Every European digital experience platforms (DXP) tool reviewed
Geneva, Switzerland
Founded 2002
Quote only: two plans, Enterprise CMS and Enterprise DXP, with no amounts shown
Book a demo
Best for: Groups with dozens of brand or country sites that want visitor profiles and content in the same product
Jahia is a Geneva enterprise CMS whose DXP edition puts a customer data platform next to the content editor. Its pricing page compares an Enterprise CMS plan with an Enterprise DXP plan, and the second adds visitor profiles, personalisation, dynamic lists and analytics dashboards, so segment rules live where the pages are edited.
The company behind it is Jahia Solutions Group SA, founded in 2002 and named as controller in its privacy policy. Jahia Cloud offers France (OVH), Ireland, North Virginia (AWS) or Singapore, with a 99.9% production commitment, and the company dates its ISO 27001 certification to 2019. The vendor cites about 120 customers, which is modest, and no prices are published.
What Jahia does well
- DXP plan contains the customer data platform
- Cloud region is the customer's choice
- Site creation is unlimited, according to the vendor
- Several modules are public on GitHub under Apache-2.0 or MIT
- ISO 27001 certification is shown on the vendor's site
Where Jahia falls short
- Prices only on request
- Half of the cloud regions are outside the EU
- Development centres on Java
- About 120 customers, per the vendor, is a small reference base
Standout feature. Jahia is the only suite here whose DXP plan includes the customer data platform in the same licence as the CMS.
Hamburg, Germany
Founded 1996
No amounts listed; a demo comes first
Book a demo
Best for: Regulated or multi-brand enterprises that want a visual editor and an API from one content system
CoreMedia is a hybrid headless CMS from Hamburg: REST and GraphQL deliver content to any front end, while CoreMedia Studio gives editors an in-context preview and drag-and-drop blocks. The preview is a Studio plugin plus a small front-end package, so it keeps working when a separate front end renders the site.
CoreMedia GmbH is registered at Rödingsmarkt 9 in Hamburg (HRB 162480), and its history page dates the start to 1996. Client stories name the Deutsche Bundesbank, the Deutscher Bundestag and Finnair. Modules for testing, journeys, email and SMS, chat and a contact centre are listed separately, with no prices or certificate list on the pages read.
What CoreMedia does well
- Hamburg register number is published in the imprint
- Deployable on a major cloud, a private cloud or on-premises
- Editors can preview pages rendered by a separate front end
- Testing, personalisation and campaign modules come from the same vendor
- Bundestag and Bundesbank appear as customers
Where CoreMedia falls short
- No prices and no trial
- Engagement and marketing modules widen the project
- US customers may contract with the Corporation named in the copyright line
- No certificate list on the pages we read
Standout feature. CoreMedia keeps in-context visual preview working even when a separate front end renders the site.
Oslo, Norway
Founded 1999
Open Source Edition costs nothing under GPLv2; the commercial Ibexa DXP subscription is priced individually
Book a demo
Best for: Symfony teams that want an enterprise DXP with a licence-free route behind the paid subscription
Ibexa is a Norwegian DXP that descends from eZ Systems, founded in 1999. The code on GitHub is dual-licensed: GPLv2 at no cost, or the Ibexa Business Use Licence for customers with a DXP subscription. The product line is split into Ibexa Headless, Ibexa Experience and Ibexa Commerce.
Ibexa AS is registered in Oslo, so it falls under GDPR through the EEA but is not an EU company. The commercial subscription has no public price, and the free edition removes the licence fee, not the implementation work: the documentation assumes a Symfony-literate team. Its positioning has moved toward a wider orchestration platform, which can blur what a quote includes.
What Ibexa does well
- Open-source edition is real GPLv2 code, not a trial
- Subscription pays for support and extras, not for the right to run it
- Headless, Experience and Commerce editions fit different project types
- Continuity from eZ Systems since 1999
- GPL code keeps running if the contract ends
Where Ibexa falls short
- Norway is in the EEA but not the EU
- Commercial pricing is unpublished
- Running it well takes Symfony developers
- Product naming has shifted toward orchestration
Standout feature. Ibexa is the only DXP here whose open-source edition is the same GPLv2 code as the enterprise product.
Oslo, Norway
Founded 1996
Developer plan at no cost; Professional and Enterprise are quoted
Book a demo
Best for: Nordic public bodies and enterprises that expect to keep a content platform for a decade
Enonic is an Oslo platform whose core, Enonic XP, is published on GitHub under GPL-3.0 and sold as managed SaaS. Editors use Content Studio with interactive previews, workflows and AI drafting, and developers can work against headless APIs with a Next.js integration. A Free plan gives developers 5 GB of storage and community support, without backups.
