European Online Assessment and Exam Proctoring Software

Online assessment software delivers, secures and marks exams, and remote proctoring adds recordings of a candidate's screen, webcam and sometimes room. Because those recordings are personal data about students and test takers, many institutions look for vendors under European jurisdiction, with EU hosting and clear data processing agreements.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Vendors can pay for more visibility, higher up on the review pages; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

11 European Online Assessment and Exam Proctoring Platforms

TestReach

Live human proctoring and exam delivery from a Dublin vendor

Ireland
Live human proctors Exam authoring and marking EU hosting on AWS

WISEflow

University assessment platform with lockdown and proctoring add-ons

Denmark
Lockdown browser Live proctoring add-on Data in Ireland and Germany

TestWe

Online exams with AI marking and screen, webcam and audio proctoring

France
AI-assisted marking Asynchronous replay Identity check

Inspera

Modular assessment suite with secure browser and AI-flagged proctoring

Norway
Integrity Browser Live or recorded proctoring EU-hosted cloud

Smowl

Modular proctoring that adds to Moodle, Canvas and other LMSs

Spain
Detects AI tools Browser lock Live option

TAO

Open-source assessment platform built on QTI and LTI standards

Luxembourg
GPL-2.0 Community Edition Self-hosting Proctoring via partners

ProctorExam

Amsterdam proctoring service with screen, webcam and phone camera

Netherlands
Second camera via app EU data centres API and LTI

TestVision

Dutch SaaS test system with invigilator monitor and Safe Exam Browser link

Netherlands
All functions included Safe Exam Browser API, LTI, SSO

Surpass Assessment

Certification-grade item banking, adaptive tests and test centre delivery

United Kingdom
Screen and paper delivery Adaptive testing Test centre network

Exam.net

Teacher-built exam tool using exam keys and three security levels

Sweden
No student accounts Lockdown mode School licence

Testportal

Self-service test maker with published plans and tab monitoring

Poland
Published pricing AI question creation Certificates

Key takeaways

  • TestReach is the only tool in this directory whose remote proctors are described as the vendor's own employees, recruited, trained and monitored by the Dublin company rather than drawn from a third-party pool.
  • WISEflow, Inspera and TestWe each combine exam authoring with proctoring in one product, while Smowl and ProctorExam supply only the monitoring layer and need a host system such as an LMS.
  • TAO publishes a free Community Edition under GPL-2.0 that can be installed on your own servers, but it has no native video proctoring and relies on partner integrations for camera supervision.
  • TestVision, Exam.net and Testportal protect exams through lockdown, monitoring and tab detection, not through recording the candidate, and Testportal says AI proctoring is still to come.
  • Inspera lists US providers such as Zendesk, Databricks and TrackJS among its sub-processors and Surpass Assessment hosts North American customers in the USA, so European hosting in this category never means a chain with no American company in it.

European online assessment and exam proctoring software delivers, secures and marks exams over the internet, optionally adding recorded or live supervision of the candidate, and is run by a vendor established in the EU, EEA, UK or Switzerland, which matters because a proctoring recording is personal data about a student at home and the contract, the regulator and the courts stay inside Europe.

European online assessment and exam proctoring compared

European online assessment and exam proctoring tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 TestReach Ireland Not published on the pages checked; demo on request Professional bodies and certification programmes that want human proctors included in one contract
#2 WISEflow Denmark Annual site licence plus tiered per-student fee; amounts not published Universities moving every exam type, including invigilated ones, onto one platform
#3 TestWe France Quote after a demo booking French-speaking universities, certifiers and recruiters running exams at volume
#4 Inspera Norway Demo on request; no public price list Large universities and awarding bodies that want an assessment platform with proctoring as one module
#5 Smowl Spain Custom quote, answered within 48 hours per the vendor Institutions that already have an exam platform or LMS and want to bolt proctoring onto it
#6 TAO Luxembourg Free Community Edition; cloud tiers priced by user volume, amounts not seen Ministries, universities and test publishers that want open standards and the option to run the code themselves
#7 ProctorExam Netherlands See website; the shop page was not readable Test organisers who need camera evidence from two angles inside an existing exam system
#8 TestVision Netherlands Not published; demo on request Dutch and Flemish education and examination bodies running supervised, on-site digital exams
#9 Surpass Assessment United Kingdom Not published on the pages checked Certification bodies and awarding organisations that run both test centres and remote delivery
#10 Exam.net Sweden School licence on quote; 30-day free trial Secondary schools and universities running classroom or remote exams on a school licence
#11 Testportal Poland From $35 per month (US dollars on the page); custom plan from $159 per month Companies, trainers and teachers who want a self-service test maker with a visible price list

