European Alternatives to Disqus and Facebook Comments - Website Commenting Software (2026) | European Purpose

European Website Commenting Software Alternatives

A comment section is the one part of a website where strangers write under your name, and the system behind it decides who sees their data. Disqus and Facebook Comments are American and ad-funded. These European alternatives come from companies established in France, Germany, Sweden and Austria, and they are two kinds of product: comment and discussion systems for blogs and newsrooms, and engagement widgets such as polls and quizzes that sit beside an article.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

7 European Website Commenting Software

Logora

Paris SAS that sells comments, structured debates and reader consultations to newsrooms, with application hosting at OVH in Paris

France Annual licence, price not published
Comments, pro/con debates and consultationsHybrid AI and human moderationApplication and moderation hosted by OVH, Paris

GraphComment

Aix-en-Provence comment system with a free plan and EU servers, run on DigitalOcean in Amsterdam, a US-owned provider

France Free / $25 or $51 per month billed yearly
Free plan with 100 AI moderation analyses a monthServers in Amsterdam on DigitalOcean LLCData processing agreement published

Talkyard

Swedish AGPL discussion platform that does blog comments, forums and Q&A, with a managed service whose processors include Google Cloud and Amazon

Sweden €4 or €12 per active coworker per month, first month free
Open source under AGPL, self-hostableEmbedded comments, forum, Q&A and idea votingDebiki AB, Swedish law, Stockholm courts

Civey

Berlin survey company whose poll widget media partners embed in articles, with data kept on German servers

Germany Not published
Survey widget embedded in article pagesData on German servers per the privacy policyCivey GmbH is sole controller of participation data

Pinpoll

Linz polls, quizzes and forms for publishers, with personal data stored on Microsoft servers in the EU

Austria Not published
Polls, quizzes and forms for publishersData stored on Microsoft servers in the EUAustrian law, courts in Linz

Opinary

Berlin voting and poll tool for publishers and brands, operated by Affinity Global GmbH with no hosting location named

Germany Not published
Opinion polls inside articlesGerman law governs the termsPrivacy policy mentions US transfers, no host named

HYVOR Talk

Paris-registered comment platform with published prices and core hosting on Hetzner in Germany, though Cloudflare in the US handles CDN and media

France From €5 per month, 14-day trial
Personal, Premium, Business and Enterprise plansHetzner in Germany as primary hostCloudflare (US) used for CDN and media storage

Key takeaways

  • Logora ranks #1 among the European website commenting tools in this directory, because Logora's legal notice places its application and moderation infrastructure with a European provider, OVH in Paris, and one Paris SAS covers comments, structured debates and reader consultations.
  • Four of the seven are comment or discussion systems (Logora, GraphComment, Talkyard, HYVOR Talk) and three are polling widgets (Civey, Pinpoll, Opinary). They answer different needs and should not be compared on one feature list.
  • Talkyard is the only open-source product here. Debiki AB of Sweden licenses it under AGPL, so a site can run it on its own server instead of buying the managed service.
  • GraphComment, HYVOR and Pinpoll are European companies that use US-owned infrastructure in part: DigitalOcean in Amsterdam, Cloudflare for CDN and media, and Microsoft servers in the EU. It is stated here rather than left in a footnote.
  • Disqus and Facebook Comments have no European entry in this list because both are American. Several popular independent systems, Isso and Remark42 among them, also fail the test used here: they have maintainers but no named company.
  • Only GraphComment and Talkyard let a site start without paying: GraphComment has a permanent free plan, Talkyard gives the first month free.

European website commenting software is the software that lets readers write comments, join debates or vote on polls on your own pages, built by a company established in Europe so that the people writing under your articles are covered by European law rather than by an American ad network.

It covers two products that get searched with the same words: comment and discussion systems for blogs and newsrooms, and engagement widgets such as polls and quizzes that sit beside an article.

