European Cloud Computing Alternatives

Build and deploy your applications on European cloud infrastructure. These providers offer competitive pricing, GDPR-compliant data centers, and full data sovereignty within Europe. Whether you need virtual servers, managed Kubernetes, or object storage, European cloud providers deliver reliable performance without compromising on data privacy.

11 European Cloud Computing Providers

UpCloud

High-performance Finnish cloud

#1 of 11 in this category
Finland From €5.00/month
MaxIOPS storage 100% uptime SLA Global data centers

Hetzner

Affordable and reliable German cloud hosting

#2 of 11 in this category
Germany From €4.51/month
Cloud servers Dedicated servers Excellent value

Infomaniak

Eco-friendly Swiss cloud hosting

#3 of 11 in this category
Switzerland From €5.75/month
100% renewable energy Swiss privacy kDrive included

Exoscale

Swiss cloud for demanding workloads

#4 of 11 in this category
Switzerland From €8.90/month
Managed Kubernetes GPU instances SLA-backed support

IONOS

Enterprise German cloud solutions

#5 of 11 in this category
Germany From €1.00/month
Managed Kubernetes Enterprise support S3 object storage

Scaleway

Developer-friendly European cloud

#6 of 11 in this category
France From €0.01/hour
Pay-as-you-go Serverless functions Managed databases

Cyso Cloud

100% Dutch sovereign cloud on OpenStack

#7 of 11 in this category
Netherlands Usage-based
Managed Kubernetes S3 object storage Load balancers

OVHcloud

Europe's largest cloud provider

#8 of 11 in this category
France From €3.50/month
Public & private cloud Managed Kubernetes 30+ data centers

gridscale

Flexible German cloud platform

#9 of 11 in this category
Germany From €5.00/month
Pay-per-minute billing Managed Kubernetes Object storage

Contabo

Budget-friendly German hosting

#10 of 11 in this category
Germany From €4.50/month
VPS & dedicated High resources/price Object storage

Lucity

Open-source PaaS you can leave - EU Vercel/Heroku alternative

#11 of 11 in this category
Switzerland / Germany Free self-host / trial
Git-based deploys Managed Postgres No lock-in (eject)

Key takeaways

  • UpCloud ranks #1 among the European cloud providers in this directory, because UpCloud's proprietary MaxIOPS storage delivers up to 100,000 IOPS with no noisy-neighbour variance, and independent benchmarks repeatedly place it among the fastest providers worldwide.
  • Hetzner is the price floor for serious European infrastructure: about €4.51 per month for 2 vCPUs, 4GB RAM and 40GB SSD, with 20TB of outbound traffic included and no charge for inbound — typically three to five times cheaper than the equivalent hyperscaler instance.
  • OVHcloud is the only provider here with SecNumCloud qualification from ANSSI, which requires data processed exclusively on French territory by French staff under French jurisdiction — a level above standard GDPR compliance, and why it appears in government and healthcare procurement.
  • These eleven tools are not interchangeable: UpCloud, Hetzner, Exoscale, Scaleway, Cyso Cloud, OVHcloud, gridscale and Contabo sell infrastructure, Infomaniak sells a Google Workspace replacement, and Lucity is a platform-as-a-service that deploys your repos.
  • Lucity is the only one that ships an eject button: it exports standard Helm charts and ArgoCD configurations, so leaving the platform is a migration of portable artefacts rather than a rebuild.

European cloud computing is on-demand compute, storage and managed services operated by a company established in Europe from European data centres, which means the infrastructure falls under European law and outside the reach of the US CLOUD Act — the statute that lets American authorities compel a US-established provider to produce data it holds anywhere in the world.