Every European online assessment and exam proctoring tool reviewed

#1 TestReach

Dublin, Ireland Not published on the pages checked; demo on request Demo on request

Best for: Professional bodies and certification programmes that want human proctors included in one contract

  • Operating company. TestReach
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Ireland)
  • Where the data sits. AWS, within the EU
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio, remote proctoring add-ons, separate exam and invigilation vendors

TestReach pairs a full exam application with remote invigilation delivered by its own employed proctors. A candidate is authenticated at the start, shows the surroundings, and is then watched live for the whole sitting, while the session is recorded so the examining body can review an incident later. Exams run in a wrapped browser, a lockdown mode can block other windows and AI tools, and answers save to the server continuously.

The company is based in Dublin, hosts on AWS within the EU according to its own pages and quotes an uptime guarantee of 99.95 percent or better. It says the proctoring service has run since 2014. Pricing is not published, and the terms of use cap liability at one hundred dollars for site use, so a legal review is sensible before an awarding body signs.

What TestReach does well

  • Own staff act as live proctors
  • Authoring, delivery, marking and proctoring in one application
  • Hosted on AWS within the EU
  • Secure lockdown and continuous answer saving
  • Candidate helpdesk by phone, email and chat

Where TestReach falls short

  • No public pricing
  • Human proctoring is harder to scale to thousands of daily sittings
  • Aimed at formal certification more than classroom use
  • Privacy policy text refers to the Privacy Shield

Standout feature. TestReach is the only tool in this category that puts proctors from its own payroll on every live session.

#2 WISEflow

Aarhus, Denmark Annual site licence plus tiered per-student fee; amounts not published Demo on request

Best for: Universities moving every exam type, including invigilated ones, onto one platform

  • Operating company. UNIwise ApS
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Denmark)
  • Where the data sits. AWS in Ireland and Germany
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio, separate lockdown and submission tools

WISEflow is the digital assessment platform of UNIwise in Aarhus, built for higher education and priced as an annual site licence plus a tiered per-student fee. Its three plans, Core, Advanced and Premium, all include written assignments, file hand-in and auto-marked questions, with the lockdown browser starting in Advanced and Device Monitor, which flags secondary screens and virtual machines, included in Premium.

Advanced proctoring adds facial comparison and voice detection, and live proctoring puts a human invigilator on the session with a chat module for candidates. UNIwise states that data is held on AWS in Ireland and Germany and publishes a trust centre and a note on AI and the EU AI Act. An AI feedback add-on drafts comments against the institution's own rubric, and an assessor must approve it before students see anything.

What WISEflow does well

  • Whole assessment workflow in one product
  • Lockdown browser inside plans
  • Facial comparison and live proctoring available
  • Data held in Ireland and Germany
  • Fee does not change with assessment volume

Where WISEflow falls short

  • No amounts on the pricing page
  • Proctoring features are separate add-ons
  • Higher-education focus
  • Large suite for institutions that only need monitoring

Standout feature. WISEflow lets a university keep one fee that does not change with assessment volume and add proctoring only for the sittings that need it.

#3 TestWe

Paris, France Founded 2014 Quote after a demo booking Demo on request

Best for: French-speaking universities, certifiers and recruiters running exams at volume

  • Operating company. TestWe SAS
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio, separate test and proctoring tools

TestWe runs online tests in which the candidate can answer by choice, text, speech or multimedia, with an AI assistant that generates questions from a topic or an uploaded PDF or DOCX and helps mark open answers. Proctoring checks the identity of the candidate and workspace, records screen, webcam and audio, and offers an asynchronous replay for quality control, with monitoring described as continuing without Wi-Fi.

TestWe SAS has its seat in Paris and is confirmed in the French company register, which lists it as created in 2014. The vendor advertises compliance with GDPR and the CNIL and shows 2024 figures such as 128,552 proctored sittings, which are its own numbers. Its legal notice and privacy pages gave a server error when we checked, so hosting and processors are unconfirmed, and no prices are published.

