Best European TeamViewer Alternatives (2026)

A European TeamViewer alternative is remote access software from a company established in Europe that reaches the same machines at a lower or more predictable licence cost, and in several cases without routing the session through the vendor at all.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

European Purpose may be paid for placements on this page and may earn a commission through links on it. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed or what our review says. Editorial policy

Key takeaways

  • AnyDesk is the strongest direct replacement: German, faster on poor connections, generally cheaper at comparable tiers, and available as an on-premises relay.
  • Licensing rather than capability drives this category, which is why the comparison worth doing is total cost at your real concurrent-session count over three years.
  • Three options here can keep the vendor out of the session path — AnyDesk on-premises, ISL Online’s perpetual server licence, RealVNC direct connections.
  • Iperius Remote is the cheapest credible option at comparable session counts, with licensing simple enough to understand in one reading.
  • TSplus is not a TeamViewer replacement at all: it publishes Windows applications, which is Citrix’s job rather than remote support.

Almost nobody leaves TeamViewer because it stopped working. They leave because of the renewal quote. This ranking judges six European tools on licence cost and predictability, on session performance where the connection is poor, and on whether the vendor can be removed from the session path entirely.

6 European remote desktop software tools compared

European remote desktop software tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 AnyDesk Germany Per licence, per year The closest replacement, faster and cheaper
#2 RealVNC United Kingdom Per device or per user, per year Removing the broker from the session path
#3 ISL Online Slovenia Per user or per session, plus self-hosted licence A perpetual licence you install yourself
#4 Iperius Remote Italy Per concurrent connection, per year The cheapest credible replacement
#5 TeamViewer Germany Per licence, per year Staying, when reach matters more than cost
#6 TSplus France Perpetual licence per server A different problem entirely

The 6 tools reviewed

#1 AnyDesk

Stuttgart, Germany Per licence, per year Demo on request

Best for: The closest replacement, faster and cheaper

AnyDesk was founded in Stuttgart by former TeamViewer engineers, and it shows: the same job, the same platform coverage, a purpose-built codec that keeps sessions usable on poor connections, and pricing that generally undercuts TeamViewer at equivalent tiers. For most organisations leaving on cost, this is the shortest move.

The on-premises option is the differentiator TeamViewer does not match — the entire relay network can run inside your own infrastructure, so no session metadata leaves the building.

What AnyDesk does well

  • Direct like-for-like replacement
  • Faster on constrained connections
  • On-premises relay available

Where AnyDesk falls short

  • Smaller installed base
  • On-premises licence priced separately

Standout feature. Built by the people who built TeamViewer, with a relay you can host yourself.

#2 RealVNC

Cambridge, United Kingdom Per device or per user, per year Demo on request

Best for: Removing the broker from the session path

RealVNC supports direct machine-to-machine connections with no third party in the path, which is a capability TeamViewer does not offer at any tier. For regulated environments and air-gapped networks that is the difference between usable and prohibited.

It comes from the people who created the VNC protocol at Olivetti Research in Cambridge, and remains effectively the default on Raspberry Pi and embedded Linux.

What RealVNC does well

  • Direct connections with no broker
  • Strong encryption and MFA
  • Default on Raspberry Pi and embedded

Where RealVNC falls short

  • UK rather than intra-EEA processing
  • Fewer support-desk features

Standout feature. A connection model TeamViewer cannot offer: nobody in the middle.

#3 ISL Online

Ljubljana, Slovenia Per user or per session, plus self-hosted licence Demo on request

Best for: A perpetual licence you install yourself

ISL Online sells a perpetual server licence: connection brokering, session recordings and the audit log all run on hardware you own, permanently, rather than on a subscription that reprices each year. For public bodies and healthcare that combination answers both the cost and the sovereignty question at once.

Cloud and private cloud options exist alongside it, priced per concurrent user or per session.

What ISL Online does well

  • Perpetual self-hosted server licence
  • Per-session pricing for irregular volume
  • Session recording and audit trails

Where ISL Online falls short

  • Self-hosting is real infrastructure work
  • Smaller vendor than TeamViewer

Standout feature. Buy it once and run it yourself — the opposite of an annual renewal negotiation.

#4 Iperius Remote

Italy Per concurrent connection, per year Demo on request

Best for: The cheapest credible replacement

Iperius Remote does the core job — attended and unattended access, file transfer, multi-monitor, mobile clients — at a price no other vendor here matches at comparable concurrent-session counts, with licensing simple enough to understand in one reading.

