SimpleX Chat

UK-based messenger with no user identifiers - no phone numbers, no usernames, no accounts, just complete privacy

Quick Overview

Company SimpleX Chat Ltd
Category Messaging (No User IDs)
Headquarters United Kingdom
EU Presence Yes - UK (European)
Data Centers Self-hostable / Multiple relay servers
Open Source Yes (AGPLv3)
GDPR Compliant Yes (no user data collected)
End-to-End Encryption Yes (Double Ratchet)
Main Features No user IDs, no account, double ratchet encryption, self-hostable servers, voice/video calls
Pricing Free
Best For Privacy maximalists wanting messaging without any persistent user identifiers
Replaces WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram

Detailed Review

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • No user identifier at all — the strongest metadata position here
  • Servers cannot link conversations to a single person
  • Open source under AGPLv3, independently audited
  • Self-hostable relay servers
  • Free, with voice and video calls

Cons

  • No way to find anyone — connections need invitation links
  • Backup requires manual database export
  • Groups less mature than established platforms
  • UK jurisdiction, and a small user base

Alternatives to SimpleX Chat

Looking for other European secure messaging apps? Here are some alternatives worth considering:

Frequently Asked Questions

SimpleX uses a clever architecture where each conversation has unique, random queue identifiers on relay servers. Instead of "User A sends to User B," messages go to specific queues that only the intended recipient knows to check. Each of your contacts has a different way to reach you, with no common identifier linking your conversations.

You share a one-time invitation link or QR code with the person you want to connect with. They scan or click the link, and a private encrypted channel is established. The link is single-use, so it can't be reused or intercepted. You can share links through any channel - in person, via email, or another messenger.

In terms of metadata protection, yes. Signal requires a phone number and stores user accounts on central servers. SimpleX has no user identifiers and cannot build a social graph of users. Both use strong encryption (Double Ratchet), but SimpleX's architecture provides better protection against metadata analysis and correlation attacks.

Without a database backup, your SimpleX identity and contacts are lost - there's no account to recover. SimpleX allows you to export an encrypted backup of your database, which you should store securely. This backup can restore your conversations and contacts to a new device.

Yes, SimpleX is designed for self-hosting. You can run your own relay servers and configure the app to use them exclusively. This is valuable for organizations wanting to keep traffic within their infrastructure or users wanting maximum control. Documentation guides the setup process.

Yes, SimpleX supports encrypted voice and video calls on mobile and desktop. Calls use WebRTC with the same privacy protections as messaging - no user identifiers are involved. Call quality is good for typical internet connections.

Yes, SimpleX is fully open source under the AGPLv3 license. All client apps, server software, and protocol specifications are available on GitHub. Independent security audits by Trail of Bits have been conducted and published publicly.

Both are excellent privacy messengers without phone numbers. Session uses a permanent Session ID and decentralized node network. SimpleX has no user IDs at all and uses federated relay servers. SimpleX offers better metadata protection (no correlation possible), while Session offers better censorship resistance (blockchain-based network).

Who worked on this review

Three people touch every tool page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's own documentation.

Ingrid Halvorsen
Written by

Ingrid Halvorsen

Managing Editor · Oslo, Norway

Runs the review process and decides when a page is ready to publish or needs another pass.

Daniel Brandt
Edited by

Daniel Brandt

Privacy & Compliance Researcher · Berlin, Germany

Checks the compliance claims: where the company is established, where the data sits, and what the DPA actually says.

Sebastiaan Smits
Fact-checked by

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder & Editor · Netherlands

Selects the tools, writes the reviews, and checks where each company is actually established.

Read our editorial process for how we source, verify and update these pages — and how we keep affiliate income separate from what we recommend.

Go to SimpleX Chat