European Procurement Software

Procurement software handles purchase requests, approvals, purchase orders, sourcing, supplier records and contracts in one place. Procurement data shows what a company buys, from whom and at what price, so many European buyers want the platform to be run by a company inside the EU, EEA, UK or Switzerland. The tools below contract through European entities, from suite vendors to catalogue marketplaces and analytics specialists.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA, the UK, Switzerland or Israel, and processes customer data in Europe or Israel. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Vendors can pay for more visibility, higher up on the review pages; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

13 European Procurement Platforms

Onventis

Stuttgart source-to-pay suite on a shared supplier network

Germany
Sourcing, contracts and eProcurement 4.5 million connected suppliers EU Data Boundary

Esker

French source-to-pay and order-to-cash automation platform

France
AI-assisted purchase requests Approvals and PO management Sourcing and contracts

Basware

Finnish eProcurement and marketplace next to invoice automation

Finland
eProcurement and punchout marketplace Procure-to-pay workflow e-Invoicing network

Mercanis

Berlin procurement suite with intake, sourcing and contracts

Germany
Intake and sourcing Supplier and contract management AI agents for procurement tasks

Unite

European catalogue procurement marketplace, formerly Mercateo

Germany
100+ million catalogue products Single creditor invoicing Punchout OCI and cXML

Planergy

Dublin procure-to-pay and AP automation for mid-market firms

Ireland
Approval workflows Real-time budget tracking Spend analysis

Kodiak Hub

Stockholm supplier relationship management platform

Sweden
Supplier onboarding Performance monitoring Compliance and audit

SupplyOn

Supply chain platform with a purchasing and sourcing module

Germany
Sourcing and auctions eProcurement and catalogues Supplier qualification

Spendesk

French spend management with a procurement request module

France
Purchase requests and approvals Automatic PO generation Contract renewal tracking

Sievo

Helsinki procurement analytics for spend, savings and CO2

Finland
Spend analytics Initiative management Supplier risk analytics

Market Dojo

UK eSourcing and source-to-contract platform with published prices and a free sourcing sandpit

#11 of 13 in this category
United Kingdom From £500/month (annual) for eSourcing; on-demand from £1,000/month or event
RFx and reverse eAuctions with templates and Excel integrationSupplier onboarding, supplier management and contract management modulesCategory spend insight and opportunity analysis, with agentic AI sourcing assistance

Keelvar

Cork-built AI sourcing platform: optimisation for strategic tenders plus autonomous sourcing events

#12 of 13 in this category
Ireland Not published, demo or pricing request via the vendor
Sourcing Optimizer for multi-variable award decisions on strategic tendersAutonomous Sourcing workflows with conditional approvals, plus the Kai intake assistantRate Manager to centralise supplier rates and trigger events before contracts expire

Otnox

AI tender intelligence that scores public tenders against your profile and shows which suppliers win

#13 of 13 in this category
Latvia 7-day free trial, Premium €98/month + VAT, Enterprise on request
AI scoring of tenders from 0 to 100 against a company profileBuyer intelligence: re-tender cycles and repeat winnersBid pipeline plus Claude and ChatGPT connectors

Key takeaways

  • Esker ranks #1 among the European procurement tools in this directory because the Villeurbanne vendor ties purchase requests, budget-checked approvals and purchase orders to its own accounts payable automation, with separate sourcing, supplier management and contract modules available next to it.
  • Basware and Planergy both sell procurement and invoice processing together, but from different starting points: Basware, founded in Finland in 1985, puts invoice automation first and lists eProcurement and a Marketplace as modules, while Planergy of Dublin sells procure-to-pay to mid-market firms and lists 32-plus punchout catalogues.
  • Mercanis is the only tool here pitched as an intake, sourcing, supplier and contract suite on one data foundation, signed by CdC3 GmbH in Berlin under German law, though the company-stated figures of 55 AI agents and more than €70 billion of managed spend could not be checked independently.
  • Unite, formerly Mercateo, is a catalogue marketplace rather than a suite: the buyer gets one contract partner and one invoice across more than 100 million products, and Unite says it carries the credit risk, which means payment terms are set by Unite.
  • Kodiak Hub, SupplyOn and Sievo each cover one slice instead of the whole cycle: Kodiak Hub manages the supplier lifecycle and its risk work from Stockholm, SupplyOn runs a network of more than 140,000 companies shaped by Bosch, Schaeffler and ZF, and Sievo analyses spend from Helsinki without running a single purchase order.

European procurement software is the set of tools that handle purchase requests, approvals, ordering, sourcing, supplier records and spend analysis for a company, built by vendors established inside the EU, which matters because a procurement system holds every supplier name, price, contract term and negotiating position a buyer has, and that record is commercially sensitive long before it is personal data.

