Best European E-Signature Software

Looking for a GDPR-compliant alternative to DocuSign? European e-signature platforms offer legally binding digital signatures compliant with eIDAS regulations.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

13 European E-Signatures

Yousign

French e-signature solution

#1 of 13 in this category
France From €9/mo
eIDAS compliantAPI accessTemplates

Skribble

Swiss e-signature platform

#2 of 13 in this category
Switzerland From free
eIDAS compliantQES supportSwiss hosting

Signicat

Nordic digital identity platform

#3 of 13 in this category
Norway Custom
Identity verificationeIDASEnterprise

SignRequest

Simple e-signatures

#4 of 13 in this category
Netherlands From free
Easy to useTemplatesAPI

Scrive

Swedish QTSP with native Nordic eID signing through BankID and MitID

#5 of 13 in this category
Sweden Plans and enterprise pricing on request
All three eIDAS levelsNordic eID integrationQTSP

Penneo

Danish signing platform built around the compliance workload of regulated professions

#6 of 13 in this category
Denmark Published plans, from a per-user subscription
Digital signingData collectionAudit trail

Namirial

Italian trust service provider certified as a QTSP across Italy, Spain and France

#7 of 13 in this category
Italy Enterprise pricing on request
Qualified signaturesPan-European QTSPIdentity verification

sproof

Austrian e-signature platform with SES, AES and QES, a free private plan and an eID hub for qualified signing

#8 of 13 in this category
Austria Private free / Single €15/month (1 user, 100 AES + 10 QES per year) / Team €170/month (10
SES, AES and QESREST APIFree plan for private use

FP Sign

German e-signature service from the Francotyp-Postalia group, with SES, AES and QES in its own German cloud

#9 of 13 in this category
Germany Business €24.90 per user/month (12-month term) / Enterprise Light €242/month for 20 users
SES, AES and QESBSI C5 and ISO 27001Own cloud in German data centres

inSign

German e-signature software with a web app, a REST API and an on-premise edition, hosted in Germany

#10 of 13 in this category
Germany inSign 365 €24.90 per user/month billed annually or €26.90 monthly, excl. VAT, 12-month mi
SES, AES and QESREST API (inSign connect)On-premise option

Legalesign

UK e-signature service with UK-only data storage, bulk sending and online witnessing

#11 of 13 in this category
United Kingdom Pay as you go £1.50 per sent document / Solo Basic £10/month / Solo Pro £25/month / Team £
UK-only data storageBulk sending and formsREST and GraphQL APIs

Autenti

Polish e-signature platform that is itself a qualified trust service provider for registered e-delivery

#12 of 13 in this category
Poland PRO €20/month billed annually (€30 monthly) / PREMIUM €35/month billed annually (€55 month
SES, AES and QESQualified e-deliveryISO 27001 and ISO 22301

CanUSign

Pay-per-document e-signatures from Germany, processed in Frankfurt

#13 of 13 in this category
Germany Pay per document
Simple e-signature (SES)DigiCert timestampAPI and MCP server

Key takeaways

  • Yousign ranks #1 among the European e-signature services in this directory, because Yousign is a French qualified trust service provider with eIDAS compliance built in, an API for embedding signing, and pricing from about €9 per month.
  • eIDAS defines three signature levels — SES, AES and QES — that carry different legal weight, and choosing the wrong one only becomes a problem when somebody disputes the document.
  • Skribble is the only service here offering all three levels including QES, the highest, which is legally equivalent to a handwritten signature and reverses the burden of proof in a dispute.
  • Signicat goes beyond signing into identity verification and KYC, with Norwegian BankID integration and support for the EU Digital Identity Wallet — which is where this category is heading.
  • A signature is only as strong as the identity check behind it, which is why the serious providers charge for verification rather than for the signature itself.

European electronic signature services let documents be signed digitally under the eIDAS Regulation, which gives an electronic signature the same legal standing as a handwritten one across the EU — provided the signature is at the level the transaction actually requires, which is where most buyers get it wrong.