European website commenting software compared

European website commenting software tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Logora France Annual SaaS licence, price not published Newsrooms that want comments, structured debates and consultations on one moderation pipeline
#2 GraphComment France Free / Starter $25 per month yearly or $29 monthly / Pro $51 yearly or $59 monthly / Enterprise on request Publishers that want a free plan and AI moderation without self-hosting
#3 Talkyard Sweden Standard €4 and Business €12 per active coworker per month (Business minimum €300 a month), Enterprise on request Teams that want blog comments and a forum from one open-source product
#4 Civey Germany null Media sites that want representative opinion polls embedded in articles
#5 Pinpoll Austria null Publishers that want polls, quizzes and forms with an Austrian vendor
#6 Opinary Germany null Publishers and brands that want voting tools inside articles
#7 HYVOR Talk France Personal €5 per month (€50 yearly), Premium €12, Business €40, Enterprise on request Blogs and small publishers that want a hosted Disqus replacement with published prices

Every European website commenting software tool reviewed

#1 Logora

Paris, France Founded 2019 Annual SaaS licence, price not published Pilots of 30 to 60 days before a full deployment

Best for: Newsrooms that want comments, structured debates and consultations on one moderation pipeline

  • Operating company. Logora SAS, SIREN 811 763 553
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. France, application and moderation infrastructure at OVH, 8 rue de la Ville l'Évêque, Paris; the logora.com website itself is hosted by Bunny.net SRL in Slovenia
  • Replaces. Disqus, Facebook Comments, OpenWeb

Logora sells a conversation layer to media: threaded comments tied to reader accounts, pro and con debates on editorial questions, and consultations that collect and rank ideas. Its site says it works with more than 50 outlets in 12 countries and cites Der Spiegel and Milenio among them.

The operator is Logora SAS, a société par actions simplifiée registered under SIREN 811 763 553, VAT FR07 850 171 695, with its seat in Paris. The legal notice names OVH, 8 rue de la Ville l'Évêque, 75008 Paris, as host of the application and moderation infrastructure, and Bunny.net SRL in Slovenia as host of the logora.com website. The site is governed by French law with French courts.

There is no public price list. Logora describes annual SaaS licensing with no integrated advertising, and pilots of 30 to 60 days before a deployment decision. That suits a newsroom with a procurement process and does not suit a hobby blog.

What Logora does well

  • Application and moderation hosted by OVH in Paris, per the legal notice
  • Comments, debates and consultations from one vendor
  • Hybrid AI and human moderation pipeline
  • No integrated advertising, per the vendor
  • French SAS with SIREN and VAT number published

Where Logora falls short

  • No published price, only annual licensing
  • Aimed at newsrooms, a poor fit for a small blog
  • Not described as open source
  • The marketing website is hosted separately by Bunny.net in Slovenia

Standout feature. It is the only tool here that adds structured pro and con debates and reader consultations to ordinary comments.

#2 GraphComment

Aix-en-Provence, France Free / Starter $25 per month yearly or $29 monthly / Pro $51 yearly or $59 monthly / Enterprise on request Free plan, no time limit

Best for: Publishers that want a free plan and AI moderation without self-hosting

  • Operating company. SemioLogic SAS, RCS Aix-en-Provence 790 715 726
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Netherlands, service infrastructure on DigitalOcean LLC (Colorado, USA) with servers in Amsterdam; the website is on Vercel Inc. (California, USA)
  • Replaces. Disqus, Facebook Comments

GraphComment is a hosted comment system that adds discussions, votes, shares and media embeds to a page, and shows a threaded layout it calls Bubble Flow. Its homepage lists Le Monde, France Info, 20 Minutes and Les Echos among its clients and says the data is stored on webservers in the European Union.

The legal notice names SemioLogic SAS, 67 cours Mirabeau, 13100 Aix-en-Provence, registered in the Aix-en-Provence commercial register under 790 715 726, with Mathias Blandin as legal representative. It also states the hosting plainly: the website runs on Vercel Inc. in California, and the service infrastructure runs on DigitalOcean LLC in Colorado with servers in Amsterdam. The servers are in the EU; the provider is American.

Pricing is in US dollars: Free at $0 with 100 AI moderation analyses and up to one million data loads a month, Starter at $25 a month billed yearly or $29 monthly, Pro at $51 yearly or $59 monthly, and Enterprise on request. SSO and push notifications start on Starter, and a data processing agreement is published on the site.