European cloud computing compared

European cloud computing tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 UpCloud Finland From about €5/month (Cloud Server) Developers and businesses needing high-performance European infrastructure
#2 Hetzner Germany From about €4.51/month (Cloud VPS) Developers and businesses wanting affordable, reliable EU-hosted infrastructure
#3 Infomaniak Switzerland From CHF 5.75/month (kSuite); kDrive Solo free Businesses wanting a Swiss cloud suite instead of Google Workspace
#4 Exoscale Switzerland From about CHF 5.50/month (Compute) Organisations requiring Swiss data privacy with European infrastructure
#5 IONOS Germany From about €1/month Businesses wanting European cloud infrastructure with a sustainability commitment
#6 Scaleway France From about €0.0025/hour (DEV1-S) Developers needing EU-only infrastructure with GPU and serverless options
#7 Cyso Cloud Netherlands Transparent usage-based, no lock-in Regulated organisations needing sovereign Dutch cloud with managed Kubernetes
#8 OVHcloud France From about €3.50/month (VPS) Businesses needing a comprehensive European cloud with sovereignty certification
#9 gridscale Germany From about €5/month (Cloud Server), billed per minute German businesses, agencies and MSPs wanting easy-to-use cloud infrastructure
#10 Contabo Germany From about €4.50/month (VPS) Cost-conscious developers needing generous resources for the money
#11 Lucity Switzerland Free self-hosted; Lucity Cloud 14-day trial with €5 credits Teams wanting Heroku-style deployment without vendor lock-in

Every European cloud computing tool reviewed

#1 UpCloud

Helsinki, Finland Founded 2011 From about €5/month (Cloud Server) Trial credits for new customers

Best for: Developers and businesses needing high-performance European infrastructure

UpCloud competes on storage performance, and in cloud infrastructure that is usually what decides whether an application feels fast. UpCloud's proprietary MaxIOPS delivers up to 100,000 IOPS to every cloud server, using a distributed architecture with multiple redundancy layers rather than the shared storage most providers use — which means performance stays consistent regardless of what other tenants are doing. Noisy-neighbour contention is the reason a cheap instance benchmarks well and then stalls under real load, and MaxIOPS removes it. Independent benchmarks repeatedly place UpCloud among the fastest cloud providers globally, ahead of providers many times its size.

UpCloud Ltd is based in Helsinki and runs data centres across Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, Poland and Spain, with further regions beyond Europe. Alongside compute it offers managed databases, managed Kubernetes, private networking and load balancers. Pricing starts around €5 per month with traffic billed separately at competitive rates, backed by a 100% uptime SLA, and new customers get credits to benchmark against their own workload before committing. For teams leaving AWS with I/O-bound applications, the price-performance gap is usually the argument that closes it.

What UpCloud does well

  • MaxIOPS delivers up to 100,000 IOPS with no noisy-neighbour variance
  • Benchmarks among the fastest cloud providers worldwide
  • 100% uptime SLA with responsive support
  • Finnish company, European data centres across six countries
  • Trial credits to benchmark before moving production workloads

Where UpCloud falls short

  • Not the cheapest option; Hetzner and Contabo undercut it
  • Traffic billed separately rather than bundled generously
  • Smaller service catalogue than a hyperscaler
  • No free tier, only trial credits

Standout feature. MaxIOPS storage: UpCloud is the only provider in this category that guarantees storage performance rather than averaging it, which is why its instances hold speed under load that others lose.

#2 Hetzner

Gunzenhausen, Germany Founded 1997 From about €4.51/month (Cloud VPS) No trial; pay by the hour

Best for: Developers and businesses wanting affordable, reliable EU-hosted infrastructure

Hetzner is the price floor for serious European infrastructure, and the numbers are not close. A cloud server with 2 vCPUs, 4GB RAM and 40GB SSD starts around €4.51 per month — typically three to five times cheaper than the equivalent instance on AWS, Google Cloud or Azure. Most plans include 20TB of outbound traffic at no extra cost, inbound traffic is free, snapshots are cheap, and there are no hidden charges for API calls or data retrieval. That predictability is the real contrast with hyperscaler billing, where the bill grows with success rather than with usage.

Hetzner Online GmbH has operated from Gunzenhausen since 1997 and runs data centres in Germany and Finland, which places it in the EU with intra-EEA processing and outside the reach of the US CLOUD Act. The range covers cloud VPS, dedicated servers, Storage Boxes, managed hosting, load balancers and firewalls. The combination of low price and genuine reliability has made Hetzner the default for cost-conscious developers and bootstrapped startups across Europe, and the loyalty it generates is unusual for infrastructure.

What Hetzner does well

  • Three to five times cheaper than equivalent hyperscaler instances
  • 20TB outbound traffic included; inbound traffic free
  • No hidden fees for API calls, snapshots or data retrieval
  • German company, data centres in Germany and Finland
  • Cloud VPS, dedicated servers and storage from one provider

Where Hetzner falls short

  • Smaller managed-service catalogue than Scaleway or OVHcloud
  • Only two data centre countries, both in northern Europe
  • Support is efficient rather than white-glove
  • No free tier

Standout feature. Included egress: Hetzner bundles 20TB of outbound traffic and charges nothing for inbound, which removes the line item that makes hyperscaler bills unpredictable.

