European Enterprise Search Tools

Enterprise search and AI work assistants connect to your mail, file shares, wikis and business systems, then answer questions from that content while respecting who may see what. Because the tool indexes your internal documents, the vendor's jurisdiction and hosting options matter more than for most software, and the tools below are run by companies in the EU, Norway, Switzerland or Austria that offer EU hosting, private cloud or on-premises installation.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Vendors can pay for more visibility, higher up on the review pages; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

11 European Enterprise Search Tools

Langdock

Model-agnostic AI chat, agents and workflows hosted in the EU

Germany
Chat, agents and workflows EU hosting, on-premises option Seat price published

Ayfie

Norwegian AI platform for work with an index and assistant

Norway
Index plus assistant SaaS, private cloud or on-premises Prices published

IntraFind

Munich enterprise search with iFinder, iAssistant and iHub

Germany
80+ connectors On-premises or sovereign cloud Free trial

Mindbreeze

Austrian insight engine with 500+ data source connectors

Austria
500+ data sources Permissions preserved MCP server

LightOn

Paris enterprise AI search platform for document estates

France
Governed document search API test access Paris-based

Sinequa

Paris enterprise AI search platform, part of ChapsVision

France
200+ native connectors 22+ languages Cloud, on-premises or hybrid

Squirro

Zurich GenAI platform with full on-premises deployment

Switzerland
Air-gapped deployment Knowledge graphs Agent catalog

Intergator

Dresden enterprise search with AI answers and source links

Germany
On-premises or private cloud Agentic chat Teams plugin

Dust

French platform for AI agents connected to company knowledge

France
20+ models EU or US data residency SOC 2 Type II

Zeta Alpha

Amsterdam agentic search and RAG for R&D and engineering teams

Netherlands
Federated search Private tenant option Plan from €20 per user

deepset

Berlin builder of Haystack for RAG pipelines and agents

Germany
Open-source Haystack Visual pipeline builder Cloud or self-hosted

Key takeaways

  • Langdock ranks #1 among the eleven tools in this directory section because Langdock GmbH in Berlin publishes €25 and €99 seat prices, names EU-hosted Azure as its infrastructure and claims both ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.
  • Mindbreeze states 500+ data source connectors and Sinequa states 200+, which makes them the widest connector offers here, while IntraFind lists 80+ and Ayfie, Intergator and Squirro publish no count.
  • Squirro describes full on-premises and air-gapped delivery of its complete platform, and IntraFind, Intergator, Ayfie and LightOn also describe installation inside the customer's own environment.
  • Ayfie, Langdock, Zeta Alpha and Dust publish a price, while Mindbreeze, Sinequa, Squirro, Intergator, IntraFind and LightOn quote on request and deepset quotes every Enterprise plan.
  • European contracting does not make the model layer European: Dust orchestrates GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Mistral and Grok, Ayfie offers GPT, Claude and Gemini, and deepset also contracts through a New York entity for US customers.

European enterprise search and AI work assistant software connects to a company's mail, file shares, wikis and business systems, answers staff questions from that content with sources and respects who may see what, and it is supplied by a vendor established in the EU, EEA, UK or Switzerland, which matters because the index becomes a searchable copy of the whole organisation.

