Best European Messaging Apps

Looking for a private alternative to WhatsApp or Telegram? European messaging apps offer end-to-end encryption, minimal data collection, and GDPR compliance. Communicate with friends, family, and colleagues without worrying about your messages being analyzed or your metadata being harvested.

How we rank these tools — 4-step process
  1. 1
    European ownership, verified

    The company is headquartered and incorporated in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, and processes customer data in Europe. A US parent company disqualifies a tool from this page regardless of where its servers are.

  2. 2
    Category fit and hands-on review

    What the tool actually does, who it suits, and where it falls short — checked against the vendor’s own documentation, changelog and pricing page rather than its marketing copy.

  3. 3
    Compliance and pricing check

    GDPR posture, hosting location and the prices quoted on this page are verified against the vendor’s public pricing before publication, and re-checked when we revisit the category.

  4. 4
    Position on this page

    Placement on this page can be paid, and that can affect the order tools appear in. It never buys a listing: a tool that fails the checks above is not here at any price, and payment does not change the shortcomings we write about. A vendor can ask us to correct a factual error — not to remove a criticism.

Vendors can pay for visibility on this page. It never changes what an entry says about a product, including the criticism, and we earn nothing when you click through to a vendor. Paid placement can affect the order in which tools appear; it never affects whether a tool is listed. Editorial policy

8 European Messaging Apps

Threema

Swiss-made secure messenger with no phone number required

#1 of 12 in this category
Switzerland One-time purchase
No phone number needed Swiss privacy Open source

SimpleX

Private messenger with no user identifiers

#2 of 12 in this category
United Kingdom Free
No user IDs Decentralized Open source

Wire

Secure collaboration platform for businesses

#3 of 12 in this category
Germany Free tier available
End-to-end encrypted Video calls File sharing

Element

Secure messenger built on the Matrix protocol

#4 of 12 in this category
United Kingdom Free
Open source Decentralized End-to-end encrypted

Session

Decentralized messenger with no phone number or email required

#5 of 12 in this category
Switzerland Free
No phone number needed Decentralized network Open source

Briar

Peer-to-peer encrypted messenger designed for activists and journalists

#6 of 12 in this category
United Kingdom Free
Peer-to-peer Works offline via WiFi/Bluetooth Tor integration

BirdyChat

Latvian professional messaging app and EU alternative to WhatsApp

#7 of 12 in this category
Latvia EU member state
Professional messaging DMA interoperability EU-based

HansaChat

German team chat priced per workspace instead of per user

#8 of 12 in this category
Germany From €99/month
Flat workspace pricing IONOS Cloud EU hosting Slack alternative

Olvid

French messenger with no phone number and no central directory, holding an ANSSI CSPN visa

#9 of 12 in this category
France Free / Pro €4.99 per user per month
No phone numberAGPL-3.0 appsANSSI CSPN visa

Teamwire

German business messenger for public safety and healthcare, on IONOS or on-premise

#10 of 12 in this category
Germany From €79 per month for up to 25 users
IONOS cloud or on-premiseAudit-proof archivingLDAP and MDM integration

ginlo

Munich messenger with a free private app and a managed business edition

#11 of 12 in this category
Germany Free private app / Business from €3.57 per user per month
Free private appBusiness management cockpitServers in Germany

Delta Chat

Encrypted messenger built on email, so any email or chatmail server can carry it

#12 of 12 in this category
Germany Free and open source
Runs on email serversMulti-deviceOpen source (MPL-2.0)

Key takeaways

  • Threema ranks #1 among the European messaging apps in this directory, because Threema requires no phone number and no email address, is bought once for CHF 4.99 rather than subscribed to, and is open source and independently audited.
  • Everyone in this category encrypts the message contents, so that is not the differentiator: what separates them is metadata — whether a server can see that you and another person are talking at all.
  • SimpleX Chat goes furthest by having no user identifier of any kind. Not a phone number, not a username, not even an internal ID: each conversation uses different random identifiers, so a compromised server cannot reconstruct who knows whom.
  • Briar has no servers at all. Messages pass directly between devices over Tor, and when the internet is cut off Briar syncs over Wi-Fi or Bluetooth — which is why it exists for protests, disaster zones and censored networks.
  • HansaChat is the only team chat here that stays priced per workspace rather than per seat past 25 users: 99 EUR a month covers up to 100 users, so adding a contractor or a seasonal shift stops being a budget decision.

European messaging is chat software built by a company, foundation or project based in Europe that encrypts messages end to end and — in the strongest cases — is designed so that no server ever learns who is talking to whom, which is the part conventional messengers leave exposed.