What TestWe does well

  • Screen, webcam and audio capture in one flow
  • AI question generation and assisted marking
  • Asynchronous replay for audits
  • Covers recruitment, certification and higher education
  • Company confirmed in the French register

Where TestWe falls short

  • Legal pages unreadable at the time of the check
  • No public pricing
  • French-first documentation
  • Live human proctoring not described

Standout feature. TestWe is the only tool here that combines spoken and multimedia answers, AI-assisted marking and recorded proctoring in a single French product.

#4 Inspera

Oslo, Norway Founded 1999 Demo on request; no public price list Demo on request

Best for: Large universities and awarding bodies that want an assessment platform with proctoring as one module

  • Operating company. Inspera AS
  • Jurisdiction. EEA, not EU (Norway)
  • Where the data sits. AWS, within the EU
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio, standalone secure browsers, separate plagiarism checkers

Inspera is a modular assessment platform whose Integrity Browser, proctoring and originality checking can be chosen separately. Proctoring comes in live and recorded forms, inside Inspera Assessment or an LMS, with AI flags for events such as a candidate leaving the frame or using a second device and a timeline for staff, coloured by severity. The company states that a person, not the technology, takes the final conduct decision.

Inspera AS is in Oslo, which puts it in the EEA but not the EU, and was founded in 1999. Its security statement says the Assessment Cloud is hosted entirely on AWS in the European Union and lists ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials Plus. The published sub-processor list names several US providers, so a buyer who wants no US processor at all has to read that list against its own scope. There is no public price.

What Inspera does well

  • Modular: browser, proctoring and originality can be chosen separately
  • Live and recorded proctoring options
  • Human makes the final conduct decision
  • Assessment Cloud data hosted in the EU
  • ISO 27001 certification listed

Where Inspera falls short

  • No published pricing
  • US providers appear among sub-processors
  • Suite is large for proctoring-only needs
  • Rollout effort suits big institutions

Standout feature. Inspera lets an institution buy its secure browser, proctoring and originality checker as three separate modules.

#5 Smowl

San Sebastian, Spain Custom quote, answered within 48 hours per the vendor Demo on request

Best for: Institutions that already have an exam platform or LMS and want to bolt proctoring onto it

  • Operating company. Smiley Owl Tech, S.L. (Smowltech)
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Spain)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio, other remote monitoring add-ons

Smowl is a proctoring specialist from San Sebastian that attaches to an LMS or exam platform you already run, and does not author or mark exams. Its computer-monitoring module, SMOWL CM, logs how the exam was completed and can flag generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Copilot, virtual machines and copy and paste, with the institution choosing which applications are allowed. Browser lock blocks tab changes and keyboard shortcuts.

SMOWL LIVE is the synchronous mode in which a proctoring team watches, chats with the examinee and applies corrective steps, and automated and deferred modes sit beside it. The company, Smiley Owl Tech, S.L., is named in its privacy policy. The vendor quotes prices individually within 48 hours, and the pages checked do not say where recordings are stored or which processors are used.

What Smowl does well

  • Modular, so cost follows the level of supervision
  • Detects generative AI tools and virtual machines
  • Live supervision available
  • Pages for Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard and D2L
  • Spanish company confirmed in its privacy policy

Where Smowl falls short

  • No published price
  • Data storage location not stated
  • Does not author or mark exams
  • Desktop app needed for computer monitoring

Standout feature. Smowl lets one contract run automated, deferred and live supervision side by side, chosen exam by exam.

#6 TAO

Capellen, Luxembourg Free Community Edition; cloud tiers priced by user volume, amounts not seen Demo on request

Best for: Ministries, universities and test publishers that want open standards and the option to run the code themselves

  • Operating company. Open Assessment Technologies S.A.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Luxembourg)
  • Where the data sits. AWS and Google Cloud; region not stated
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio-based exam stacks, closed assessment suites

TAO is an assessment engine built on open standards, with a free Community Edition under GPL-2.0 and paid cloud and enterprise options. Its components cover item authoring, delivery with session monitoring and lockdown control, scoring with grader routing and psychometric reporting, and the vendor says it supports the QTI and LTI standards. Camera proctoring comes through partner integrations, since TAO has no native video proctoring.

Open Assessment Technologies S.A. is based in Capellen, Luxembourg, and its privacy policy names the Luxembourg company as controller, although the contact page also lists a US corporation in Delaware and a Madrid office. Cloud hosting runs on AWS and Google Cloud with the region not stated, and cloud tier amounts were not seen. Self-hosting the Community Edition means your own security patching and support.

