FRISS
Utrecht-based trust automation for property and casualty insurers, scoring claims and applications for fraud
Quick Overview
| Company | FRISS Fraudebestrijding B.V. |
|---|---|
| Category | Fraud Detection Software |
| Headquarters | Utrecht, Netherlands |
| Founded | 2006 |
| EU Presence | Yes - Netherlands (EU) |
| Data Location | Not stated on the pages read |
| Open Source | No |
| GDPR Compliant | Yes |
| Self-Hosting | No |
| Main Features | Claims analytics, underwriting analytics, investigations, KYC and sanctions/PEP screening, media check for manipulated or AI-generated images and PDFs |
| Pricing | Pricing on request |
| Best For | Property and casualty insurers |
| Replaces | Sift, Shift Technology, SAS fraud |
Detailed Review
FRISS is built for insurers rather than online shops. It scores the trustworthiness of each claim and policy application so honest customers are fast-tracked and files that need a human reach an investigator.
The company says it was founded in 2006 by Jeroen Morrenhof and Christian van Leeuwen and counts over 300 implementations in more than 45 countries. The privacy notice names FRISS Fraudebestrijding B.V., Orteliuslaan 15, Utrecht, as controller.
Claims and underwriting
Claims analytics scores each claim in seconds. Underwriting analytics scores trust at the quote, so applications with a good profile can bind straight through.
The home page claims 75% fewer false positives and 90% of honest claims fast-tracked, which are vendor figures.
Investigations and screening
An investigations module gives a structured, confidential way to build facts on flagged claims. KYC and compliance screening checks sanctions and PEP lists daily as the lists change.
Both feed back upstream into scoring.
Checking the evidence
Media check looks for manipulated, reused and AI-generated images and PDFs in claims. This addresses a growing issue in claims fraud where documents are edited before submission.
The page gives no accuracy figures.
Limitations to Consider
FRISS serves insurers only, so it cannot score e-commerce payments, account signups or banking transactions. Pricing is not published and the entry point is a conversation with a specialist. The pages read give no data location. For banking fraud see Feedzai or Cleafy.
Who Should Use FRISS
Property and casualty insurers that want claims and underwriting fraud scoring with sanctions screening from a Dutch vendor.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Claims and underwriting scoring in one platform
- Daily sanctions and PEP screening
- Media check for manipulated and AI-generated files
- Dutch B.V. named as controller
Cons
- Insurance only
- No public pricing
- Headline results are vendor-reported
- Data location not stated
Alternatives to FRISS
Other European fraud detection software worth comparing before you decide:
SEON
Hungary · Fraud checks and AML screening on one 1,100-signal platform
Ravelin
United Kingdom · Custom ML scoring, graph networks and rules for online merchants
Trustfull
Italy · Pay-per-check phone, email, IP and session risk signals
Oneytrust
France · Payment and identity fraud scoring for European retailers and banks
See all European fraud detection software or compare them directly against Sift on our alternatives page.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. Its site is about claims and underwriting for P&C insurers, not online payments or account signups.
A module that detects manipulated, reused and AI-generated images and PDFs in claims.
The privacy notice lists FRISS Fraudebestrijding B.V. at Orteliuslaan 15 in Utrecht, the Netherlands.