#3 Infomaniak

Geneva, Switzerland Founded 1994 From CHF 5.75/month (kSuite); kDrive Solo free Free kDrive Solo tier

Best for: Businesses wanting a Swiss cloud suite instead of Google Workspace

Infomaniak is the only tool in this category that replaces Google Workspace rather than a server. The kSuite ecosystem covers kDrive for cloud storage, kMail for email, kMeet for video conferencing and kChat for messaging, alongside web hosting and domain registration — a complete productivity stack run by one Swiss company rather than assembled from four vendors. kDrive Solo with 15GB is free, which makes the storage half testable at no cost before any commitment.

Infomaniak Network SA has operated from Geneva since 1994 and runs its own data centres in Geneva and Winterthur on 100% renewable energy, holding ISO 27001 certification. Switzerland sits outside the EU with an adequacy decision, which means lawful transfers without standard contractual clauses and no US jurisdiction, though not the intra-EEA footing an EU provider gives. kSuite starts at CHF 5.75 per month per user including email, calendar, contacts, 15GB of kDrive and kMeet. The honest limits are ecosystem size: fewer third-party integrations than Google or Microsoft, mobile apps that trail theirs on polish, and Swiss Franc pricing that moves with the exchange rate for buyers outside Switzerland.

What Infomaniak does well

  • Complete productivity suite: storage, mail, video, chat, hosting and domains
  • Own data centres in Geneva and Winterthur on 100% renewable energy
  • ISO 27001 certified, Swiss jurisdiction outside US reach
  • kDrive Solo free at 15GB, so the suite is testable at no cost
  • Operating since 1994, with products sold standalone or bundled

Where Infomaniak falls short

  • Smaller integration ecosystem than Google or Microsoft
  • Mobile apps less polished than Google's
  • Swiss Franc pricing exposes non-Swiss buyers to exchange rates
  • Swiss adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing

Standout feature. Own data centres on renewable power: Infomaniak builds and runs its own Swiss facilities rather than renting capacity, which is why its sustainability and sovereignty claims are verifiable rather than contractual.

#4 Exoscale

Lausanne, Switzerland Founded 2011 From about CHF 5.50/month (Compute) Trial credits available

Best for: Organisations requiring Swiss data privacy with European infrastructure

Exoscale pairs Swiss privacy with a genuinely developer-oriented platform, and that combination is rarer than it sounds. Exoscale offers compute instances, managed Kubernetes through SKS, S3-compatible object storage, managed databases, DNS and network load balancers — a coherent catalogue rather than an exhaustive one, with an API and tooling built for people who automate their infrastructure rather than click through a console.

Exoscale is based in Lausanne and operates as part of A1 Digital, running data centres in Switzerland, Germany, Austria and Bulgaria. That spread matters for latency across central and eastern Europe, which the northern-European providers cover less well. Switzerland's position outside the EU and outside US jurisdiction, combined with an adequacy decision, gives lawful transfers without standard contractual clauses. Pricing starts around CHF 5.50 per month for compute with trial credits available. The catalogue is smaller than a hyperscaler's, so organisations with niche service requirements should confirm availability before committing.

What Exoscale does well

  • Swiss privacy with data centres across four European countries
  • Managed Kubernetes (SKS), S3-compatible storage and managed databases
  • Strong API and automation tooling for infrastructure-as-code
  • Coverage in Austria and Bulgaria that northern providers lack
  • Backed by A1 Digital rather than a standalone startup

Where Exoscale falls short

  • Smaller service catalogue than the hyperscalers
  • Swiss Franc pricing for non-Swiss buyers
  • Swiss adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing
  • Less well known, so fewer community resources and tutorials

Standout feature. Central and eastern European regions: Exoscale is the only provider here with data centres in both Austria and Bulgaria, which changes latency for workloads serving that half of the continent.

#5 IONOS

Montabaur, Germany Founded 1988 From about €1/month Free tier options

Best for: Businesses wanting European cloud infrastructure with a sustainability commitment

IONOS is the largest hosting provider in Europe and has been at it longer than almost anyone here, which for infrastructure is a purchasing criterion rather than trivia. The range spans cloud infrastructure and DevOps tooling through web hosting to domain registration and digital identity services, so a business can consolidate what it would otherwise split between a cloud provider and a registrar. Pricing starts around €1 per month for entry offerings, with transparent pay-as-you-go and committed-use discounts rather than the multi-dimensional billing that makes hyperscaler costs hard to forecast.

