European SASE and ZTNA Platforms

SASE and zero trust network access platforms sit between every employee and every application, so the vendor sees who connects to what and from where. The European options below range from open-source access networks to managed SASE services, and each one has a contracting entity inside the EU, the UK, Switzerland or Israel.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Vendors can pay for more visibility, higher up on the review pages; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

11 European SASE and ZTNA Platforms

NetBird

Berlin WireGuard mesh network with a free plan and public per-user prices

Germany
Open source Self-hostable Posture checks

Defguard

Self-hosted WireGuard platform that asks for MFA on each connection

Poland
MFA per connection AGPL core Own servers

Systancia

Zero trust access and privileged access for IT and industrial systems

France
ZTNA for IT and OT Privileged access Software or SaaS

Open Systems

Zurich operator running SASE as a managed service with a 24 by 7 team

Switzerland
Managed SASE Web gateway Swiss law

Cato Networks

Single-platform SASE with SD-WAN, firewall, web gateway and ZTNA

Israel
One platform Regional entities Own PoPs

Check Point SASE

SASE from Check Point, including the former Perimeter 81 service

Israel
Private access On-device inspection Sold via partners

genua

genusphere gives browser access to approved apps without a VPN client

Germany
Clientless access On-premises or Kubernetes Bundesdruckerei Group

Stormshield

French firewall maker with ZTNA built into its network products

France
ZTNA included Host checks Micro-segmentation

SSH.com PrivX

Passwordless, just-in-time access to servers and cloud infrastructure

Finland
Zero standing privilege Certificate-based Free trial

Sophos

UK security vendor selling ZTNA inside its Workspace Protection bundle

United Kingdom
Bundled ZTNA English law Endpoint integration

Cyolo

Agentless remote access and segmentation aimed at industrial sites

Israel
OT focus Session recording No cloud dependency

Key takeaways

  • NetBird (Berlin) ranks first because it prints its prices (€0, €6 and €12 per user per month), publishes its code and offers a self-hosted route, although it covers private access only.
  • Defguard (Szczecin) asks for a second factor each time a WireGuard tunnel is opened and bundles its own identity provider, free up to 10 users on the Business edition.
  • Open Systems (Zurich), Cato Networks and Check Point SASE are the three entries here that list a secure web gateway or CASB next to ZTNA, and none of them publishes a price.
  • Systancia (Sausheim) and Cyolo aim at industrial sites, where suppliers need supervised access to operational technology, and neither offers web filtering.
  • genua (Kirchheim) and Stormshield (Issy-les-Moulineaux) come from the firewall side of the market, with national approvals that SASE services do not hold.

European SASE and zero trust network access platforms decide which employee, device and contractor may reach which internal application or web destination, and because the vendor sees every one of those connections, it matters whether the contracting company, its courts and its control plane sit in the EU, the UK, Switzerland or Israel instead of the United States.

European SASE and zero trust network access compared

European SASE and zero trust network access tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 NetBird Germany Free EUR 0 (up to 5 users, 100 machines); Team EUR 6 and Business EUR 12 per seat each month; Enterprise priced individually Teams retiring a classic VPN who want to start free and keep the option to self-host
#2 Defguard Poland Open Source free; Business free up to 10 users and one location, paid options beyond that; Enterprise priced individually Technical teams that want identity, VPN and MFA in one stack on their own servers
#3 Systancia France No prices published; contact or demo Industrial and public-sector organisations that need controlled third-party access to IT and OT systems
#4 Open Systems Switzerland No prices published; quote Mid-sized and large companies that prefer a vendor to operate the network and security stack
#5 Cato Networks Israel No prices found; licensed per user group and ZTNA user Multi-site organisations that want networking and security from one vendor with regional contracts
#6 Check Point SASE Israel No prices published; demo Organisations that already use Check Point firewalls or want SASE bought through a security channel partner
#7 genua Germany Pricing on request Government, defence and critical infrastructure networks with classification rules
#8 Stormshield France Enterprise pricing on request Organisations that run or plan firewall appliances and want ZTNA features and sovereignty-grade qualifications from one French vendor
#9 SSH.com PrivX Finland No prices published; free trial offered DevOps and infrastructure teams that need controlled administrator access to servers and cloud workloads
#10 Sophos United Kingdom See website Teams already managing endpoints and e-mail in Sophos Central
#11 Cyolo Israel No prices published; demo Manufacturers, utilities and data center operators controlling third-party access to OT networks