What TAO does well

  • Free Community Edition under GPL-2.0
  • QTI and LTI standards support
  • Self-hosting possible
  • Covers authoring through reporting
  • Luxembourg-governed terms

Where TAO falls short

  • Proctoring depends on partners
  • Self-hosting needs technical staff
  • Cloud price amounts not seen
  • Hosting region not stated

Standout feature. TAO is the only tool in this category whose assessment engine you can install, read and modify yourself.

#7 ProctorExam

Amsterdam, Netherlands See website; the shop page was not readable Demo on request

Best for: Test organisers who need camera evidence from two angles inside an existing exam system

  • Operating company. ProctorExam
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Where the data sits. AWS and Google Cloud data centres inside the EU
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio, other remote proctoring services

ProctorExam is a proctoring service from Amsterdam that adds a smartphone as a second camera next to the webcam and the screen share. The candidate installs a Chrome extension, shows an ID and is guided through setup while seeing what each feed sends. The rules cover lighting, being alone, no extra devices, no headphones and no talking, and the audio is analysed for suspicious behaviour.

The vendor says it acts for the test organiser, always signs a data processing agreement, encrypts stored data with AES-256 and holds it in data centres of AWS and Google Cloud inside the EU. Its documentation covers API version 3 and LTI. The public site is short, no price list is shown and the shop page was unreadable, so the cost and the company's legal form are unknown.

What ProctorExam does well

  • Second-camera option through a smartphone app
  • Data in EU data centres
  • AES-256 encryption stated
  • API v3 and LTI documentation
  • Privacy by design with anonymous learner configurations

Where ProctorExam falls short

  • Very little public product detail
  • No visible pricing
  • Chrome and desktop required
  • Needs a partner exam system

Standout feature. ProctorExam is the only tool here that routinely records the desk from a second angle using the candidate's own smartphone.

#8 TestVision

Wilp, Netherlands Not published; demo on request Demo on request

Best for: Dutch and Flemish education and examination bodies running supervised, on-site digital exams

  • Operating company. Teelen B.V.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio-based exam delivery, closed testing suites

TestVision manages the whole test cycle, from construction and administration to grading and learning analytics, with roles and permissions for the examination board. On exam day a candidate logs in with a one-time ticket number and password, and the invigilator sees a status monitor of progress, where irregularities such as a double login appear straight away. Answers are written to the server as the candidate works.

Teelen B.V. in Wilp, the Netherlands, builds it, and the product links to Safe Exam Browser or a browser the customer supplies, with allowed websites whitelisted in advance. That is lockdown, not camera proctoring, and the pages checked do not describe remote proctoring. API, LTI and sign-in through accounts such as SURFconext are available. Pricing and hosting are unpublished, and the general terms are the Nederland ICT Voorwaarden 2014.

What TestVision does well

  • Every function included for every customer
  • No limit on candidates or sittings
  • Invigilator status monitor
  • Safe Exam Browser link
  • API, LTI and SURFconext sign-in

Where TestVision falls short

  • No camera proctoring seen
  • Dutch-first communication
  • No public pricing
  • Hosting location not stated

Standout feature. TestVision includes every function for every customer, with no limit on candidates or sittings.

#9 Surpass Assessment

Saltaire, United Kingdom Not published on the pages checked Demo on request

Best for: Certification bodies and awarding organisations that run both test centres and remote delivery

  • Operating company. BTL Group Limited (trading as Surpass Assessment)
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Azure in the UK for customers outside North America
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio-based delivery chains, closed psychometric platforms

Surpass Assessment is an item-banking and testing platform that delivers one authored test on desktops, laptops, tablets, bring-your-own devices or paper. Test assembly, adaptive testing, scoring and psychometric reporting sit next to a network of approved test centres and an online proctoring service that integrates with the Surpass test driver. Surpass Luma AI supports item authoring and Surpass Tutor AI gives instant feedback.

The contracting company is BTL Group Limited, trading as Surpass Assessment, in Saltaire in the United Kingdom, and its policies are shared with a US sister company. The sub-processor list shows hosting on Microsoft Azure, in the UK for customers outside North America and in the USA for those in North America. Pricing is not published and the proctoring description is thin on the pages checked.

What Surpass Assessment does well

  • Item banking and test assembly in one tool
  • Screen and paper delivery from one item bank
  • Test centres and online proctoring services
  • UK hosting for non-North American customers
  • Adaptive and progress testing

Where Surpass Assessment falls short

  • No public pricing
  • Azure hosting under a US parent
  • Shares policies with a US entity
  • Proctoring detail is thin

Standout feature. Surpass Assessment delivers the same item bank on screen, on paper and through its own test centre network.