European E-Signatures compared

European e-signature tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Yousign France From about €9/month French and European businesses wanting eIDAS signing with an API
#2 Skribble Switzerland Free tier / from about CHF 12/month Businesses that need the highest legal level of signature
#3 Signicat Norway Custom pricing Enterprises where identity verification matters as much as signing
#4 SignRequest Netherlands Free tier / from about €7/month Small teams that need signing to be effortless for the other party
#5 Scrive Sweden Plans and enterprise pricing on request Nordic businesses that want customers to sign with the eID they already have
#6 Penneo Denmark Published subscription plans Accountants, lawyers and financial firms with a recurring signing workload
#7 Namirial Italy Enterprise pricing on request Organisations needing qualified signatures across several European countries
#8 sproof Austria Private free / Single €15/month (1 user, 100 AES + 10 QES per year) / Team €170/month (10 users, 1,200 AES + 120 QES per year), billed annually, excl. VAT / Enterprise on request Individuals and small teams that want signatures counted rather than seats sold
#9 FP Sign Germany Business €24.90 per user/month (12-month term) / Enterprise Light €242/month for 20 users / Enterprise Starter €6,900/year for up to 50 users / Premium on request; all excl. VAT; QES €1.50 per signature on the smaller plans German organisations that want the documents on German hardware at a published price
#10 inSign Germany inSign 365 €24.90 per user/month billed annually or €26.90 monthly, excl. VAT, 12-month minimum term / inSign connect (API) and enterprise on request; QES at a surcharge German firms that would rather run the signing software themselves
#11 Legalesign United Kingdom Pay as you go £1.50 per sent document / Solo Basic £10/month / Solo Pro £25/month / Team £15 per user/month (2–5 users), excl. VAT / 5+ users and Enterprise on request UK organisations that want UK storage and pay-as-you-go billing
#12 Autenti Poland PRO €20/month billed annually (€30 monthly) / PREMIUM €35/month billed annually (€55 monthly), 1 seat, net of VAT / Corporate and Enterprise on request Businesses that need proof of delivery as well as proof of signature

Every European e-signature tool reviewed

#1 Yousign

Paris, France Founded 2013 From about €9/month Free trial

Best for: French and European businesses wanting eIDAS signing with an API

  • Operating company. Yousign
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. EU (France)
  • Independent checks. eIDAS compliant, qualified trust service provider
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, HelloSign

Yousign is the most complete general-purpose e-signature service in this category for a European business. eIDAS compliance is the foundation rather than a badge, giving signatures legal standing across the EU, and the operational features are the ones that determine whether a rollout survives: templates so recurring agreements are not rebuilt each time, bulk signing for sending the same document to many people, workflow automation for multi-party sequences, and an audit trail that is the actual evidence if a document is ever disputed.

The API is what makes it infrastructure rather than a tool. Contracts are usually generated somewhere — a CRM, an HR system, a quoting tool — and signing initiated from there rather than by someone downloading a PDF and uploading it again is the difference between a process and a habit that decays. Yousign supports that properly.

Yousign is based in Paris with French data storage, so signed documents — employment contracts, commercial terms, settlements — stay under EU jurisdiction with intra-EEA processing. Pricing starts around €9 per month. The limitations: Yousign focuses on signing rather than on identity verification, so a process needing deep KYC will pair it with something else, and QES coverage is narrower than Skribble's.

What Yousign does well

  • eIDAS compliant with legal standing across the EU
  • API for triggering signing from your own systems
  • Templates, bulk signing and workflow automation
  • Audit trail and document security
  • French company, French storage, from about €9/month

Where Yousign falls short

  • Less depth on identity verification than Signicat
  • QES coverage narrower than Skribble's
  • Not open source
  • Strongest fit in the French market

Standout feature. Signing triggered from your own systems: Yousign's API means the contract goes out from the tool that generated it rather than from someone's downloads folder.

#2 Skribble

Zurich, Switzerland Founded 2018 Free tier / from about CHF 12/month Free tier

Best for: Businesses that need the highest legal level of signature

  • Operating company. Skribble AG
  • Jurisdiction. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Switzerland
  • Independent checks. QES, AES and SES; eIDAS and ZertES
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Sign

Skribble is the one service here covering all three eIDAS levels — SES, AES and QES — which matters because they are legally distinct instruments rather than tiers of quality.

QES is the level that carries the same legal effect as a handwritten signature across the EU and reverses the burden of proof: someone disputing it must prove it invalid, rather than you proving it genuine. For a document that would be expensive to lose in a dispute, that reversal is the entire point.

Getting there requires identity verification to a standard equivalent to showing a passport, which Skribble handles through qualified trust service providers. Being able to choose the level per document is the practical benefit: a routine NDA at SES, an employment contract at AES, a property or corporate document at QES, all in one platform rather than three.

Skribble AG operates from Zurich with Swiss hosting, and complies with both eIDAS and ZertES, the Swiss signature law — genuinely useful for a company signing with both Swiss and EU counterparties, which otherwise means two providers.

Switzerland sits under an adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing. There is a free tier with paid plans from about CHF 12 per month. The considerations: Swiss Franc pricing for non-Swiss buyers, and QES identity verification adds real friction for the signer, which is inherent to the level rather than a Skribble flaw.

What Skribble does well

  • All three eIDAS levels including QES, chosen per document
  • QES reverses the burden of proof in a dispute
  • Complies with both eIDAS and Swiss ZertES
  • Swiss hosting, free tier available
  • Identity verification through qualified trust service providers

Where Skribble falls short

  • QES identity verification adds friction for the signer
  • Swiss Franc pricing for non-Swiss buyers
  • Swiss adequacy rather than intra-EEA processing
  • Not open source

Standout feature. Three legal levels in one platform: Skribble is the only service here where a routine NDA and a qualified corporate document can be signed through the same account.