Every European SASE and zero trust network access tool reviewed

#1 NetBird

Berlin, Germany Free EUR 0 (up to 5 users, 100 machines); Team EUR 6 and Business EUR 12 per seat each month; Enterprise priced individually Demo via sales

Best for: Teams retiring a classic VPN who want to start free and keep the option to self-host

  • Operating company. NetBird GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Your own infrastructure when self-hosted; cloud hosting region not stated on the pricing page
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Netskope Private Access, Zscaler Private Access, Tailscale

NetBird replaces the VPN in a Netskope deployment and nothing else: devices form direct WireGuard connections, and a central policy states which groups may reach which machines and networks. The feature list covers SSO and MFA, group rules, private DNS, SCIM provisioning and SSH access, with device posture checks and traffic event logging reserved for the Business plan at €12 per user per month.

The company is NetBird GmbH in Berlin, registered at the Amtsgericht Charlottenburg (HRB 237529 B), and the terms follow German law. Most of the code is BSD-3-Clause, with the management, signal and relay parts under AGPLv3, and a Docker Compose quickstart exists for self-hosting. The ISO 27001 and DORA banner on its pricing page is a vendor claim that this review did not check.

What NetBird does well

  • Free plan and public per-user prices
  • Source code you can read and host
  • German company under German law
  • Group-based access with posture checks on Business
  • Billing only for active users

Where NetBird falls short

  • No web gateway, CASB or DLP
  • Posture checks only on the EUR 12 plan
  • Self-hosting means running it yourself
  • Smaller than the US platforms

Standout feature. NetBird counts only the users and machines that connected in the billing period, and lists extra machines at €0.50 a month on its paid plans.

#2 Defguard

Szczecin, Poland Open Source free; Business free up to 10 users and one location, paid options beyond that; Enterprise priced individually Demo via sales

Best for: Technical teams that want identity, VPN and MFA in one stack on their own servers

  • Operating company. Defguard Sp. z o.o.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Poland)
  • Where the data sits. Your own servers (self-hosted)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Netskope Private Access, Zscaler Private Access, OpenVPN

Defguard combines a WireGuard VPN, an identity provider and multi-factor authentication in one platform that you run yourself. The second factor (TOTP, WebAuthn or e-mail) is asked when the tunnel opens, so a key left on a stolen laptop does not give standing access. Firewall rules are set per user or group, and LDAP and Active Directory sync fill the groups.

Defguard Sp. z o.o. is based in Szczecin (KRS 0001168794) and contracts under Polish law. Most code is AGPL, with an enterprise directory under a separate licence, so the open-source edition does not contain every feature. The Business edition costs nothing up to 10 users and one location, while prices above that, and for Enterprise, are not shown. Operations and updates are your job.

What Defguard does well

  • MFA applied to the connection itself
  • Identity provider included
  • Free open-source edition
  • Runs fully on your servers
  • Polish company, Polish law

Where Defguard falls short

  • No web security features
  • Paid prices not published
  • You operate and update it
  • Young vendor

Standout feature. Defguard enforces MFA on the connection itself and ships the identity provider that checks it.

#3 Systancia

Sausheim, France No prices published; contact or demo Demo via sales

Best for: Industrial and public-sector organisations that need controlled third-party access to IT and OT systems

  • Operating company. SA SYSTANCIA
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Data centers in France (vendor statement)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Netskope Private Access, Zscaler Private Access, CyberArk

Systancia approaches the access question through three products: Gate for zero trust remote access, Cleanroom for privileged sessions, and modules for identity and authentication. The site frames the platform as European zero trust for IT and OT systems and has a page on secure access to industrial infrastructure, which suits plants whose contractors need to reach machines remotely.

The company is SA SYSTANCIA, based at Actipolis III in Sausheim near Mulhouse (RCS Mulhouse 419 687 231). Gate is available as software or as a SaaS service, and the vendor states that its data centers are in France. The analyst placements on its pages are its own statements and were not verified, no prices are shown, and there is no secure web gateway or CASB.