IONOS SE is based in Montabaur, Germany, and runs data centres in Germany, the UK and Spain on 100% renewable energy, holding ISO 27001 certification. As a German company it sits in the EU with intra-EEA processing and outside the reach of the US CLOUD Act. The breadth is both the appeal and the caveat: IONOS serves a very wide market from individual domain buyers to enterprise cloud customers, and the developer experience is not as focused as UpCloud's or Scaleway's.

What IONOS does well

  • Europe's largest hosting provider, with three decades of operation
  • 100% renewable energy and ISO 27001 certification
  • Cloud, hosting, domains and digital identity from one vendor
  • Transparent pricing from about €1/month with free tier options
  • German company, EU jurisdiction, data centres in three European countries

Where IONOS falls short

  • Developer experience less focused than UpCloud or Scaleway
  • Very broad product range dilutes the cloud offering
  • Upselling is more present than at developer-first providers
  • Support quality varies by product line

Standout feature. Scale plus green power: IONOS is the only provider here running Europe's largest hosting footprint entirely on renewable energy, which is a different claim from offsetting it.

#6 Scaleway

Paris, France Founded 1999 From about €0.0025/hour (DEV1-S) Pay by the hour, no commitment

Best for: Developers needing EU-only infrastructure with GPU and serverless options

Scaleway is the most complete modern cloud catalogue in this category that keeps every data centre inside the EU. VPS, managed Kubernetes, S3-compatible object storage, serverless functions, managed databases and — unusually for a European provider — real GPU instances for AI and machine learning workloads. For a team that wants to train or serve models without sending the workload to a US-established provider, Scaleway is the practical option here rather than one of several.

Scaleway is based in Paris and is part of the Iliad Group, with data centres in Paris, Amsterdam and Warsaw. All three are in the EU, so data never leaves EU jurisdiction and the company is not subject to US law including the CLOUD Act. Pricing is hourly and transparent from about €0.0025 per hour for a DEV1-S instance, with no hidden egress fees at reasonable volumes and committed-use and volume discounts available. The catalogue is smaller than a hyperscaler's and support leans on community forums and documentation at the lower tiers, with dedicated support reserved for enterprise customers.

What Scaleway does well

  • GPU instances for AI and ML, rare among European providers
  • Every data centre inside the EU — Paris, Amsterdam, Warsaw
  • Serverless functions, managed Kubernetes and S3-compatible storage
  • Transparent hourly billing with no hidden egress fees
  • Backed by the Iliad Group rather than standing alone

Where Scaleway falls short

  • Fewer regions and niche services than AWS or Google Cloud
  • Community-based support at lower tiers requires self-service
  • Only three data centre locations
  • Documentation thinner than the hyperscalers for edge cases

Standout feature. GPU instances inside EU-only regions: Scaleway is the one provider here where AI training and inference can run at scale without any data leaving EU jurisdiction.

#7 Cyso Cloud

Alkmaar, Netherlands Founded 1997 Transparent usage-based, no lock-in Contact for trial

Best for: Regulated organisations needing sovereign Dutch cloud with managed Kubernetes

Cyso Cloud is built for the buyer whose compliance officer reads the contract first. It is 100% Dutch and independently owned, running from three data centres in Amsterdam and Frankfurt, and holds ISO 27001 plus NEN 7510 — the Dutch standard for information security in healthcare. That second certification is what makes Cyso Cloud a clean fit for healthcare, finance and government, where GDPR compliance alone does not close the procurement question. Because the company is Dutch-owned and EU-based, there is no conflict between European data protection principles and foreign surveillance law.

The flagship service is managed Kubernetes with a 99.9% SLA, where Cyso handles implementation, management, maintenance and monitoring of the cluster so development teams never touch the control plane. Alongside it sit S3-compatible object storage, load balancers, cloud compute, managed databases, DNS and a transactional email service. The platform is OpenStack-based and open by philosophy, so the APIs are standard rather than proprietary. Pricing is transparent and usage-based with no lock-in. As a focused Dutch provider it runs fewer regions than the hyperscalers, and some newer services such as Cloud Databases and IAM are still in beta.