European procurement software compared

European procurement software tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Esker France Not published, quote on request Finance and procurement teams that want purchasing linked to accounts payable
#2 Basware Finland Subscription model by module, amounts not published Larger organisations that want requisitioning and invoicing from one vendor
#3 Mercanis Germany Not published, meeting or demo on request Mid-size and large European companies that want intake, sourcing and contracts in one suite
#4 Unite Germany Not published, demo on request Companies and public bodies that buy indirect goods from catalogues
#5 Planergy Ireland Not published, demo on request Mid-market companies that want purchasing and invoice processing in one tool
#6 Kodiak Hub Sweden Not published; demo-based quote Procurement teams that want supplier onboarding, performance and risk in one workspace
#7 SupplyOn Germany Quote on request; demo offered Automotive and industrial manufacturers whose suppliers already trade on the SupplyOn network
#8 Spendesk France Subscription + per user Finance teams that want control at the request, not the receipt
#9 Sievo Finland Not published, demo on request Large procurement organisations that need spend visibility across ERPs
#10 Market Dojo United Kingdom Published on the vendor's pricing page, excluding taxes, with a package customiser and quote form. eSourcing (RFx and eAuctions): £500 per month billed annually, £1,000 per month on-demand monthly, or £1,000 per event; a mid tier at £583 per month annually (£1,500 monthly or per event) adds collaborative scoring, weighted events, API integration and a dedicated account manager; an advanced tier at £667 per month annually (£2,000 monthly or per event) adds multi-stage RFx, lots and multi-currency events. Supplier onboarding from £833.33 per month billed annually (includes 500 suppliers, £1,500 per year per additional 500). RFQ tool from £100 per user per month billed annually. Category spend insight has a free sandpit version and a premium tier; contract management has a free version for up to 10 contracts and a premium tier (from £20 per contract, billed annually); supplier management has a free version for up to 3 users and a premium tier from £250 per month for up to 5 users. Optional services (consultancy, white labelling, data migration) are priced separately via quote. Prices can also be shown in USD or EUR in the customiser. Buyers who want eSourcing with published prices
#11 Keelvar Ireland Not published. The vendor's demo page invites visitors to book a demo or request pricing. Sourcing teams running complex, multi-variable tenders
#12 Otnox Latvia Trial: €0 for 7 days, no card required, 1 market, 50 AI credits. Premium: €98 per month + VAT, billed monthly, cancel any time, 1 market, 200 AI credits per month; extra credit packs from €9.00, extra users +€10/month each, departments +€15/month, additional markets as monthly add-ons (price not stated). Enterprise: contact sales, unlimited markets, API and scheduled exports, SSO, SLA, custom invoicing. Suppliers hunting public tenders across Europe

Every European procurement software tool reviewed

#1 Esker

Villeurbanne (Lyon area), France Founded 1985 Not published, quote on request Demo on request

Best for: Finance and procurement teams that want purchasing linked to accounts payable

  • Operating company. Esker S.A.
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages we reviewed
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa, SAP Ariba

Esker is the tool in this list where purchasing is built to end in finance. Its procurement page describes AI-assisted capture of purchasing needs from catalogues, supplier quotes and earlier requests, policy-driven approvals with budget checks, web or mobile approval, and tracking of committed spend before invoices arrive. Purchase orders, acknowledgements, changes and supplier messages run in one connected process, and the shared data is what ties the request to Esker's accounts payable automation.

Esker S.A. is based in Villeurbanne near Lyon, and the company says it started in 1985 and now sells source-to-pay and order-to-cash products to the office of the CFO. It states a customer base of more than 3,000, naming NVIDIA, Whirlpool, Sony, Trek and Heineken.

Sourcing, supplier management and contract management have their own pages, so you can start with requests and add modules later. The website terms apply Wisconsin law to visitors in the United States, Canada and Latin America, so confirm that Esker S.A. or another European entity signs your order form. Pricing is by quote and the hosting location is not stated on the pages we reviewed.

What Esker does well

  • Procurement linked to accounts payable
  • Approvals with budget checks and mobile approval
  • Separate sourcing, supplier and contract modules
  • Operating since 1985
  • Interface in several European languages

Where Esker falls short

  • No published pricing
  • Hosting location not stated on the pages reviewed
  • US operations, so confirm the contracting entity
  • Broad finance scope may be more than a pure procurement team needs

Standout feature. The only tool here whose purchasing flow is designed to hand the same data straight to the vendor's own AP automation, so committed spend is visible before the invoice shows up.

#2 Basware

Espoo, Finland Founded 1985 Subscription model by module, amounts not published Demo on request

Best for: Larger organisations that want requisitioning and invoicing from one vendor

  • Operating company. Basware Oy
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Finland)
  • Where the data sits. Cloud services for EEA customers hosted within the EEA, per general terms
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa, SAP Ariba

Basware sells procurement as one module among several on a platform that presents itself mainly as invoice lifecycle and AP automation. The e-Procurement page describes requisitioning, ordering and exchange of purchase documents between buyers and suppliers, and Basware Marketplace adds guided purchasing from up-to-date catalogues so employees buy from preferred suppliers at negotiated prices. The pricing page describes a subscription where customers choose modules, from invoice automation to eProcurement, with no amounts shown.