What Systancia does well

  • Covers IT and OT access
  • Privileged access in the same platform
  • Available as software or SaaS
  • French company with register entry
  • Data centers stated to be in France

Where Systancia falls short

  • No web gateway or CASB
  • No published prices
  • Rankings are self-reported
  • Smaller ecosystem

Standout feature. Systancia puts operational technology and privileged access under one vendor with software and SaaS delivery.

#4 Open Systems

Zurich, Switzerland No prices published; quote Demo via sales

Best for: Mid-sized and large companies that prefer a vendor to operate the network and security stack

  • Operating company. Open Systems AG
  • Jurisdiction. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Switzerland or the EU where possible, per vendor blog
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Netskope, Zscaler, Palo Alto Prisma Access

Open Systems sells SASE as a service that its own staff operate around the clock. The descriptions list SD-WAN, a firewall, a secure web gateway, CASB and ZTNA, plus contractual SLAs and a named customer success contact, so a company without a network security team buys an outcome and not a set of products to assemble.

The legal entity is Open Systems AG at Raeffelstrasse 29 in Zurich, which its imprint places inside the Swiss Post Group. The website terms follow Swiss law, and Switzerland is outside the EU. A vendor blog says data is hosted in Switzerland or the EU where possible, with Swiss-only hosting on request. The vendor site refused automated access, and the customer contract was not available, so these statements come from excerpts.

What Open Systems does well

  • SD-WAN, web gateway, CASB and ZTNA in one service
  • Operated by the vendor 24 by 7
  • Part of the Swiss Post Group
  • Swiss or EU hosting stated
  • Contractual SLAs

Where Open Systems falls short

  • No published prices
  • No self-service trial
  • Contract terms not checked
  • Outside the EU

Standout feature. Open Systems is the only entry in this category sold as a fully vendor-operated service with a web gateway included.

#5 Cato Networks

Israel, Israel No prices found; licensed per user group and ZTNA user Demo via sales

Best for: Multi-site organisations that want networking and security from one vendor with regional contracts

  • Operating company. Cato Networks Ltd.
  • Jurisdiction. Israel (outside the EU/EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Regional management instances in the US, EU, India and Japan
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Netskope, Zscaler, Palo Alto Prisma Access

Cato Networks describes one platform with a single control plane, data plane and data lake covering SD-WAN, firewall as a service, secure web gateway, IPS, CASB, DLP, ZTNA, remote browser isolation and AI security. ZTNA licences are defined per user and cover up to 3 devices, and there is no price list in the pages that could be read.

Cato Networks Ltd. is Israeli, with legal entities in Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and France that act as contracting parties in their regions, and which entity signs depends on where you buy. Management instances run in the US, EU, India and Japan, with geo-fencing on regional points of presence. The direct website blocked automated access, so the facts come from its knowledge base and excerpts of its legal pages.

What Cato Networks does well

  • Broad single platform
  • EU legal entities as contracting parties
  • Regional management instances and geo-fencing
  • Sovereign deployment options
  • Own PoP infrastructure per its docs

Where Cato Networks falls short

  • No public prices
  • Direct site blocked automated access
  • Entity depends on region
  • Single-vendor lock-in

Standout feature. Cato Networks states that the same feature set is available through public, telecom-run and customer-hosted deployments.

#6 Check Point SASE

Israel, Israel No prices published; demo Demo via sales

Best for: Organisations that already use Check Point firewalls or want SASE bought through a security channel partner

  • Operating company. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Jurisdiction. Israel (outside the EU/EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the product page
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Netskope, Zscaler, Perimeter 81 (same product family)

Check Point SASE, formerly Harmony SASE, divides the offer into Private Access with agentless and client-based zero trust access, Internet Access that inspects browsing on the device and in the cloud, and SaaS security with DLP covering over 800 predefined data types. Its SD-WAN part lists failover between MPLS, 5G and broadband and branch provisioning without touching the device.

The contracting party is Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. of Israel, and search excerpts of its cloud terms point to Israeli law and the Tel Aviv-Yafo courts. The Perimeter 81 website now carries the title Check Point SASE - Perimeter 81, so that service sits under this entry. Check Point says it sells only through channel partners, no prices or hosting regions are published, and its terms page blocked automated access.