#3 Signicat

Trondheim, Norway Founded 2007 Custom pricing Demo on request

Best for: Enterprises where identity verification matters as much as signing

  • Operating company. Signicat
  • Jurisdiction. EEA, not EU (Norway)
  • Where the data sits. EEA
  • Independent checks. eIDAS, EU Digital Identity Wallet support
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, OneSpan

Signicat treats identity as the product and signing as one thing you do with it, which is the correct emphasis: a signature is only as strong as the identity check behind it, and cryptography cannot rescue a signature anyone could have produced. Signicat covers electronic signatures alongside KYC, authentication and identity verification, which for a bank, an insurer or any regulated business is one platform rather than three integrations.

The distinguishing capability is using identities people already hold. Norwegian BankID integration lets a Norwegian signer identify themselves with bank credentials they already trust and use daily, which removes the friction that makes high-assurance signing painful — nobody has to obtain a new credential to sign one document. Signicat also supports the EU Digital Identity Wallet, which is where this whole category is heading as member states roll it out.

Signicat has operated from Trondheim since 2007, placing it in the EEA with the GDPR applying in full, and is eIDAS compliant with qualified signature support.

Pricing is custom, because identity verification is priced per check rather than per seat — the right model for the product and harder to compare against a monthly subscription. The considerations follow from the positioning: this is enterprise software with a sales process, aimed at regulated organisations rather than at a small team that wants to sign a contract this afternoon.

What Signicat does well

  • Identity verification, KYC and authentication alongside signing
  • Norwegian BankID integration removes signer friction
  • EU Digital Identity Wallet support
  • eIDAS compliant with qualified signature support
  • Norwegian company, EEA jurisdiction, operating since 2007

Where Signicat falls short

  • Custom pricing with an enterprise sales process
  • Aimed at regulated organisations rather than small teams
  • Overkill if you only need to sign documents
  • Norway is EEA rather than EU, for procurement purposes

Standout feature. Signing with an identity people already have: Signicat is the only service here where a Norwegian signs with their bank ID rather than obtaining a new credential.

#4 SignRequest

Amsterdam, Netherlands Founded 2014 Free tier / from about €7/month Free tier

Best for: Small teams that need signing to be effortless for the other party

  • Operating company. SignRequest
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Where the data sits. EU
  • Independent checks. eIDAS compliant
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, HelloSign

SignRequest is built around the observation that decides whether e-signing actually works: the person who abandons the process is almost never you. A counterparty who has to create an account, install something or puzzle out an interface will ask for a PDF to print and scan instead, and the whole exercise is defeated. SignRequest optimises hard for that external signer — open the link, sign, done — and simplicity at that point is worth more than any feature list.

For the sending side it covers what a small team needs: templates for recurring documents, team features for shared visibility, an API for triggering signing from other systems, and integrations with common business tools. eIDAS compliance gives the signatures legal standing across the EU.

SignRequest operates from Amsterdam with EU processing, so signed documents stay under European jurisdiction with intra-EEA processing. There is a free tier with paid plans from about €7 per month, the lowest here — for a small team signing a handful of documents monthly, the free tier may cover it outright. The limits are scope: no QES, less depth on identity verification than Signicat, and fewer workflow features than Yousign for complex multi-party sequences.

What SignRequest does well

  • Optimised for the external signer, who is who actually abandons
  • Templates, team features, API and integrations
  • eIDAS compliant with legal standing across the EU
  • Dutch company, EU processing
  • Free tier with paid plans from about €7/month, cheapest here

Where SignRequest falls short

  • No qualified electronic signatures (QES)
  • Less identity verification depth than Signicat
  • Fewer workflow features than Yousign for complex sequences
  • Not open source

Standout feature. Nothing for the other party to install: SignRequest removes the step where the counterparty gives up and asks you to send a PDF instead.

#5 Scrive

Stockholm, Sweden Founded 2010 Plans and enterprise pricing on request Contact sales

Best for: Nordic businesses that want customers to sign with the eID they already have

  • Operating company. Scrive AB
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Sweden)
  • Where the data sits. EU (Sweden)
  • Independent checks. Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Sign

Scrive is a Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS that built its product around a specifically Nordic reality: in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland almost everyone already has a state-backed digital identity they use for banking and tax, and asking them to instead draw a signature with a mouse is a step backwards in both security and convenience.

So Scrive signs with Swedish BankID, Norwegian BankID, Danish MitID and the Finnish Trust Network natively. The signer authenticates with the method they use every week, the identity is cryptographically established rather than assumed from an email address, and the completed document carries evidence a court will accept. All three eIDAS levels are supported, so the same platform covers a routine internal approval and a contract that needs a qualified signature.

Scrive AB has operated from Stockholm since 2010 and reports more than 10,000 customers across 50-plus countries. Pricing is quoted rather than published, which is friction for a small team evaluating it. Its centre of gravity is the Nordics: outside those markets the eID advantage largely disappears and it competes on ordinary e-signature terms.