What GraphComment does well

  • Permanent free plan with up to one million data loads a month
  • Servers in Amsterdam, stated in the legal notice
  • AI moderation included on every plan, with the monthly volume stated
  • Data processing agreement published
  • French SAS with commercial register number on its own site

Where GraphComment falls short

  • Infrastructure provider DigitalOcean LLC is a US company
  • Prices are in US dollars, not euros
  • The website is hosted on Vercel in the United States
  • Not described as open source

Standout feature. It has the only permanent free plan among the hosted comment systems in this list.

#3 Talkyard

Sweden Standard €4 and Business €12 per active coworker per month (Business minimum €300 a month), Enterprise on request First month free, no credit card

Best for: Teams that want blog comments and a forum from one open-source product

  • Operating company. Debiki AB
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Sweden)
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. Disqus, Discourse

Talkyard is a community discussion platform that does embedded blog comments, forums, Q&A and idea voting, and it can be installed on your own server or bought as a managed service. Its site describes blog comments that work like Disqus but without ads and tracking.

The company is Debiki AB of Sweden. Its standard SaaS terms are governed by Swedish law with the courts of Stockholm, and the site credits the code to Magnus Lindberg. The software is licensed AGPL, with source on GitHub.

The terms do not name a data centre, and the founder's own forum thread on GDPR lists Google Cloud, Amazon Simple Email Service and Automattic Akismet among the third-party processors of the hosted service. No region is stated on the pages checked.

Pricing is per active coworker rather than per page view: Standard at €4 a month and Business at €12 a month with a €300 monthly minimum and a dedicated managed server, plus Enterprise on request. The first month is free with no card. External members such as readers and customers are unlimited on every plan.

What Talkyard does well

  • Open source under AGPL, so you can host it yourself
  • Comments, forum, Q&A and idea voting in one product
  • Prices in euros are published
  • Unlimited external members on every plan
  • Swedish company, Swedish law, courts in Stockholm

Where Talkyard falls short

  • Managed hosting names no region and lists Google Cloud and Amazon as processors
  • Priced per coworker, which suits a team more than a solo blog
  • The company page gives no registration number or street address
  • The main site redirects to its own forum, so legal pages are harder to find

Standout feature. It is the only product here whose source code you can run on your own server.

#4 Civey

Berlin, Germany

Best for: Media sites that want representative opinion polls embedded in articles

  • Operating company. Civey GmbH, HRB 165277 B Amtsgericht Charlottenburg
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Germany, "auf deutschen Servern in professionellen Rechenzentren" per the privacy policy
  • Replaces. Opinary, Typeform polls

Civey is a Berlin survey company whose widget media partners embed in article pages, so readers answer a question in context. It is a polling tool, not a comment system, and it is on this list because the widget is the reader-participation feature that sits beside an article.

The operator is Civey GmbH, Alte Jakobstraße 85/86, 10179 Berlin, HRB 165277 B at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, managed by Janina Mütze and Gerrit Richter. The privacy policy states that the data sits "auf deutschen Servern in professionellen Rechenzentren", and that Civey is the sole controller of survey participation and account data collected through the widget.

The homepage presents market research for enterprises, institutions and media, and shows no price. The widget's own terms and fees are not published on the pages checked, so a publisher has to ask.

What Civey does well

  • German servers stated in the privacy policy
  • Berlin GmbH with commercial register number and named managers
  • Civey is sole controller of data collected through the widget
  • Built for embedding in news article pages

Where Civey falls short

  • No published price or plan
  • Not a comment system, readers cannot write replies
  • The privacy policy names no hosting company, only the country
  • Widget terms are not visible on the pages checked

Standout feature. It is the only tool here whose privacy policy states German servers and names itself as sole controller of the widget's data.

#5 Pinpoll

Linz, Austria Founded 2015

Best for: Publishers that want polls, quizzes and forms with an Austrian vendor

  • Operating company. Pinpoll GmbH, FN 433631 v Landesgericht Linz
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Austria)
  • Where the data sits. European Union, on a server of Microsoft Corporation (Redmond, USA) in the EU per the data protection declaration
  • Replaces. Opinary, Typeform polls

Pinpoll offers three products to website operators: Pinpoll Tools for polls, quizzes and forms, a data management platform for first-party audience data, and an advertising product. Its site lists IPPEN.MEDIA, ORF and MDR among customers.