European enterprise search and AI work assistant software compared

European enterprise search and AI work assistant software tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Langdock Germany Business plan: Standard seat €25, Business Max seat €99, each per user per month before VAT, 20% lower when billed yearly / Workflows add-on from €539 per workspace per month / Enterprise on request Staff-wide AI chat and agents at a stated seat price, hosted in the EU
#2 Ayfie Norway Index €2,000 per month; Assistant from €20 per user per month (10 to 50 users), €15 per user per month (51 to 300 users), Enterprise from €3,990 per month (300+ users); ready-made agents from €300 per month Organisations in Norway and the wider Nordic region that need an assistant grounded in their own documents and case systems
#3 IntraFind Germany Pricing on request; free trial of iFinder available Public administration, courts, banks and insurers that want search and AI answers installed inside their own infrastructure
#4 Mindbreeze Austria Pricing on request Large organisations with many heterogeneous systems that need one permission-aware knowledge layer
#5 LightOn France Enterprise pricing / Contact for quote European enterprises needing secure, compliant generative AI
#6 Sinequa France Pricing on request Large multinational organisations with complex systems, many languages and regulated data
#7 Squirro Switzerland Pricing on request Banks, insurers, government and other regulated organisations that cannot send data to third-party clouds
#8 Intergator Germany Pricing on request German public administration, industry, banks and insurers that want search on their own infrastructure
#9 Dust France From €24/user/mo (billed yearly) Teams building custom AI workflows
#10 Zeta Alpha Netherlands Open Access plan free / Personal AI Assistant €20 a month on annual billing / Team and Enterprise quoted Research and engineering groups that read papers and internal reports side by side
#11 deepset Germany Haystack framework free and open source (Apache 2.0) / Studio free tier (1 workspace, 100 pipeline hours) / Enterprise: custom pricing on request Developers building governed RAG applications and AI agents

Every European enterprise search and AI work assistant software tool reviewed

#1 Langdock

Berlin, Germany Business plan: Standard seat €25, Business Max seat €99, each per user per month before VAT, 20% lower when billed yearly / Workflows add-on from €539 per workspace per month / Enterprise on request Seven days free, with €5 of model credit and no card needed

Best for: Staff-wide AI chat and agents at a stated seat price, hosted in the EU

  • Operating company. Langdock GmbH, HRB 254499 Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg)
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. EU: shared SaaS runs through Microsoft Azure on EU servers, with the application and most configurable models kept inside the EU, according to its security page
  • Independent checks. Claims ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II; says customer data is not used for training
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Microsoft Copilot Studio, ChatGPT Enterprise

Langdock combines a chat that works with several model providers, agents you configure yourself, workflow automation, integrations and an API in one workspace. The operator is Langdock GmbH of Berlin (Greifswalder Strasse 212, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 254499).

Of the eleven tools in this section it is the one whose price list is easiest to read: a Standard seat at €25 and a Business Max seat at €99 per user per month before VAT, with a 20 percent reduction for yearly billing.

On hosting, the vendor writes that its shared SaaS runs through Microsoft Azure on servers in the EU, with the application and most configurable models staying there, and that customer content does not train models. It claims ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II. Large customers can ask for a dedicated tenant, bring-your-own-cloud from 2,000 seats or Kubernetes installation from 5,000 seats. Workflow runs cost extra, and the product leans towards chat and agents more than towards indexing old archives.

What Langdock does well

  • Two seat tiers priced in euros on a public page
  • A seven-day trial with a small credit and no card
  • EU server location named, with a German contracting company
  • Dedicated, own-cloud and on-premises routes exist for very large deployments
  • Can use your own API keys with several model providers

Where Langdock falls short

  • Runs on Azure, so a US cloud provider sits under the EU servers
  • Not every model is guaranteed to run inside the EU
  • Self-hosted options start only at thousands of seats
  • Automation is sold as a separate add-on with run limits

Standout feature. Langdock is the one tool here that prints a standard seat, a heavy-use seat and an automation add-on on a single public price list.

#2 Ayfie

Norway, Norway Index €2,000 per month; Assistant from €20 per user per month (10 to 50 users), €15 per user per month (51 to 300 users), Enterprise from €3,990 per month (300+ users); ready-made agents from €300 per month Demo on request

Best for: Organisations in Norway and the wider Nordic region that need an assistant grounded in their own documents and case systems

  • Operating company. Ayfie International AS and Ayfie AS
  • Jurisdiction. EEA, not EU (Norway)
  • Where the data sits. Where you choose: SaaS, private cloud or on-premises
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Glean, Microsoft 365 Copilot

Ayfie calls itself a context layer between company data and every AI experience staff use. Connectors read the sources, the index tracks what is current and who may see it, and the assistant and agents answer with a link to the source. The legal entities named are Ayfie International AS (organisation number 917913773) and Ayfie AS, formerly VirtualWorks AS, and the site points to an Oslo Stock Exchange investor page.