What Scrive does well

  • Native signing with Swedish and Norwegian BankID and Danish MitID
  • Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS
  • All three eIDAS signature levels on one platform
  • Identity cryptographically established, not assumed from an email
  • Swedish company, operating since 2010

Where Scrive falls short

  • Pricing quoted rather than published
  • eID advantage is concentrated in the Nordics
  • Not aimed at self-serve individual use
  • Enterprise sales cycle before evaluation

Standout feature. Customers sign with the BankID they use for their bank — no drawn squiggle, and no doubt about who signed.

#6 Penneo

Copenhagen, Denmark Founded 2014 Published subscription plans Contact sales

Best for: Accountants, lawyers and financial firms with a recurring signing workload

  • Operating company. Penneo A/S
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Denmark)
  • Where the data sits. EU (Denmark)
  • Independent checks. GDPR, eIDAS
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Sign

Penneo is built around the specific working life of regulated professions rather than around signing in general. An accounting firm does not sign one contract occasionally; it collects signatures and documents from hundreds of clients on a cycle dictated by reporting deadlines, and the work is chasing people rather than applying signatures.

That shapes the product: signing sits alongside structured data collection, so the same flow that gathers a signature also gathers the identification documents and declarations the engagement requires, with an audit trail recording who signed what and when. For a firm whose regulator will eventually ask that question, having the answer generated automatically is the value.

Penneo A/S was founded in Copenhagen in 2014 and reports more than 3,500 accounting firms, law practices and financial institutions using it, with particular strength in Denmark, Norway and Belgium. Pricing is published as subscription plans, which is more transparent than most of this category. The limits follow from the focus: it is aimed at professional services rather than at general business signing, and its market presence is Nordic and Benelux rather than pan-European.

What Penneo does well

  • Signing and structured data collection in one flow
  • Audit trail built for regulatory questions
  • Designed around the compliance cycle of professional firms
  • Published subscription pricing
  • Danish company, 3,500+ regulated customers

Where Penneo falls short

  • Aimed at professional services rather than general signing
  • Market presence concentrated in the Nordics and Benelux
  • Less flexible than a general e-signature platform
  • Not the cheapest option for occasional signing

Standout feature. It collects the identification documents in the same flow as the signature — which is the actual job in a regulated firm.

#7 Namirial

Senigallia, Italy Enterprise pricing on request Contact sales

Best for: Organisations needing qualified signatures across several European countries

  • Operating company. Namirial S.p.A.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Italy)
  • Where the data sits. EU
  • Independent checks. Qualified Trust Service Provider in Italy, Spain and France
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Sign, OneSpan

Namirial is a trust service provider rather than an e-signature app, and the distinction decides what its signatures are worth. It is certified as a Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS in Italy, Spain and France, which means it can issue qualified electronic signatures — the level that carries the same legal weight as a handwritten signature across the EU, and the level most e-signature tools cannot reach.

For an organisation operating in several European countries, being a QTSP in more than one jurisdiction is the practical differentiator. Qualified signature requirements are national in their administration even where the standard is European, and a provider certified in one country only leaves you assembling a different vendor per market.

Namirial S.p.A. operates from Italy across the wider trust services stack — identity verification, certificates, timestamping and archiving alongside signing — which suits an enterprise that needs the whole chain from one accountable provider. Pricing is enterprise and quoted, with no self-serve route in, and the breadth means more product than a company that simply wants contracts signed will use.

What Namirial does well

  • Qualified Trust Service Provider in Italy, Spain and France
  • Qualified signatures with full legal equivalence across the EU
  • Identity verification, timestamping and archiving alongside signing
  • Multi-country certification for cross-border operations
  • Italian company, EU jurisdiction throughout

Where Namirial falls short

  • Enterprise pricing on request, no self-serve entry
  • More product than simple contract signing needs
  • Interface less modern than the newer platforms
  • Sales-led engagement before evaluation

Standout feature. Qualified status in three countries at once — the level of signature most tools here cannot issue at all.

#8 sproof

Puch bei Hallein (Salzburg), Austria Private free / Single €15/month (1 user, 100 AES + 10 QES per year) / Team €170/month (10 users, 1,200 AES + 120 QES per year), billed annually, excl. VAT / Enterprise on request Free plan for individuals, students and associations; 14-day free trial of paid plans

Best for: Individuals and small teams that want signatures counted rather than seats sold

  • Operating company. sproof GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Austria)
  • Where the data sits. Europe, in ISO 27001-certified data centres; hosting provider and country not named by sproof
  • Independent checks. ISO 27001 (stated by sproof); not itself on the Austrian EU trusted list — QES via integrated eID providers
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign

sproof GmbH is registered in Puch bei Hallein near Salzburg under FN 520262t at the Landesgericht Salzburg, and its imprint names no parent company — in a category where half the familiar names now sit under a holding somewhere else, an Austrian company that still belongs to itself is worth noting.