Enonic AS has been registered in Oslo since 1996, according to the Norwegian business register, and the About page counts 18 staff. Professional states 99.5 percent uptime and Enterprise up to 99.99 percent, but the paid prices and the hosting region are not published. Named customers include NAV, the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, and DiBK, the Norwegian Building Authority.
What Enonic does well
- XP core is open source under GPL-3.0
- Developers can start on a free plan
- Managed SaaS comes with stated uptime tiers
- Registered in Oslo since 1996
- NAV and DiBK are named public-sector customers
Where Enonic falls short
- No prices for Professional or Enterprise
- A team of about 18 people
- Norway is in the EEA but not the EU
- Fewer partners than larger vendors
Standout feature. Enonic pairs a GPL-3.0 core with a free developer plan and a managed tier that states 99.99 percent uptime.
Brno, Czech Republic
Estimate via sliders, final quote via a form; no price list
Book a demo
Best for: Big editorial organisations with several approval stages, brands and markets
Kontent.ai is a hosted enterprise CMS from Brno that puts roles, workflows and approvals ahead of page design. Its home page cites a customer managing one portal across 30 or more sites and a team of 100 marketers on 30 websites. The vendor describes AI agents for audits, governance and localization.
The terms of service name Kontent CZ s.r.o. as provider, or another affiliated group company, and the data processing terms list Kontent US, LLC, so the signing entity should be confirmed. The vendor states SOC 2, ISO 27001 and 27017, GDPR, HIPAA and GLBA, with a Trust Center. Pricing runs through sliders and a quote form, and no hosting region was stated.
What Kontent.ai does well
- Approval workflows and governance form the core of the product
- SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are stated, with a Trust Center
- Chat support runs around the clock on every plan
- Customers run many sites from a single portal
- Provider named in the terms is registered in the Czech Republic
Where Kontent.ai falls short
- No fixed prices
- No self-hosting, hosted service only
- Terms allow a US affiliate to act as provider
- Hosting region absent from the pages we read
Standout feature. Kontent.ai is built around approval chains, and all plans include 24/7 in-app chat support.
Salzburg, Austria
Founded 2013
Community edition at no cost; paid editions and a cloud service sit above it
Book a demo
Best for: Product companies whose images, documents and catalogue data must stay linked in a single system
Pimcore is an open-source platform from Salzburg that keeps digital assets, product information, customer data and content in one model. The practical effect is that an image knows which product variant it belongs to, where a DAM, a PIM and a CMS wired together need someone to maintain that link.
Pimcore GmbH (FN 398049t) was founded in 2013, and the community edition is free, with paid editions and a cloud. Because the core is open source and runs on your servers or an EU cloud, the exit is built in. It is a platform rather than a packaged application, so implementations usually go through a partner, which is heavy for a team that only wants a brand portal.
What Pimcore does well
- One data model covers assets, product data and content
- Open source and self-hostable, so leaving is straightforward
- Community edition is free; paid editions and a cloud exist
- Austrian company, deployable on your own servers or an EU cloud
Where Pimcore falls short
- Arrives as a platform, so plan an implementation project
- A partner is normally needed to deploy it well
- Excessive for a plain shared brand library
Standout feature. Pimcore links each asset to the product it belongs to inside one data model, with no integration in between.
Münchenstein (Basel), Switzerland
Founded 1997
Self-hosted DX Core starts near €3,000 a month and managed DX Cloud near €5,000 a month, each negotiated further
Book a demo
Best for: Large enterprises assembling content, commerce and integrations from independent building blocks
Magnolia is a Swiss composable DXP built around content, commerce and integrations that are combined as separate blocks. DX Core is deployed on infrastructure you control, and DX Cloud is the managed version that Magnolia runs across AWS, Azure, GCP and other providers according to the customer's needs.
Magnolia International Ltd sits in Münchenstein near Basel and has developed since 1997. Its site states ISO 27001, SOC 2, SOC 3, GDPR and Spain's ENS. Starting prices are about €3,000 a month for DX Core and about €5,000 for DX Cloud, both quoted further, with no free Community Edition now. Switzerland has an adequacy decision but is outside the EEA.
What Magnolia does well
- Composable design: content, commerce and integrations as separate blocks
- Managed cloud is spread over AWS, Azure, GCP and others
- ISO 27001, SOC 2 and SOC 3 are listed on the vendor site
- DX Core can be fully self-hosted
- Developed continuously since 1997
Where Magnolia falls short
- Entry price of about €3,000 a month leaves out smaller organisations
- No free edition to try
- Switzerland is not in the EEA
- Composable builds call for real implementation skills
Standout feature. Magnolia runs its managed cloud across AWS, Azure and GCP instead of committing to a single provider.