The connector list names SharePoint, Exchange, Teams, Confluence, Jira, iManage, NetDocuments and file servers, plus Norwegian case systems such as ePhorte, P360 and Acos Websak, and the vendor says Active Directory rights are mirrored. Deployment ranges from secure SaaS to private cloud and full on-premises with local models. The index is billed separately from the per-user assistant, so the monthly total is higher than the seat figure suggests, and Norway sits outside the EU.

What Ayfie does well

  • Index, assistant and agent prices are published
  • SaaS, private cloud or on-premises
  • Active Directory rights mirrored
  • Choice between GPT, Claude and Gemini or local models
  • ISO 27001 certified (stated)

Where Ayfie falls short

  • Index is a separate monthly cost
  • Connector list is strong on Norwegian systems
  • Norway is EEA, not EU
  • Smaller ecosystem than the large search platforms

Standout feature. Ayfie is the only tool here that bills the knowledge index and the assistant as two separate lines, which shows what the data layer costs by itself.

#3 IntraFind

Munich, Germany Pricing on request; free trial of iFinder available Demo on request

Best for: Public administration, courts, banks and insurers that want search and AI answers installed inside their own infrastructure

  • Operating company. IntraFind Software AG
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. On-premises, sovereign cloud or managed service
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Glean, Coveo, Elastic Enterprise Search

IntraFind sells iFinder for search, iAssistant for chatting with company data and iHub for everyday AI tasks, all on one semantically enriched knowledge base with continuous permission checks. IntraFind Software AG sits at Landsberger Strasse 368 in Munich and is entered at the Munich District Court under HRB 134378. Search queries can be typed or spoken, and the vendor describes the platform as scaling to billions of documents.

The company has built enterprise search for more than twenty years and shows ISO/IEC 27001:2022 on its site. It lists 80+ connectors, hundreds of file formats, an Outlook add-in, a Confluence integration, and APIs and MCP for customers' own applications. Deployment can be on-premises, hybrid, sovereign cloud or managed service. Prices are not published, but a free iFinder trial is, which few quote-only vendors in this section match. References lean toward German-speaking public bodies and financial institutions.

What IntraFind does well

  • Over 20 years of enterprise search work
  • On-premises, hybrid or sovereign cloud
  • Free trial of iFinder
  • Continuous permission checks
  • Voice and text queries

Where IntraFind falls short

  • No published prices
  • Fewer connectors than the largest platforms
  • References lean toward DACH public sector
  • Site only in German and English

Standout feature. IntraFind is the only quote-based search platform here that lets a technical team start on a free trial of the search product itself.

#4 Mindbreeze

Linz, Austria Pricing on request Demo on request

Best for: Large organisations with many heterogeneous systems that need one permission-aware knowledge layer

  • Operating company. Mindbreeze GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Austria)
  • Where the data sits. Depends on the deployment option chosen
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Glean, Coveo, Microsoft 365 Copilot search

Mindbreeze InSpire is an insight engine that connects business systems, keeps their permissions and feeds search, assistants and agents from one knowledge base. The European contact is Mindbreeze GmbH, Honauerstrasse 2 in Linz, entered under FN 262155y, and its imprint says Fabasoft AG, the Austrian software group, owns 85.5 percent. The product page claims 500+ data sources, and the documentation describes authorisation through graph structures with referenced access lists computed ahead of time.