The pricing model is the unusual part. Instead of selling seats and metering nothing, sproof sells allowances: Single at €15 a month covers one user with 100 advanced and 10 qualified signatures a year, Team at €170 a month covers ten users with 1,200 advanced and 120 qualified, both billed annually and excluding VAT, with Enterprise quoted.

There is a genuinely free plan for private use, students and associations, and a fourteen-day trial of the paid plans. A low-volume team knows its bill for the year in advance; a busy one has to check whether 100 signatures is anywhere near enough.

Two things are missing and both matter here. sproof describes its hosting as ISO 27001-certified data centres in Europe and names neither the country nor the provider, which for a tool sold on European data handling is the one sentence a buyer wants completed.

And sproof is not on the Austrian trusted list: qualified signing runs through the eID providers integrated into its eID hub, not through sproof itself. It does not publish a founding year either. SES, AES and QES are all covered, and there is a REST API.

What sproof does well

  • Austrian company with no parent company named in its imprint
  • Free plan for private use, students and associations
  • Signature allowances published: Single €15/month, Team €170/month for ten users
  • SES, AES and QES with a REST API
  • Fourteen-day trial of the paid plans

Where sproof falls short

  • Hosting is described only as ISO 27001-certified data centres in Europe, with no country or provider named
  • sproof is not on the Austrian trusted list; QES runs through integrated eID providers
  • Signature allowances are capped: 100 advanced and 10 qualified a year on Single
  • Enterprise pricing on request
  • Not open source

Standout feature. Signatures are counted, not just seats: €15 a month buys one user 100 advanced and 10 qualified signatures for the year.

#9 FP Sign

Berlin, Germany Business €24.90 per user/month (12-month term) / Enterprise Light €242/month for 20 users / Enterprise Starter €6,900/year for up to 50 users / Premium on request; all excl. VAT; QES €1.50 per signature on the smaller plans Free plan: 1 user for 30 days, expires automatically, no credit card

Best for: German organisations that want the documents on German hardware at a published price

  • Operating company. FP Digital Business Solutions GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Germany, in FP Sign's own cloud in BSI-certified German data centres (operator not named)
  • Independent checks. ISO 27001, BSI C5 (stated by FP Sign)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign

FP Sign is run by FP Digital Business Solutions GmbH in Berlin, a subsidiary of Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG — so the ownership chain does not leave Germany at the first step, which is more than most of this category manages. It covers all three eIDAS levels, SES, AES and QES.

The infrastructure is the reason it ranks where it does. FP Sign states that documents are held in its own cloud in German data centres certified by the BSI, the German federal information security office, and it holds ISO 27001 and BSI C5.

That is a different proposition from a European company renting American capacity: the company, the cloud and the hardware are all in one jurisdiction. The gap in the story is that FP Sign does not name who operates those data centres, and it is not itself on the German trusted list — the qualified provider issuing the certificates behind QES goes unnamed too.

Pricing is published in full, which in this category is unusual enough to be a feature: Business at €24.90 per user per month on a twelve-month term, Enterprise Light at €242 a month for twenty users, Enterprise Starter at €6,900 a year for up to fifty, Premium on request, all excluding VAT, with QES charged at €1.50 per signature on the smaller plans.

A free single-user plan runs for thirty days and expires by itself, with no card. The commitment is the catch: there is no monthly way in on the Business plan, and a team that signs at volume should do the QES arithmetic before committing to a year.

What FP Sign does well

  • German company under a German parent, Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG
  • Documents in FP Sign's own cloud in BSI-certified German data centres
  • ISO 27001 and BSI C5
  • Full price list published, from €24.90 per user/month
  • Free single-user plan for 30 days, no credit card

Where FP Sign falls short

  • The Business plan is sold on a twelve-month term, with no monthly option
  • FP Sign is not on the German trusted list, and the qualified provider behind QES is not named
  • The operator of the German data centres is not named either
  • QES costs €1.50 per signature on top of the smaller plans
  • Not open source

Standout feature. The chain stays in one country: a Berlin company under a German parent, with the documents in its own cloud in German data centres.

#10 inSign

Marzling, Germany Founded 2022 inSign 365 €24.90 per user/month billed annually or €26.90 monthly, excl. VAT, 12-month minimum term / inSign connect (API) and enterprise on request; QES at a surcharge Free test account, no credit card

Best for: German firms that would rather run the signing software themselves

  • Operating company. inSign GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Germany, in a German provider's data centre (provider not named); on-premise option for inSign enterprise
  • Independent checks. ISO 27001; BITMi "Software Hosted in Germany" and "Software Made in Germany" labels
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign

inSign is the answer to a question the rest of this category cannot answer: what if you do not want to take anyone's word about the hosting at all. inSign enterprise can be installed on-premise, so the documents sit on hardware the customer controls and no vendor cloud is involved. For a hospital, an insurer or a public body with a rule about that, it decides the shortlist by itself.

The hosted product runs in a German provider's data centre, though inSign does not name the provider. inSign GmbH sits in Marzling in Bavaria and was incorporated at the end of 2022, when the product was spun out of iS2 AG, where it had been built in 2011; the owner is BSI Business Systems Integration Deutschland GmbH, whose parent is BSI Software AG in Dättwil, Switzerland.