#10 Exam.net

Danderyd, Sweden Founded 2016 School licence on quote; 30-day free trial Demo on request

Best for: Secondary schools and universities running classroom or remote exams on a school licence

  • Operating company. Teachiq AB
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Sweden)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages checked
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Proctorio and lockdown browsers for classroom exams

Exam.net is an exam tool written by teachers, where students need no account, only an exam key. It has eight question types, an AI question generator and three security levels: native apps for iOS, macOS and Chromebooks for high-security tests, Safe Exam Browser support, and a normal browser for lower-stakes or open-book exams. Teachers get real-time monitoring, chat with students and background cheat detection.

Teachiq AB in Danderyd, Sweden, runs it, and the vendor says it was founded in 2016. There is a single plan with the full feature range and a school-based licence with unlimited use, with a 30-day trial that opens for the whole school and does not roll into a paid plan. A US entity, Exam.net US, Inc., serves US institutions with Californian-law terms. The pages checked show no camera proctoring and no stated hosting location.

What Exam.net does well

  • No student accounts needed
  • Three security levels including lockdown
  • School-wide unlimited licence
  • Native apps and Safe Exam Browser support
  • Auto-marking and anonymised grading

Where Exam.net falls short

  • No camera proctoring seen
  • Price on request
  • Hosting location not stated
  • Separate US contracting entity exists

Standout feature. Exam.net starts a sitting from nothing more than an exam key, with no student accounts to create.

#11 Testportal

Babimost, Poland From $35 per month (US dollars on the page); custom plan from $159 per month Demo on request

Best for: Companies, trainers and teachers who want a self-service test maker with a visible price list

  • Operating company. Testportal Sp. z o.o.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Poland)
  • Where the data sits. Microsoft Azure; region not stated
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Lightweight test platforms used alongside Proctorio

Testportal is a self-service online test maker with AI question creation, import from PDF and Word, question randomisation, server-side timing and certificates. Its integrity tools are a set number of attempts, blocked back-navigation and Honest Respondent Technology, which monitors test-tab movements and can disable access after too many tab leaves. The vendor says an AI-driven proctoring solution is coming soon, and points to Zoom, Webex or Google Meet for live supervision.

Testportal Sp. z o.o. is a Polish company in Babimost, and the product has an API and a Microsoft Teams app. The pricing page shows plans in US dollars with result caps: Standard at $35 a month for 30 results, Pro at $79 for 300, Max at $129 for 3000, and a custom plan from $159. The security page states that the infrastructure is based on Microsoft Azure and that the customer owns the test data.

What Testportal does well

  • Published plans with a free trial
  • AI question creation and Word or PDF import
  • Tab-leave detection and server-side timing
  • Certificates and API
  • Polish company with Polish-law terms

Where Testportal falls short

  • No camera proctoring yet
  • Dollar pricing
  • Result caps per plan
  • Azure region not stated

Standout feature. Testportal is the only tool here that publishes monthly prices for every plan, though in US dollars.

How do I choose between a full assessment suite and a proctoring add-on?

Start from where your exams live today. If questions are written and marked in Moodle, Canvas or Blackboard and you only need the candidate watched, Smowl and ProctorExam are the add-on route: Smowl has dedicated pages for Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard and D2L Brightspace, and ProctorExam documents API version 3 and LTI. Neither authors or marks an exam, so your existing quiz stays where it is.

If you are also unhappy with the quiz engine, a suite removes one vendor. WISEflow covers hand-in, auto-marked questions and a lockdown browser; Inspera adds item banks and an originality checker; TestWe adds oral and multimedia answers with AI-assisted marking. The price is migration work: question banks, rubrics and examiner habits all move.

How much does an online exam platform cost in Europe?

Mostly you cannot tell from a website. TestReach, WISEflow, TestWe, Inspera, Smowl, TestVision and Surpass Assessment publish no amounts, and TAO's cloud tiers are priced by user volume without a figure on the pages we read. WISEflow at least explains its model: an annual site licence plus a tiered per-student fee, with Core, Advanced and Premium plans.

