Luscii
Utrecht home-monitoring platform with ready-made programmes for 150+ conditions and FHIR links to hospital records
Quick Overview
| Company | Luscii healthtech B.V. |
|---|---|
| Category | Remote Patient Monitoring Software |
| Headquarters | Utrecht, Netherlands |
| Founded | Not stated |
| EU Presence | Yes - Netherlands (EU) |
| Data Location | Not stated on the pages reviewed |
| Open Source | No |
| GDPR Compliant | Yes |
| Self-Hosting | Not stated |
| Main Features | Condition programmes, 100+ devices, configurable alarms, FHIR EHR integration, patient timeline, self-care hub, video and messaging, regional care network, program builder |
| Pricing | Pricing on request |
| Best For | Hospitals and regions rolling out home monitoring across many conditions |
| Replaces | Biofourmis, Current Health |
Detailed Review
Luscii markets one app for every condition, linked to the hospital record. Its Dutch home page says it is used by 85 percent of hospitals and says it has launched in eleven countries across Europe and Africa.
Luscii healthtech B.V. publishes its Utrecht address, a privacy statement dated 23 March 2026 and separate terms for UK and US users.
A Library and a Builder
The Luscii Library holds programmes for more than 150 conditions, and a separate Medical Developer route lets organisations build their own. A clinical team can start from a template instead of a blank screen.
Fewer Alarms Reaching Clinicians
When a threshold is crossed, the patient can first answer targeted questions or receive self-care advice. In the COPD pathway at St. Antonius hospital, the company reports that 34 percent of alarms are handled automatically.
Hospital Record Integration
The product page lists FHIR-based integration with the electronic patient record, configurable alarms, trend graphs, video calls and messaging, and the device is described as a CE class IIa medical device.
Limitations to Consider
Luscii shows no price and does not state a hosting location on the pages we reviewed. The product pages we could read are mostly in Dutch, and the English-language claims about reach come from the vendor alone. Smaller practices will find Medixine or Cuviva easier to white-label.
Who Should Use Luscii
Dutch and wider European hospitals that want a broad programme library and tight record integration.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- 150+ condition programmes
- 100+ supported devices
- FHIR link to the patient record
- Alarm filtering through patient questions
- Terms for UK and US users published
Cons
- No public pricing
- Hosting location not stated
- Product pages mostly Dutch
- Reach figures are self-reported
Alternatives to Luscii
Other European remote patient monitoring software worth comparing before you decide:
Healthentia
Belgium · Class IIa software for monitoring, coaching and trial data
Medixine
Finland · Configurable monitoring suite with a Bluetooth hub app
Cuviva
Sweden · White-label platform with Swedish storage options
Corsano Health
Netherlands · Medical wristband with cloud and raw data access
See all European remote patient monitoring software or compare them directly against Biofourmis on our alternatives page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Its library lists monitoring programmes for more than 150 conditions, and organisations can create their own with the Medical Developer route.
The product page names FHIR-based integration with the electronic patient record.
The company says it has launched in 11 countries in Europe and Africa and publishes separate terms of use for UK and US users.