A Model Context Protocol server lets AI agents use the indexed knowledge, and the same engine is packaged for contract management, RFP handling, quality management and process automation. A partner programme allows software vendors to embed it. The website also lists Mindbreeze Corp. in Chicago for North America and calls the headquarters 'Chicago and Linz', so confirm which entity signs. Prices are not published, deployments are normally projects, and cloud hosting regions were not stated.

What Mindbreeze does well

  • 500+ data sources stated
  • Existing permissions preserved
  • MCP server for AI agents
  • Ready applications for contracts and RFPs
  • Majority owned by an Austrian software group

Where Mindbreeze falls short

  • Pricing not published
  • US subsidiary and Chicago headquarters mentioned
  • Project-style implementation
  • Cloud hosting regions not stated

Standout feature. Mindbreeze states the longest connector list in this section, 500+ sources, and hands the whole index to outside agents over MCP.

#5 LightOn

Paris, France Founded 2016 Enterprise pricing / Contact for quote Demo on request

Best for: European enterprises needing secure, compliant generative AI

  • Operating company. LightOn SA
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Source code. Closed source

LightOn built its place in this category on keeping everything inside the customer's perimeter. The Paris company, founded in 2016 as a spin-off from research at Ecole Polytechnique and Ecole Normale Superieure, sells the Paradigm platform for on-premises or private-cloud use, with retrieval-augmented generation over unstructured documents, fine-tuning on proprietary data and agents that choose between document search and web exploration. Its enterprise search and reasoning solution lets employees ask questions of internal repositories in natural language.

LightOn went public on Euronext Paris in 2024 and, according to the EP review, counts the Ile-de-France region, Safran, Groupama and the French Space Agency (CNES) among its customers, with partnerships at Orange Business and Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

The same review gives annual recurring revenue of 1.9 million euros at the end of December 2025, up 54 percent, and notes that hardware supply constraints slowed deployments. The company publishes retrieval models such as GTE-ModernColBERT on Hugging Face. Pricing is enterprise-only and starts with a demo.

What LightOn does well

  • Full on-premises or private-cloud deployment keeps data in the customer's infrastructure
  • Named public-sector and industry references, including Safran, Groupama and CNES
  • RAG, fine-tuning and agents are built into one platform
  • Retrieval models published openly on Hugging Face
  • French company under EU law with GDPR compliance and SOC 2 Type 1

Where LightOn falls short

  • Enterprise pricing only, reached through the sales team
  • Small revenue base: 1.9 million euros ARR at the end of 2025
  • Hardware supply constraints slowed 2025 deployments
  • The largest foundation models are still produced by US firms

Standout feature. LightOn installs a complete generative AI platform, fine-tuned models included, on the customer's own servers and publishes its retrieval research.

#6 Sinequa

Paris, France Pricing on request Demo on request

Best for: Large multinational organisations with complex systems, many languages and regulated data

  • Operating company. SINEQUA (SAS), part of ChapsVision
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Cloud, on-premises or hybrid
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Glean, Coveo, Elastic

Sinequa has sold enterprise search for over two decades and now positions the product as an agentic AI platform covering AI search, assistants, agents and advanced RAG, under the line 'Sinequa by ChapsVision'. The privacy policy names SINEQUA as a French simplified joint-stock company, registered in Paris under 442 599 213 at 24 rue de la Pepiniere. The company states that cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment are available, tied to data residency rules in regulated industries.

Its own comparison page states 200+ native connectors, 350 document formats and natural language processing in 22+ languages, so a question in one language can surface documents in another. Typical sources named are SharePoint, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, Jira and Confluence. Those figures come from the vendor and the page also ranks competitors. Sinequa is sold through demos and projects without published prices, and the buyer should confirm which entity signs the contract.

What Sinequa does well

  • 200+ native connectors stated
  • 22+ languages with cross-language retrieval
  • Cloud, on-premises or hybrid
  • Two decades of enterprise search
  • French registered company

Where Sinequa falls short

  • No published pricing
  • Aimed at large organisations
  • Figures come from its own marketing pages
  • Part of a larger group (ChapsVision)

Standout feature. Sinequa is the tool here built around cross-language retrieval, backed by 22+ languages and 350 document formats.