What Check Point SASE does well

  • Covers private access, web and SaaS
  • Branch networking included
  • Agentless access option
  • Contract under Israeli law
  • Perimeter 81 customers keep a path

Where Check Point SASE falls short

  • No public prices
  • Sold through partners
  • Hosting regions unstated
  • Large vendor, less personal

Standout feature. Check Point SASE absorbs Perimeter 81, so existing customers of that service stay in the same product family.

#7 genua

Kirchheim (Munich), Germany Pricing on request Demo via sales

Best for: Government, defence and critical infrastructure networks with classification rules

  • Operating company. genua GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. On-premise appliances; no cloud service required
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto firewalls

genua is a German vendor whose range runs from the genugate firewall, which puts an application level gateway and a packet filter on two separate computers, to genusphere, a product that gives users browser access to approved applications without a VPN client. Sign-in works through Microsoft Entra ID or Keycloak, and genusphere can run on-premises, on Kubernetes or in the cloud.

genua GmbH has its seat in Kirchheim near Munich (HRB 98238, Amtsgericht München) and says on its homepage it belongs to the Bundesdruckerei Group. The product page for genugate states Common Criteria EAL 4+ and approvals for VS-NfD, NATO RESTRICTED and EU RESTRICTED, and a licence can be activated offline. Prices are on request, and the sales approach aims at authorities and industry.

What genua does well

  • Two-computer architecture with separate gateway and filter
  • Common Criteria EAL 4+ stated on the product page
  • Approval for VS-NfD, NATO RESTRICTED and EU RESTRICTED
  • Offline licence activation and manual patching
  • German company with imprint and Munich register entry

Where genua falls short

  • No published prices
  • Sales-led purchase process
  • More complex than a single-box UTM for small offices
  • Marketing aimed at government and industry

Standout feature. genua combines a firewall with approvals for classified German and NATO networks and a browser-based access product.

#8 Stormshield

Issy-les-Moulineaux, France Enterprise pricing on request Demo via sales

Best for: Organisations that run or plan firewall appliances and want ZTNA features and sovereignty-grade qualifications from one French vendor

  • Operating company. Stormshield
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Mostly the EEA, with international transfers under EU standard contractual clauses
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Palo Alto Cortex

Stormshield makes network firewalls with ZTNA features inside them: host checks on the workstation, policy by user or group, multi-factor authentication and micro-segmentation, which the vendor says come at no extra cost. A ZTNA agent opens a VPN connection to the allowed resources, so the model is appliances you operate and not a cloud broker, and there is no cloud web gateway.

The company is based in Issy-les-Moulineaux and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Airbus Defence and Space Cyber Programmes. Its endpoint agent, Stormshield Endpoint Security Evolution, holds an ANSSI CSPN qualification and Spain's CCN-LINCE approval, and its privacy notice says data is processed mostly within the EEA, with standard contractual clauses for the rest. Pricing is quoted, no trial is listed, and the partner network thins out outside France.

What Stormshield does well

  • ANSSI CSPN qualification and CCN-LINCE (Spain) approval
  • Signatureless behavioural detection built to survive attacks on the agent itself
  • Backed by Airbus Defence and Space
  • Device control included to reduce the attack surface
  • Data processing mostly within the EEA

Where Stormshield falls short

  • Quoted pricing only, no published price list
  • No trial listed
  • Thin partner network outside France, like TEHTRIS

Standout feature. Stormshield includes ZTNA in the firewall instead of selling it as a separate subscription.

#9 SSH.com PrivX

Helsinki, Finland No prices published; free trial offered Demo via sales

Best for: DevOps and infrastructure teams that need controlled administrator access to servers and cloud workloads

  • Operating company. SSH Communications Security Oyj
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Finland)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the product page
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Privileged access parts of Netskope and Zscaler deployments, CyberArk

SSH.com PrivX removes the standing password from administrator access. A user or a machine receives a certificate for one session, and it expires afterwards, so there is no key lying around to steal. The product page lists zero standing privileges, secrets management, browser sessions with single sign-on and an architecture aimed at cloud-native, auto-scaling infrastructure.

SSH Communications Security Oyj is a Finnish public limited company with its headquarters at Karvaamokuja 2D in Helsinki. The product page offers a free trial, and gives no prices, no hosting options and no self-hosting statement. Its terms and governing law were not opened for this review. PrivX covers servers and infrastructure access and does not filter web traffic, so it complements a web gateway.