The terms identify Pinpoll GmbH, registered at the regional court of Linz under FN 433631 v, with its head office at Hopfengasse 3, 4020 Linz. They are governed by Austrian law with the local court of Linz as venue. The data protection declaration states that personal data is stored on a server of Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, in the European Union. The site also lists a sales office in Cape Town, South Africa.

No price is published on the pages checked, and there is no stated free plan. Terms, a data protection declaration and a processing agreement are published as PDF documents.

What Pinpoll does well

  • Austrian GmbH with a Firmenbuch number in its own terms
  • Storage in the EU stated in the data protection declaration
  • Processing agreement published as a PDF
  • Polls, quizzes and forms from one vendor

Where Pinpoll falls short

  • Storage provider is Microsoft Corporation, a US company
  • No published price or free plan
  • Not a comment system, readers cannot write replies
  • Legal documents are PDFs only

Standout feature. It is the only tool here that bundles polls, quizzes and forms with its own audience data platform.

#6 Opinary

Berlin, Germany

Best for: Publishers and brands that want voting tools inside articles

  • Operating company. Affinity Global GmbH, HRB 151824 B Amtsgericht Charlottenburg
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Replaces. Disqus polls, Typeform polls

Opinary is a polling and voting tool that publishers place inside articles, with brands buying access to the audiences that answer. Its site says it reaches over 125 million users and lists Der Spiegel and The Times among partners.

The imprint names Affinity Global GmbH, Engeldamm 62-64, 10179 Berlin, HRB 151824 B at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, VAT DE291652961, with Cornelius Frey as managing director. The terms of use are governed by German law. Opinary describes itself as part of the Affinity Ecosystem, and the privacy policy refers to Affinity Global Inc. for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, so the group is not European-owned throughout.

The privacy policy says data may be transferred to the USA and names no hosting provider or region, and no price is published. That makes it the least verifiable entry in this list on hosting, and it is ranked below the tools that name a host for that reason.

What Opinary does well

  • Berlin GmbH with commercial register number and VAT ID in its imprint
  • Terms governed by German law
  • Used by named European publishers

Where Opinary falls short

  • No hosting provider or region named
  • Privacy policy allows transfers to the USA
  • The wider group includes Affinity Global Inc.
  • No published price
  • Not a comment system, readers cannot write replies

Standout feature. It is the most widely placed polling tool in this list, and the one that says least about where data is stored.

#7 HYVOR Talk

Paris, France Personal €5 per month (€50 yearly), Premium €12, Business €40, Enterprise on request 14-day free trial, no credit card required

Best for: Blogs and small publishers that want a hosted Disqus replacement with published prices

  • Operating company. HYVOR, SIREN 914168042
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Germany, primary infrastructure on Hetzner per the sub-processor page; Cloudflare (United States) handles DNS, CDN and media storage
  • Replaces. Disqus, Facebook Comments

HYVOR Talk is a hosted comment widget that goes on a page with one script and replaces Disqus or Facebook Comments without an advertising network behind it. It is one of five products from HYVOR, alongside Hyvor Blogs, Hyvor Post, FortGuard and Hyvor Relay, and it is the one the company is best known for.

The operator is HYVOR, 10 Rue de Penthièvre, 75008 Paris, SIREN 914168042, VAT FR52914168042. Its terms are governed by French law with the courts of Paris.

The sub-processor page names Hetzner in Germany as the primary hosting provider, Crisp in France for support, and FortGuard in France for spam protection. It also names Cloudflare in the United States for DNS, CDN, DDoS protection and media storage, Mailgun, Sentry and Stripe in the United States, and AWS in the United States with EU servers for newsletter and notification emails.