European messaging compared

European messaging tools compared on position, country, entry price and best use
PositionToolEstablishedEntry priceBest for
#1 Threema Switzerland CHF 4.99 one-time (mobile) / CHF 2/user/month (Work) Privacy-conscious individuals and businesses wanting anonymous messaging
#2 SimpleX Chat United Kingdom Free Privacy maximalists who want no persistent identifier at all
#3 Wire Switzerland Free (personal) / from €5.83/user/month (business) Businesses that need encrypted collaboration including with outsiders
#4 Element United Kingdom Free self-hosted / from about €5/user/month (managed) Organisations wanting decentralised chat with full data sovereignty
#5 Session Switzerland Free Users wanting anonymous messaging on a decentralised network
#6 Briar Europe Free and open source Activists and journalists who need messaging when networks fail
#7 BirdyChat Latvia See website Professionals wanting a European messenger built for DMA interoperability
#8 HansaChat Germany Free for 10 users / from 99 EUR per month per workspace, flat EU SMEs and agencies wanting German hosting without per-seat pricing
#9 Olvid France Free / Pro €4.99/user/month incl. tax (in-app) / Business €9.90/user/month excl. tax / Enterprise €9.90/user/month + €4,990/year Individuals and organisations that want accounts with no phone number behind them and apps with a French security visa
#10 Teamwire Germany Small Business €79/month for up to 25 users / Standard €3.45/user/month (25–500 users), billed annually / Professional on request Public safety and healthcare organisations that want a business messenger hosted in Germany or on their own servers
#11 ginlo Germany ginlo Private free / ginlo Business from €3.57/user/month incl. 19% VAT (education €1.19) Schools, practices and firms that want a managed messenger with servers only in Germany
#12 Delta Chat Germany Free and open source People who would rather choose, or run, the server their messages pass through

Every European messaging tool reviewed

#1 Threema

Pfaffikon, Switzerland Founded 2012 CHF 4.99 one-time (mobile) / CHF 2/user/month (Work) One-time purchase, no subscription

Best for: Privacy-conscious individuals and businesses wanting anonymous messaging

  • Operating company. Threema GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Switzerland
  • Independent checks. Open source, independently audited
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal

Threema is the most usable answer in this category, and it gets there by removing the one thing that ties a messaging account to a person.

Instead of a phone number or an email address, Threema issues a random Threema ID — so the account exists without an identity behind it, and there is no contact list to upload or address book to scan. That is a materially stronger position than Signal's, which encrypts perfectly but still requires a phone number.

Threema GmbH operates from Pfäffikon with Swiss hosting and Swiss jurisdiction, outside the EU and outside the intelligence-sharing alliances, under an adequacy decision. The apps are open source and independently audited.

The business model is the other unusual choice: CHF 4.99 once for the mobile app rather than a subscription, and CHF 2 per user per month for Threema Work — so the company is paid by users rather than by anything it might do with their data.

The honest limits are adoption and polish: a smaller user base than WhatsApp or Signal means convincing contacts, the one-off fee competes against free alternatives, and there are no sticker libraries or third-party integrations.

What Threema does well

  • No phone number or email required — a random Threema ID instead
  • One-off CHF 4.99 rather than a subscription
  • Open source with published independent audits
  • Swiss hosting and jurisdiction, outside the Eyes alliances
  • Threema Work for businesses at CHF 2/user/month

Where Threema falls short

  • Smaller user base than WhatsApp or Signal
  • The one-off fee is a barrier against free competitors
  • Occasional mobile-to-desktop sync issues
  • Few extras: no sticker libraries or integrations

Standout feature. An account with no identity attached: Threema is the most usable messenger here where signing up requires neither a phone number nor an email address.

#2 SimpleX Chat

United Kingdom Founded 2021 Free Free, no account needed

Best for: Privacy maximalists who want no persistent identifier at all

  • Operating company. SimpleX Chat Ltd
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Self-hostable relay servers
  • Independent checks. Open source (AGPLv3), audited
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram

SimpleX Chat is architecturally different from everything else in this category, including the other privacy messengers. Signal has your phone number, Session has a Session ID, Threema has a Threema ID — SimpleX has nothing.

There is no global user identifier of any kind; each conversation uses unique random identifiers that differ per contact, so the servers relay encrypted messages without ever knowing which conversations belong to the same person. If every SimpleX server were seized tomorrow, the social graph could not be reconstructed, because it was never recorded anywhere.

SimpleX Chat Ltd is based in the United Kingdom, open source under AGPLv3 and independently audited, using the Double Ratchet protocol with self-hostable relay servers so an organisation can run its own infrastructure.

It is free, with voice and video calls alongside messaging. The friction is the direct consequence of the design and SimpleX states it: there is no way to search for someone, so connections require exchanging a one-time invitation link through another channel, and backup means manually exporting your database because there is no account to restore.

Groups are less mature than on established platforms, and the UK jurisdiction may concern some — though the architecture protects regardless of legal environment.

What SimpleX Chat does well

  • No user identifier at all — the strongest metadata position here
  • Servers cannot link conversations to a single person
  • Open source under AGPLv3, independently audited
  • Self-hostable relay servers
  • Free, with voice and video calls

Where SimpleX Chat falls short

  • No way to find anyone — connections need invitation links
  • Backup requires manual database export
  • Groups less mature than established platforms
  • UK jurisdiction, and a small user base

Standout feature. No user ID whatsoever: SimpleX is the only messenger here where a total server compromise still reveals nothing about who talks to whom.