Basware Oy is a Finnish company; the privacy notice gives Basware Corporation, Linnoitustie 2, Espoo as controller address. The company says it was founded in 1985 and serves clients in more than 190 countries with over 6,500 customers.

The hosting position is better documented than most: the general terms say EEA-related cloud services are hosted within the EEA, but they also list sub-processors in India, the USA and Australia, with US access for operation, development and support under standard contractual clauses. Category sourcing and contract management are not described on the pages we reviewed, so a buyer who needs those should ask what Basware offers beyond requisitioning.

What Basware does well

  • eProcurement and marketplace modules
  • Connected AP automation and e-invoicing network
  • Operating since 1985
  • Documented hosting commitment for EEA customers
  • Published terms and sub-processor information

Where Basware falls short

  • No published pricing
  • Invoice automation is the main focus
  • US, Indian and Australian sub-processors with support access
  • Sourcing and contracts not described on pages reviewed

Standout feature. The one tool here that publishes both an EEA hosting commitment and a named list of non-EU sub-processors, so the support chain can be audited before signing.

#3 Mercanis

Berlin, Germany Not published, meeting or demo on request Demo on request

Best for: Mid-size and large European companies that want intake, sourcing and contracts in one suite

  • Operating company. CdC3 GmbH (Mercanis)
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages we reviewed
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa, SAP Ariba, Jaggaer

Mercanis packs the front half of the procurement cycle into one suite: on-demand intake for purchase requests and approvals, sourcing that compares suppliers, prices and terms, supplier records, contract tracking and renewals, risk and compliance monitoring, and analytics on spend, cycle time and savings. The site says every module runs on one data foundation and describes 55 AI agents embedded in the process. Industry pages cover energy, chemicals and pharma, automotive, consumer goods, manufacturing and construction.

The operator is CdC3 GmbH, listed in its imprint at Greifswalder Str. 208 in Berlin and registered at the Charlottenburg local court under HRB 221095; the published customer terms are governed by German law with Berlin as place of jurisdiction.

The site reports 55 AI agents deployed and more than €70 billion in annual spend managed, both company-stated and not independently verified here. The privacy policy says third-party providers in the EU and USA are used and that a list of processors outside the EU is available, so request it. Pricing is not published, the buyer is invited to book a meeting, and the product is younger than established suites.

What Mercanis does well

  • Intake, sourcing, suppliers and contracts in one suite
  • German contracting entity and German governing law
  • Risk and compliance monitoring included as a module
  • Industry pages for chemicals, energy, automotive and others
  • Customer terms are published

Where Mercanis falls short

  • No published pricing
  • Hosting location not stated on the pages reviewed
  • Privacy policy mentions US-based providers
  • AI and spend figures are company-reported

Standout feature. The only tool here that places intake, sourcing, supplier management, contracts and risk monitoring on a single data model under a German contract.

#4 Unite

Köthen, Germany Founded 2000 Not published, demo on request Demo on request

Best for: Companies and public bodies that buy indirect goods from catalogues

  • Operating company. Unite Procurement Deutschland AG
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Hosted within the EU, per the vendor's about page
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa, SAP Ariba

Unite is a catalogue marketplace for indirect goods, formerly Mercateo, rather than a procurement suite. Buyers consolidate ad-hoc needs and search more than 100 million products across catalogues, with basket optimisation and view management for spend control per department. Unite acts as one contractual partner and creditor for many suppliers, so the buyer books one invoice and carries one credit relationship, and tail-spend reporting shows what the small purchases add up to.

Unite says it was founded in Munich in 2000 as Mercateo and now describes itself as a European procurement platform headquartered in Leipzig, active in 12 countries.

The German imprint lists Unite Procurement Deutschland AG in Köthen, registered in Munich under HRB 243681, while the UK site names Unite Procurement UK Ltd in London, so check which entity signs.

The vendor says it is European-owned and hosted within the EU. It connects to an ERP or e-procurement system through punchout OCI, cXML and an API, or works on its own in the web interface. Because Unite takes on the credit risk, terms of payment are set by Unite, and pricing is not published.

What Unite does well

  • 100+ million catalogue products
  • Single creditor invoicing
  • Punchout OCI and cXML connection
  • Hosted within the EU, per the vendor
  • Local entities in several countries

Where Unite falls short

  • Limited to catalogue-based indirect spend
  • No published pricing
  • Contracting entity differs per country
  • Not a sourcing or contract suite

Standout feature. The one tool here that becomes the single creditor for many suppliers, taking on credit risk so the buyer books one invoice.