Brno, Czech Republic
Founded 2004
Enterprise quotes only; delivery as managed SaaS or inside your own private cloud
Book a demo
Best for: Marketing teams that outgrew a simple CMS and need a self-hosting fallback in procurement terms
Kentico Xperience is a Czech DXP that combines content management, digital marketing and commerce, and it is sold as fully managed SaaS or deployed in your own private cloud on Azure, AWS or on-premises. The vendor calls the result the same product, same capabilities and no lock-in, so a SaaS customer can later move in-house without changing platform.
Kentico Software s.r.o. has been registered in Brno since 2004, so the vendor is inside the EU whichever deployment you pick. There is no public price list, and every engagement is quoted. Self-hosting leaves patching, scaling and backups with you, and the interface assumes a marketing team with a dedicated administrator.
What Kentico Xperience does well
- One product delivered as SaaS, private cloud or on-premises
- EU-registered vendor whatever the deployment
- Content, marketing and commerce in the same platform
- Developed in Brno since 2004
- Moving between SaaS and self-hosted needs no platform change
Where Kentico Xperience falls short
- Quote-only pricing
- Self-hosting adds patching, scaling and backup duties
- Assumes a marketing team with an administrator
- More platform than a small site needs
Standout feature. Kentico Xperience promises identical capabilities on-premises, in a private cloud and as managed SaaS.
Linz, Austria
Founded 2017
A free tier, then roughly EUR 99 a month for teams; enterprise is quoted
Book a demo
Best for: Marketing teams that publish in many languages and want to edit visually on a decoupled front end
Storyblok is an Austrian headless CMS built to answer the usual complaint about headless systems: editors can no longer see the page. Its editor shows the live rendered page, and clicking an element selects the matching component, while the API returns structured JSON to Next.js, Nuxt, Astro or any other front end.
Storyblok GmbH is based in Linz and founded in 2017, and European customers default to an EU region. Field-level translation and per-market variants are core features, and teams start from about €99 per month after a free tier. It has no self-hosting, costs climb with team size and API traffic, and the component library needs careful design early on.
What Storyblok does well
- Visual editing sits on top of a headless architecture
- Translation and market handling are built in
- European customers start in an EU region
- REST and GraphQL APIs with framework SDKs
- A free tier covers small projects
Where Storyblok falls short
- Hosted only, with no self-hosting route
- Price grows with seats and traffic
- Component structure must be planned up front
Standout feature. Storyblok lets editors click through the live page on a headless stack, which classic headless tools lack.
Odense, Denmark
Founded 2003
Self-hosting is free open source; Umbraco Cloud runs from roughly €45 a month (Starter) to roughly €730 (Professional), Enterprise quoted
Book a demo
Best for: Agencies and enterprises on .NET that want a free CMS core and a choice of hosting
Umbraco is a Danish .NET CMS whose core is MIT-licensed, so the software carries no licence fee on any hosting route. Content, media and document types are modelled in the interface instead of code-first schemas, which leaves editors independent once the site is built.
Umbraco A/S was founded in Odense in 2003 and sells Umbraco Cloud, managed hosting on Microsoft Azure with an ISO 27001-certified platform. Plans run from about €45 a month for Starter to about €730 for Professional, with Enterprise quoted. Cloud names Azure but no EU region, the backoffice looks dated beside newer tools, and .NET hosting is a smaller market than PHP.
What Umbraco does well
- Open-source .NET CMS with twenty years of production use
- Umbraco Cloud adds managed hosting on Azure
- Cloud platform carries ISO 27001
- Wide package ecosystem and an active community
- The software costs nothing whichever hosting you pick
Where Umbraco falls short
- .NET hosting is rarer and costlier than PHP hosting
- Backoffice feels dated next to headless newcomers
- Azure named without a specific EU region
- Community package quality is uneven
Standout feature. Umbraco is the only tool here whose open-source software never carries a price, with the fee limited to optional hosting.
Basel, Switzerland
Founded 1998
Open source and free; agency work and ELTS support are billed separately
Book a demo
Best for: Universities, municipalities and public bodies running many sites and languages from one installation
TYPO3 is a multisite CMS developed since 1998 and governed by the TYPO3 Association, a membership organisation rather than a venture-backed company. One installation can serve a whole university, with each faculty holding its own domain, design and editorial team, while language handling and translation fallbacks are structural.
Permissions can be set per page tree, content type and field, and workspaces let changes be prepared, previewed and approved before going live. Long-term support releases come with defined windows and paid extended support. The software is free, but implementations usually involve a specialist agency, the interface looks dated and the extension ecosystem is smaller than WordPress's.
What TYPO3 does well
- Many sites and languages run from one installation
- Permissions reach down to page and field level
- Workspaces handle staging and approval
- Long record on accessibility support
- LTS releases can be extended with paid support
Where TYPO3 falls short
- Specialist agency support is usually required
- Interface looks older than recent CMSs
- Too much for a small site
Standout feature. TYPO3 serves dozens of sites and languages from one install with per-department permissions down to field level.