European ownership, then, but one step outside the EU. It holds ISO 27001, alongside the BITMi "Software Hosted in Germany" and "Software Made in Germany" labels.

inSign 365 costs €24.90 per user per month billed annually or €26.90 monthly, excluding VAT, on a twelve-month minimum term; inSign connect, the REST API, and the enterprise editions are quoted. A free test account needs no card.

What is not settled: QES carries a surcharge that is not published, and it comes from a co-operation partner inSign does not name — inSign is not on the German trusted list itself. A buyer who needs qualified signatures should ask who that partner is before signing the twelve months.

What inSign does well

  • On-premise edition, so signed documents need never reach a vendor cloud
  • German company in Bavaria, owned through BSI Software AG in Dättwil, Switzerland
  • Hosted product runs in a German provider's data centre
  • ISO 27001
  • Published seat price of €24.90 per user/month annually, €26.90 monthly
  • Free test account with no credit card

Where inSign falls short

  • Twelve-month minimum term on inSign 365
  • The German hosting provider is not named
  • QES comes from an unnamed partner at a surcharge that is not published
  • inSign connect, the API, and the enterprise editions are priced on request
  • Not open source

Standout feature. The on-premise edition: the only option here where the signed documents can stay on hardware you own.

#11 Legalesign

Cambridge, United Kingdom Founded 2012 Pay as you go £1.50 per sent document / Solo Basic £10/month / Solo Pro £25/month / Team £15 per user/month (2–5 users), excl. VAT / 5+ users and Enterprise on request 14-day free trial, no credit card

Best for: UK organisations that want UK storage and pay-as-you-go billing

  • Operating company. Legalesign Limited
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. United Kingdom, on Amazon Web Services
  • Independent checks. ISO 27001 (since 2016), Cyber Essentials Plus
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign

Legalesign Limited was incorporated on 28 May 2012, is registered in Glasgow as SC425013 and works from the St John's Innovation Centre in Cambridge. Its persons-with-significant-control register lists three individuals each holding between 25% and 50%: no corporate parent and no private equity, which in a category currently being consolidated is a genuine distinction rather than a marketing line.

It is also the cheapest and the most flexible on price. Pay as you go costs £1.50 per document sent with nothing to subscribe to, and it is the only tool here billed purely on what you send.

Otherwise Solo Basic is £10 a month, Solo Pro £25, and Team £15 per user per month for two to five users, all excluding VAT, with five or more seats and Enterprise quoted. A fourteen-day trial asks for no card. Legalesign has held ISO 27001 since 2016 and Cyber Essentials Plus.

The reason it sits last here is jurisdiction and infrastructure, the two things this directory weighs first.

The United Kingdom is outside the EEA and covered by an adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing, so a buyer with a hard EU-establishment rule stops at that line.

And Legalesign runs on Amazon Web Services, an American provider, without naming a region — while its claim that all data is stored and processed in the UK appears on a marketing comparison page rather than in the privacy policy or the data processing agreement, which is the wrong document for a commitment of that kind. QES, when needed, is issued by Digidentity rather than by Legalesign.

What Legalesign does well

  • Pay as you go at £1.50 per document sent, with no subscription
  • Owned by three individuals, with no corporate parent or private equity on the PSC register
  • ISO 27001 since 2016 and Cyber Essentials Plus
  • Published prices from £10/month, the cheapest entry point here
  • Fourteen-day trial without a credit card
  • Incorporated in 2012, working from Cambridge

Where Legalesign falls short

  • UK jurisdiction: outside the EEA, under an adequacy decision
  • Runs on Amazon Web Services, a US provider, with no region named
  • The UK-only storage claim sits on a comparison page, not in the privacy policy or DPA
  • QES is issued by Digidentity rather than by Legalesign
  • Prices in pounds, and five-plus-seat pricing is on request

Standout feature. £1.50 a document with nothing to subscribe to — the only tool here that bills purely on what you send.

#12 Autenti

Poznań, Poland Founded 2012 PRO €20/month billed annually (€30 monthly) / PREMIUM €35/month billed annually (€55 monthly), 1 seat, net of VAT / Corporate and Enterprise on request 14-day free trial, no credit card

Best for: Businesses that need proof of delivery as well as proof of signature

  • Operating company. Autenti S.A.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Poland)
  • Where the data sits. EEA, in data centres subject to European law; country and operator not named by Autenti
  • Independent checks. QTSP on the Polish EU trusted list for qualified electronic registered delivery and qualified validation (not for signature certificates); ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign

Autenti is on the Polish EU trusted list as a qualified trust service provider, and it is worth reading what for, because the marketing shorthand hides the distinction.

Autenti is qualified for electronic registered delivery, granted in March 2024, and for qualified validation, granted in March 2026. It is not qualified to issue signature certificates: QES on the platform comes from InfoCert, SimplySign or mSzafir. So the qualified status is real and independently granted, and it covers a different thing from signing.