#5 Planergy

Dublin, Ireland Not published, demo on request Demo on request

Best for: Mid-market companies that want purchasing and invoice processing in one tool

  • Operating company. Planergy Ltd
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Ireland)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages we reviewed
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa, Procurify

Planergy is a procure-to-pay product aimed at mid-market finance and purchasing teams. Customisable approvals and automatic workflows replace email and spreadsheets, real-time budget tracking supports decisions from a phone, and order tracking and supplier communication run through the same process. AI processes invoices, spend analysis reports aim to show savings, and the site lists 32-plus punchouts including Amazon Business, Staples and Grainger.

PLANERGY Ltd is an Irish company with its principal place of business in Ballymount, Dublin 22, and the terms apply Irish law with the Irish courts having jurisdiction. The site says more than 1,200 companies have used Planergy and that 98 percent are still customers, both company-stated numbers.

It also says integration with an existing ERP and accounting tools can be done in days. Pricing is not published, the hosting location is not stated on the pages we reviewed, and the site copy uses dollar examples, so check support hours and currency set-up for your region. Large enterprises with complex sourcing may find it light.

What Planergy does well

  • Approval workflows with budget tracking
  • Procure-to-pay and AP automation together
  • 32+ punchout catalogues listed
  • Irish entity and Irish governing law
  • Published terms

Where Planergy falls short

  • No published pricing
  • Hosting location not stated on the pages reviewed
  • Aimed at mid-market, less at complex sourcing
  • Customer figures are company-stated

Standout feature. The one tool here that pairs a published Irish-law agreement with a procure-to-pay flow explicitly sized for mid-market companies.

#6 Kodiak Hub

Stockholm, Sweden Not published; demo-based quote Demo on request

Best for: Procurement teams that want supplier onboarding, performance and risk in one workspace

  • Operating company. Kodiak Hub
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Sweden)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Spreadsheet-based supplier scorecards, disconnected SRM and risk tools bought separately

Kodiak Hub is a supplier relationship management platform whose risk module is part of a wider workspace. Onboarding, performance monitoring, compliance and audit management and risk assessment share the same system, so a procurement team does not integrate a separate risk tool. The company cites 7 to 10 percent average cost savings and 80 percent faster supplier onboarding than legacy tools, both company-reported, and says it manages more than 300,000 suppliers across 20-plus industries and 176 countries.

The company is headquartered in Stockholm and led by CEO Malin Schmidt, with additional EU offices in Gdansk, Poland and Munich, Germany, plus a London office. No founding year or price is published, and it sells through a demo.

The trade-off is scope: a team that wants only risk management will pay for supplier workflow it may not use, and the certifications and hosting location are not stated on the pages we reviewed. Where Kodiak Hub fits is a procurement function that wants supplier risk handled in the same place as onboarding and performance.

What Kodiak Hub does well

  • Risk, compliance and audit management sit beside onboarding and performance
  • More than 300,000 suppliers across 20+ industries and 176 countries
  • Efficiency claims tie risk work to a procurement business case
  • EU offices in Sweden, Poland and Germany
  • Single workspace for the full supplier lifecycle

Where Kodiak Hub falls short

  • No published pricing or founding year
  • Efficiency figures are company-reported
  • Broader than a team needing only risk management
  • Certifications and hosting location not stated on the pages reviewed

Standout feature. The only tool here built so that supplier risk, compliance and audit sit in the same workspace as onboarding and performance.

#7 SupplyOn

Hallbergmoos, Germany Founded 2000 Quote on request; demo offered Demo on request

Best for: Automotive and industrial manufacturers whose suppliers already trade on the SupplyOn network

  • Operating company. SupplyOn GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages reviewed
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Resilinc, Interos, bilateral supplier portals

SupplyOn is a supply chain collaboration platform for manufacturers, and its risk work grows out of that network. The supply chain risk module links risk signals to affected suppliers, materials and deliveries, and operational incident management collects supplier impact feedback when something goes wrong. If your suppliers already use SupplyOn for orders, quality or logistics, risk information arrives next to the operational data and suppliers do not have to be asked to join a new tool.

SupplyOn GmbH in Hallbergmoos near Munich has operated since 2000, and Bosch, Schaeffler and ZF are among its shareholders. It reports more than 140,000 companies on its network, which suits automotive and industrial manufacturers.

Ask how many of your tier-one suppliers are already connected before assuming a quick roll-out. The focus is operational supply chain risk, not cyber questionnaires or human-rights due diligence, and outside manufacturing the network has little to offer. Pricing is by quote with a demo, and certifications and hosting location are not stated on the pages reviewed.

What SupplyOn does well

  • Links risk signals to affected suppliers, materials and deliveries
  • Incident management with supplier impact feedback
  • Network of more than 140,000 companies
  • Shareholders include Bosch, Schaeffler and ZF
  • German company operating since 2000

Where SupplyOn falls short

  • Operational focus rather than cyber or human-rights due diligence
  • Strongest for manufacturers, especially automotive
  • Pricing by quote only
  • Certifications and hosting location not stated on the pages reviewed

Standout feature. The one tool here owned partly by large manufacturers and built on a supplier network of more than 140,000 companies.