Pricing is published in euros: Personal at €5 a month for one website and 2,500 credits, Premium at €12 for up to 10 websites, Business at €40 for up to 50 websites with SSO, branding and webhooks, and Enterprise on request. There is a 14-day trial with no card, and the Personal plan carries a 5% membership fee. The privacy policy itself names no storage location, so the sub-processor page is the source for hosting.

What HYVOR Talk does well

  • Registered Paris company with SIREN and VAT number on its own site
  • Primary hosting on Hetzner in Germany, per the sub-processor page
  • Prices in euros are published, from €5 a month
  • 14-day trial with no credit card
  • Governed by French law with courts in Paris

Where HYVOR Talk falls short

  • Cloudflare in the United States handles CDN and media storage
  • Mailgun, Sentry and Stripe in the United States are also sub-processors
  • Not described as open source
  • The privacy policy names no data location, only the sub-processor page does

Standout feature. It is the only comment system in this list with a published price, a trial, a named German host and a registered company number together.

Do you need readers to write, or only to react?

A comment system gives readers a thread under the article, with accounts, replies, moderation and notifications. A polling widget asks one question and shows the result. The first produces text you are responsible for moderating; the second produces counts and, depending on the vendor, first-party data about your audience.

If readers should write, the candidates are Logora, GraphComment, Talkyard and HYVOR Talk. If readers should vote, the candidates are Civey, Pinpoll and Opinary. A newsroom often wants both, and Logora and Opinary are the two here that describe themselves around newsrooms and publishers.

Where does the comment data actually sit?

Hosting is the question the vendor pages answer least evenly. HYVOR's sub-processor page names Hetzner in Germany as the primary host. Logora's legal notice names OVH in Paris for the application. Civey's privacy policy says German servers. Pinpoll says a Microsoft server in the European Union.

GraphComment names DigitalOcean LLC, a US company, with servers in Amsterdam. Talkyard names Google Cloud and Amazon Simple Email Service among its processors without a region, and Opinary names no host at all. A European operator on a US-owned provider is a different risk from a European operator on a European provider, and a procurement form should ask which one it is.

What does a comment section cost beyond the subscription?

A comment section is a moderation job. HYVOR Talk lists spam detection on Premium and above. GraphComment counts AI moderation analyses per month, from 100 on the free plan to 10,000 on Pro, so volume matters for the price. Logora describes a hybrid pipeline of AI and human moderators, which is why it sells by annual licence rather than by page view.

The second cost is leaving. A site that has run Disqus for years holds its history there, and the migration path is worth testing before signing. Import from Disqus and WordPress is a question to put to every vendor in writing.

How we selected and ranked these 7 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

Logora holds #1 among the European website commenting tools in this directory, because its legal notice places its application and moderation infrastructure at OVH in Paris and it covers comments, debates and consultations from one Paris SAS. The right answer depends on the site: GraphComment for a free plan, Talkyard for open source, HYVOR Talk for a hosted widget with published prices from €5 a month and a primary host in Germany.

HYVOR names Hetzner in Germany. Logora names OVH in Paris. GraphComment runs on DigitalOcean servers in Amsterdam. Civey says German servers. Pinpoll says Microsoft servers in the EU. Talkyard and Opinary name no region.

GraphComment has a permanent free plan with 100 AI moderation analyses a month. Talkyard offers a free first month, and its source code is free to self-host under AGPL. HYVOR Talk offers a 14-day trial on paid plans from €5 a month.

Talkyard, from Debiki AB in Sweden, is licensed AGPL and can be installed on your own server. The other six tools here do not describe themselves as open source on the pages checked.

Logora is built for newsrooms and lists Der Spiegel among its outlets. Opinary and Pinpoll describe publishers as their audience, and Civey offers a survey widget to media partners. HYVOR Talk and GraphComment also serve publishers but sell to blogs and small sites as well.

Isso and Remark42 are open-source projects whose pages name maintainers but no company with an address, so they fail the European-company test used here. Commento is excluded because it could not be verified on its own pages and a directory lists it as US-hosted. Leaving them out is a verification decision, not a quality judgment.

No. None of the seven names an ISO or SOC certification on the pages checked. HYVOR points to a GDPR compliance page and a data processing agreement, and GraphComment publishes a data processing agreement.