#7 Squirro

Zurich, Switzerland Pricing on request Demo on request

Best for: Banks, insurers, government and other regulated organisations that cannot send data to third-party clouds

  • Operating company. Squirro AG
  • Jurisdiction. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Customer choice, including full on-premises
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Glean, Coveo

Squirro presents itself as a GenAI platform proven in regulated industries, with enterprise search and insights as one solution area. Core components are agentic AI, knowledge graphs, guardrails, a privacy layer and a classifier, with taxonomy and ontology management. Its website terms name Squirro AG, Zurich, as service provider, apply Swiss law and set Zurich as the exclusive place of jurisdiction, and the privacy policy gives Muhlebachstrasse 164 as the controller address.

The vendor says its complete platform can be delivered fully on-premises, from secure VPCs for global banks to air-gapped defence networks, rather than as a reduced offline version. Visitors can try the agent catalog without signing up or speaking to sales. Banking, insurance, government, healthcare, manufacturing and telecom are the listed industries. The privacy policy mentions several group entities, prices are not published, and efficiency claims on the site are the vendor's own figures.

What Squirro does well

  • Full on-premises and air-gapped deployment
  • Swiss law and Zurich jurisdiction in the website terms
  • Agent demos without sign-up
  • Knowledge graphs and guardrails included
  • Industry focus on regulated sectors

Where Squirro falls short

  • No published pricing
  • Enterprise project rather than self-serve
  • Group has several legal entities
  • Efficiency claims are the vendor's own

Standout feature. Squirro is the one tool here that states it ships the whole platform, not a cut-down edition, into air-gapped networks.

#8 Intergator

Dresden, Germany Pricing on request Demo on request

Best for: German public administration, industry, banks and insurers that want search on their own infrastructure

  • Operating company. interface projects GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. On-premises or private cloud
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Glean, Coveo

Intergator is enterprise search from interface projects GmbH, Cottaer Strasse 2 in Dresden, registered at the Amtsgericht Dresden under HRB 8740. It comes in a Core edition for search and AI and AI+ editions that add generative answers, summarised with the sources visible. The AI edition connects document management systems, databases, file servers, wikis and e-mail and analyses content semantically.

Version 6.8, announced in September 2026, adds an agentic chat and improved hybrid search, and a Microsoft Teams plugin brings the assistant into chat. Packaged applications cover knowledge management, digital workplace, social intranet, website search and compliance monitoring. The vendor lists on-premises and private cloud and mentions no shared SaaS option, so the buyer carries more setup. Prices and connector counts are not published, and the site is oriented to the German-speaking market.

What Intergator does well

  • Source-backed answers
  • On-premises or private cloud
  • Teams plugin
  • Three editions from search to AI+
  • Active release cadence (6.8 in September 2026)

Where Intergator falls short

  • No published pricing
  • No connector count stated
  • No shared SaaS option mentioned
  • Site oriented to DACH market

Standout feature. Intergator lets a buyer start with plain search in the Core edition and move to generated answers by changing edition, not product.

#9 Dust

Paris, France Founded 2022 From €24/user/mo (billed yearly) Demo on request

Best for: Teams building custom AI workflows

  • Operating company. Dust
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. ChatGPT Teams, Microsoft Copilot

Dust turns a company's existing tools into the knowledge base for custom AI agents. The Paris company was founded in 2022 by Gabriel Hubert, formerly at Stripe and Alan, and Stanislas Polu, formerly at OpenAI. Admins decide per agent which Slack channels, Drive directories, Notion pages or Confluence areas it may read, and agents can update Notion, HubSpot and Salesforce records as well as read them. Agents can call other agents, and Dust Apps cover custom actions.