#3 Wire

Zug, Switzerland Founded 2014 Free (personal) / from €5.83/user/month (business) Free personal tier

Best for: Businesses that need encrypted collaboration including with outsiders

  • Operating company. Wire Swiss GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. EU (Germany, Ireland)
  • Independent checks. Open source
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom

Wire is the team chat that solves the external-party problem properly. Guest Rooms let a client, contractor or partner join a conversation through a link in a web browser — no account, no installation — while keeping the same end-to-end encryption as registered users.

That closes the usual failure where secure collaboration quietly falls back to unencrypted email the moment someone outside the organisation is involved. Alongside it, Wire covers end-to-end encrypted group calls for up to 50 participants on the Teams plan, with encrypted screen sharing.

Wire Swiss GmbH is based in Zug with data processing in EU data centres in Germany and Ireland, and the platform is open source, built on the Proteus encryption protocol. Business plans start at €5.83 per user per month with a free personal tier.

Two things to weigh honestly: the integration ecosystem is far smaller than Slack's with no comparable app marketplace, and there have been questions about the ownership structure following venture capital funding — Wire has reaffirmed its privacy commitment and clarified that the holding structure does not affect Swiss operational jurisdiction, and the open-source code means the community can watch for changes.

What Wire does well

  • Guest Rooms give externals encrypted access with no account
  • End-to-end encrypted group calls up to 50 participants
  • Encrypted screen sharing
  • Open source, Swiss company, EU data centres
  • Free personal tier alongside business plans

Where Wire falls short

  • Far smaller integration ecosystem than Slack
  • Questions raised about ownership after VC funding
  • Personal users struggle to bring contacts across
  • No app marketplace

Standout feature. Guest Rooms: Wire is the only tool here where someone outside your company joins an encrypted conversation from a browser without creating anything.

#4 Element

London, United Kingdom Founded 2016 Free self-hosted / from about €5/user/month (managed) Free self-hosted

Best for: Organisations wanting decentralised chat with full data sovereignty

  • Operating company. Element (New Vector Ltd)
  • Jurisdiction. United Kingdom (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Self-hosted, or European managed options
  • Independent checks. Open source, Matrix protocol
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord

Element is the reason European governments run Matrix. Built on the open Matrix protocol, Element federates rather than centralises: an organisation runs its own server, users on different servers still talk to each other, and the messages never touch a vendor's infrastructure. For a public body that must guarantee where communications live, that is the only architecture that delivers it — and it is why Matrix has seen government and enterprise adoption where SaaS chat products could not qualify.

Element (New Vector Ltd) is based in London, open source, free to self-host with managed hosting from about €5 per user per month including European options.

The distinctive practical feature is bridges: Matrix can connect to Slack, Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp, Signal and IRC, so an organisation consolidates communications without forcing everyone to switch at once — a migration path rather than a cliff edge, though bridges add complexity and inherit each platform's API limits.

The costs are stated plainly: a steeper learning curve than centralised tools, federation delays, encryption key management that confuses non-technical users who must verify devices and manage backups, and a resource-intensive Synapse server that needs deliberate infrastructure planning at scale.

What Element does well

  • Matrix federation with full self-hosting and data sovereignty
  • Bridges to Slack, Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp, Signal and IRC
  • Open source, with government and enterprise adoption
  • Free self-hosted, or managed with European hosting
  • End-to-end encryption across federated servers

Where Element falls short

  • Steeper learning curve than centralised platforms
  • Federation can delay message delivery
  • Key management confuses non-technical users
  • Synapse is resource-intensive at scale

Standout feature. Bridges to everything else: Element is the only tool here that lets an organisation move without making everyone else move first.

#5 Session

Switzerland Founded 2020 Free Free, no account needed

Best for: Users wanting anonymous messaging on a decentralised network

  • Operating company. Session Technology Foundation
  • Jurisdiction. Switzerland (adequacy decision, outside the EEA)
  • Where the data sits. Decentralised community nodes worldwide
  • Independent checks. Open source (GPLv3)
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram

Session protects the pattern rather than only the contents. Every message is routed through three random nodes before reaching its destination, each node knowing only the previous and next hop — onion routing borrowed from Tor — so no single node ever knows both who you are and who you are talking to.

Your ISP and any network observer see that you are using Session, not with whom or when. There is no phone number: an anonymous Session ID is the whole account.

Session is run by the Session Technology Foundation, based in Switzerland, open source under GPLv3, and free. The network is decentralised across community-operated nodes, which means there is no company storing metadata logs that could be subpoenaed — a structural answer rather than a policy one.

Features cover disappearing messages, open groups and cross-platform apps. The costs follow from the architecture: decentralised routing is slower than a centralised service, especially under congestion, onion routing adds latency, voice and video quality varies with network conditions, and the anonymous Session ID makes finding and verifying contacts harder than a phone number would.