That different thing is useful. Qualified registered delivery is the eIDAS equivalent of registered post — evidence of what was sent, to whom, and when it arrived, with the same presumption in law. Most tools in this category prove that a document was signed and leave the delivery to email. Autenti also holds ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 22301, the business continuity standard, which few of its competitors bother with.

Autenti S.A. works from Poznań and has been trading since 2012, when it was registered as Autenti Sp. z o.o.; it converted to a joint-stock company in June 2026.

Seat pricing is published: PRO at €20 a month billed annually or €30 monthly, PREMIUM at €35 billed annually or €55 monthly, one seat each, net of VAT, with Corporate and Enterprise quoted.

There is a fourteen-day trial and no card is asked for. The weak point is location: Autenti says its data sits in the EEA in data centres subject to European law, and names neither the country nor the operator — which, for a buyer whose whole reason for shortlisting European tools is knowing where the documents are, is the sentence that needs finishing.

What Autenti does well

  • On the Polish EU trusted list as a qualified trust service provider
  • Qualified electronic registered delivery, which most signing tools do not offer
  • ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 22301
  • Published seat prices: PRO €20/month and PREMIUM €35/month billed annually
  • Polish company trading since 2012, 14-day trial without a card

Where Autenti falls short

  • The qualified status covers registered delivery and validation, not signature certificates
  • QES is issued by InfoCert, SimplySign or mSzafir rather than by Autenti itself
  • Hosting is given only as the EEA, with neither country nor operator named
  • Corporate and Enterprise pricing is on request
  • Not open source

Standout feature. Qualified registered e-delivery: Autenti is on a trusted list for proving a document arrived, not only for signing it.

SES, AES or QES — which do you actually need?

eIDAS defines three levels and they are not grades of quality but legally distinct instruments.

A Simple Electronic Signature (SES) is any electronic indication of intent — typing your name, clicking accept, drawing with a mouse. It is admissible as evidence and valid for most everyday agreements, and it proves very little on its own if challenged.

An Advanced Electronic Signature (AES) is uniquely linked to the signer, capable of identifying them, created using means under their sole control, and linked to the document so any change is detectable. That is a real evidentiary position: you can show who signed and that nothing changed afterwards.

A Qualified Electronic Signature (QES) is an AES created with a qualified signature creation device and based on a qualified certificate from a qualified trust service provider. Under eIDAS it has the same legal effect as a handwritten signature across the entire EU, and — the part that matters — it reverses the burden of proof: the person disputing it has to prove it is invalid, rather than you proving it is genuine.

Most commercial agreements are fine with SES or AES. QES is required for specific transactions in specific countries and is worth having wherever the document would be expensive to lose in a dispute.

What is actually being verified when you sign?

Identity, and this is where the real cost and the real value sit. A signature that anyone could have produced proves nothing regardless of the cryptography behind it.

At SES level, verification is usually just access to an email inbox — which is why it is cheap and why it proves little. AES adds stronger identification, and QES requires identity verification to a standard equivalent to showing a passport, often through a video call, an eID scheme or a bank identity.

Skribble handles all three levels and works through qualified trust service providers for the identity verification behind QES. Signicat treats identity as the whole product rather than a step: KYC, authentication and identity verification alongside signing, with Norwegian BankID integration that lets a Norwegian signer identify themselves with credentials they already have and trust.

That last point is the practical one. The friction in high-assurance signing is the identity check, and using an identity the signer already holds — a bank ID, a national eID — removes it. It is also why the European market fragments by country: the identity schemes are national.

Why does the audit trail matter more than the signature image?

Because the picture of a signature proves nothing and the record around it proves everything.

What makes an electronic signature defensible is the audit trail: who was invited, when they opened the document, from which address, how they were identified, when they signed, and a cryptographic seal showing the document has not changed since. That record is the evidence, not the rendered squiggle.

Yousign, Skribble, Signicat and SignRequest all maintain audit trails, and this is the thing to examine during evaluation rather than the signing interface. Ask what the trail contains, how it is exported, and whether it survives independently of the provider — because if the vendor disappears, an audit trail you cannot produce is worth nothing.

Document security matters equally: the sealed document should be verifiable by a third party without the original platform. A signed PDF with an embedded qualified certificate can be validated by anyone with a standard reader, which is the property that makes it useful five years later in a dispute.

Where does jurisdiction matter in signing?

In two places: where the documents are stored, and whether the provider is a qualified trust service provider recognised under eIDAS.

Signed documents are frequently the most sensitive files an organisation holds — employment contracts, commercial terms, settlements, NDAs. Yousign stores in France and SignRequest in the Netherlands, both EU-established with intra-EEA processing. Signicat is Norwegian, so EEA with the GDPR applying in full.

Skribble is Swiss, operating under both eIDAS and ZertES, the Swiss signature law. That dual compliance is genuinely useful for a company signing with both Swiss and EU counterparties, and Switzerland sits under an adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing.