Dust is model-agnostic across GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Mistral and Grok, and holds SOC 2 Type II.

Its EP review cites Doctolib with more than 3,000 users, Alan and Wakam as customers, and reports 2,000-plus organisations and $7.3 million in annual recurring revenue by mid-2025, backed by $21.5 million from Sequoia Capital. Core platform code is published under the MIT licence. Seat pricing begins at $29 per month on the tool page. Enterprise customers add SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, audit logs and a choice of EU or US hosting.

What Dust does well

  • Deep connections to Notion, Drive, Salesforce, HubSpot and more
  • Admin control down to individual channels and folders
  • Agents write back to connected systems, not just read
  • Agent chaining and Dust Apps for custom workflows
  • French company with EU data residency on every plan

Where Dust falls short

  • €24 to €30 per seat per month adds up across a company
  • Credit-based usage makes heavy agent work harder to budget
  • Single-tenant deployment only on the Enterprise tier
  • Underlying models are third-party, not European

Standout feature. Dust is the one tool here where non-engineers scope each agent to specific channels and folders and let it write back into Salesforce or HubSpot.

#10 Zeta Alpha

Amsterdam, Netherlands Open Access plan free / Personal AI Assistant €20 a month on annual billing / Team and Enterprise quoted Personal plan trial on request

Best for: Research and engineering groups that read papers and internal reports side by side

  • Operating company. Zeta Alpha Vector B.V.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Netherlands)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Google Agentspace, Microsoft Copilot Studio

Zeta Alpha started as a search product for AI research literature and has grown into agentic search and retrieval-augmented generation for companies. A free Open Access plan covers open research, the Personal AI Assistant costs €20 a month with annual billing, a Team plan brings in material from Trello, Slack, Jira, Confluence, Google Drive and SharePoint, and an Enterprise plan adds custom agents working on private data.

The legal entity in the terms and privacy policy is Zeta Alpha Vector B.V., Science Park 608 in Amsterdam, under Dutch law. Enterprise customers can take a private tenant, with on-premises hosting possible, and the vendor lists 99.9 percent availability. What the pages do not say is just as useful: no cloud provider, region or security certificate is named, Team and Enterprise are priced by quote, and building your own agents is reserved for the top plan.

What Zeta Alpha does well

  • A free plan and a €20 personal plan allow a test without a sales call
  • Dutch private company named in the legal pages
  • Private tenant with optional on-premises hosting
  • One search across Slack, Jira, Confluence, Drive and SharePoint

Where Zeta Alpha falls short

  • Hosting provider and region are not stated
  • Team and Enterprise prices are available only by quote
  • Custom agents require the Enterprise plan
  • No certification is named on the pages read

Standout feature. Zeta Alpha is the one tool here that starts from a free search over open AI research before it adds the private-data agent layer.

#11 deepset

Berlin, Germany Founded 2018 Haystack framework free and open source (Apache 2.0) / Studio free tier (1 workspace, 100 pipeline hours) / Enterprise: custom pricing on request Demo on request

Best for: Developers building governed RAG applications and AI agents

  • Operating company. deepset GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. LangChain, LlamaIndex

The Berlin company deepset maintains Haystack, a project under the Apache 2.0 licence with over 26,000 GitHub stars, used to assemble retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, agents and semantic search.

Unlike most vendors in this section, deepset sells building blocks rather than a finished assistant. The proprietary Haystack Enterprise Platform adds a visual pipeline builder, a test playground, guardrails and an audit trail with role-based permissions, and can run in the cloud or self-hosted. The vendor markets it as a platform for sovereign AI.

The company was founded in 2018 and holds SOC 2 Type II. Outside the United States the contracting party is the Berlin GmbH and German law applies, whereas a New York office serves American customers.

The free Studio tier is meant for trying things out: a single workspace and user, a hundred hours of pipeline time and fifty uploaded files. Enterprise buyers receive an individual offer, which a small team comparing against Dust's listed seat price will find harder to weigh. Teams without developers should treat Haystack as a component a partner builds with.