What Session does well

  • Onion routing through three nodes hides who talks to whom
  • Anonymous Session ID — no phone number or email
  • Decentralised, so no company holds subpoena-able metadata logs
  • Open source under GPLv3 and free
  • Disappearing messages and open groups

Where Session falls short

  • Slower delivery, especially under network congestion
  • Onion routing adds latency to every message
  • Session IDs make finding and verifying contacts harder
  • Voice and video quality varies with conditions

Standout feature. Onion routing on a community-run network: Session is the only messenger here where there is no company holding metadata logs, because there is no company in the delivery path.

#6 Briar

Europe (distributed team) Founded 2018 Free and open source Free

Best for: Activists and journalists who need messaging when networks fail

  • Operating company. Briar Project (non-profit)
  • Jurisdiction. No servers to hold jurisdiction over
  • Where the data sits. None — peer-to-peer over Tor
  • Independent checks. Open source (GPLv3)
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp, Signal in high-risk scenarios

Briar has no servers, and that is not a technical curiosity — it is the entire point. Messages pass directly between devices, routed over Tor when the internet is available, so there is nothing to hack, nothing to subpoena, no company that can be pressured and no central point a censor can block. Even if the project's own development infrastructure were seized, existing users would keep communicating without interruption.

The capability that no other messenger in this category has is working with the internet switched off.

When connectivity is censored, damaged or absent, Briar syncs between nearby devices over Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, letting messages hop device to device until they arrive — which is why it exists for protests where mobile networks are disabled, for disaster zones, and for remote areas.

Briar is a non-profit project developed by a distributed European team, open source under GPLv3 and free, with forums and blogs alongside messaging. The trade-offs are severe and honestly documented: Android only, no iOS because Apple restricts the background processes P2P requires, a desktop version still in beta, messages syncing only while the app is open with the battery cost that implies, and contacts exchanged in person. Briar is not for casual messaging with friends and family, and says so.

What Briar does well

  • No servers at all — nothing to hack, subpoena or block
  • Works over Wi-Fi and Bluetooth when the internet is unavailable
  • Tor routing hides metadata from network observers
  • Non-profit, open source under GPLv3, free
  • Forums and blogs alongside private messaging

Where Briar falls short

  • Android only; no iOS due to Apple background restrictions
  • Messages sync only while the app is open, costing battery
  • Contacts must be exchanged in person
  • Not designed for everyday messaging

Standout feature. Messaging with the internet switched off: Briar is the only tool in this category that keeps working when the network is deliberately shut down.

#7 BirdyChat

Latvia Founded 2026 See website See website

Best for: Professionals wanting a European messenger built for DMA interoperability

  • Operating company. BirdyChat
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Latvia)
  • Where the data sits. EU
  • Independent checks. GDPR
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp

BirdyChat is a bet on a rule change rather than on a feature. The EU Digital Markets Act requires large messaging platforms to open up to interoperability, and BirdyChat is built around that era arriving — a European messenger designed from the start to talk across apps rather than to become another walled garden. If interoperability lands as intended, an app architected for it has an advantage that no amount of feature development buys.

BirdyChat is based in Latvia, so EU-established with intra-EEA processing and GDPR compliance by jurisdiction rather than by arrangement, and is aimed at professional and team messaging rather than consumer chat.

It is also very new — launched in 2026 — and the honest assessment is that this is an early-stage product whose proposition depends on a regulatory outcome that has not fully arrived. There is no open-source code to inspect, the feature set is still forming, and pricing is published on the site rather than fixed here. Promising rather than proven.

What BirdyChat does well

  • Built around EU Digital Markets Act interoperability
  • Latvian company, EU jurisdiction, intra-EEA processing
  • Aimed at professional and team messaging
  • GDPR compliance by establishment rather than arrangement
  • A genuinely different bet from the walled-garden messengers

Where BirdyChat falls short

  • Launched 2026, so early-stage and unproven
  • Not open source
  • Feature set still forming
  • Its core advantage depends on how DMA interoperability lands

Standout feature. Designed for interoperability: BirdyChat is the only messenger here built on the assumption that messaging apps will have to talk to each other.

#8 HansaChat

Lübeck, Germany Founded 2024 Free for 10 users / from 99 EUR per month per workspace, flat Free for 10 users

Best for: EU SMEs and agencies wanting German hosting without per-seat pricing

  • Operating company. HansaChat (sole operator)
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. IONOS Cloud, EU
  • Independent checks. DPA under Art. 28 GDPR
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat

HansaChat removes the link between headcount and invoice, and for a growing team that is the whole argument.

Slack and Microsoft Teams scale with users, so onboarding a seasonal team, a group of contractors or a warehouse shift becomes a budget decision rather than an access decision. HansaChat charges per workspace: 99 EUR per month on annual billing for up to 100 users with 25 GB storage, or 199 EUR for 500 users and 100 GB. Past roughly fifteen people that wins on cost, and it keeps winning as the team grows.

HansaChat runs on IONOS Cloud in the EU with a data processing agreement under Article 28 GDPR, operated from Lübeck, with encrypted backups in Sweden and the UK.

