BugBug
Polish no-code browser test recorder with cloud runs, schedules and a fixed price per plan instead of seat pricing
Quick Overview
| Company | TestRevolution sp. z o.o. |
|---|---|
| Category | Cross-Browser and Test Automation Tools |
| Headquarters | Tarnowskie Gory, Poland |
| Founded | Not stated |
| EU Presence | Yes - Poland (EU) |
| Data Location | Gdansk, Poland (EU) |
| Open Source | No |
| GDPR Compliant | Yes |
| Self-Hosting | No |
| Main Features | Chrome extension recorder, edit and rewind, reusable components, built-in email testing, cloud runs and schedules, CI/CD and CLI, YAML import and export, MCP, visual regression (Pro) |
| Pricing | Free plan; Core $99/month and Pro $189/month billed annually (prices exclude VAT); Business on request |
| Best For | Small product teams that want end-to-end browser tests without writing a framework |
| Replaces | BrowserStack Low Code Automation, Ghost Inspector, Testim |
Detailed Review
BugBug starts from a Chrome extension: you click through a flow in the browser, the recorder turns it into a test, and the test can then run locally or on a schedule in the vendor cloud. There is no framework to install.
The service provider is TestRevolution sp. z o.o. in Poland. The FAQ states that primary infrastructure is hosted in the EU, with servers in Gdansk, and the terms are governed by Polish law.
Recording and Maintenance
Tests are edited visually, can be exported to YAML for review in version control, and can be repaired with an AI agent connected over MCP. Reusable components avoid repeating login steps across tests.
Email Testing Built In
Each paid plan includes an inbox for testing flows that send email, such as sign-up and password reset, so no separate mailbox service is needed.
Pricing Without Seats
The vendor sells fixed monthly prices and says there are no per-seat fees: the Free plan has 1 user and 15 tests with local runs only, Core allows 3 users and 50 tests, and Pro has unlimited users and tests. Prices are in US dollars.
Limitations to Consider
BugBug tests web applications in Chrome. It is not a multi-browser or real-device grid, so teams that must verify Safari or Firefox rendering still need a cloud such as TestingBot. The free plan is limited to local runs and 15 tests, and prices are quoted in US dollars.
Who Should Use BugBug
Founders, product teams and small QA groups that want regression coverage of a web app quickly, without a test framework or dedicated automation engineer.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Codeless recorder inside the browser
- Polish contracting entity, servers in Gdansk
- Unlimited users on Pro, no seat pricing
- Built-in email testing
- YAML export for version control
Cons
- Chrome-based, not a multi-browser grid
- Free plan allows 15 tests and local runs only
- Prices in US dollars
- Visual regression and CI/CD only on Pro
Alternatives to BugBug
Other European cross-browser and test automation tools worth comparing before you decide:
TestingBot
Belgium · Selenium and Playwright browser grid hosted in Belgium
Squish
Finland · GUI test automation for desktop, web, mobile and embedded apps
Checkly
Germany · Synthetic monitoring for developers, with checks written as code
Argos
France · Visual regression testing for Playwright, Storybook and Vitest
See all European cross-browser and test automation tools or compare them directly against BrowserStack Low Code Automation on our alternatives page.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. Flows are recorded in a Chrome extension. Custom JavaScript actions exist for cases that need them.
The FAQ on the vendor site states that primary infrastructure is in the EU, with servers in Gdansk, Poland.
Yes. The Free plan at $0 allows 1 user, 1 project, 15 tests and 4 test suites with local runs only. A 14-day trial of paid plans is offered.