What deepset does well

  • Haystack framework is free, open source and Apache 2.0
  • More than 26,000 GitHub stars and active development
  • Cloud or self-hosted deployment for data sovereignty
  • RBAC, audit logs and guardrails built into the Enterprise Platform
  • SOC 2 Type II certified

Where deepset falls short

  • No published Enterprise pricing; every plan is quoted
  • Free Studio tier is a prototype limit, not production-ready
  • Requires developers; not a no-code bot builder like Rasa or Dust
  • Also operates from New York, so not EU-only

Standout feature. deepset gives you an Apache 2.0 retrieval framework you can inspect and self-host, with a Berlin company supplying the governed platform on top.

Search platform or ready-made assistant: which kind of European tool should you buy?

Two kinds of product share this category. Sinequa, Mindbreeze, IntraFind and Intergator grew out of search engines: you connect systems, tune relevance and add an answer layer, usually with a partner and over weeks or months. Langdock, Dust and Ayfie start from the assistant and add connectors, so a department can be working in days. LightOn and Squirro sit in between, selling a platform that is installed in your environment, and deepset sells the parts to build your own.

The deciding question is who will operate it. An IT team that owns servers and a long list of legacy systems should shortlist the search platforms. A business team with Slack, Notion and Drive should look at the assistants. A development team that understands retrieval should look at deepset. Choosing by feature list before answering that question produces short-lists of products nobody can run.

How do prices compare across European enterprise search tools?

Four vendors let you budget from the website. Langdock lists €25 per Standard seat and €99 per Business Max seat per month excluding VAT, with 20 percent off for annual billing.

Ayfie lists its Index at €2,000 a month, its assistant at €20 per user for 10 to 50 users and €15 for 51 to 300 users, an Enterprise tier from €3,990 a month and ready-made agents from €300 a month. Zeta Alpha lists a personal plan at €20 a month billed annually. Dust's tool page shows seats from $29 per month.

Everyone else quotes: Mindbreeze, Sinequa, Squirro, Intergator, IntraFind and LightOn on request, and deepset for every Enterprise plan, although its Haystack framework is free and its Studio tier costs nothing. The cost unit differs as well. Seat prices grow with headcount, Ayfie adds a fixed index fee, and the installed platforms price a deployment plus the infrastructure underneath. Ask every vendor to price the same scenario, for example 500 users and ten sources, and compare three-year totals.

What does a European vendor change about jurisdiction and data protection?

It changes the contract and the legal reach. The vendors here are registered in Germany (Langdock, IntraFind, Intergator, deepset), France (LightOn, Sinequa, Dust), Austria (Mindbreeze), the Netherlands (Zeta Alpha), Norway (Ayfie) and Switzerland (Squirro). Norway is in the EEA but not the EU, and Switzerland is covered by an adequacy decision, which some tenders treat differently from EU membership. LightOn's EP review states that a French company is not subject to US laws such as the CLOUD Act.

It does not change where every component comes from. Langdock runs on Microsoft Azure inside the EU, a US provider with European servers. Dust sends queries to third-party model providers and says they keep nothing. Mindbreeze names a US subsidiary in Chicago, deepset operates in New York, and Sinequa and Squirro state that the group has other entities. Ask each vendor which entity signs the contract, which sub-processors touch your content and which country hosts the models.

Which tools can run fully on-premises or air-gapped?

Squirro states that it delivers its complete GenAI platform fully on-premises, in a secure VPC or air-gapped, and does not offer a reduced offline edition. IntraFind offers on-premises, hybrid, sovereign cloud and managed service. Intergator lists on-premises or private cloud, Ayfie lists SaaS, private cloud and full on-premises with local model hosting, and LightOn describes Paradigm as deployable on-premises or in a private cloud. Sinequa says cloud, on-premises or hybrid, and Mindbreeze says deployment options are flexible.