What SSH.com PrivX does well

  • Short-lived certificate access
  • Covers machine identities
  • Free trial
  • Finnish public company
  • Browser-based sessions

Where SSH.com PrivX falls short

  • Not a web gateway
  • No published prices
  • Hosting options not stated
  • Terms not checked

Standout feature. SSH.com PrivX makes every session credential short-lived, for people and for machines.

#10 Sophos

Abingdon, United Kingdom See website Demo via sales

Best for: Teams already managing endpoints and e-mail in Sophos Central

  • Operating company. Sophos Limited
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Sophos Central, see vendor
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Forcepoint DLP, Symantec DLP

Sophos appears in this category through its ZTNA, which is sold inside the Sophos Workspace Protection bundle and shares device health with its firewall and endpoint products so that a compromised device can be isolated automatically. On the data side, the DLP policy in Sophos Central uses content and file rules and regional templates, but its documentation states it is available on Windows devices only.

The end user terms name Sophos Limited, registered in Abingdon in the United Kingdom, as the contracting party for customers outside the US, Canada and Latin America, which contract with Sophos Technology Limited instead. The UK is outside the EEA and has an adequacy decision. No price is published for ZTNA or DLP, and the monitored DLP destinations are not documented.

What Sophos does well

  • DLP inside the console you already use
  • Content and file rule types
  • Regional templates for fast start
  • Custom confirm and block messages
  • UK contracting entity for most customers

Where Sophos falls short

  • Windows only
  • Rule evaluation affects transfer speed
  • Monitored destinations not documented
  • No published licence or price for DLP

Standout feature. Sophos lets device health reported by its own endpoint and firewall products decide access.

#11 Cyolo

Israel, Israel No prices published; demo Demo via sales

Best for: Manufacturers, utilities and data center operators controlling third-party access to OT networks

  • Operating company. Cyolo Security Ltd.
  • Jurisdiction. Israel (outside the EU/EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Agentless deployment with no cloud dependency (vendor statement)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Netskope Private Access for industrial use, Zscaler Private Access

Cyolo has moved its homepage from general enterprise ZTNA to secure connectivity for OT and critical infrastructure. Its Privileged Remote Operations product gives employees and vendors least-privilege access that can be supervised and recorded, with MFA for legacy systems that cannot host an agent. A separate segmentation product adds policy simulation before enforcement.

Cyolo Security Ltd. is the responsible entity named in the privacy policy and is Israeli. The vendor describes agentless deployment with no cloud dependency, which has not been verified. The terms page returned not found, so the governing law of a customer contract is unconfirmed, and no prices are published. A buyer wanting web filtering, CASB or office-wide access will find the product too narrow.

What Cyolo does well

  • Session supervision and recording
  • Agentless deployment
  • Works with legacy systems
  • No cloud dependency stated
  • Segmentation included

Where Cyolo falls short

  • Narrow OT focus
  • No web gateway or CASB
  • No published prices
  • Contract law not verified

Standout feature. Cyolo records and supervises third-party sessions on industrial systems without installing an agent on them.

How do I choose between a ZTNA tool and a full SASE service?

Start with the work Netskope or Zscaler does for you today. If staff mainly connect to internal applications, an access tool is enough: NetBird, Defguard, Systancia, genua and SSH.com PrivX each handle that job, with different emphasis on cloud, self-hosting, industrial systems and server administration. These tools decide who may reach an application, and they leave browsing alone.

If you also filter web traffic and watch cloud app use, the field narrows quickly. Open Systems lists SD-WAN, firewall, web gateway, CASB and ZTNA as a managed service, Cato Networks lists them on one platform, and Check Point SASE splits the offer into private access, internet access and SaaS security. Everything else on this page needs a second product next to it for the web half.

Which of these platforms publish prices?

Only two. NetBird shows a Free plan for up to 5 users and 100 machines, then €6 (Team) and €12 (Business) per user per month, billed for users and machines that actually connected. Defguard shows an Open Source edition and a Business edition that is free up to 10 users and one location, with paid options beyond that unpriced.