It covers channels, direct messages, file sharing, audio and video calls with screen sharing, SSO and webhooks, and is free for up to 10 users. Two things deserve stating plainly because HansaChat states them itself.

There is no end-to-end encryption — TLS in transit and AES-256 at rest, the same posture as Slack — so a team that needs E2E should choose Wire instead. And HansaChat is operated by a single person, which is a real continuity risk to weigh against the pricing advantage rather than discover later.

What HansaChat does well

  • Priced per workspace, not per seat — 99 EUR for up to 100 users
  • German operator, IONOS Cloud in the EU, Art. 28 GDPR DPA
  • Free for up to 10 users
  • Channels, calls, screen sharing, SSO and webhooks
  • Open about what it does not offer

Where HansaChat falls short

  • No end-to-end encryption — TLS and at-rest only
  • Operated by a single person, a genuine continuity risk
  • Not open source
  • Smaller integration ecosystem than Slack

Standout feature. A flat workspace price: HansaChat is the only team chat here where adding the fiftieth colleague costs nothing, which changes who gets an account at all.

#9 Olvid

Paris, France Founded 2019 Free / Pro €4.99/user/month incl. tax (in-app) / Business €9.90/user/month excl. tax / Enterprise €9.90/user/month + €4,990/year Free tier; 1-month free trial of the in-app Pro option

Best for: Individuals and organisations that want accounts with no phone number behind them and apps with a French security visa

  • Operating company. Olvid SAS
  • Jurisdiction. EU (France)
  • Where the data sits. Amazon Web Services (AWS), region not stated by Olvid; the server only relays encrypted payloads
  • Independent checks. ANSSI CSPN security visas (iOS and Android apps)
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp, Signal, Microsoft Teams chat

Olvid is a French messenger, made by Olvid SAS in Paris, that needs no phone number and keeps no central user directory, so an Olvid account is not listed anywhere a stranger could search for it. The Olvid apps for Android and iOS are open source under AGPL-3.0, and Olvid has published the code of its distribution server as well, which means the part that moves messages can be read and not only the part that encrypts them.

Olvid holds ANSSI CSPN security visas for its iOS and Android apps, so the certification attaches to the software people install rather than to a data centre beneath it.

Olvid is free to use, with an in-app Pro option at €4.99 per user per month including tax and a one-month free trial of that option. For organisations, Olvid Business costs €9.90 per user per month excluding tax, and Olvid Enterprise costs €9.90 per user per month plus €4,990 a year and adds SSO and MDM.

The caveat with Olvid is the hosting. Olvid names Amazon Web Services as its host and does not say which AWS region the service runs in, so a French company sits on an American infrastructure provider in a location Olvid leaves unstated. Olvid states that its server only relays encrypted payloads, which limits what that provider holds, but a buyer whose procurement rules reach the subprocessor and the data location will have to ask Olvid for the region directly.

What Olvid does well

  • No phone number and no central user directory
  • Android and iOS apps open source under AGPL-3.0, with the distribution server code published
  • ANSSI CSPN security visas for the iOS and Android apps
  • Free tier, with a one-month trial of the in-app Pro option
  • Business and Enterprise plans, with SSO and MDM on Enterprise

Where Olvid falls short

  • Hosted on Amazon Web Services, a US infrastructure provider
  • Olvid does not state which AWS region the service runs in
  • No directory to search, so every contact has to be added deliberately
  • Enterprise adds €4,990 a year on top of €9.90 per user per month

Standout feature. Certification on the client: Olvid holds ANSSI CSPN security visas for the iOS and Android apps themselves, which is where a messenger does its encrypting.

#10 Teamwire

Munich, Germany Founded 2014 Small Business €79/month for up to 25 users / Standard €3.45/user/month (25–500 users), billed annually / Professional on request 15-day free trial, no credit card

Best for: Public safety and healthcare organisations that want a business messenger hosted in Germany or on their own servers

  • Operating company. Teamwire GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Germany, on IONOS Cloud (public cloud or dedicated private cluster); on-premise option
  • Independent checks. ISO 27001 and BSI C5 (stated for the IONOS-hosted service)
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp at work, Microsoft Teams chat, Slack

Teamwire is a business messenger from Teamwire GmbH in Munich, founded in 2014 and aimed at public safety and healthcare organisations. Teamwire includes audit-proof archiving and integrates with LDAP, Active Directory and MDM systems, so accounts can follow the staff directory an organisation already maintains.

Teamwire hosts the service in Germany on IONOS Cloud, either in the public cloud or in a dedicated private cluster, and offers an on-premise installation for organisations that want the servers under their own roof.

With Teamwire the company is German and the servers are in Germany, and the on-premise route takes the hosting provider out of the chain altogether. Teamwire cites ISO 27001 and BSI C5 alongside its IONOS hosting, but the Teamwire hosting page does not make clear whether those certificates are held by Teamwire or by the data centre, so it is worth asking which entity the certificate names.