#8 Spendesk

Paris, France Subscription + per user Demo on request

Best for: Finance teams that want control at the request, not the receipt

  • Operating company. Spendesk
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Expensify, Ramp, Coupa, SAP Concur

Spendesk starts the purchase one step earlier than most spend tools. Requests, approvals and budgets come first, and cards, invoices and reimbursements carry out what was already agreed. The platform covers purchase requests with approval chains, physical and virtual cards, supplier invoice capture and payment, subscription tracking, budgets with live consumption, and accounting export into the common European ledgers.

Spendesk is headquartered in Paris and holds a French payment institution licence, so the regulated card activity as well as the data stays under EU supervision. Pricing is a platform subscription plus per-user fees, quoted by company size rather than published as a single rate.

The site compares it with Expensify, Ramp, Coupa and SAP Concur and says the comparison against SAP Concur is usually about implementation time as much as licence cost. The cons are the flip side of the approval focus: more process than a small team may want, and an implementation heavier than a card-first tool.

What Spendesk does well

  • Approval workflows before money is committed
  • Budgets with live consumption
  • Cards, invoices and subscriptions in one place
  • French payment institution licence
  • Supplier invoice capture and payment

Where Spendesk falls short

  • More process than a small team may want
  • Platform fee plus per-user pricing
  • Quoted by company size rather than published
  • Implementation heavier than a card-first tool

Standout feature. The one tool here that also issues the payment instrument, under a French payment institution licence, so approval and card sit in one regulated provider.

#9 Sievo

Helsinki, Finland Not published, demo on request Demo on request

Best for: Large procurement organisations that need spend visibility across ERPs

  • Operating company. Sievo Oy
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Finland)
  • Where the data sits. Not stated on the pages we reviewed
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa spend analysis

Sievo is a procurement analytics product, and it says so by not running any transactions. The product pages list spend analytics, payment terms, contract compliance, PO analytics, market benchmarking and supplier risk analytics, plus CO2, sustainability and diversity analytics. Initiative management tracks savings delivery, and budgeting, forecasting and what-if scenarios for direct materials extend it toward finance planning.

The privacy policy names Sievo Oy as parent of Sievo, Inc. and Sievo Procurement Analytics SRL, with the data privacy officer at Mikonkatu 15A, Helsinki; offices are listed in Helsinki, Chicago, London, Paris and Bucharest.

Sievo, Inc. is a US subsidiary and the policy treats Sievo Oy as controller, so confirm the contracting entity for your region. It analyses spend and does not run purchase requests, purchase orders or supplier onboarding, so it complements a requisition or sourcing tool. No prices are published, hosting location is not stated, and savings and ROI statements are company-reported.

What Sievo does well

  • Spend analytics across systems
  • Savings initiative management
  • CO2, sustainability and diversity analytics
  • Supplier risk analytics
  • Finnish parent company

Where Sievo falls short

  • Not a transactional procurement system
  • No published pricing
  • Hosting location not stated on the pages reviewed
  • ROI figures are company-reported

Standout feature. The one tool here that tracks savings initiatives and CO2 across ERPs without ever touching a purchase order.

#10 Market Dojo

Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom Founded 2010 Published on the vendor's pricing page, excluding taxes, with a package customiser and quote form. eSourcing (RFx and eAuctions): £500 per month billed annually, £1,000 per month on-demand monthly, or £1,000 per event; a mid tier at £583 per month annually (£1,500 monthly or per event) adds collaborative scoring, weighted events, API integration and a dedicated account manager; an advanced tier at £667 per month annually (£2,000 monthly or per event) adds multi-stage RFx, lots and multi-currency events. Supplier onboarding from £833.33 per month billed annually (includes 500 suppliers, £1,500 per year per additional 500). RFQ tool from £100 per user per month billed annually. Category spend insight has a free sandpit version and a premium tier; contract management has a free version for up to 10 contracts and a premium tier (from £20 per contract, billed annually); supplier management has a free version for up to 3 users and a premium tier from £250 per month for up to 5 users. Optional services (consultancy, white labelling, data migration) are priced separately via quote. Prices can also be shown in USD or EUR in the customiser. Free Sourcing Sandpit to try the platform from buyer and supplier side; free versions of some modules

Best for: Buyers who want eSourcing with published prices

  • Operating company. Market Dojo Ltd
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa Sourcing, SAP Ariba Sourcing, Jaggaer

Market Dojo is an eSourcing platform from the UK, and it is the one tool on this page that publishes a price list.

Its pricing page shows monthly and per-event licences for RFx and reverse eAuctions, per-supplier prices for onboarding, per-contract prices for contract management and a package customiser, in pounds, euros or dollars. Most vendors here send you to a demo before you see a number, so a buyer can budget for a first tender in an afternoon. That openness is unusual in this category and makes shortlisting faster for small teams.

The core is sourcing events: RFIs, RFQs, RFPs and reverse auctions with templates, Excel integration, weighted scoring and multi-stage events on the higher tiers.