The qualification question is separate and more technical: to issue QES, a provider must be a qualified trust service provider on the EU trusted list. That status is what makes the signature carry its legal weight, and it is verifiable — ask, and check the trusted list rather than the marketing page.

What should you check before rolling this out?

Whether the signing flow works for people outside your organisation, because they are the ones who will abandon it. A counterparty who has to create an account, install something or work out a confusing interface will ask for a PDF to print instead — which defeats the purpose entirely. SignRequest is built around exactly this simplicity, and it is more valuable than any feature list.

Whether the API fits how the documents are actually generated. If contracts come out of your CRM or your HR system, signing should be triggered from there rather than by someone uploading files by hand. Yousign, Signicat and SignRequest all provide APIs, and Yousign supports templates and bulk signing for volume.

What it costs at your volume. SignRequest starts around €7 per month and Yousign around €9, Skribble has a free tier with paid plans from about CHF 12, and Signicat quotes custom pricing because identity verification is priced per check rather than per seat.

And whether you need QES anywhere. If any document in your process legally requires it, that requirement decides the provider before anything else — and only Skribble and Signicat cover the qualified level here.

How we selected and ranked these 12 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

Yousign holds #1 among the European e-signature services in this directory, because it is a French provider with eIDAS compliance, an API for embedding signing into your own systems, templates and bulk signing, and audit trails, from about €9 per month. The right answer depends on the requirement: Skribble when you need qualified signatures at QES level, Signicat when identity verification and KYC matter as much as signing, and SignRequest for a small team wanting the simplest possible flow.

Three legally distinct instruments under eIDAS. A Simple Electronic Signature is any electronic indication of intent — typing a name, clicking accept — admissible as evidence and proving little if challenged.

An Advanced Electronic Signature is uniquely linked to the signer, under their sole control, and detects any change to the document. A Qualified Electronic Signature adds a qualified certificate and device, has the same legal effect as a handwritten signature across the EU, and reverses the burden of proof: the disputing party must prove it invalid.

Skribble covers all three eIDAS levels including QES, working through qualified trust service providers for the identity verification behind it, and complies with both eIDAS and the Swiss ZertES — useful for a company signing with both Swiss and EU counterparties. Signicat also supports qualified signatures alongside its identity verification services. If any document in your process legally requires QES, that requirement decides your provider before any other consideration.

SignRequest from about €7 per month with a free tier, followed by Yousign from about €9. Skribble has a free tier with paid plans from about CHF 12 per month. Signicat quotes custom pricing, because identity verification is priced per check rather than per seat — which is the right model for that product and makes it harder to compare. For a small team signing a handful of documents a month, SignRequest's free tier may cover it entirely.

Yes, under the eIDAS Regulation, though the strength depends on the level. All three levels are admissible as evidence and cannot be denied legal effect merely for being electronic. A Qualified Electronic Signature carries the same legal effect as a handwritten signature across the entire EU and reverses the burden of proof in a dispute. Simple and Advanced signatures are valid for most commercial agreements; specific transactions in specific countries require QES, so check your national rules.

The audit trail, not the signature image. What matters is the record: who was invited, when they opened the document, from which address, how they were identified, when they signed, and a cryptographic seal proving nothing changed since. Yousign, Skribble, Signicat and SignRequest all maintain audit trails — examine what yours contains, how it exports, and whether it can be verified independently of the provider, because a trail you cannot produce without the vendor is worth very little.

Signicat, which treats identity as the product rather than a step: electronic signatures alongside KYC, authentication and identity verification, with Norwegian BankID integration and support for the EU Digital Identity Wallet.

That matters because a signature is only as strong as the identity check behind it, and using an identity the signer already holds — a bank ID or a national eID — removes the friction that makes high-assurance signing painful. Signicat is Norwegian, so EEA with the GDPR applying in full.

Yousign stores in France and SignRequest in the Netherlands, both EU-established with intra-EEA processing. Signicat is Norwegian and therefore EEA. Skribble is Swiss under an adequacy decision, complying with both eIDAS and the Swiss ZertES. This matters because signed documents are frequently the most sensitive files an organisation holds — employment contracts, commercial terms, settlements, NDAs — and a US-established provider would place them within reach of the CLOUD Act.

Friction for the counterparty. Someone outside your organisation who must create an account, install software or navigate a confusing interface will ask for a PDF to print and scan instead, which defeats the purpose.

SignRequest is built around removing exactly that friction, and simplicity for the external signer is worth more than any feature comparison. The second failure is manual triggering: if contracts come out of your CRM or HR system, signing should be initiated there through an API rather than by someone uploading files by hand.

Not on this list?

If you build a European e-signatures tool that belongs here, tell us about it. Every suggestion is checked against the same criteria as the tools above: European ownership and hosting, a real product, and pricing we can verify. A listing is editorial, and we say so on this page where placement is paid.

Suggest your tool