Teamwire Small Business costs €79 a month for up to 25 users, Teamwire Standard costs €3.45 per user per month for 25 to 500 users on annual billing, and Teamwire Professional is priced on request. Teamwire offers a 15-day free trial without a credit card. Teamwire is not open source, so what the Teamwire apps do with a message rests on Teamwire's own description rather than on code anyone can read.

What Teamwire does well

  • Hosted in Germany on IONOS Cloud, as public cloud or a dedicated private cluster
  • On-premise installation for organisations that want their own servers
  • Audit-proof archiving built in
  • LDAP/Active Directory and MDM integration
  • Flat €79 a month for up to 25 users, and a 15-day trial with no credit card

Where Teamwire falls short

  • Unclear whether the ISO 27001 and BSI C5 certificates are Teamwire's own or the data centre's
  • Not open source
  • Per-user pricing from 25 users, and Professional only on request
  • No free tier, only a 15-day trial

Standout feature. Three places to put the servers: Teamwire runs on IONOS Cloud in Germany, in a dedicated private cluster there, or on the customer's own hardware.

#11 ginlo

Munich, Germany Founded 2020 ginlo Private free / ginlo Business from €3.57/user/month incl. 19% VAT (education €1.19) Free (Private); 30-day free trial (Business)

Best for: Schools, practices and firms that want a managed messenger with servers only in Germany

  • Operating company. ginlo.net Gesellschaft für Datenkommunikationsdienste mbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. Germany, in an ISO 27001 (IT-Grundschutz) data centre; operator not named
  • Source code. Closed source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp, Microsoft Teams chat

ginlo is a messenger from ginlo.net Gesellschaft für Datenkommunikationsdienste mbH in Munich, offered as two editions: ginlo Private, a free app for personal use, and ginlo Business, a managed edition for schools, practices and firms.

ginlo Business costs from €3.57 per user per month including 19% VAT, with an education price of €1.19, and comes with a 30-day free trial. Administrators handle ginlo Business licences in a Management Cockpit. ginlo keeps its servers in Germany only, in an ISO 27001 (IT-Grundschutz) certified data centre.

The caveat with ginlo is who runs that data centre. ginlo does not name the operator anywhere on its site, so a buyer can confirm the country and the certificate but not the company operating the hardware. ginlo does not publish its source code either, so the ginlo apps have to be taken on the vendor's description.

What ginlo does well

  • A free private app alongside a paid business edition
  • Servers in Germany only, in an ISO 27001 (IT-Grundschutz) data centre
  • ginlo Business from €3.57 per user per month including VAT
  • Education pricing at €1.19
  • Management Cockpit for licences, and a 30-day Business trial

Where ginlo falls short

  • The operator of ginlo's data centre is not named
  • The hosting chain can be checked as far as country and certificate, not provider
  • Not open source
  • Prices include 19% VAT, so compare them with care against net prices elsewhere

Standout feature. Private and business in one product line: ginlo gives private users a free app and gives schools, practices and firms a managed business edition, with servers only in Germany.

#12 Delta Chat

Freiburg, Germany Free and open source Free

Best for: People who would rather choose, or run, the server their messages pass through

  • Operating company. merlinux GmbH
  • Jurisdiction. EU (Germany)
  • Where the data sits. No central Delta Chat server: messages go over chatmail relays or any email server the user picks; the default relay nine.testrun.org is run by testrun UG i.G., Freiburg (hosting provider not named)
  • Source code. Open source
  • Replaces. WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal

Delta Chat is an end-to-end encrypted messenger built on email standards, from merlinux GmbH in Freiburg, and there is no central Delta Chat server: messages travel over chatmail relays or over any email server the user picks. With Delta Chat the operator of the server is whoever the user chose, which can be a public relay, a provider the user already trusts, or the user.

Delta Chat is free and open source: the core is published under MPL-2.0, the Android app under GPL-3.0 and the chatmail relay software under MIT, so an organisation can read the client core and the relay code and run a relay of its own. Delta Chat supports multiple profiles and multiple devices.

The caveat with Delta Chat is the default setting. The default Delta Chat relay, nine.testrun.org, is run by testrun UG i.G., also in Freiburg, which is a different company from merlinux, and the relay's privacy policy does not name the hosting provider underneath it. A Delta Chat user who accepts the default is therefore relying on a second company and an unnamed hoster, and one who picks another relay should check who runs that one instead.

What Delta Chat does well

  • No central Delta Chat server; chatmail relays or any email server carry the messages
  • Free and open source, with the core under MPL-2.0 and the Android app under GPL-3.0
  • Relay software under MIT, so an organisation can run its own relay
  • Multiple profiles and multiple devices
  • Made by merlinux GmbH in Freiburg, under German jurisdiction

Where Delta Chat falls short

  • The default relay is run by testrun UG i.G., a different company from merlinux
  • The hosting provider behind the default relay nine.testrun.org is not named
  • Where messages pass depends on the relay chosen, so the data-location answer varies per user
  • Vetting a relay is left to the user

Standout feature. An operator you pick: Delta Chat has no central server, so the relay carrying a conversation is run by whoever the user chose, the user included.