Around it sit supplier onboarding, supplier management, contract management and category spend insight, plus an agentic AI layer the vendor calls Agentic Sourcing. The vendor also offers a free Sourcing Sandpit where a team can run an event as buyer and supplier before paying anything. Buyers can start on one module and add the others later, since each is priced on its own line.

The contracting entity is Market Dojo Ltd, registered in England and Wales under number 07332766 (Companies House listing: incorporated 2 August 2010, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire), and the terms apply English law.

The United Kingdom is outside the EU and EEA but holds an adequacy decision.

It is a sourcing tool, not a purchase-to-pay suite: it has no requisitions, purchase orders or invoice matching, so it complements a system like Esker or Basware rather than replacing it. The vendor's logo reads "an Esker company" and its site offers an extension through Esker S2P, so it is not independent of Esker, which is also on this page. Check data hosting and certifications with the vendor in writing before you sign, because the pages we reviewed state neither.

What Market Dojo does well

  • Prices published on the vendor's own pricing page
  • Free Sourcing Sandpit and free versions of some modules
  • RFx, reverse auctions and weighted scoring in one tool
  • Supplier onboarding, supplier management and contract modules
  • English-law contracting entity in a registered UK company

Where Market Dojo falls short

  • Sourcing only, no purchase orders or invoice matching
  • UK entity, outside the EU and EEA
  • Hosting location and certifications not stated on the pages reviewed
  • Prices rise quickly for supplier-heavy use (per 500 suppliers)

Standout feature. The only tool on this page that publishes sourcing prices per month and per event, with a free sandpit to try an auction first.

#11 Keelvar

Cork, Ireland Founded 2012 Not published. The vendor's demo page invites visitors to book a demo or request pricing. Demo on request; self-guided product tour on the site

Best for: Sourcing teams running complex, multi-variable tenders

  • Operating company. Keelvar Systems Ltd
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Ireland)
  • Where the data sits. AWS Dublin (eu-west-1) primary data centre, per the vendor's security page
  • Independent checks. ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27701, per the vendor's trust center
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Coupa Sourcing, SAP Ariba Sourcing, Jaggaer

Keelvar is a sourcing specialist from Cork. It does not run purchase requests or purchase orders. It handles what comes before them: running RFQs and tenders, comparing bids and reaching an award.

The Sourcing Optimizer is its centrepiece, built for strategic tenders where the lowest bid is not the right answer, letting a buyer model price, risk, sustainability and other constraints together before picking an outcome. It is aimed at teams that already have a requisition and ordering system and want better outcomes from the tendering step.

Beside it the vendor lists Autonomous Sourcing, fully configurable workflows that run events for any spend category with conditional approvals, Kai, a plain-language assistant that takes a sourcing request and routes it to the right workflow, and Rate Manager, which centralises supplier rates so events trigger before contracts drift from benchmarks.

The vendor states an average of 6 percent incremental savings, a figure we could not check independently. A buyer keeps control, since the vendor describes human approvals where they are needed and a team of ex-procurement staff for event design.

The privacy policy names Keelvar Systems Ltd of Cork as controller and the subscription terms apply Irish law with Irish courts. The security page puts the primary data centre in AWS Dublin, and the trust center lists ISO 27001 and ISO 27701.

Pricing is not published. Compared with Mercanis, which bundles intake, sourcing, supplier and contract management, Keelvar goes deeper on optimisation and shallower on the rest of the cycle. Ask for a quote early, as nothing is published, and ask how the optimiser is priced against plain RFQ events.

What Keelvar does well

  • Irish contracting entity with Irish law and courts
  • Primary hosting in AWS Dublin (EU)
  • ISO 27001 and ISO 27701 listed on its trust center
  • Optimisation engine for multi-variable award decisions
  • Integration with SAP Ariba described on the site

Where Keelvar falls short

  • Sourcing only, no purchase orders or invoicing
  • No published pricing
  • Aimed at larger buyers (vendor cites 150+ multinationals)
  • Savings figures are company-stated

Standout feature. The one sourcing tool here built around an optimisation engine for awarding tenders on several variables at once.

#12 Otnox

Riga, Latvia Trial: €0 for 7 days, no card required, 1 market, 50 AI credits. Premium: €98 per month + VAT, billed monthly, cancel any time, 1 market, 200 AI credits per month; extra credit packs from €9.00, extra users +€10/month each, departments +€15/month, additional markets as monthly add-ons (price not stated). Enterprise: contact sales, unlimited markets, API and scheduled exports, SSO, SLA, custom invoicing. 7-day free trial, no credit card, full access

Best for: Suppliers hunting public tenders across Europe

  • Operating company. SIA Vietne (trading as Otnox)
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Latvia)
  • Where the data sits. EU data centres (Google Cloud europe-west region); Supabase database in an EU region, per privacy policy
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Deltek GovWin IQ, GovSpend

Otnox sits at the edge of this category. The other tools here help a buyer run purchasing, sourcing and supplier records. Otnox works from the other side of the table: it collects public tenders and awards, scores each tender from 0 to 100 against a company profile, and keeps a bid pipeline from watching to won. Read it as procurement intelligence for companies that sell to governments, not as a purchasing system.