For a small IT provider whose complaint is the bill rather than the feature set, it is usually the answer.

What Iperius Remote does well

  • Cheapest at comparable session counts
  • Licensing you can understand immediately
  • Free tier for personal use

Where Iperius Remote falls short

  • Fewer enterprise features
  • No self-hosted relay

Standout feature. A price that does not move when your device count crosses a threshold.

#5 TeamViewer

Göppingen, Germany Per licence, per year Demo on request

Best for: Staying, when reach matters more than cost

TeamViewer is included here because leaving is not always right. Its platform coverage is the broadest, it connects where others need network work first, and the person you are helping usually has it installed already — which for a support desk removes a negotiation before every session.

If the renewal is affordable and your fleet is heterogeneous, the honest comparison frequently favours staying.

What TeamViewer does well

  • Broadest platform coverage
  • Connects without network configuration
  • Already installed on many machines

Where TeamViewer falls short

  • The most expensive option here
  • Renewal increases are a recurring complaint

Standout feature. The incumbent is still the one that connects to anything, anywhere.

#6 TSplus

Montpellier, France Perpetual licence per server Demo on request

Best for: A different problem entirely

TSplus is in this list to be ruled out deliberately. It publishes Windows applications to remote users through a browser, which is Citrix’s job rather than TeamViewer’s. If what you actually need is staff running a line-of-business application from home, TSplus on a perpetual licence is dramatically cheaper than either.

What TSplus does well

  • Perpetual licence per server
  • Far cheaper than Citrix
  • HTML5 browser access

Where TSplus falls short

  • Not a remote support tool
  • Requires Windows server infrastructure

Standout feature. Solves the problem people mistake for remote support, at a fraction of Citrix pricing.

How should you compare the licence cost?

Count concurrent sessions rather than users, because that is what these products meter. A ten-person support team that never runs more than three sessions at once needs three, not ten.

Then check the thresholds: managed device counts, endpoint tiers and feature gates all step the price, and crossing one mid-year is where renewal surprises come from. Ask for the price at your projected count in year three, in writing.

Finally, count what you would stop paying for. Several tools here bundle features TeamViewer charges separately for, and one or two bundle none — the comparison is only meaningful at equivalent capability.

When is a self-hosted relay worth it?

When your security policy says session metadata cannot leave the organisation, which is common in healthcare, government and finance. In that case the shortlist narrows immediately to AnyDesk on-premises, ISL Online’s server licence and RealVNC direct connections.

It is also worth it when the vendor relationship itself is the risk — a support desk whose entire customer map is visible to a third party has a concentration problem that no contract fully removes.

Against that: you now operate the relay, patch it and keep it available. If the desk cannot afford that, cloud with strong access controls is the better honest answer.

What actually differs between these tools?

Less than the marketing suggests on core function: all of them show you a remote screen and let you control it. The real differences are in three places.

Platform coverage, including the awkward parts — Raspberry Pi, embedded Linux, older Windows, macOS on Apple silicon. This is where shortlists collapse, and it is worth testing against your actual fleet rather than reading a table.

Connection model, which cannot be retrofitted. And session performance on a poor connection, which is where AnyDesk’s codec earns its reputation and which you can only assess by trying it from the worst network you support.

How we selected and ranked these 6 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

AnyDesk for most organisations: also German, built by former TeamViewer engineers, faster on poor connections, generally cheaper at comparable tiers, and available with an on-premises relay. ISL Online is the better answer if you want a perpetual self-hosted licence, and Iperius Remote if the priority is simply the lowest bill.

It prices by concurrent sessions and managed devices in tiers, and both step up as an organisation grows. The recurring complaint is not the initial quote but the renewal, which is what drives most of the migrations in this category. Whether that is worth leaving over depends on how heterogeneous your fleet is.

AnyDesk sells an on-premises deployment where the whole relay network runs in your infrastructure. ISL Online offers a perpetual server licence for the same purpose. RealVNC supports direct connections with no broker at all. TeamViewer does not offer an equivalent.

Less than most migrations, because there is no data to move. The work is redeploying the client to unattended machines, re-establishing the access lists, and retraining the desk — measured in days rather than months. The awkward part is customers who expect to be sent a TeamViewer link.

Iperius Remote, by a clear margin at comparable concurrent-session counts, with licensing simple enough to understand in one reading. AnyDesk generally undercuts TeamViewer while offering more capability than Iperius. Both RealVNC and Iperius have free tiers for occasional personal use.