The others quote. Cato Networks licenses per user group and per ZTNA user, Check Point sells through channel partners, and Open Systems, Systancia, genua, Stormshield, Cyolo and SSH.com ask for a demo or a quote. SSH.com PrivX adds a free trial. When you request quotes, give each vendor the same user count and scope so the numbers can be compared.

Where does my data sit with each vendor, and which law applies?

NetBird and Defguard answer by architecture: self-hosted, the control plane runs on your own servers, and NetBird GmbH and Defguard Sp. z o.o. sign under German and Polish law. genua also runs where you put it, on-premises, on Kubernetes or in a cloud. Systancia states French data centers, and Stormshield says processing is mostly within the EEA with standard contractual clauses for the rest.

The other vendors need a closer look. Open Systems says Switzerland or the EU where possible, under Swiss law. Cato Networks runs management instances in the US, EU, India and Japan and contracts through regional entities. Check Point SASE does not state hosting regions on its product page, and Sophos contracts through Sophos Limited, which sits in the UK. Read the order form, not the website.

What breaks when I migrate from Netskope or Zscaler?

The endpoint agent and its certificates come first. A US platform steers traffic through a client, and removing it changes browsing until the replacement is live, so keep both on a pilot group and decide which tool owns DNS and proxy settings. Policies do not export between vendors. Expect to rebuild groups and per-application rules, and to point log shipping at the new product.

Identity is the second dependency. NetBird, Defguard and genua attach rights to users and groups, so the directory and single sign-on behind them must be clean before cutover. Defguard can sync from LDAP or Active Directory, genua supports sign-in via Microsoft Entra ID or Keycloak. Check the notice period on the existing contract before the pilot starts.

When should I not switch away from a US SASE vendor?

When the web and cloud inspection is the core of the deployment and the European candidates would leave you with a gap. NetBird, Defguard, Systancia, SSH.com and Cyolo say plainly that they do not filter browsing, so a company that mainly uses Netskope for that would add a second tool and a second contract. The three full-scope options quote on request, so cost is also unknown.

A narrower case is a small team with no jurisdiction requirement, no regulator and no public customers. For them the effort of migrating may outweigh the benefit. If a European tool is still wanted, a staged move of private access to NetBird or Defguard keeps the existing web filtering in place for the time being.

Do the industrial and firewall vendors belong in a SASE comparison?

They answer a different version of the question. Systancia and Cyolo target supervised third-party access to plants and critical infrastructure, and Cyolo records sessions. genua sells firewalls with national approvals plus a browser-based access product, and Stormshield adds ZTNA features to its network appliances and sells an endpoint agent with an ANSSI qualification.

Put them on the shortlist when your threat model is about a supplier reaching a machine or about classified networks, not about office staff browsing. Leave them off when the brief is a cloud web gateway for 500 laptops, because none of the four provides one.

How we selected and ranked these 11 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Every page is researched and drafted with AI assistance, and the compliance and pricing claims are checked against the vendor's documentation before it is published under the founder's editorial responsibility. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

On this directory's criteria (jurisdiction, access scope, self-hosting, published prices) NetBird ranks first, followed by Defguard and Systancia. If your priority is a managed service with a web gateway and CASB, Open Systems, Cato Networks and Check Point SASE are the three that list that scope, and for industrial or classified environments look at Cyolo, genua and Stormshield.

NetBird has a Free plan for up to 5 users and 100 machines, Defguard has a free Open Source edition and a Business edition free up to 10 users, and SSH.com PrivX offers a free trial on its product page. Every other tool on this page works through a demo or a quote.

Three entries list one. Open Systems of Zurich runs it as a managed service, Cato Networks lists it on a single platform with regional EU entities, and Check Point SASE inspects browsing on the device and in the cloud. Switzerland and Israel are outside the EU, so check the contracting entity for each.

NetBird and Defguard can, and Defguard is built for it. genua runs on-premises, on Kubernetes or in a cloud, and Stormshield sells appliances you operate. Cato Networks offers private points of presence and a private management instance for sovereign deployments. Open Systems and Check Point SASE are operated services.

NetBird and genua (Germany), Defguard (Poland), Systancia and Stormshield (France) and SSH.com (Finland) are EU companies. Open Systems is Swiss, Sophos is British, and Cato Networks, Check Point and Cyolo are Israeli, which this directory counts as European while noting they sit outside EU law.