The vendor says it brings public procurement from 80+ markets into one platform, maps more than 47,000 procurement codes into a single taxonomy and translates tenders with one click. A buyer intelligence view profiles public buyers, including re-tender cycles, scoring habits and repeat winners, which helps a bidder decide where to spend effort. Claude and ChatGPT connectors are linked from the site.

The contracting entity is SIA Vietne in Riga, Latvia (registration number 40103048838, confirmed in the Latvian register open data). The privacy policy places data in EU data centres. Pricing is unusually open for this category: a 7-day trial without a card, then Premium at €98 per month plus VAT for one market. It does not replace an ERP, e-sourcing or spend analysis tool such as Sievo or Mercanis.

What Otnox does well

  • Published self-serve pricing from €98 per month + VAT
  • 7-day trial without a credit card
  • Contracting entity in Latvia, EU data centres per privacy policy
  • Buyer intelligence on repeat winners and re-tender cycles
  • Claude and ChatGPT connectors linked from the site

Where Otnox falls short

  • Supplier-side bid tool, not a purchasing or sourcing suite
  • Premium covers only one market, extra markets cost more (price not stated)
  • No certifications stated on the pages reviewed
  • Uses OpenAI for optional AI features and Mailgun with US transfers under SCCs

Standout feature. The only tool on this page aimed at winning public contracts rather than managing purchasing, with prices published on the vendor's own pricing page.

How do I choose between a procurement suite, a marketplace and a spend analytics tool?

Start from the job you actually do badly today, because the nine tools here are not one product type. Esker, Basware, Mercanis and Planergy run the transaction: someone asks for something, a budget is checked, an approver says yes and a purchase order goes out. Unite does the buying itself from catalogues. Kodiak Hub and SupplyOn manage the supplier relationship and its risks. Sievo does none of these and instead reads the data other systems produce.

A company whose problem is uncontrolled requests usually wants the first group. Esker describes policy-driven approvals with budget checks and web or mobile approval, and tracking of committed spend before invoices arrive. Planergy describes real-time budget tracking that supports approval decisions from a phone. A company whose problem is tail spend on office supplies, tools and consumables is better served by Unite's cross-catalogue search than by a full suite it will never configure.

If you already have an ERP with a requisition module and want to know where the money went, Sievo is the tool that fits, but it is explicitly an analytics layer used next to a requisition or sourcing tool. Buying it as your only procurement system leaves purchase requests unsolved.

How is European procurement software priced, and can I compare it before a demo?

Mostly you cannot. Esker, Mercanis, Unite, Planergy, Kodiak Hub, SupplyOn and Sievo publish no price and route buyers to a demo or a quote. Basware states a subscription model where you choose modules, from invoice automation to eProcurement, and shows no amounts. Spendesk describes a platform subscription plus per-user pricing, quoted by company size rather than published as a single rate.

That makes the pricing question one of structure rather than numbers. Ask each vendor what is the billing unit (users, modules, invoice or document volume, spend under management), what is charged separately (supplier onboarding, catalogue connections, integrations) and what happens at renewal. Basware's module model means the eProcurement price depends on which other modules you buy. Unite's single creditor model is the opposite: the cost sits partly in the catalogue prices and in payment terms that Unite sets.

Two practical habits help. Run the same twelve-month purchase volume past every vendor so the quotes are comparable, and ask for the implementation estimate in the same document, since the heavier suites also carry configuration work that the licence figure hides.

Does a European procurement vendor keep my supplier data under EU jurisdiction?

It improves your position, but each vendor needs checking one by one. The contracting entity is the first test. Mercanis is operated by CdC3 GmbH in Berlin with German law and Berlin as the place of jurisdiction.

Planergy names PLANERGY Ltd in Dublin and applies Irish law. Esker's terms name Esker S.A. in Villeurbanne, but the group also operates in the United States and applies Wisconsin law to visitors there, so the order form should name the European entity. Unite's imprint differs by country, and the UK site names Unite Procurement UK Ltd.

Hosting is the second test and the pages are uneven. Basware's general terms say cloud services for EEA customers are hosted within the EEA, while listing sub-processors in India, the USA and Australia with access for operation, development and support under standard contractual clauses.

Unite says it is hosted within the EU, per its about page. Esker, Mercanis, Planergy, SupplyOn and Sievo do not state a hosting location on the pages we reviewed, and Mercanis's privacy policy mentions providers in the EU and the USA.

So ask three things before signing: which entity is the controller, where the production data sits, and who outside the EU can reach it for support. Sievo shows why the third question matters, since Sievo Oy is the parent of Sievo, Inc., a US subsidiary, even though its privacy policy treats the Finnish company as controller.

