Gitea

Lightweight self-hosted Git - European alternative based in Germany

Quick Overview

Company Gitea
Category Developer Tools
Headquarters Berlin, Germany
EU/European Yes - Germany
Open Source Yes
GDPR Compliant Yes
Main Features Self-hosted Git, Lightweight, Issue tracking, Pull requests, Wiki
Pricing Free (self-hosted)
Best For Teams wanting self-hosted Git with minimal resources
Replaces GitHub, GitLab

Detailed Review

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Single Go binary with no external dependencies
  • Outperforms GitLab on resource use and response time
  • Gitea Actions compatible with GitHub Actions syntax
  • Runs on SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL or MSSQL
  • Free and open source, self-hosted

Cons

  • Fewer features than GitLab for larger organisations
  • Commercial entity governance prompted the Forgejo fork
  • You run and maintain the infrastructure
  • Not every GitHub Actions marketplace action works

Alternatives to Gitea

Looking for other European developer tools solutions? Here are some alternatives worth considering:

Frequently Asked Questions

As a self-hosted solution, Gitea's GDPR compliance depends on where and how you deploy it. By hosting Gitea on EU-based infrastructure, you maintain complete control over your development data and ensure it stays within European jurisdiction. Since you control the server, there is no third-party data processing to manage, making GDPR compliance straightforward. Gitea itself does not collect or transmit data to external services.

Gitea is a community-driven open-source project. The commercial entity Gitea Ltd is registered in the EU, and the project has strong ties to the European developer community. Since Gitea is self-hosted, your instance runs wherever you choose to deploy it, giving you complete control over data location and jurisdiction.

Gitea is completely free and open source under the MIT license. There are no paid tiers, no enterprise editions, and no artificial feature limitations. The only costs are the infrastructure to host it, which can be as minimal as a small VPS (starting around EUR 3-5 per month) or even a Raspberry Pi for personal use.

Gitea is a self-hosted alternative to GitHub and GitLab. It provides core development features including Git hosting, issue tracking, pull requests, wiki, CI/CD through Gitea Actions (compatible with GitHub Actions syntax), and a package registry. For teams that do not need GitLab's enterprise features, Gitea provides a lighter, faster, and more resource-efficient option.

Gitea's requirements are remarkably low. It can run comfortably with as little as 256MB of RAM and minimal CPU resources. It supports SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MSSQL as database backends, with SQLite being the simplest option for small installations. Gitea compiles to a single binary with no external dependencies, making deployment exceptionally straightforward.

Yes, Gitea Actions provides built-in CI/CD that is compatible with GitHub Actions workflow syntax. This means many existing GitHub Actions workflows can run on Gitea with minimal modification. Gitea Actions supports triggers based on pushes, pull requests, tags, schedules, and manual dispatch. The act runner can be self-hosted alongside Gitea or on separate infrastructure.

Yes, Gitea includes built-in migration tools that can import repositories, issues, pull requests, milestones, labels, releases, and wiki content from GitHub, GitLab, Gogs, and Bitbucket. The GitHub Actions workflow compatibility for CI/CD further simplifies the transition. Most teams can migrate their entire development workflow from GitHub to Gitea with minimal disruption.

Yes, Gitea includes a built-in package registry supporting multiple formats including npm, PyPI, Maven, NuGet, Cargo, Helm, Docker/OCI containers, and more. This allows teams to host private packages alongside their source code without needing a separate package management service, and integrates with Gitea Actions for automated publishing.

Forgejo is a community-driven fork of Gitea created in 2022 by members concerned about the governance direction after Gitea formed a commercial entity. Both projects remain technically very similar, with Forgejo tracking Gitea's releases and adding community-driven improvements. The main difference is governance philosophy: Forgejo emphasizes community ownership, while Gitea has a commercial backing. For most users, either choice works well.

Gitea is well-suited for small to medium-sized teams and organizations. For enterprise deployments, it provides repository management, access control, CI/CD, and package hosting. However, larger enterprises with complex requirements around compliance, advanced analytics, or built-in security scanning may find GitLab's enterprise features more comprehensive. Gitea's strength is its simplicity and efficiency for teams that need reliable Git hosting without enterprise-level complexity.

Who worked on this review

Three people touch every tool page: one writes it, a second edits it, and a third checks the compliance and pricing claims against the vendor's own documentation.

Ingrid Halvorsen
Written by

Ingrid Halvorsen

Managing Editor · Oslo, Norway

Runs the review process and decides when a page is ready to publish or needs another pass.

Sebastiaan Smits
Edited by

Sebastiaan Smits

Founder & Editor · Netherlands

Selects the tools, writes the reviews, and checks where each company is actually established.

Marta Kowalczyk
Fact-checked by

Marta Kowalczyk

Senior Analyst, Infrastructure & Developer Tools · Warsaw, Poland

Covers hosting, developer tooling and the practical side of moving workloads to European providers.

Read our editorial process for how we source, verify and update these pages — and how we keep affiliate income separate from what we recommend.

Go to Gitea