand hides the distinction.

Autenti is qualified for electronic registered delivery, granted in March 2024, and for qualified validation, granted in March 2026. It is not qualified to issue signature certificates: QES on the platform comes from InfoCert, SimplySign or mSzafir. So the qualified status is real and independently granted, and it covers a different thing from signing.

Where is Autenti based?

Autenti operates from Poznań, Poland, which places it under EU (Poland). Compliance: QTSP on the Polish EU trusted list for qualified electronic registered delivery and qualified validation (not for signature certificates); ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301.

What does Autenti cost?

PRO €20/month billed annually (€30 monthly) / PREMIUM €35/month billed annually (€55 monthly), 1 seat, net of VAT / Corporate and Enterprise on request. 14-day free trial, no credit card.

Who is Autenti best for?

Businesses that need proof of delivery as well as proof of signature. Qualified registered e-delivery: Autenti is on a trusted list for proving a document arrived, not only for signing it.

What are the drawbacks of Autenti?

The qualified status covers registered delivery and validation, not signature certificates. QES is issued by InfoCert, SimplySign or mSzafir rather than by Autenti itself. Hosting is given only as the EEA, with neither country nor operator named. Corporate and Enterprise pricing is on request. Not open source.

Is Autenti a good alternative to DocuSign?

Autenti is built as a European alternative to DocuSign: Polish e-signature platform that is itself a qualified trust service provider for registered e-delivery. It will not be a like-for-like feature match in every respect, so check the review above for where the two genuinely differ before switching.

How does Autenti compare to other E-Signature Software?

Autenti is one of several European E-Signature Software we cover. It is most often compared with DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign.

Who worked on this review

Three people touch every tool page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's own documentation.

Ingrid Halvorsen
Written by

Ingrid Halvorsen

Managing Editor · Oslo, Norway

Runs the review process and decides when a page is ready to publish or needs another pass.

Marta Kowalczyk
Edited by

Marta Kowalczyk

Senior Analyst, Infrastructure & Developer Tools · Warsaw, Poland

Covers hosting, developer tooling and the practical side of moving workloads to European providers.

Daniel Brandt
Fact-checked by

Daniel Brandt

Privacy & Compliance Researcher · Berlin, Germany

Checks the compliance claims: where the company is established, where the data sits, and what the DPA actually says.

Read our editorial process for how we source, verify and update these pages — and how we keep affiliate income separate from what we recommend.

Go to Autenti