How do I move away from Coupa or SAP Ariba without losing my approval history?

Treat it as two migrations, because the live process and the historical record move differently.

Esker, Basware and Mercanis are listed on this site as alternatives to Coupa and SAP Ariba, and Mercanis is also listed against Jaggaer, but they cover the process in different depths: Esker leans on the link to accounts payable, Basware on invoices and a marketplace, Mercanis on intake, sourcing and contracts. Compare module depth for your own flows in a demo rather than relying on the label.

Move the process first and archive the history rather than importing all of it. Open purchase orders and active supplier master data are what the new tool needs on day one. Closed approvals from years ago can stay in an export, which keeps the migration short and keeps the new tool's data clean.

Plan the supplier side too. Suppliers who send acknowledgements and invoices through your old portal have to be moved, and a network tool like SupplyOn only helps if your suppliers already sit on it. SupplyOn lists more than 140,000 companies, so for an automotive buyer the migration may be lighter than the generic advice suggests.

When should I not switch to a European procurement tool?

Switch only if the replacement covers what you use. Unite does not replace a sourcing, contract or supplier-qualification suite, because it covers catalogue-based indirect purchasing. Sievo does not run purchase requests, purchase orders or supplier onboarding. Kodiak Hub is broader than a team needing only risk management and could mean paying for workflow it does not use. Planergy is described for mid-market firms, so a large enterprise with complex sourcing may find it light.

Do not switch either if the driver is only ideology. A company whose legal team needs a European contract and a European regulator gets that from most of the vendors here. A company that needs no American entity anywhere in the chain will find that none of the pages we reviewed make that promise, and several name US subsidiaries or sub-processors.

Timing matters too. A procurement tool touches every department, so replacing it in the middle of a year-end close or an ERP project adds risk without adding value. A smaller step is often better: add Sievo for analytics, or Unite for catalogue buying, and leave the transactional core where it is until the contract ends.

How should a procurement tool connect to the ERP and the accounts payable process?

The integration test is whether purchase orders and invoices end up matched without retyping.

Esker and Basware are the two tools here where procurement and accounts payable are the same vendor: Esker says procurement and finance share the same data, and Basware lists AP automation, invoice matching and an e-invoicing network next to eProcurement. Planergy offers procure-to-pay and AP automation together, and says integration with an existing ERP and accounting tools can be done in days, which is a company claim worth testing with your own system.

For catalogue buying, Unite connects through punchout OCI, cXML and an API, according to the vendor, or can be used on its own through the web interface. Planergy lists 32-plus punchouts including Amazon Business, Staples and Grainger. Punchout lets an employee shop in a supplier's catalogue from inside your approval flow, so budgets and approvals still apply.

Spendesk sits slightly apart: it captures supplier invoices, issues cards and exports to the common European ledgers, so its integration question is about your accounting package rather than your ERP purchasing module. Ask each vendor for the list of ERPs it has connected in production, not the ones on the roadmap.

How we selected and ranked these 12 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Every page is researched and drafted with AI assistance, and the compliance and pricing claims are checked against the vendor's documentation before it is published under the founder's editorial responsibility. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

Esker ranks first in this directory for companies that want purchasing linked to accounts payable, followed by Basware for requisitioning and invoicing from one Finnish vendor and Mercanis for intake, sourcing and contracts in one suite. Unite suits catalogue buying, Planergy suits mid-market procure-to-pay, Kodiak Hub and SupplyOn cover supplier relationships and risk, Spendesk controls spend at the request, and Sievo analyses spend across systems. The best choice depends on whether you need a transaction system, a marketplace or analytics.

None publishes a full price list. Esker, Mercanis, Unite, Planergy, Kodiak Hub, SupplyOn and Sievo sell by quote or demo, Basware describes a module-based subscription without amounts, and Spendesk describes a platform subscription plus per-user pricing quoted by company size.

Esker, Basware, Mercanis, Unite and Planergy are all listed on this site as alternatives to Coupa. Mercanis and Esker also appear against SAP Ariba, and Sievo is listed against Coupa spend analysis, which is a narrower comparison. Check module depth in a demo, since the scope differs a lot between them.

Esker, Basware and Planergy. Esker links purchasing to its accounts payable automation, Basware lists AP automation and an e-invoicing network next to eProcurement, and Planergy combines procure-to-pay with AI-assisted invoice processing.

Basware states in its general terms that cloud services for EEA customers are hosted within the EEA, and Unite says it is hosted within the EU. Esker, Mercanis, Planergy, SupplyOn and Sievo do not state a hosting location on the pages we reviewed, so ask for it in writing before you sign.

SupplyOn, based in Hallbergmoos, Germany, links risk signals to affected suppliers, materials and deliveries, and reports more than 140,000 companies on its network. Kodiak Hub in Stockholm is the alternative if you want supplier onboarding, performance, compliance and audit in one workspace.