Everyone encrypts messages — so what actually differs?

Metadata. End-to-end encryption hides what you said; it does not hide that you said it, to whom, at what time and how often. For most threat models the pattern of communication is more revealing than the content, and it is the part that survives a subpoena.

The messengers in this category attack that problem at different depths. Threema issues a random Threema ID rather than requiring a phone number, so the account is not tied to an identity. Session goes further with onion routing: every message passes through three random nodes, each knowing only the previous and next hop, so no single node knows both who you are and who you are talking to.

SimpleX Chat removes the identifier entirely, which is a genuinely different design. There is no phone number, no username and no global ID — each conversation uses unique random identifiers per contact, and the servers only relay encrypted messages without knowing which conversations belong to the same person. Even if every SimpleX server were seized, the social graph could not be rebuilt because it was never recorded.

Briar removes the servers. Messages travel directly between devices over Tor, so there is nothing to hack, subpoena or block, and no company that can be pressured.

Private messenger or team chat? They are different purchases.

A personal messenger optimises for reaching individuals: Threema, SimpleX, Session, Briar, Olvid and Delta Chat all do this, and all six can be used without a subscription.

A team chat optimises for channels, administration and access control. Wire covers encrypted group calls for up to 50 participants, screen sharing and — its distinctive feature — Guest Rooms, where an external client or contractor joins a conversation by link, in a browser, with the same end-to-end encryption and without creating an account. Element gives Matrix-based federation with self-hosting and bridges. HansaChat is a straightforward Slack replacement on German hosting.

Buying one for the other job is the standard mistake. A team that adopts Threema loses channels and administration; an individual who adopts Element inherits a server to run.

BirdyChat sits between the two, aimed at professional messaging and built around EU Digital Markets Act interoperability — which is a genuinely interesting bet on cross-app messaging, and also a 2026 launch with the maturity that implies.

What does the network effect actually cost you here?

The best messenger is worthless if nobody you know uses it, and several tools in this category say so plainly. Threema, Wire and Session all note that convincing contacts to install is the practical barrier, not any technical limitation.

That reframes the decision. For personal messaging, the question is not which app is most private but which private app your circle will actually adopt — and a one-off CHF 4.99 for Threema is a smaller ask than persuading someone to manage Session IDs or exchange SimpleX invitation links.

For a team, the network effect works in your favour because adoption is a decision rather than a negotiation. This is why the European team-chat tools are more viable than the European consumer messengers: an employer can simply choose Wire, Element, HansaChat, Teamwire or ginlo.

Element offers the one genuine escape from the trade-off. Matrix bridges connect to Slack, Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp, Signal and IRC, so an organisation can consolidate without forcing everyone to switch at once. Bridges add complexity and inherit the limits of each target platform's API, but they turn a cliff-edge migration into a gradual one.

When is self-hosting or decentralisation worth the trouble?

When the requirement is that no third party can be compelled. Element self-hosted on your own Matrix server means the messages never touch anyone else's infrastructure, which is why European governments and public bodies have adopted Matrix rather than a SaaS chat product.

The cost is real and Element states it: Matrix has a steeper learning curve, federation between servers can delay delivery, encryption key management confuses non-technical users who must verify devices and manage key backups, and the Synapse server is resource-intensive enough that larger deployments need deliberate infrastructure planning.

Session decentralises differently, running on community-operated nodes with no company holding metadata logs to subpoena — at the cost of slower delivery under congestion and added onion-routing latency.

Briar is the extreme case and is honest about the trade: Android only, no iOS because Apple restricts the background processes P2P needs, messages sync only while the app is open, and contacts must be exchanged in person. Briar is not a WhatsApp replacement for friends and family; it is a tool for situations where that friction is worth it.

What should a European business check before rolling out team chat?

Where the data sits and who holds the DPA. Wire is a Swiss company processing in EU data centres in Germany and Ireland. HansaChat runs on IONOS Cloud in the EU with a DPA under Article 28 GDPR, with encrypted backups in Sweden and the UK. Element self-hosted puts the question entirely in your hands.

Then the pricing model, because it shapes behaviour. Slack and Teams bill per seat, so onboarding contractors or a seasonal shift becomes a budget decision rather than an access decision. HansaChat charges per workspace — 99 EUR a month for up to 100 users, 199 EUR for 500 — which past roughly fifteen people wins on cost and keeps winning.

Then what the vendor does not claim. HansaChat is explicit that it does not offer end-to-end encryption: TLS in transit and AES-256 at rest, which is the same posture as Slack. That is a legitimate choice stated honestly, and it is a different product from Wire — a team needing E2E should not choose on price here.

And the continuity question. HansaChat is operated by one person, which is a genuine risk to weigh against the pricing advantage, and worth asking about directly rather than discovering later.

How we selected and ranked these 12 tools

Every tool on this page is in the European Purpose directory, which means the operating company is established in Europe and we have verified that from the company register or the vendor's own legal notice rather than from a marketing page. Tools headquartered outside Europe are not eligible, however good they are.