Two tools do print numbers. Testportal lists Standard at $35 a month for 30 results, Pro at $79 for 300, Max at $129 for 3000 and a custom plan from $159, in US dollars with a 14-day trial. Exam.net sells a school-wide licence on quote with a 30-day trial. For everything else, expect a demo, then a quote that follows candidates, supervision level and integrations.

Does European hosting keep exam recordings out of American hands?

Not by itself. TestReach hosts on AWS within the EU, ProctorExam stores data on AWS and Google Cloud inside the EU, WISEflow uses AWS in Ireland and Germany, and Inspera states its Assessment Cloud is hosted on AWS within the European Union. All four are European companies on infrastructure owned by US groups, so what you buy is a European contract and regulator, not independence from American clouds.

Surpass Assessment shows the other side: it hosts on Microsoft Azure, in the UK for customers outside North America and in the USA for North American ones. Testportal also runs on Azure. For a no-American-processor requirement, only TAO's Community Edition on your own servers fully removes the question, and then the hosting is yours to run.

What should I check about a vendor's data processing terms before signing?

Read the sub-processor list first, because that is where the surprises sit. Inspera publishes one that includes US-based providers with standard contractual clauses or the EU-US Data Privacy Framework as the transfer basis. Exam.net and Surpass Assessment each have a US sister entity with its own terms, so confirm that your institution contracts with the European company.

Then ask for what the public pages leave open. TestWe's legal notice and privacy pages returned errors when we checked, Smowl and TestVision do not state where recordings are stored, and TestReach's privacy policy still mentions the Privacy Shield. A written answer on location, retention period and deletion is more useful than any badge.

How do I move from Proctorio to a European vendor?

Treat it as three migrations. The exam content moves only if you change platform, so a monitoring swap to Smowl or ProctorExam leaves it alone. The candidate flow changes in every case: ProctorExam asks for a Chrome extension and optionally a smartphone second camera, and Smowl's computer monitoring needs a desktop application. And the evidence archive from past sittings stays under your institution's retention rules, not the new vendor's.

Run one low-stakes course through the new tool first, with real student devices and the helpdesk staffed. TestReach is the exception that eases this: its candidates reach a helpdesk by phone, email or in-application chat, which suits a first high-stakes sitting.

When should I not switch to a European proctoring tool?

Keep your current setup if your data protection review has already accepted it, if your exams rely on a long list of fine-grained lockdown rules that the European tool does not offer, or if you run thousands of automated sittings a day. TestReach's live human proctors, for example, scale with the number of sittings, and WISEflow's most relevant proctoring features are priced as add-ons.

Also do not switch to a tool that lacks the control you need. TAO, TestVision, Exam.net and Testportal have no camera proctoring on the pages we checked, which is fine for supervised classrooms and a poor fit for unsupervised high-stakes remote exams.

How we selected and ranked these 11 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Every page is researched and drafted with AI assistance, and the compliance and pricing claims are checked against the vendor's documentation before it is published under the founder's editorial responsibility. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on the job. TestReach from Ireland is the pick for live proctoring by the vendor's own staff, WISEflow from Denmark and Inspera from Norway are the larger suites for universities, and TestWe from France combines exams with recorded proctoring. Smowl from Spain and ProctorExam from the Netherlands add monitoring to an exam system you already have, and TAO from Luxembourg is the open-source engine.

TestReach uses proctors employed by the company. WISEflow offers live proctoring as an add-on with a chat module, Smowl has SMOWL LIVE with a proctoring team that can message the examinee, and Inspera offers live and recorded options. TestWe describes recorded proctoring with asynchronous replay, and the pages checked do not describe live human supervision there.

TAO, TestVision, Exam.net and Testportal did not describe webcam or microphone recording on the pages we checked. They control the exam through lockdown, Safe Exam Browser, invigilator status monitors or tab-leave detection, and collect less personal data than a recorded session does.

TAO is the one: its Community Edition is free under GPL-2.0 and can be installed on your own servers, with QTI and LTI support. The other ten are commercial services. TAO's paid cloud tiers and enterprise deployments sit next to the free edition.

Testportal. It lists four plans from $35 to $159 a month, in US dollars, each with a 14-day trial. WISEflow explains its pricing model on its site but shows no amounts, and the other tools quote after a demo or on request.

Yes, in different ways. Smowl lists Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard and D2L Brightspace, ProctorExam documents API v3 and LTI, WISEflow lists LTI 1.3, and TestVision, TAO and Exam.net mention LTI, an API or LMS links. Test the grade return in a sandbox course before committing.