Cyolo
Israeli remote access and segmentation platform now aimed at industrial and critical infrastructure sites
Quick Overview
| Company | Cyolo Security Ltd. |
|---|---|
| Category | SASE and Zero Trust Network Access |
| Headquarters | Israel, Israel |
| Founded | Not stated |
| EU Presence | Yes - Israel |
| Data Location | Agentless deployment with no cloud dependency (vendor statement) |
| Open Source | No |
| GDPR Compliant | Yes |
| Self-Hosting | Not stated |
| Main Features | Privileged remote operations, agentless access, MFA for legacy systems, session recording, file transfer and malware checks, segmentation with policy simulation |
| Pricing | No prices published; demo |
| Best For | Manufacturers, utilities and data center operators controlling third-party access to OT networks |
| Replaces | Netskope Private Access for industrial use, Zscaler Private Access |
Detailed Review
Cyolo's homepage describes secure connectivity for OT and critical infrastructure. Its PRO product (Privileged Remote Operations) gives employees and vendors least-privilege access with supervision and recording, and a separate segmentation product limits lateral movement.
The privacy policy names Cyolo Security Ltd. as the responsible entity. Cyolo has moved away from general enterprise ZTNA, so it fits this page as a niche option.
Session control
Sessions can be supervised and recorded, and the homepage describes AI-based session intelligence that alerts teams while a session is still running.
Agentless and legacy-friendly
Access is agentless for users and critical assets, and MFA is applied to modern and legacy systems that cannot run an agent themselves.
Segmentation
The segmentation product offers policy simulation before enforcement and continuous traffic analysis, deployed agentless and without a cloud dependency.
Limitations to Consider
Cyolo is built for industrial environments and is a poor match for a company that wants web filtering, CASB or office-wide access. No prices are given, its terms page returned not found, and the governing law of a customer contract is not verified.
Who Should Use Cyolo
Operators of plants and critical infrastructure in Europe that let suppliers connect remotely and need recorded, supervised sessions.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Session supervision and recording
- Agentless deployment
- Works with legacy systems
- No cloud dependency stated
- Segmentation included
Cons
- Narrow OT focus
- No web gateway or CASB
- No published prices
- Contract law not verified
Alternatives to Cyolo
Other European sase and zero trust network access worth comparing before you decide:
NetBird
Germany · Berlin WireGuard mesh network with a free plan and public per-user prices
Defguard
Poland · Self-hosted WireGuard platform that asks for MFA on each connection
Systancia
France · Zero trust access and privileged access for IT and industrial systems
Open Systems
Switzerland · Zurich operator running SASE as a managed service with a 24 by 7 team
See all European sase and zero trust network access or compare them directly against Netskope Private Access for industrial use on our alternatives page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Its homepage now positions it for OT and critical infrastructure rather than office workers.
Access is described as agentless for users and critical assets.
No, the site directs you to a demo.