CAPMO

German site management from diary to handover - European alternative based in Germany

Quick Overview

Company CAPMO
Category Construction Management Software
Headquarters Munich, Germany
EU/European Yes - Germany
GDPR Compliant Yes
Main Features Site diary & defects, Task coordination, German construction practice
Pricing Per user, per month
Best For German contractors digitising the site diary and defect process
Replaces Procore, Fieldwire, paper site diaries

Detailed Review

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Site diary built for German practice
  • Defects pinned to drawings
  • Weather and workforce logging included
  • Subcontractor access priced separately
  • German hosting

Cons

  • German and Austrian market focus
  • Smaller than PlanRadar internationally
  • No tendering or progress control
  • Reporting formats tuned to DACH conventions

Alternatives to CAPMO

Looking for other European construction platforms? Here are the alternatives worth comparing:

Frequently Asked Questions

CAPMO is based in Germany and operates under European data-protection rules including the GDPR. Site records name individual workers and subcontractors, so that jurisdiction covers personal data as well as commercial documentation.

CAPMO is based in Germany. We list European construction platforms because the documentation they hold is evidence in disputes governed by European law.

Digital site diary with weather and workforce logging, defect and snag management on drawings, task coordination across trades, photo documentation, and automatically generated reports for clients and subcontractors.

Per-user monthly subscription by tier, with subcontractor access priced separately so the whole site can participate without full licences.

CAPMO is a European alternative to Procore, Fieldwire, paper site diaries, built around European documentation and tender practice rather than adapted to it.

Offline capability is the first thing to test in this category, because half a building has no signal in it. PlanRadar and BulldozAIR are both built for capture without a connection and sync afterwards. Whatever you shortlist, trial it in a basement rather than in the office.

Who worked on this review

Three people touch every tool page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's own documentation.

Sebastiaan Smits
Written by

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder & Editor · Netherlands

Selects the tools, writes the reviews, and checks where each company is actually established.

Marta Kowalczyk
Edited by

Marta Kowalczyk

Senior Analyst, Infrastructure & Developer Tools · Warsaw, Poland

Covers hosting, developer tooling and the practical side of moving workloads to European providers.

Ingrid Halvorsen
Fact-checked by

Ingrid Halvorsen

Managing Editor · Oslo, Norway

Runs the review process and decides when a page is ready to publish or needs another pass.

Read our editorial process for how we source, verify and update these pages — and how we keep affiliate income separate from what we recommend.

Go to CAPMO