What Cyso Cloud does well

  • ISO 27001 and NEN 7510, the Dutch healthcare security standard
  • Managed Kubernetes with a 99.9% SLA and no control-plane work
  • 100% Dutch and independently owned, EU-only data centres
  • OpenStack-based with S3-compatible APIs, so no proprietary lock-in
  • Transparent usage-based pricing with no hidden egress

Where Cyso Cloud falls short

  • Fewer regions than the global hyperscalers
  • Cloud Databases and IAM still in beta
  • Smaller community and ecosystem than Scaleway or OVHcloud
  • Less suited to workloads needing presence outside Europe

Standout feature. NEN 7510 certification: Cyso Cloud is the only provider in this category certified against the Dutch healthcare information security standard, which is a procurement requirement GDPR alone does not satisfy.

#8 OVHcloud

Roubaix, France Founded 1999 From about €3.50/month (VPS) Pay as you go

Best for: Businesses needing a comprehensive European cloud with sovereignty certification

OVHcloud owns its stack from the metal up, and that is the basis of its sovereignty claim. OVHcloud designs and builds its own servers and operates them in its own data centres, so no third party has access to the physical infrastructure — vertical integration that is unique among major cloud providers. It is a founding member of GAIA-X, the European federated data infrastructure initiative, and offers public cloud, private cloud, bare metal, managed Kubernetes, web hosting and domain registration from more than 30 data centres, the majority in Europe.

OVHcloud SAS is based in Roubaix, France. The qualification that separates it from everything else here is SecNumCloud, certified by ANSSI, the French national cybersecurity agency: data processed exclusively on French territory, by French staff, under French jurisdiction. That is a level above standard GDPR compliance and is why OVHcloud appears in government, healthcare and financial procurement where GDPR is not a sufficient answer on its own. VPS pricing starts around €3.50 per month, and the global footprint means workloads needing presence outside Europe do not require a second provider.

What OVHcloud does well

  • SecNumCloud qualification from ANSSI — French territory, staff and jurisdiction
  • Builds and operates its own servers in its own data centres
  • Founding member of GAIA-X
  • 30+ data centres, so global reach without a second provider
  • Public cloud, private cloud, bare metal and Kubernetes in one catalogue

Where OVHcloud falls short

  • Console and developer experience less polished than Scaleway or UpCloud
  • Very broad catalogue makes the right product harder to identify
  • Support quality varies by tier and region
  • Some services are French-market-first in documentation and rollout

Standout feature. SecNumCloud: OVHcloud is the only provider in this category holding a national sovereignty qualification that guarantees which country's staff can touch the data, not just where it sits.

#9 gridscale

Cologne, Germany Founded 2014 From about €5/month (Cloud Server), billed per minute Trial available

Best for: German businesses, agencies and MSPs wanting easy-to-use cloud infrastructure

gridscale competes on how the cloud feels to operate rather than on what it costs. The control panel is genuinely designed: creating a server takes a few clicks and resources scale up or down in real time without downtime. The platform uses a building-block model where compute, storage and network resources combine freely instead of forcing a choice between predefined instance types, and everything is billed per minute — which makes it unusually cost-efficient for variable workloads and development environments that do not run overnight.

gridscale GmbH is based in Cologne and runs data centres in Frankfurt and Cologne, keeping data in Germany with intra-EEA processing. The catalogue covers cloud servers, managed Kubernetes, S3-compatible storage, managed databases and load balancers, with full API access, Terraform support and German-language support. The distinguishing commercial feature is the partner programme: agencies and managed service providers can resell gridscale under their own brand with custom pricing and white-label options, which is why gridscale often sits inside another company's offering rather than being bought directly. Pricing starts around €5 per month.

What gridscale does well

  • Genuinely usable control panel with real-time scaling and no downtime
  • Building-block resources instead of fixed instance types
  • Per-minute billing, efficient for variable and dev workloads
  • White-label reseller programme for agencies and MSPs
  • German data centres, Terraform support and German-language support

Where gridscale falls short

  • Only two data centre locations, both in Germany
  • Smaller service catalogue than Scaleway or OVHcloud
  • Less well known outside the German market
  • No GPU instances or serverless offering

Standout feature. White-label reselling: gridscale is the only provider here built to be sold under someone else's brand, which is why agencies and MSPs can offer cloud without building infrastructure.