The hosted assistants are more restricted. Langdock reserves bring-your-own-cloud for deployments from 2,000 seats and on-premises from 5,000 seats, and Dust offers single-tenant deployment only on its Enterprise tier. Zeta Alpha mentions a private tenant with an on-premises option. Check what exactly stays inside: the index, the application, the language model, or only some of them.

How hard is migration from Glean or Microsoft Copilot?

Ayfie, IntraFind, Mindbreeze, Sinequa, Squirro and Intergator each name Glean among the tools they replace, and their reviews describe projects: connectors are authorised, sources are crawled, permissions are mapped to your directory and relevance is tuned. Expect weeks to months, with the longest part being the unusual systems. Dust and Langdock replace Copilot or ChatGPT-style tools, and the work is recreating agents and connections.

Content created in the old product, such as saved prompts or custom agents, rarely moves automatically. Keep the old tool running in parallel for one team cycle, move one department at a time and measure whether staff still ask the old tool for answers. Contract notice periods matter more than technology here.

When should a company stay with its current tool instead of switching?

When breadth is the reason you bought it. The EP reviews are open about the limits: Ayfie's visible connectors lean toward Norwegian public-sector systems, IntraFind's 80+ connectors are fewer than Sinequa's 200+ and Mindbreeze's 500+, Intergator states no connector count, and Zeta Alpha is built around research material. LightOn says the very largest foundation models are still produced by US firms.

Staying also makes sense when nobody will own the replacement. An installed platform without an owner decays within a year, and a hosted assistant without an admin collects stale connections. If the reason to switch is a feeling about jurisdiction, write down the concrete risk first, then test whether the European tool covers your five most important sources.

How we selected and ranked these 11 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Every page is researched and drafted with AI assistance, and the compliance and pricing claims are checked against the vendor's documentation before it is published under the founder's editorial responsibility. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on who will run it. Langdock and Ayfie are the clearest choices if you want an assistant quickly at a published price, Mindbreeze, Sinequa and IntraFind are the established search platforms for many systems, Squirro, Intergator and LightOn suit installations inside your own network, Dust suits teams building agents on cloud tools, Zeta Alpha suits research groups, and deepset suits developers. Shortlist two and test them on your own documents.

Langdock lists €25 and €99 seats, Ayfie lists a €2,000 monthly index plus €15 to €20 per assistant user, Zeta Alpha lists a €20 personal plan, and Dust's tool page shows seats from $29. Mindbreeze, Sinequa, Squirro, Intergator, IntraFind and LightOn quote on request, and deepset quotes Enterprise plans while offering a free framework and Studio tier.

The vendors state that they do. Mindbreeze preserves existing permissions, IntraFind runs continuous permission checks, Ayfie mirrors Active Directory rights, Sinequa lists document-level access controls and Dust lets admins scope each agent to chosen channels and folders. Ask how quickly a permission change reaches the index, because that detail is rarely published.

Yes, several vendors state it. Squirro describes full on-premises and air-gapped delivery, IntraFind offers on-premises or sovereign cloud, Intergator on-premises or private cloud, Ayfie private cloud or on-premises with local model hosting, and LightOn on-premises or private cloud. Langdock reserves on-premises for very large deployments, from 5,000 seats.

The contracting contact for Europe is Mindbreeze GmbH in Linz, owned 85.5 percent by the Austrian group Fabasoft AG according to its imprint. The website also lists a US subsidiary, Mindbreeze Corp. in Chicago, so a buyer should confirm in the order form that the Austrian GmbH is the contracting party.

It can be. Ayfie is Norwegian, and Norway is in the EEA but outside the EU. Squirro is Swiss and covered by an adequacy decision but outside the EEA. For most data protection purposes both are acceptable, yet a tender that demands EU-established suppliers may exclude them, so read the wording of the requirement.