  1. Feature verification (weight: 40%). We check each capability against the vendor's own documentation and product pages, and record what the tool does rather than what the category is assumed to include.
  2. Ease of adoption (weight: 30%). Integrations, published API access, trial availability and how much configuration stands between signing and a usable result.
  3. Value and transparency (weight: 30%). Published pricing counts in a vendor's favour; quote-only pricing is recorded as quote-only rather than estimated. We weigh what a buyer gets for the entry price, not the headline feature count.
  4. Editorial review. Three people touch every page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's documentation. The three weights above decide the order; a position is a ranking against the other European tools in this category, not an absolute score.

Vendor-reported outcomes — ROI figures, margin uplift, time saved — are labelled as vendor claims wherever they appear on this page. We have not audited them, and neither has anyone else who quotes them. Read our full editorial process for how pages are re-verified.

Frequently asked questions

Threema holds #1 among the European messaging apps in this directory, because Threema needs no phone number or email, costs CHF 4.99 once rather than a subscription, is open source and independently audited, and hosts in Switzerland. The right answer depends on the job: SimpleX Chat for the strongest metadata protection, Session for anonymous decentralised messaging, Briar for high-risk situations without internet, Wire or Element for encrypted team collaboration, and HansaChat for a Slack replacement priced per workspace.

Threema issues a random Threema ID instead of requiring a phone number or email. Olvid works without a phone number and without a central user directory. Session uses an anonymous Session ID.

SimpleX Chat goes furthest and has no user identifier at all — no phone number, no username, no internal ID — with each conversation using different random identifiers per contact. Briar identifies contacts through direct exchange rather than any registry. This matters because a phone number is the single item that ties a messaging account to a legal identity.

SimpleX Chat, because there is nothing to protect: with no global user identifier, servers relay encrypted messages without knowing which conversations belong to the same person, so even a full compromise of every SimpleX server could not reconstruct the social graph. Session is next, using onion routing through three random nodes so no single node knows both endpoints. Briar removes servers entirely with peer-to-peer delivery over Tor.

Briar, and it is the only one. When the internet is unavailable, censored or shut down, Briar syncs messages between nearby devices over Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, creating a mesh where messages hop device to device until they reach their destination.

That is why it exists for protests where mobile networks are disabled, disaster zones with damaged infrastructure, and remote areas. The trade-offs are Android only, no iOS due to Apple background-process restrictions, and messages syncing only while the app is open.

Four, differently. Wire offers end-to-end encrypted channels, group calls for up to 50 participants, screen sharing and Guest Rooms for external collaborators, from €5.83 per user per month. Element gives Matrix-based federation, self-hosting and bridges to other platforms, free self-hosted or about €5 per user managed.

HansaChat is the straightforward option: German hosting on IONOS Cloud, priced per workspace at 99 EUR per month for up to 100 users rather than per seat. Teamwire is the one aimed at public safety and healthcare: a Munich business messenger hosted in Germany on IONOS Cloud or installed on-premise, from €79 a month for up to 25 users.

HansaChat, which prices per workspace: 99 EUR per month on annual billing for up to 100 users with 25 GB storage, or 199 EUR for 500 users and 100 GB.

Slack and Microsoft Teams both scale the invoice with headcount, which turns onboarding contractors or a seasonal shift into a budget decision. Past roughly fifteen people the per-workspace model wins on cost and keeps winning. Teamwire has a flat tier too, €79 a month for up to 25 users, but Teamwire moves to per-user pricing above that. Note that HansaChat does not offer end-to-end encryption and says so openly.

Wire's Guest Rooms are built for exactly that: an external client, contractor or partner joins a conversation through a link in a web browser, with no account and no software to install, and receives the same end-to-end encryption as registered users. That solves the usual failure where secure collaboration falls back to unencrypted email because the other party is not on your platform. Element's Matrix bridges handle it differently, connecting to Slack, Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp and Signal.

Threema, SimpleX Chat, Wire, Element, Session, Briar, Olvid and Delta Chat are all open source — SimpleX and the Olvid apps under AGPLv3, Session and Briar under GPLv3, the Delta Chat core under MPL-2.0, Element built on the open Matrix protocol. That matters more in messaging than in most categories, because the client is what performs the encryption, so closed-source code means trusting the vendor's description of what it does. HansaChat, BirdyChat, Teamwire and ginlo are closed source.

It depends on whether the architecture already answers the question. Threema, Wire and Session are Swiss-linked, which puts them outside the EU and outside the Five, Nine and Fourteen Eyes arrangements under an adequacy decision — though Wire actually processes in EU data centres in Germany and Ireland. HansaChat and BirdyChat are EU-established with intra-EEA processing. For SimpleX and Briar the question barely applies: neither collects data that a jurisdiction could compel.

Not on this list?

If you build a European messaging apps tool that belongs here, tell us about it. Every suggestion is checked against the same criteria as the tools above: European ownership and hosting, a real product, and pricing we can verify. A listing is editorial, and we say so on this page where placement is paid.

Suggest your tool