#10 Contabo

Munich, Germany Founded 2003 From about €4.50/month (VPS) No trial

Best for: Cost-conscious developers needing generous resources for the money

Contabo sells more machine per euro than anything else in this category, and the gap is not marginal. The entry VPS gives 4 vCPU physical cores, 8GB RAM, 50GB NVMe storage and 200TB of monthly traffic from about €4.50 per month — a configuration that costs two to four times as much at most competitors. Crucially, those are physical CPU cores rather than the heavily oversubscribed virtual cores common in the industry, so the benchmark holds up rather than degrading under contention. The 200TB traffic allowance is effectively unlimited outside media streaming, which removes the overage anxiety that comes with usage-based providers.

Contabo GmbH has operated from Munich since 2003 and runs 12 data centre locations including Germany, the UK, the US, Singapore, Japan and Australia — the widest global spread of the German providers here, which suits workloads serving users outside Europe. NVMe storage is standard across the range and DDoS protection is included. The trade-offs are real and predictable: the control panel and automation are more basic than premium providers, support is adequate rather than SLA-backed, and provisioning can take longer than at fully automated providers, particularly during high-demand periods.

What Contabo does well

  • Physical CPU cores, not oversubscribed virtual ones
  • 200TB monthly traffic on most VPS plans
  • NVMe storage standard, DDoS protection included
  • 12 global locations, useful for non-European users
  • German company operating since 2003

Where Contabo falls short

  • Control panel and automation more basic than premium providers
  • No premium support tiers with guaranteed SLAs
  • Provisioning can be slow during high-demand periods
  • Fewer managed services than Scaleway or Cyso Cloud

Standout feature. 200TB of included traffic: Contabo is the only provider here where bandwidth effectively stops being a cost line, which is why it dominates game servers, CDN origins and media workloads.

#11 Lucity

Switzerland Founded 2024 Free self-hosted; Lucity Cloud 14-day trial with €5 credits 14-day free trial

Best for: Teams wanting Heroku-style deployment without vendor lock-in

Lucity is the only platform-as-a-service in this category, and the only one that treats leaving as a product feature. Lucity deploys GitHub repositories to production on Kubernetes and handles builds, containers, databases and domains, so a team ships code without operating servers. The differentiator is the eject button: most managed platforms make leaving painful by design, wiring applications into proprietary build systems and config formats. Lucity exports standard Helm charts and ArgoCD configurations — the actual portable artefacts it runs on underneath — so an entire setup lifts onto any Kubernetes cluster and keeps running. That makes "no lock-in" testable rather than a claim.

Lucity is built by zeitlos.software, a Swiss company, and released under AGPL-3.0; Lucity Cloud is hosted in Germany. Self-hosting is free, and Lucity Cloud offers a 14-day trial with €5 in credits. The honest assessment is that this is a young platform: a smaller community, less independent operating history and a thinner ecosystem than the US incumbents it replaces, and considerably less than raw Kubernetes with mature tooling. The self-hosted path still assumes comfort with Kubernetes concepts, and teams with demanding uptime, scale or support requirements should evaluate SLAs, regions and pricing directly before betting production on it.

What Lucity does well

  • Exports standard Helm charts and ArgoCD configs — a real eject button
  • Deploys GitHub repos with builds, containers, databases and domains handled
  • Open source under AGPL-3.0, self-hostable for free
  • Lucity Cloud hosted in Germany
  • Built on open standards rather than a proprietary runtime

Where Lucity falls short

  • Young platform with a small community and short track record
  • Managed cloud is early-stage; check SLAs before production
  • Self-hosting still assumes Kubernetes knowledge
  • Swiss company, so adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA establishment

Standout feature. The eject button: Lucity is the only platform in this category that hands you the exact Helm charts and ArgoCD configs it runs on, so migrating away is a copy rather than a rewrite.

What are you actually buying — infrastructure, a platform, or a suite?

Three different products are sold under the word "cloud", and comparing their prices is meaningless until you separate them. Infrastructure-as-a-service gives you a virtual machine and leaves everything above the operating system to you: UpCloud, Hetzner, Exoscale, Scaleway, Cyso Cloud, OVHcloud, gridscale and Contabo all sell this. Platform-as-a-service takes your source code and runs it: Lucity deploys GitHub repositories to Kubernetes, handling builds, containers, databases and domains. A productivity suite replaces Google Workspace rather than a server: that is Infomaniak, with kDrive, kMail, kMeet and kChat.

The choice is really about where you want your engineering time to go. IaaS is cheapest per unit of compute and most expensive in operational attention. PaaS costs more per workload and removes the operational attention almost entirely. A team of three shipping a product usually loses money on IaaS even at Hetzner prices, because the hours spent on deployment pipelines are worth more than the difference in the invoice.

The question that decides it is not price but who is on call. If nobody is, buy the platform.

What does the CLOUD Act actually mean for a European buyer?

The US CLOUD Act allows American authorities to compel a US-established provider to produce data it controls, regardless of which country the servers are in. An AWS region in Frankfurt does not remove that exposure, because the obligation attaches to the company rather than to the hardware. This is the single legal fact that makes this category exist.

A provider established in the EU is not subject to it. Scaleway keeps all data centres inside the EU in Paris, Amsterdam and Warsaw. Cyso Cloud is 100% Dutch and independently owned, running from Amsterdam and Frankfurt. Hetzner runs in Germany and Finland, gridscale in Frankfurt and Cologne, UpCloud from Helsinki with European regions. None of them can be reached by a US order.

OVHcloud goes furthest with SecNumCloud, a qualification from ANSSI, the French national cybersecurity agency, requiring that data be processed exclusively on French territory by French staff under French jurisdiction. OVHcloud is also a founding member of GAIA-X and builds its own servers in its own data centres, so no third party touches the physical hardware.

Switzerland is a separate case. Infomaniak, Exoscale and Lucity are Swiss-established, which means an adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing — lawful without standard contractual clauses, and outside US jurisdiction, but not the same legal footing as an EU provider for procurement rules that distinguish the two.

Why is European cloud so much cheaper than the hyperscalers?

Mostly because of egress. Hyperscaler pricing is built so that compute looks competitive and moving data out does not, and the bill grows with success rather than with usage. Hetzner includes 20TB of outbound traffic on most plans and charges nothing for inbound. Contabo includes 200TB on most VPS plans, which is effectively unlimited outside media streaming. Scaleway has no hidden egress fees at reasonable volumes.

The second reason is oversubscription. Contabo provides physical CPU cores rather than the heavily oversubscribed virtual cores common in the industry, which is why a €4.50 VPS with 4 vCPUs and 8GB RAM benchmarks better than the price suggests. UpCloud takes the same approach with storage: MaxIOPS avoids the shared-storage contention that makes a cheap instance unpredictable under load.

The third is scope. A European provider offering forty services rather than four hundred carries far less R&D overhead. That is also the trade-off — Scaleway, Exoscale and Cyso Cloud all note that organisations with very specific niche service requirements should check availability before committing.

The honest arithmetic is that for a straightforward web application, database and object storage, a European provider is routinely three to five times cheaper than the equivalent hyperscaler configuration, and the gap widens as traffic grows.

Which provider fits which workload?

For I/O-bound work — databases, e-commerce, busy content management — UpCloud's MaxIOPS is the differentiator, delivering up to 100,000 IOPS consistently rather than on average. Storage contention is what makes cheap instances feel slow, and removing it matters more than raw CPU for most real applications.

For cost-driven work at scale, Hetzner and Contabo are the two to weigh. Hetzner is the better platform with an ISO 27001 certification and a cleaner API; Contabo is cheaper still with far more included traffic, at the cost of a more basic control panel and slower provisioning during busy periods.

For Kubernetes without operating the control plane, Cyso Cloud offers managed Kubernetes with a 99.9% SLA and holds ISO 27001 plus NEN 7510, the Dutch healthcare information security standard — which makes it a clean fit for regulated sectors. Scaleway, Exoscale, gridscale and OVHcloud all offer managed Kubernetes too.

For GPU and machine learning workloads, Scaleway is the one in this group with a real GPU instance offering alongside serverless functions and object storage.

For agencies and managed service providers, gridscale runs a white-label reseller programme with custom pricing, which is unusual in this category and the reason it appears inside other companies' offerings.

How do you avoid replacing one lock-in with another?

By checking what leaving looks like before you arrive. The lock-in that hurts is rarely the virtual machine; it is the proprietary managed services, the bespoke build system and the config format that only one platform understands.

Lucity is the clearest answer to this in the category, because it treats leaving as a feature. Lucity exports standard Helm charts and ArgoCD configurations — the actual artefacts the platform runs on — so an entire setup can be lifted onto any Kubernetes cluster and keep running. That turns "no lock-in" from a claim into something testable on a Tuesday afternoon.

Cyso Cloud reaches the same place through open standards: an OpenStack-based platform with S3-compatible object storage, so the API your code speaks is not proprietary. Exoscale, Scaleway, gridscale and OVHcloud all offer S3-compatible storage and standard Kubernetes for the same reason.

The practical test before committing is to write down every managed service you intend to use and ask, for each one, what the migration target would be. If the answer for more than one is "rewrite it", the discount is not worth what it costs later.

How we selected and ranked these 11 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

UpCloud holds #1 among the European cloud providers in this directory, because its proprietary MaxIOPS storage delivers up to 100,000 IOPS without noisy-neighbour variance and independent benchmarks repeatedly rank it among the fastest providers globally. The right answer depends on the workload: Hetzner or Contabo for the lowest cost, OVHcloud for sovereignty certification and global reach, Scaleway for GPU and serverless, Cyso Cloud for managed Kubernetes in regulated sectors, gridscale for agencies reselling infrastructure, Infomaniak to replace Google Workspace, and Lucity to deploy code without operating servers.

Contabo is the cheapest for the resources you get: about €4.50 per month for a VPS with 4 vCPU physical cores, 8GB RAM, 50GB NVMe and 200TB of monthly traffic — a configuration that typically costs two to four times as much elsewhere. Hetzner starts around €4.51 for 2 vCPUs, 4GB RAM and 40GB SSD with 20TB of outbound traffic included. IONOS starts around €1 per month for entry offerings, and Scaleway bills from about €0.0025 per hour.

Yes, when the provider is established in Europe. The CLOUD Act attaches to the company, not the hardware, which is why an AWS or Azure region in Frankfurt does not remove the exposure. Scaleway, Cyso Cloud, Hetzner, gridscale, UpCloud, IONOS and OVHcloud are all EU-established and cannot be compelled by a US order. Infomaniak, Exoscale and Lucity are Swiss, which is outside US jurisdiction and covered by an adequacy decision rather than intra-EEA processing.

SecNumCloud is a qualification issued by ANSSI, the French national cybersecurity agency, requiring that data be processed exclusively on French territory, by French staff, under French jurisdiction. OVHcloud is the provider in this category that holds it. That goes beyond standard GDPR compliance and is why OVHcloud appears in French government, healthcare and financial sector procurement where GDPR alone is not a sufficient answer.

UpCloud, on storage performance specifically. UpCloud's proprietary MaxIOPS storage delivers up to 100,000 IOPS to all cloud servers using a distributed architecture with multiple redundancy layers, and crucially it avoids the noisy-neighbour contention that makes shared storage unpredictable. Independent benchmarks consistently rank UpCloud among the fastest cloud providers globally, often ahead of providers many times its size. For databases, e-commerce and busy CMS workloads that is the metric that decides real performance.

Cyso Cloud offers production-grade managed Kubernetes with a 99.9% SLA, handling implementation, management, maintenance and monitoring of the cluster, and holds ISO 27001 plus NEN 7510. Scaleway, Exoscale (through SKS), gridscale, OVHcloud and UpCloud all offer managed Kubernetes as well. Lucity approaches it differently: it runs Kubernetes underneath but exposes a Heroku-style deploy-from-GitHub experience instead of a cluster.

Scaleway is the provider in this category with a real GPU instance offering, alongside serverless functions, object storage and managed databases, and it keeps all data centres inside the EU in Paris, Amsterdam and Warsaw. For organisations subject to data residency requirements that want to train or serve models without sending workloads to a US-established provider, Scaleway is the practical option here.

IONOS runs on 100% renewable energy across its infrastructure and has done so as a stated commitment rather than an offset arrangement. Infomaniak runs on 100% renewable energy in its Swiss data centres in Geneva and Winterthur and treats sustainability as a founding principle. Both also hold ISO 27001. If sustainability is a procurement criterion rather than a preference, those are the two that document it.

Prefer standard interfaces and check the exit before you commit. Lucity is explicit about it, exporting standard Helm charts and ArgoCD configurations so an entire deployment can be lifted onto any Kubernetes cluster. Cyso Cloud is OpenStack-based with S3-compatible object storage, so the APIs are not proprietary. Exoscale, Scaleway, gridscale and OVHcloud all offer S3-compatible storage and standard Kubernetes. The practical test is to list every managed service you plan to use and name the migration target for each; if more than one answer is "rewrite it", reconsider.